Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity / 2018 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 |Article ID 3075293 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3075293

Manuela Minguzzi, Silvia Cetrullo, Stefania D’Adamo, Ylenia Silvestri, Flavio Flamigni, Rosa Maria Borzì, "Emerging Players at the Intersection of Chondrocyte Loss of Maturational Arrest, Oxidative Stress, Senescence and Low-Grade Inflammation in Osteoarthritis", Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2018, Article ID 3075293, 17 pages, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3075293

Emerging Players at the Intersection of Chondrocyte Loss of Maturational Arrest, Oxidative Stress, Senescence and Low-Grade Inflammation in Osteoarthritis

Academic Editor: Gabriele Saretzki
Received25 Aug 2017
Accepted10 Dec 2017
Published11 Feb 2018


The prevalence of Osteoarthritis (OA) is increasing because of the progressive aging and unhealthy lifestyle. These risk factors trigger OA by removing constraints that keep the tightly regulated low turnover of the extracellular matrix (ECM) of articular cartilage, the correct chondrocyte phenotype, and the functionality of major homeostatic mechanisms, such as mitophagy, that allows for the clearance of dysfunctional mitochondria, preventing increased production of reactive oxygen species, oxidative stress, and senescence. After OA onset, the presence of ECM degradation products is perceived as a “danger” signal by the chondrocytes and the synovial macrophages that release alarmins with autocrine/paracrine effects on the same cells. Alarmins trigger innate immunity in the joint, with important systemic crosstalks that explain the beneficial effects of dietary interventions and improved lifestyle. Alarmins also boost low-grade inflammation: the release of inflammatory molecules and chemokines sustained by continuous triggering of NF-κB within an altered cellular setting that allows its higher transcriptional activity. Chemokines exert pleiotropic functions in OA, including the recruitment of inflammatory cells and the induction of ECM remodeling. Some chemokines have been successfully targeted to attenuate structural damage or pain in OA animal models. This represents a promising strategy for the future management of human OA.

1. Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most frequent arthritic disease with an expanding prevalence not only due to the aging of the population in western countries and to the increasing impact of some key epidemiological factors such as the global epidemic of obesity and metabolic syndrome (and the consequent increase of the so-called metabolic syndrome-associated OA or metOA) but also to increased exposure to independent risk factors that are associated to the postindustrial era [1].

OA heavily impacts on the expenditure of the national health services as well as on patients’ quality of life. Currently, there are not yet true disease-modifying drugs and in most cases the disease progresses until arthroplasty.

The bone-joint decade (2000–2010) has fostered the research aimed at a better understanding of musculoskeletal disorders there including OA in order to improve prevention and treatment. Therefore, the recent years witnessed the deepening of our knowledge of the molecular mechanisms that are responsible for this disease. It becomes clear that notwithstanding the initial OA triggering risk factors (aging, mechanical stress, genetics, and obesity), there are shared downstream molecular modifications that affect transcription factors and epigenetic changes, thus leading to common dysregulation of target gene expression in joint cells and disrupted cellular functions [2]. Moreover, it is now a matter of fact that OA represents a disease of the whole joint organ, with important crosstalks between various tissues. There is also an increasing awareness of the “systemic” dimension of OA, which is supported by the evidence of crosstalks between “local” joint tissue inflammation and “systemic” inflammation. This is in the frame of a generalized failure of postmitotic tissues supported by shared mechanisms, such as the impairment of major homeostatic cell responses [3, 4] that lead to accumulation of oxidative stress, cell dysfunction, and senescence. These stress signals are perceived as “danger-associated molecular pattern” and thus are able to trigger macrophage activation and innate immunity. Notably, a recent proteomic study performed in the sera of OA patients pointed at a cluster of three proteins as highly indicative of radiographic OA and therefore useful as convenient biomarkers for screening and early diagnosis. This cluster contains an alarmin (S100A6) and a complement protein (C3), two proteins able to trigger innate immunity, besides inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain 1 (ITH1) that acts as a protease inhibitor [5].

A putative successful therapeutic strategy should therefore combine several lines of actions targeted at multiple levels with the aim of restoring “joint” homeostasis in the context of a “systemic” homeostasis. This implies dramatic changes in lifestyle (diet, exercise, healthy microbiota, and weight loss) that ultimately have the potential of reducing the activation of the innate immunity in joint and nonjoint tissues.

Basic research deepened our understanding of OA pathogenesis, and major achievements in defining critical targets have been obtained in matching findings derived from human tissues with those derived from several different animal models. A wide array of OA animal models either surgical or chemical have been developed, but the destabilization of medial meniscus (DMM) carried out in mice at the time of skeletal maturity is recognized as the method of choice for mimicking human pathology and its progression from mild-to-moderate OA (4 weeks) to moderate-to-severe OA (8 weeks) [6]. DMM should be a first choice to challenge mice with gene deletions of potential targets in OA [7].

Many review papers have reported an updated understanding of the role of signaling pathways [8] or cytokines [9] in OA pathogenesis, but a cumulative picture of cellular and molecular mechanisms of oxidative stress in articular cartilage in relation to aging, activation of innate immunity, metabolism, and cellular survival/longevity was lacking. In this review, we summarized recent information linking aging, metabolic deregulation, oxidative stress, and inflammation, with particular focus on selected chemokines, which have a role in pain. As long as OA can be considered as resulting from loss of tissue homeostasis, the above-mentioned pathogenetic mechanisms all result in an accelerated cartilage aging.

2. OA in the Context of Aging and Metabolic Deregulation

2.1. OA and Loss of Maturational Arrest

OA is the joint disease most closely correlated with aging. The status of healthy articular cartilage is actively kept in virtue of molecular constraints that prevent the progression of chondrocytes into their default route to hypertrophy and terminal differentiation prior to endochondral ossification [10]. Indeed, along OA initiation and progression, chondrocytes undergo a switch in gene expression from an “anabolic” to a “catabolic” pattern [10], recapitulating what occurs in growth plate calcification, the latter being considered as a “developmental model” for OA pathogenesis [11]. Chondrocyte progression from a “resting” to an “activated” state in either growth plate calcification or OA cartilage degeneration is indeed accompanied by the same shared signature of marker genes (extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins or transcription factors) and related phenotypic changes and cell reaction patterns such as cell proliferation or apoptotic cell death [12]. The loss of this “maturational arrest” of articular cartilage in all the species is somehow programmed to occur at a given age that follows the decline of the reproductive age and depends on the life expectancy of the species. On a general basis, life expectancy and longevity of a species have been connected to the differential capacity of its cells to handle oxidative damage to the DNA [1316] in the form of double-strand breaks.

2.2. Oxidative Stress, NF-κB Activation in OA, and Differential IKK Role

The role played by oxidative damage is central in OA and in the other age-related diseases. Indeed, at the cell level, oxidative damage of genomic and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) triggers a DNA damage response and activation of the nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) pathway [3, 17], the master regulator of inflammation. NF-κB is a family of transcription factors that have a central role not only in the proinflammatory stress-related responses of chondrocytes to extra- and intracellular insults but also in the control of their differentiation program [17, 18]. The activation of NF-κB is triggered by the signalosome complex, a molecular switch controlled by two main serine threonine kinases able to remove NF-κB inhibitors that block NF-κB transcriptional activities: IKKβ and IKKα. These kinases present peculiar functional features, with regard to the type of upstream activating stimuli, signaling intermediates, and downstream NF-κB activated heterodimers. IKKβ is the kinase that triggers the “canonical pathway” of NF-κB activation that controls most of the immediate inflammatory, stress-like responses in vivo and in vitro. IKKα is required for the noncanonical or alternative pathway, which is delayed and requires proteolytic processing. In some cellular settings, IKKα may also intervene in the canonical inflammatory pathway [19]. Moreover, as reviewed in [17, 20], IKKα has other functions that boost NF-κB transcriptional activities, including the inhibition of histone deacetylases and the phosphorylation of serine 10 on histone H3, thereby promoting a transcriptionally permissive conformation of the chromatin. H3 phosphorylation is required to activate promoters of some inflammatory genes, there including IL-6, IL-8, and MCP-1 [21]. These activities are played by IKKα in the nucleus, and indeed, quoting from http://proteinatlas.org, IKKα “is mainly localized to the nucleoplasm and in addition localized to the cytosol and vesicles” (https://www.proteinatlas.org/ENSG00000213341-CHUK/cell), while IKKβ is only detected in the cytosol (https://www.proteinatlas.org/ENSG00000104365-IKBKB/cell) in keeping with its activity almost only implicated in the framework of NF-κB activation. The pleiotropic activities of IKKα are presented in http://reactome.org and span far beyond signal transduction, differently from IKKβ.

Our work has also recently highlighted other IKKα activities relevant for OA that are kinase and NF-κB independent and that control ECM remodeling [22, 23] via collagenase activation. Therefore, IKKα targeting could be effective in reducing OA progression, yet sparing the prosurvival and antiapoptotic activities that are instead uniquely controlled by IKKβ [20]. Indeed, pharmacological IKKα inhibition attenuated OA progression in the DMM model, where OA progression itself is accompanied with increased expression of IKKα [24].

IKKα is therefore a candidate drug target for human OA. IKKα could be locally targeted to obtain at the same time reduction of p53 [25] and NF-κB activity [17, 20], together with the inhibition of its ECM remodeling promoting effects [23].

2.3. The IKKα/p53 Connection, Oxidative DNA Damage, Obesity, and Cell Senescence

The connection linking oxidative stress and inflammation has been reviewed in [26]. This results in cell dysfunction at multiple levels [3]. The DNA damage response activates and stabilizes p53 through posttranslational modifications and prevents its degradation by proteasome. An intriguing crosstalk has been described between IKKα and p53: under exposure to oxidative stress, the redox-sensitive PKCδ activates IKKα and induces its translocation to the nucleus, where it phosphorylates and activates p53 [25]. As a function of the DNA damage magnitude, p53 may orchestrate homeostatic activities or dysfunctional responses, such as irreversible cell cycle arrest, senescence, or apoptosis [27] (Figure 1). A recent report explored the correlation of gene and protein expression of cyclin D1, cyclin-dependent kinase 4, and p53 in cartilage derived from a large cohort of patients and healthy controls and showed that cyclin D1 and cyclin-dependent kinase 4 are negatively correlated with the disease grade in knee OA, in agreement with increased p53 [28].

Oxidative damage of genomic DNA and of mtDNA has been found in OA cartilage [29, 30]. Noteworthy, the level of oxidative damage to mtDNA has been found correlated with BMI of the patients and associated to markers of DNA damage response, hypertrophy, and senescence [29]. This discloses a molecular pathogenesis peculiar for the so-called metOA whose development is indeed anticipated compared to posttraumatic, aging, genetic, or crystal OA phenotypes [31]. Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a global epidemic (23% of the general population). White adipose tissue (WAT) plays an endocrine role in MetS: increased M1 macrophages and adipose-derived stem cells (ASC) release inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and adipokines. Adipocytes and possibly other WAT cells [32] release circulating microRNAs (miR). Circulating (blood or exosomal) miR dysregulation in MetS has been already reported [33]. Among their putative targets, there are proteins which may afford protection in conditions of metabolic or oxidative stress, such as AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), PPARγ, and PKCε [33]. Their dysfunction might result in increased DNA damage and senescence in ASC, conditioning their stemness and their trophic activity while dysfunction of these proteins in postmitotic tissues such as cartilage disrupts the existing cellular homeostasis [34, 35]. Reduced AMPKα1 [36] and PPARγ1 [37] expression in chondrocytes as a function of OA severity has been already reported. Moreover, adipose tissue has a role in OA development, acting as an endocrine organ and producing adipokines and inflammatory mediators. Leptin activates the JAK/STAT pathway and proinflammatory response and chondrocytes express functional leptin receptors [38]. Many studies evidenced a role for leptin in altering chondrocyte function, via increased expression of ECM degradative enzymes, namely, matrix metalloproteinases and enzymes of the “a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs (ADAMTS)” family. Leptin has been pointed out as a necessary factor for OA development in in vivo animal models of obesity, while studies on patients support its role in human OA, with a direct correlation between serum leptin levels and diminished cartilage thickness [39, 40].

2.4. Metabolic Deregulation in OA Pathogenesis and the Nutraceutical Approach to OA Management

Obesity is associated with a status of systemic inflammation affecting the function of many postmitotic tissues, there including the cardiovascular system. Indeed, the incidence of OA is doubled in people with cardiometabolic clustering (higher or equal to 2 of the following: low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, blood pressure, C-reactive protein, waist-to-hip ratio, or glucose; or diabetes mellitus) [41]. This opens new perspectives in the treatment of these diseases that share similar mechanisms leading to target tissue cell dysfunction and boosts the relevance of developing therapeutic approaches in the perspective of a precision medicine. On a general basis, the use of mere antioxidant supplements in clinical trials has led to weak and inconsistent results [42], while an integrated lifestyle approach including dietary intervention with nutraceutical implementation, physical exercise, and caloric restriction may increase cell homeostatic activities [43].

The ability of some nutraceuticals (in particular polyphenols) to affect chondrocyte homeostatic activities includes functional effects at multiple levels in the cells, interfering with major inflammatory signaling pathways [44] and exerting a nutrigenomic/epigenetic control [45]. Recent evidence has shown the ability of hydroxytyrosol to influence the epigenetic regulation of small noncoding RNAs, thus rescuing homeostatic activities in chondrocytes [46, 47].

Many deranged metabolic factors such as an hyperlipidemic environment, high levels of cholesterol and glucose, and oxidized low-density lipoproteins may directly impact on chondrocyte health and contribute to OA pathogenesis [48].

High dietary intake of total fat and saturated fatty acid (SFA) has been recently put in correlation with progression of knee OA [49]. The same study also reported that dietary intervention with higher intake of monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA) or polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) or higher PUFA/SFA ratio was associated with reduced OA progression and joint space narrowing. Another critical factor is represented by the plasma ω6 : ω3 ratio that positively correlates with pain and inflammation [50]. In obesity-associated OA, adipose tissue functions as an endocrine organ and contributes to low-grade inflammation, also enhanced by a M2 to M1 switch of resident macrophages. Importantly, ω6 or ω3 PUFA entering the same metabolic route in adipocytes yields proinflammatory or anti-inflammatory mediators, respectively [51], with relevant systemic consequences and differential impacts on joint tissues. The mechanisms underlying these effects on OA patients have been explored in vitro and in vivo in animal models.

The dose-dependent increased release of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (ROS and RNS) and inflammatory cytokines by chondrocytes exposed to mixtures of free fatty acids (FFA) including palmitate has been recently shown in vitro [52] and OA development in rats fed with high-SFA diet has been reported in vivo [53] (see Figure 2). Palmitate has also proapoptotic and proinflammatory activities [54] that are reduced after inhibition of Toll-like receptor (TLR) 4.

Recent evidence has also indicated that high cholesterol levels impact on mitochondrial health, thus leading to increased ROS production and an anabolic-to-catabolic switch. This condition is amenable for treatment with mitochondria-targeted antioxidants [55]. Moreover, a higher expression of miR33a and its host gene SREBP2 in OA compared to normal cartilage has been reported, together with information of the contribution of this axis to OA pathogenesis [56, 57].

The hyperglucidic-mediated dysregulation of chondrocytes has also been recently connected to derangement of the Nrf-2/HO-1 axis, a fundamental pathway in antioxidant protection [58]. Moreover, sustained hyperglycemia leads to increased level of glucose derivatives (advanced glycation end-products (AGEs), sorbitol, and diacylglycerol (DAG)) able to promote the activation of several pathways triggering inflammatory processes as reviewed in [59].

High levels of fatty acids or glucose may also worsen their damaging activity by additional mechanisms, there including a depressive activity of key metabolic stress regulators. In adipose tissue, AMPK is rescued by ω3 PUFA [51]. High levels of glucose may contribute to an altered metabolism in OA chondrocytes favoring glycolysis and depressing oxidative phosphorylation. This leads to impaired mitochondrial metabolism and drives to mitochondrial damage, associated to decreased levels of AMPK, SIRT-1, and PGC-1α, the master regulator of mitochondrial biogenesis [60] (Figure 1). PPARγ is also reduced by high levels of glucose in chondrocytes [61].

2.5. Proteostasis and Metabolic Stress Management

Aging is also characterized by a collapse in proteostasis, intended as “protein homeostasis,” a tight regulation of protein fate from biogenesis to degradation. Proteostasis is guaranteed by the correct functioning of the unfolded protein response (UPR), autophagy, the ubiquitin-proteasome system, and the lyosomes. Alteration in these pathways is a source of stress for proteins, endoplasmic reticulum (ER), and mitochondria (Figure 1). Proteostasis impairment is involved in OA pathophysiology [62], since it leads to increased oxidation of proteins and alteration of homeostatic pathways.

Chaperone and cochaperone proteins intervene in maintaining the “proteostatic network,” altered in aging and disease. Several stressors are able to trigger the heat shock response pathway (HSR) [63]. Its activation implicates chromatin remodeling to promote the transcription of heat shock proteins (HSPs), thus increasing stress resistance. HSPs are a family of highly conserved proteins, classified according to their molecular weight (HSP100, HSP90, HSP70, HSP60, HSP40, and small HSPs). They orchestrate proteome maintenance not only in de novo folding and protein trafficking but also in protein degradation and in preserving autophagic machinery components [64]. Failure of the proteostasis network is a programmed event that occurs in both development and in aging [65]. Indeed, altered chaperone expression has been observed in aged animal models and in senescent human cells [63]. A significant decrease in HSP70 expression has been reported in senescent cells derived from degenerated human intervertebral disc annulus [66].

AMPK and SIRT1 are the main bioenergy sensors that not only react to changes in energy balance but also in inflammatory processes and cell stress. SIRT1 is reduced by aging, and this impacts on proteostasis via reduction of the activity of the heat shock factor 1 (HSF1) and of the FOXO pathway [67]. Impairment of AMPK activity in cartilage promotes ECM degradation. AMPK has been found reduced in human OA as a consequence of low-grade inflammation [36]. AMPK is also affected by age and age-related accumulation of DNA breaks. The latter indeed induce DNA PK phosphorylation of HSP90α that is then able to exert an AMPK-inhibiting activity [68].

Specific increase and activation of HSP factors like HSP70 and HSF1 have been observed in synovial tissues of rheumatoid arthritis but not in OA [69]. However, in a rat OA model, increased expression of HSP70 as induced by the proteasome inhibitor MG132 reveals a local protective effect on matrix degradation and apoptosis [70]. This is in keeping with evidence pointing at a chondroprotective role of the chaperone protein HSP70 against biomechanically induced OA in rats [71]. The protective activity of HSP60 is instead acted through the reduction of SOX9 ubiquitination [72]). TRAP1, a chaperone protein of the HSP90 family with antioxidant and antiapoptotic activities and specifically expressed in mitochondria, was found upregulated in human OA chondrocytes [73]. On the other hand two proteomic studies of another group have instead identified two small HSPs that are reduced in OA chondrocytes to an extent that is associated with the severity of the disease. αB-cristallin-reduced expression impacts on ECM homeostasis [74], while the small chaperone HSP27 is involved in chondrocyte response to IL-1β [75].

SIRT1 expression is reduced in both human OA cartilage and in knee cartilage of both OA mouse model and aged mice, thus strongly suggesting SIRT1 involvement in OA development. Indeed, Sirt1 knockout mice developed accelerated OA progression both in cartilage-specific or whole organism genetic models [7678]. Recently, a wide study on human OA cartilage has negatively correlated SIRT1 expression with disease severity [79]. Together with the pivotal role in maintenance of mitochondrial homeostasis [80], SIRT1 is involved in activating HSF1 transcription and proteostasis, particularly preventing ER stress. In OA, articular chondrocyte UPR defective activity enhances ER stress thus leading to misfolding of ECM proteins [62].

3. OA and Oxidative Stress and Senescence

3.1. Sources of ROS and Major ROS Scavenging Systems in the Cell

A recent definition of oxidative stress is “an imbalance between oxidants and antioxidants in favour of the oxidants, leading to disruption of redox signaling and control and/or molecular damage” [81] and is strongly associated with aging and age-related diseases, including OA [42].

ROS production occurs mainly in mitochondria through the mitochondrial respiratory chain and the oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), but ROS can also be generated by NADPH oxidase, xanthine oxidase, and other sources (Figure 2(a)). It has been shown that the expression of some of these prooxidant enzymes increases in synovial membrane of OA patients [82]. The NADPH oxidase family comprises different members with peculiar cell localization, ROS products, and regulation. Among others, a function of the NADPH enzymes is to act as key modulators of signal transduction pathways. One emerging activity is the reversible posttranslational oxidative modification of several proteins such as via sulphonylation of conserved cysteine residues. This however may shift into a pathological role after excessive activation under chronic stress. Indeed, NADPH oxidase 4 (Nox4) has been recognized as contributing to OA pathogenesis, since its overexpression leads to increased ROS and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) [83] and has been proposed as a therapeutic target in OA.

The first generated ROS is the superoxide (O2) (Figure 2(b)) that is either rapidly transformed into hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) by the enzymes of the superoxide dismutase (SOD) family [84] or acts as a precursor for peroxynitrite formation (ONOO) when joined to nitric oxide (NO), produced by the enzymes of the nitric oxide synthase (NOS) family [85].

The main cartilage damaging ROS detected in chondrocytes are hydrogen peroxide and peroxynitrite [86, 87]. Because of unpaired electrons, free radicals are very reactive and can damage cell components. In chondrocytes, Fe2+ and H2O2 release hydroxyl radicals (OH) that react with unsaturated fatty acids of membrane lipids, thus forming lipid radicals (RO, ROO). ROS are neutralized by scavenging systems, namely, SOD, catalase, glutathione peroxidase, glutathione reductase, and reduced glutathione (Figure 2(b)). Several studies carried out in human OA cartilage and experimental animal models reported a limited antioxidant capacity of SOD, catalase, and the glutathione systems [88, 89]. Therefore, oxidative stress leads to membrane and nucleic acid damage and, also, breakdown of extracellular components, including proteoglycans and collagens. In addition, oxidative stress further sustains an anabolic-to-catabolic switch, with downregulation of glycosaminoglycan and collagen synthesis and upregulation of MMP and aggrecanase release. The final outcome is cartilage derangement and destruction. The evidence of mitochondrial dysregulation is supported by a characteristic mitochondrial protein profile in proteomic analysis of human OA samples. This confirms that redox imbalance is a key factor in OA pathogenesis, as evidenced by a reduction in SOD2 (the mitochondrial SOD) expression in superficial cartilage area [73].

3.2. Oxidative Damage to Genomic and Mitochondrial DNA and Cell Senescence

The increased ROS burden of aged cells [90] may be responsible for oxidative damage of both genomic and mtDNA. However, it is recognized that mtDNA damage is more extensive and persists longer than nuclear DNA damage in human cells [91, 92]. The key role of oxidative damage to mtDNA in OA is supported by the evidence of differential disease susceptibility of different mtDNA haplogroups [93, 94]. In addition, mitochondrial biogenesis is impaired in OA [95]. Therefore, chronic oxidative stress maintains a positive feedback loop with mitochondrial dysfunction, increased ROS, and persistent mtDNA damage, recognized to be a hallmark of chronic degenerative diseases. This emphasizes the critical role of autophagy of dysfunctional mitochondria (mitophagy) in the rescue of chondrocyte homeostasis. The mtDNA damage is in turn responsible for the senescence of OA chondrocytes, a condition of proliferative arrest not due to telomere shortening after a limited number of division (intrinsic senescence) but rather to an accumulation of DNA damage (extrinsic senescence) following exposure to stress-inducing factors.

Occurrence of in vivo telomere shortening in OA chondrocytes has been reported by some investigators [96]. Indeed, since the ends of chromosomes are particularly sensitive to oxidative stress, this can result in telomere shortening similar to that seen with replicative senescence [97, 98]. Recently, rather than to mature chondrocytes, critical susceptibility to telomere attrition and senescence has been attributed to a pool of progenitor cells whose magnitude increases along disease progression [99]. Telomere attrition in OA chondrocytes has been questioned by other studies that instead found that increased oxidative or genotoxic stress leads to “stochastic” genomic DNA damage in the OA compared to normal chondrocytes, responsible for heterogeneity of gene expression in chondrocytes with no evidence of critical telomere shortening [30].

The effects of oxidative stress have been evaluated in vitro by other studies. Susceptibility to the oxidative stimuli depends on culture conditions. A fundamental issue to keep in mind is that chondrocytes change their differentiation status in vitro; therefore, to obtain reliable information, it is important to grow them in culture conditions that allow to keep/recover a proper phenotype, that is, at high density or in 3-D [100]. It is interesting to underline that chondrocytes are inherently quite resistant to oxidative stimuli (e.g., H2O2) that induce apoptosis in a dose- and time-dependent manner [101]. To obtain significantly increased chondrocyte apoptosis at high density, as much as 500 μM H2O2 must be kept for 24 hours [101], or in any case, a consistent time window must be allowed to observe the effect.

Telomere attrition in vitro has also been evaluated: chondrocytes cultured within their native ECM were exposed to a long-lasting oxidative stimulus. Then, the cells were recovered from the tissue by means of enzymatic digestion, and H2O2-induced telomere attrition was assessed [102] together with the protective effect of ascorbate delivery.

Senescent OA chondrocytes express the senescence-associate secretory phenotype (SASP) [103] that features an overproduction of inflammatory cytokines, matrix degrading enzymes, and ROS and is sustained by the upregulation of the inflammatory pathways that participate in the “aging stress response” [3]. Therefore, senescent chondrocytes are able to affect the surrounding microenvironment, determine a senescent status of cartilage precursor cells, and even trigger OA when transplanted in healthy joints [104]. This suggests that targeting senescent cells could be an attractive therapeutic strategy in OA. Indeed, a recent report elegantly demonstrated that in a model of surgically induced OA, a significant number of senescent cells accumulate in cartilage and synovium, and selective targeting of these cells with the newly described senolytic drugs reduces progression, pain, and inflammatory/degradative activities, while promoting a regenerative environment [105].

Furthermore, along with differentiation progression and under the effects of inflammatory stimuli, human articular cartilage shows increased expression of senescence markers [106] that correlates with disease severity [107]. In keeping with this information, epigenetic (miR-mediated) mechanisms link senescence and chondrocyte terminal differentiation-associated matrix remodelling in OA [108]. Noteworthy, a healthier phenotype may be rescued through p16INK4a-specific siRNA in vitro [106].

An increase of oxidative activity of the mitochondria is also sustained by inflammatory stimuli that lead to glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) inhibition [109]. Indeed, inactivation of GSK3 is responsible for mitochondrial activation, persistent production of mitochondrial ROS through decreased complex IV activity, and cell senescence [29, 110]. Inflammation and oxidative stress are interdependent and boost each other, sustained by ROS production and antioxidant depletion [26]. In line with this concept, expression of the NALP3 inflammasome has been found strictly correlated with that of prooxidant enzymes in the synovium of knee OA [82], thus further confirming that oxidative stress sustains inflammation and degradation of the articular cartilage.

4. Low-Grade Inflammation in OA

4.1. The Role of Innate Immunity and of the Macrophages in OA

Only a few decades ago, the disease that represents the leading cause of chronic disability of the elderly was called “osteoarthrosis,” to indicate the prevalence of degenerative over inflammatory processes in its pathogenesis, at least with regard to lack of the classical signs rubor et tumor cum calor et dolor that are instead evident in the so-called inflammatory arthritides. However, an expanding body of findings collected in recent years points at the molecular evidence of inflammation in OA chondrocytes. These cells have been resembled to activated macrophages because of the shared inflammatory mediators that are able to release, and also other functional properties [111].

In recent years, increasing evidence of the pivotal role of NF-κB [17, 22] in OA pathogenesis has shed light on several molecular mechanisms responsible for cartilage derangement. Interestingly, enhanced and coordinated in vivo expression of the NF-κB target gene inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and the prototypical inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β and TNFα) in OA chondrocytes or in AR synoviocytes indicated that the major focus of OA inflammation was the cartilage, as opposed to the synovium in inflammatory arthritides [112]. However, to date, OA is considered as a whole organ disease of the joint, with important crosstalks from the synovium and the subchondral bone [113]. Occurrence of synovitis with mononuclear cell infiltration always precedes the development of radiological changes in human OA while in animal models of surgically induced OA, ablation of factors critical for macrophage recruitment ameliorates OA progression [114], thus hinting at a role for “innate” immunity in OA pathogenesis. Indeed, in both human (patients with meniscal tears, a condition that may precede OA development) and animal DMM [6] models of OA initiation, the extent of synovitis is correlated with pain and dysfunction and its molecular characterization reveals a unique chemokine signature [115, 116]. The chronic and low-grade inflammation present in OA synovium is primarily innate and secondarily adaptive. Despite the extent of the infiltrate being lower in OA compared to RA, some features are characteristic of OA synovium: the number of mast cells is higher [117]. Alteration of both conventional and nonconventional Th subsets suggests a role of T cells in OA onset and progression [118]. A recent paper indicated that in infrapatellar fat pad there is an increase of infiltrating CD8+ T cells that correlates with the radiological score [119]. B cells, plasma cells, natural killer cells, dendritic cells, and granulocytes are also occasionally present. Innate immunity is the first line of defense in the body that intervenes when physical and chemical barriers fail. Innate immunity is mostly driven by the recruitment and activation of macrophages that trigger inflammation with the aim to get rid of the noxae. However, a targeted macrophage depletion strategy proved to be unsuccessful and even worsened the inflammation status suggesting that macrophages also exert homeostatic activities [120].

4.2. Alarmins and Chemokines

Macrophages detect conserved pathogen motifs (PAMPs or pathogen-associated molecular patterns) via invariable pattern recognition receptors (PRRs). The best known class of PRRs corresponds to special receptors known as Toll-like receptors (TLRs), able to recognize bacterial or viral components such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or double-stranded RNA (dsRNA). TLR activation then induces macrophages to secrete cytokines (small molecules involved in cell signaling and attraction), as well as to phagocytose the infected cells. The innate immune system is also required to activate the “adaptive” immune system. TLR activation involvement in both synovitis activation and OA development has been extensively reviewed in [121, 122] and connected to ECM degradation products such as hyaluronan and fibronectin.

PRRs are also able to recognize damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs or alarmins), molecules that are produced and released during tissue damage with the aim of orchestrating tissue repair. DAMPs include the high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) and the S100 family proteins. Their pivotal role in disease development has been recently elucidated [123].

Alarmins are able to trigger both synovial macrophages (via TLR2 and TLR4) and chondrocytes (via TLR2, TLR4, and RAGE), thus sustaining both cartilage degradation and synovial inflammation. The crucial role of alarmins is supported by the evidence that the development of collagenase-induced OA has been blocked by the delivery of an inhibitor of S100A9 [124].

Among alarmins, HMGB1 has been shown to increase chemokine production by chondrocytes [125]. Moreover, HMGB1 has the ability to form complexes with either IL-1 or LPS, thus enhancing their inflammatory effects on synovial fibroblasts [126]. HMGB1 is a highly conserved nonhistonic nuclear protein that primarily acts as a chromatin binding factor to promote protein assembly at specific DNA targets. HMGB1 has important intracellular and extracellular functions. HMGB1 is passively released from necrotic cells and actively secreted by activated macrophages. In cartilage, stage-specific HMGB1 expression and release regulate endochondral ossification [127]. At the extracellular level, HMGB1 may serve as an inflammation promoting cytokine but also as a danger signal, and its potential as a therapeutic target in rheumatic diseases has already been reported [128130]. In comparative studies of mRNA expression of normal versus OA cartilage, an inverse trend was found between the procatabolic HMGB1 and the proanabolic HMGB2. Besides cartilage, HMGB1 is expressed also by synovial cells, and its concentration in the synovial fluid has been related to OA severity [131].

Addition of HMGB1 to cultures of human chondrocytes dramatically increased the expression of certain known NF-κB targets, including iNOS and the chemokines that are selectively increased in OA chondrocytes, that is, IL-8, MCP-1, MCP-2, MIP-3α, MIP-1α, RANTES, and GROα [125]. Interestingly, most of these chemokines belongs to the SASP, namely, the subset of molecules that show high increase (more than 4-fold) [103] (Figure 3). The expression of most of these molecules appears increased in OA compared to normal chondrocytes [132] or under the effect of chondrocyte activation with inflammatory stimuli [133, 134]. Since hypertrophy plays a pivotal role in OA pathogenesis and hypertrophic chondrocytes release large amounts of HMGB1 [127], it is conceivable that this mechanism greatly contributes to maintain the deranged OA chondrocyte transcriptisome [135].

The expression of chemokine receptors on chondrocytes has been reported several years ago together with the first findings of an increased expression in OA compared to healthy cartilage of some of these receptors [136] and their contribution to OA pathophysiology [137139].

Chemokines represent a large molecule family of increasing size and complexity [140] that have been firstly described as having a role in leukocyte traffic but now recognized as able to affect many functions in a variety of tissues, including joint tissues. Most of these molecules share some basic features: the small size, the ability to bind to seven transmembrane G-protein coupled receptors to activate intracellular responses and to exploit binding to sulfated glycosaminoglycans (abundant in cartilage ECM) that act as coreceptors and determine haptotactic gradients around the chondrocytes.

In healthy cartilage where ECM is intact and highly organized, chemokines (7–9 kDa) have a higher access to the embedded chondrocytes compared to larger size cytokines, such as IL-1β (17 kDa).

The role of chemokines in OA has been recently reviewed and disclosed on the basis of cumulative evidence derived from both findings obtained in patients and evidence obtained in animal models of OA [141]. The severity of human OA as assessed by mean of the radiological score has been found correlated with the synovial fluid level of selected chemokines: CCR2 ligands (CCL2/MCP-1); CCR5 ligands (CCL3/MIP-1α, CCL4/MIP-1β, and CCL5/RANTES); CCR7 ligands (CCL19/MIP-3β and CCL21/SLC), and CXCR4 ligand (CXCL12/SDF-1).

We will mainly focus on CCL2/MCP-1, as it is the major chemokine active in macrophage recruitment and also responsible for adipose tissue inflammation in obesity, where the size of adipocytes correlates with MCP-1 levels [51]. Serum and synovial CCL2/MCP-1 levels are also strictly correlated with the pain score [142]. The understanding of the molecular connections comes from studies carried out in DMM models that demonstrate upregulation of both CCL2/MCP-1 and CCR2 in the neurons of innervating dorsal root ganglia (DRG) in mice 8 weeks after DMM. The CCL2/MCP-1 production by DRG neurons is once again connected to molecular danger signals (S100A8 and α2 macroglobulin) [143] originated in the joint after DMM and that may diffuse to DRG and trigger TLR4 particularly on nociceptive neurons. CCL2/MCP-1 release from DRG is responsible for maximal macrophage infiltration at 8 weeks. CCR2 ablation indeed conferred protection with respect to pain but not with respect to cartilage degradation [143]. The same authors have recently shown that Ccl2 is the gene most strongly upregulated immediately after the DMM. Ccl2−/− or Ccr2−/− animals show an altered and delayed inflammatory response but similar chondropathy scores compared to their wild-type controls. Moreover, they show a significantly delayed occurrence of pain [144]. Collectively, these data suggest that the CCR2_ CCL2/MCP-1 axis may be targeted for improving OA patients’ quality of life rather for controlling cartilage structural damage [144].

Other studies reported a different scenario, pointing at a pivotal role of the CCR2_CCL2/MCP-1 axis also in structural damage. Discrepancies of findings in DMM studies may be related to the experimental design, including susceptibility of the strain [7], details of gene knockout (either full or tissue-specific and either constitutive or inducible) or age at DMM surgery, and duration of OA development in association with the timing of monitoring (hours; 4, 8, 12, and 20 weeks). A recent study focused on the transcriptional reprogramming that follows DMM at early time, while vanishing at a later time. This study indicated that at two weeks a significant upregulation was found for the TGF signaling pathway and for complement and coagulation cascade genes [145]. The upregulation of TGF is of particular interest in the context of the activities of the CCL2/CCR2 axis. Indeed, in a rat model of posttraumatic OA, Appleton and collaborators found that TGF2 and CCL2/MCP-1 were both upregulated at 4 weeks, with the former inducing the expression of the latter and with pharmacologic inhibition of either TGF2 or CCL2/MCP-1 leading to attenuation of structural damage in both in vivo or in vitro studies [146]. Notably, while the complement cascade belongs to the family of the innate immunity effectors and has been recently attributed a relevant role in mediating OA damage [147], the coagulation cascade includes the activated protein C (APC), which may act as an activator of cartilage matrix metalloproteinases [148]. Another study carried out in the rat meniscal tear OA model confirmed a strong upregulation of CCL2/MCP-1 as early as day 3 [149].

The CCR2_CCL2/MCP-1 axis is critical for the recruitment of macrophages to the joint [135]. CCR2-positive cells (macrophages) are abundantly detected in human OA synovial tissues and invade and erode cartilage in mouse OA [135]. The CCR2_CCL2/MCP-1 axis is so strictly connected with the pathogenesis of OA that a differential susceptibility to this disease has been related to both disease-promoting and disease-protective SNPs [150].

Synovial tissue specimens derived from OA patients showed increased mRNA expression of many chemokines active on monocytes and increased protein expression of the corresponding chemokine receptors, but only CCL2/MCP-1 and not CCL5/RANTES is significantly elevated in synovial fluid of OA patients, suggesting that a hierarchical selectivity exists for monocyte recruitment in OA, as also confirmed in mouse OA pathogenesis [135].

Pharmacologic suppression of CCL2/MCP-1 expression or CCR2 signaling significantly reduces OA progression and relative cartilage structural damage via inhibition of monocyte recruitment to synovial tissue and macrophage accumulation. Interestingly, elevation of CCL2/MCP-1 in synovial fluid has been pointed at as a reliable biomarker for aseptic loosening of total knee arthroplasty and bone loss [151].

Disruption of the CXCR4_CXCL12/SDF-1 axis led to protection in a guinea pig model of spontaneous OA [152]. In this perspective, it is worthy to underline that circulating HMGB1 may strengthen the downstream effects of this axis, as previously reported [153].

An intriguing hypothesis is emerging that connects innate immunity with the pathogenesis of many chronic degenerative diseases including OA [154]. An unhealthy microbiota composition together with an altered gut permeability may allow for increased absorption and serum concentration of LPS. At the systemic level, LPS may activate TLR on macrophages and trigger complement activation yielding the production of bioactive components (C3a, C3b, and C5a) that further enhance macrophage activation. LPS is indeed found elevated in serum of OA patients and correlated to knee joint narrowing [155]. To date, this mechanism has been elegantly confirmed in rats in a study [156] that teased out the pathogenesis of metOA associated with high-fat diet and related alteration of microbiota composition. Indeed, the animals treated with high-fat diet had higher serum levels of LPS and fecal analysis pointed at the abundance of particular species (Lactobacillus and Methanobrevibacter) with strong predictive relationship with the modified Mankin score.

5. Conclusion and Perspective

Latest literature findings have greatly added to the picture of OA as a disease of accelerated aging of a postmitotic tissue with little or no reparative potential, but within a framework of systemic inflammation. Except for chronological issues, in a biological sense, aging can be controlled and attenuated with the adoption of dietary intervention and lifestyle measures that rescue the functionality of major homeostatic mechanisms. In this perspective, it is worthy to underline that state-of-the-art investigations revisited OA as belonging to the so-called mismatch diseases, whose prevalence has increased in the last decades because of higher exposure to conditions that are far from those that were present when our species has evolved. These conditions include circadian rhythms, lifestyle, physical exercise, and diet. These factors are amenable to correction, thus making OA much more preventable than currently considered [1].

In the lack of a true disease-modifying strategy, once OA is established, a complete joint restitutio ad integrum appears improbable, but much can be acted to slow OA progression and delay the time of arthroplasty as well as controlling pain and disability (as depicted in Figures 1 and 3).

Although targeting of selected cytokines or molecules proved to be effective in delaying structural damage, more promising are the strategies focused to counteract general mechanisms of cell aging, such as via the use of dietary restrictions or nutraceuticals able to reduce the magnitude of insulin/IGF and mTOR signaling in favour of a stronger sirtuin activation, thus exerting antiaging effects via rescue of mitochondrial functionality, genome maintenance, and proteostasis. A fundamental effect of this dietary strategy is to promote clearance of damaged mitochondria, via mitophagy [157, 158]. This at the same time allows reduction of oxidative damage and cell senescence [3, 46, 47]. As an additional strategy, correction of intestinal microbiota may be of help in maintaining the integrity of the intestinal barrier and reducing adsorption of LPS, thus smoothing innate immunity activation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.


This work was supported by FIRB Grant RBAP10KCNS (Italian Ministry of University and Scientific Research, Italy), Fondi Cinque per Mille (Italian Ministry of Health, Italy), RFO (University of Bologna), and Fondazione del Monte di Bologna e Ravenna.


  1. I. J. Wallace, S. Worthington, D. T. Felson et al., “Knee osteoarthritis has doubled in prevalence since the mid-20th century,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 114, no. 35, pp. 9332–9336, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. S. Miyaki and H. Asahara, “Macro view of microRNA function in osteoarthritis,” Nature Reviews Rheumatology, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 543–552, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. M. C. Haigis and B. A. Yankner, “The aging stress response,” Molecular Cell, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 333–344, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. C. Franceschi, P. Garagnani, G. Vitale, M. Capri, and S. Salvioli, “Inflammaging and ‘Garb-aging’,” Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 199–212, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. L. Lourido, B. Ayoglu, J. Fernandez-Tajes et al., “Discovery of circulating proteins associated to knee radiographic osteoarthritis,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 137, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. S. Glasson, T. J. Blanchet, and E. A. Morris, “The surgical destabilization of the medial meniscus (DMM) model of osteoarthritis in the 129/SvEv mouse,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 1061–1069, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. S. S. Glasson, “In vivo osteoarthritis target validation utilizing genetically-modified mice,” Current Drug Targets, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 367–376, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. L. Wu, X. Huang, L. Li, H. Huang, R. Xu, and W. Luyten, “Insights on biology and pathology of HIF-1α/-2α, TGFβ/BMP, Wnt/β-catenin, and NF-κB pathways in osteoarthritis,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 18, no. 22, pp. 3293–3312, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. P. Wojdasiewicz, L. A. Poniatowski, and D. Szukiewicz, “The role of inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis,” Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 2014, Article ID 561459, 19 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. P. M. van der Kraan and W. B. van den Berg, “Osteoarthritis in the context of ageing and evolution. Loss of chondrocyte differentiation block during ageing,” Ageing Research Reviews, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 106–113, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. T. Aigner and N. Gerwin, “Growth plate cartilage as developmental model in osteoarthritis research--potentials and limitations,” Current Drug Targets, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 377–385, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. L. J. Sandell and T. Aigner, “Articular cartilage and changes in arthritis. An introduction: cell biology of osteoarthritis,” Arthritis Research, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 107–113, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. E. Croco, S. Marchionni, G. Storci et al., “Convergent adaptation of cellular machineries in the evolution of large body masses and long life spans,” Biogerontology, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 485–497, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. E. Croco, S. Marchionni, M. Bocchini et al., “DNA damage detection by 53BP1: relationship to species longevity,” The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, vol. 72, no. 6, pp. glw170–glw770, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. E. Croco, S. Marchionni, and A. Lorenzini, “Genetic instability and aging under the scrutiny of comparative biology: a meta-analysis of spontaneous micronuclei frequency,” Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, vol. 156, pp. 34–41, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. A. Lorenzini, F. B. Johnson, A. Oliver et al., “Significant correlation of species longevity with DNA double strand break recognition but not with telomere length,” Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, vol. 130, no. 11-12, pp. 784–792, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. K. B. Marcu, M. Otero, E. Olivotto, R. M. Borzi, and M. B. Goldring, “NF-κB signaling: multiple angles to target OA,” Current Drug Targets, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 599–613, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. E. Olivotto, R. M. Borzi, R. Vitellozzi et al., “Differential requirements for IKKα and IKKβ in the differentiation of primary human osteoarthritic chondrocytes,” Arthritis & Rheumatism, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 227–239, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. M. Adli, E. Merkhofer, P. Cogswell, and A. S. Baldwin, “IKKα and IKKβ each function to regulate NF-κB activation in the TNF-induced/canonical pathway,” PLoS One, vol. 5, no. 2, article e9428, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. N. D. Perkins, “Integrating cell-signalling pathways with NF-κB and IKK function,” Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 49–62, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. S. Saccani, S. Pantano, and G. Natoli, “p38-Dependent marking of inflammatory genes for increased NF-κB recruitment,” Nature Immunology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 69–75, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. M. B. Goldring, M. Otero, D. A. Plumb et al., “Roles of inflammatory and anabolic cytokines in cartilage metabolism: signals and multiple effectors converge upon MMP-13 regulation in osteoarthritis,” European Cells & Materials, vol. 21, pp. 202–220, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. E. Olivotto, M. Otero, A. Astolfi et al., “IKKα/CHUK regulates extracellular matrix remodeling independent of its kinase activity to facilitate articular chondrocyte differentiation,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 9, article e73024, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. F. Veronesi, G. Giavaresi, M. Maglio et al., “Chondroprotective activity of N-acetyl phenylalanine glucosamine derivative on knee joint structure and inflammation in a murine model of osteoarthritis,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 589–599, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. T. Yamaguchi, Y. Miki, and K. Yoshida, “Protein kinase C δ activates IκB-kinase α to induce the p53 tumor suppressor in response to oxidative stress,” Cellular Signalling, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 2088–2097, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. S. K. Biswas, “Does the interdependence between oxidative stress and inflammation explain the antioxidant paradox?” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2016, Article ID 5698931, 9 pages, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. E. S. Helton and X. Chen, “p53 modulation of the DNA damage response,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 883–896, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. X. Zhu, S. Yang, W. Lin et al., “Roles of cell cycle regulators cyclin D1, CDK4, and p53 in knee osteoarthritis,” Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 529–534, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. S. Guidotti, M. Minguzzi, D. Platano et al., “Lithium chloride dependent glycogen synthase kinase 3 inactivation links oxidative DNA damage, hypertrophy and senescence in human articular chondrocytes and reproduces chondrocyte phenotype of obese osteoarthritis patients,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 11, article e0143865, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. J. Rose, S. Soder, C. Skhirtladze et al., “DNA damage, discoordinated gene expression and cellular senescence in osteoarthritic chondrocytes,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 1020–1028, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. Q. Zhuo, W. Yang, J. Chen, and Y. Wang, “Metabolic syndrome meets osteoarthritis,” Nature Reviews Rheumatology, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 729–737, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. M. Roldan, M. Macias-Gonzalez, R. Garcia, F. J. Tinahones, and M. Martin, “Obesity short-circuits stemness gene network in human adipose multipotent stem cells,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 4111–4126, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. D. S. Karolina, S. Tavintharan, A. Armugam et al., “Circulating miRNA profiles in patients with metabolic syndrome,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 97, no. 12, pp. E2271–E2276, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. A. Salminen, J. M. Hyttinen, and K. Kaarniranta, “AMP-activated protein kinase inhibits NF-κB signaling and inflammation: impact on healthspan and lifespan,” Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 89, no. 7, pp. 667–676, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. H. Fahmi, J. Martel-Pelletier, J. P. Pelletier, and M. Kapoor, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma in osteoarthritis,” Modern Rheumatology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. R. Terkeltaub, B. Yang, M. Lotz, and R. Liu-Bryan, “Chondrocyte AMP-activated protein kinase activity suppresses matrix degradation responses to proinflammatory cytokines interleukin-1β and tumor necrosis factor α,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 63, no. 7, pp. 1928–1937, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. H. Afif, M. Benderdour, L. Mfuna-Endam et al., “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ1 expression is diminished in human osteoarthritic cartilage and is downregulated by interleukin-1β in articular chondrocytes,” Arthritis Research & Therapy, vol. 9, no. 2, p. R31, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. Y. Figenschau, G. Knutsen, S. Shahazeydi, O. Johansen, and B. Sveinbjornsson, “Human articular chondrocytes express functional leptin receptors,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 287, no. 1, pp. 190–197, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. O. P. Stannus, Y. Cao, B. Antony et al., “Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between circulating leptin and knee cartilage thickness in older adults,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 82–88, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. M. Scotece and A. Mobasheri, “Leptin in osteoarthritis: focus on articular cartilage and chondrocytes,” Life Sciences, vol. 140, pp. 75–78, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. M. Sowers, C. A. Karvonen-Gutierrez, R. Palmieri-Smith, J. A. Jacobson, Y. Jiang, and J. A. Ashton-Miller, “Knee osteoarthritis in obese women with cardiometabolic clustering,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 61, no. 10, pp. 1328–1336, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. P. Lepetsos and A. G. Papavassiliou, “ROS/oxidative stress signaling in osteoarthritis,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease, vol. 1862, no. 4, pp. 576–591, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. S. Cetrullo, S. D'Adamo, B. Tantini, R. M. Borzi, and F. Flamigni, “mTOR, AMPK, and Sirt1: key players in metabolic stress management,” Critical Reviews in Eukaryotic Gene Expression, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 59–75, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. C. L. Shen, B. J. Smith, D. F. Lo et al., “Dietary polyphenols and mechanisms of osteoarthritis,” The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 1367–1377, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. C. Arias, T. Zambrano, D. S. Abdalla, and L. A. Salazar, “Polyphenol-related epigenetic modifications in osteoarthritis: current therapeutic perspectives,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 22, no. 44, pp. 6682–6693, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. S. D'Adamo, S. Cetrullo, S. Guidotti, R. M. Borzi, and F. Flamigni, “Hydroxytyrosol modulates the levels of microRNA-9 and its target sirtuin-1 thereby counteracting oxidative stress-induced chondrocyte death,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 600–610, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. S. Cetrullo, S. D'Adamo, S. Guidotti, R. M. Borzi, and F. Flamigni, “Hydroxytyrosol prevents chondrocyte death under oxidative stress by inducing autophagy through sirtuin 1-dependent and -independent mechanisms,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects, vol. 1860, no. 6, pp. 1181–1191, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. F. Berenbaum, T. M. Griffin, and R. Liu-Bryan, “Review: metabolic regulation of inflammation in osteoarthritis,” Arthritis & Rheumatology, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 9–21, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. B. Lu, J. B. Driban, C. Xu, K. L. Lapane, T. E. McAlindon, and C. B. Eaton, “Dietary fat intake and radiographic progression of knee osteoarthritis: data from the osteoarthritis initiative,” Arthritis Care & Research, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 368–375, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. K. T. Sibille, C. King, T. J. Garrett et al., “Omega-6: Omega-3 PUFA Ratio, Pain, Functioning, and Distress in Adults with Knee Pain,” The Clinical Journal of Pain, p. 1, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. N. S. Kalupahana, K. J. Claycombe, and N. Moustaid-Moussa, “(n-3) fatty acids alleviate adipose tissue inflammation and insulin resistance: mechanistic insights,” Advances in Nutrition, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 304–316, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. D. Medina-Luna, M. G. Santamaria-Olmedo, Y. Zamudio-Cuevas et al., “Hyperlipidemic microenvironment conditionates damage mechanisms in human chondrocytes by oxidative stress,” Lipids in Health and Disease, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 114, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. S. Sekar, S. R. Shafie, I. Prasadam et al., “Saturated fatty acids induce development of both metabolic syndrome and osteoarthritis in rats,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, article 46457, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. O. Alvarez-Garcia, N. H. Rogers, R. G. Smith, and M. K. Lotz, “Palmitate has proapoptotic and proinflammatory effects on articular cartilage and synergizes with interleukin-1,” Arthritis & Rheumatology, vol. 66, no. 7, pp. 1779–1788, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. S. Farnaghi, I. Prasadam, G. Cai et al., “Protective effects of mitochondria-targeted antioxidants and statins on cholesterol-induced osteoarthritis,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 356–367, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. F. Kostopoulou, K. N. Malizos, I. Papathanasiou, and A. Tsezou, “MicroRNA-33a regulates cholesterol synthesis and cholesterol efflux-related genes in osteoarthritic chondrocytes,” Arthritis Research & Therapy, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 42, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. F. Kostopoulou, V. Gkretsi, K. N. Malizos et al., “Central role of SREBP-2 in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis,” PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 5, article e35753, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. C. Vaamonde-Garcia, A. Courties, A. Pigenet et al., “The nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related factor/heme oxygenase-1 axis is critical for the inflammatory features of type 2 diabetes-associated osteoarthritis,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 292, no. 35, pp. 14505–14515, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. K. B. King and A. K. Rosenthal, “The adverse effects of diabetes on osteoarthritis: update on clinical evidence and molecular mechanisms,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 841–850, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. A. Mobasheri, M. P. Rayman, O. Gualillo, J. Sellam, P. van der Kraan, and U. Fearon, “The role of metabolism in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis,” Nature Reviews Rheumatology, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 302–311, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. Y. J. Chen, D. C. Chan, K. C. Lan et al., “PPARγ is involved in the hyperglycemia-induced inflammatory responses and collagen degradation in human chondrocytes and diabetic mouse cartilages,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 373–381, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. R. Liu-Bryan and R. Terkeltaub, “Emerging regulators of the inflammatory process in osteoarthritis,” Nature Reviews Rheumatology, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 35–44, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. J. Labbadia and R. I. Morimoto, “The biology of proteostasis in aging and disease,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 435–464, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. F. U. Hartl, A. Bracher, and M. Hayer-Hartl, “Molecular chaperones in protein folding and proteostasis,” Nature, vol. 475, no. 7356, pp. 324–332, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. J. Labbadia and R. I. Morimoto, “Repression of the heat shock response is a programmed event at the onset of reproduction,” Molecular Cell, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 639–650, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. H. E. Gruber, G. L. Hoelscher, J. A. Ingram, N. Zinchenko, and E. N. Hanley Jr, “Senescent vs. non-senescent cells in the human annulus in vivo: cell harvest with laser capture microdissection and gene expression studies with microarray analysis,” BMC Biotechnology, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 5, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. S. D. Westerheide, J. Anckar, S. M. Stevens Jr., L. Sistonen, and R. I. Morimoto, “Stress-inducible regulation of heat shock factor 1 by the deacetylase SIRT1,” Science, vol. 323, no. 5917, pp. 1063–1066, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. S. J. Park, O. Gavrilova, A. L. Brown et al., “DNA-PK promotes the mitochondrial, metabolic, and physical decline that occurs during aging,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1135–1146.e7, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. G. Schett, K. Redlich, Q. Xu et al., “Enhanced expression of heat shock protein 70 (hsp70) and heat shock factor 1 (HSF1) activation in rheumatoid arthritis synovial tissue. Differential regulation of hsp70 expression and hsf1 activation in synovial fibroblasts by proinflammatory cytokines, shear stress, and antiinflammatory drugs,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 302–311, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. S. Etienne, N. Gaborit, C. Henrionnet et al., “Local induction of heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) by proteasome inhibition confers chondroprotection during surgically induced osteoarthritis in the rat knee,” Bio-medical Materials and Engineering, vol. 18, no. 4-5, pp. 253–260, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. M. Siebelt, H. Jahr, H. C. Groen et al., “Hsp90 inhibition protects against biomechanically induced osteoarthritis in rats,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 2102–2112, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. J. Y. Ko, Y. C. Sun, W. C. Li, and F. S. Wang, “Chaperonin 60 regulation of SOX9 ubiquitination mitigates the development of knee osteoarthritis,” Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 94, no. 7, pp. 755–769, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. C. Ruiz-Romero, V. Calamia, J. Mateos et al., “Mitochondrial dysregulation of osteoarthritic human articular chondrocytes analyzed by proteomics: a decrease in mitochondrial superoxide dismutase points to a redox imbalance,” Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 172–189, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. S. Lambrecht, G. Verbruggen, D. Elewaut, and D. Deforce, “Differential expression of αB-crystallin and evidence of its role as a mediator of matrix gene expression in osteoarthritis,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 179–188, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. S. Lambrecht, M. Dhaenens, F. Almqvist et al., “Proteome characterization of human articular chondrocytes leads to novel insights in the function of small heat-shock proteins in chondrocyte homeostasis,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 440–446, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. O. Gabay, H. Oppenhiemer, H. Meir, K. Zaal, C. Sanchez, and M. Dvir-Ginzberg, “Increased apoptotic chondrocytes in articular cartilage from adult heterozygous SirT1 mice,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 613–616, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. O. Gabay, C. Sanchez, M. Dvir-Ginzberg et al., “Sirtuin 1 enzymatic activity is required for cartilage homeostasis in vivo in a mouse model,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 159–166, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. O. Gabay, K. J. Zaal, C. Sanchez et al., “Sirt1-deficient mice exhibit an altered cartilage phenotype,” Joint, Bone, Spine, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 613–620, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. Y. Li, W. Xiao, P. Wu et al., “The expression of SIRT1 in articular cartilage of patients with knee osteoarthritis and its correlation with disease severity,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 144, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. B. L. Tang, “Sirt1 and the mitochondria,” Molecules and Cells, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 87–95, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. H. Sies, “Oxidative stress: a concept in redox biology and medicine,” Redox Biology, vol. 4, pp. 180–183, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. D. Clavijo-Cornejo, K. Martinez-Flores, K. Silva-Luna et al., “The overexpression of NALP3 Inflammasome in knee osteoarthritis is associated with synovial membrane prolidase and NADPH oxidase 2,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2016, Article ID 1472567, 7 pages, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. G. Teixeira, C. Szyndralewiez, S. Molango et al., “Therapeutic potential of NADPH oxidase 1/4 inhibitors,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 174, no. 12, pp. 1647–1669, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. V. Afonso, R. Champy, D. Mitrovic, P. Collin, and A. Lomri, “Reactive oxygen species and superoxide dismutases: role in joint diseases,” Joint Bone Spine, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 324–329, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. S. B. Abramson, A. R. Amin, R. M. Clancy, and M. Attur, “The role of nitric oxide in tissue destruction,” Best Practice & Research. Clinical Rheumatology, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 831–845, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. M. De la Fuente and J. Miquel, “An update of the oxidation-inflammation theory of aging: the involvement of the immune system in oxi-inflamm-aging,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 15, no. 26, pp. 3003–3026, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. Y. Henrotin, B. Kurz, and T. Aigner, “Oxygen and reactive oxygen species in cartilage degradation: friends or foes?” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 643–654, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. D. M. Olszewska-Słonina, D. Matewski, G. Drewa et al., “Oxidative equilibrium in the prophylaxis of degenerative joint changes: an analysis of pre- and postoperative activity of antioxidant enzymes in patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis,” Medical Science Monitor, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. CR238–CR245, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  89. J. L. Scott, C. Gabrielides, R. K. Davidson et al., “Superoxide dismutase downregulation in osteoarthritis progression and end-stage disease,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 69, no. 8, pp. 1502–1510, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. K. McCulloch, G. J. Litherland, and T. S. Rai, “Cellular senescence in osteoarthritis pathology,” Aging Cell, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 210–218, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. F. M. Yakes and B. Van Houten, “Mitochondrial DNA damage is more extensive and persists longer than nuclear DNA damage in human cells following oxidative stress,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 514–519, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. A. T. Akhmedov and J. Marin-Garcia, “Mitochondrial DNA maintenance: an appraisal,” Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 409, no. 1-2, pp. 283–305, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. I. Rego-Perez, M. Fernandez-Moreno, C. Fernandez-Lopez, J. Arenas, and F. J. Blanco, “Mitochondrial DNA haplogroups: role in the prevalence and severity of knee osteoarthritis,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 2387–2396, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. M. Fernandez-Moreno, A. Soto-Hermida, M. E. Vazquez-Mosquera et al., “Mitochondrial DNA haplogroups influence the risk of incident knee osteoarthritis in OAI and CHECK cohorts. A meta-analysis and functional study,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 1114–1122, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. Y. Wang, X. Zhao, M. Lotz, R. Terkeltaub, and R. Liu-Bryan, “Mitochondrial biogenesis is impaired in osteoarthritis chondrocytes but reversible via peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ coactivator 1α,” Arthritis & Rheumatology, vol. 67, no. 8, pp. 2141–2153, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. M. Harbo, J. M. Delaisse, P. Kjaersgaard-Andersen, F. B. Soerensen, S. Koelvraa, and L. Bendix, “The relationship between ultra-short telomeres, aging of articular cartilage and the development of human hip osteoarthritis,” Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, vol. 134, no. 9, pp. 367–372, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. K. Itahana, J. Campisi, and G. P. Dimri, “Mechanisms of cellular senescence in human and mouse cells,” Biogerontology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. M. H. Goyns, “Genes, telomeres and mammalian ageing,” Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, vol. 123, no. 7, pp. 791–799, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. C. R. Fellows, R. Williams, I. R. Davies et al., “Characterisation of a divergent progenitor cell sub-populations in human osteoarthritic cartilage: the role of telomere erosion and replicative senescence,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, p. 41421, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. M. Otero, M. Favero, C. Dragomir et al., “Human chondrocyte cultures as models of cartilage-specific gene regulation,” Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 806, pp. 301–336, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. I. Han, H. J. Park, S. C. Seong, S. Lee, I. G. Kim, and M. C. Lee, “Role of transglutaminase 2 in apoptosis induced by hydrogen peroxide in human chondrocytes,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 252–257, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  102. K. Yudoh, v T. Nguyen, H. Nakamura, K. Hongo-Masuko, T. Kato, and K. Nishioka, “Potential involvement of oxidative stress in cartilage senescence and development of osteoarthritis: oxidative stress induces chondrocyte telomere instability and downregulation of chondrocyte function,” Arthritis Research & Therapy, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. R380–R391, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  103. A. Freund, A. V. Orjalo, P. Y. Desprez, and J. Campisi, “Inflammatory networks during cellular senescence: causes and consequences,” Trends in Molecular Medicine, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 238–246, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  104. M. Xu, E. W. Bradley, M. M. Weivoda et al., “Transplanted senescent cells induce an osteoarthritis-like condition in mice,” The Journals of Gerontology: Series A, vol. 72, no. 6, pp. 780–785, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  105. O. H. Jeon, C. Kim, R. M. Laberge et al., “Local clearance of senescent cells attenuates the development of post-traumatic osteoarthritis and creates a pro-regenerative environment,” Nature Medicine, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 775–781, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  106. H. W. Zhou, S. Q. Lou, and K. Zhang, “Recovery of function in osteoarthritic chondrocytes induced by p16INK4a-specific siRNA in vitro,” Rheumatology, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 555–568, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  107. S. G. Gao, C. Zeng, L. J. Li et al., “Correlation between senescence-associated beta-galactosidase expression in articular cartilage and disease severity of patients with knee osteoarthritis,” International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 226–232, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  108. D. Philipot, D. Guerit, D. Platano et al., “p16INK4a and its regulator miR-24 link senescence and chondrocyte terminal differentiation-associated matrix remodeling in osteoarthritis,” Arthritis Research & Therapy, vol. 16, no. 1, p. R58, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  109. G. J. Litherland, W. Hui, M. S. Elias et al., “Glycogen synthase kinase 3 inhibition stimulates human cartilage destruction and exacerbates murine osteoarthritis,” Arthritis & Rheumatology, vol. 66, no. 8, pp. 2175–2187, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  110. H. O. Byun, H. J. Jung, Y. H. Seo et al., “GSK3 inactivation is involved in mitochondrial complex IV defect in transforming growth factor (TGF) β1-induced senescence,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 318, no. 15, pp. 1808–1819, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  111. M. G. Attur, M. Dave, M. Akamatsu, M. Katoh, and A. R. Amin, “Osteoarthritis or osteoarthrosis: the definition of inflammation becomes a semantic issue in the genomic era of molecular medicine,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–4, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  112. C. Melchiorri, R. Meliconi, L. Frizziero et al., “Enhanced and coordinated in vivo expression of inflammatory cytokines and nitric oxide synthase by chondrocytes from patients with osteoarthritis,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 2165–2174, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  113. R. F. Loeser, S. R. Goldring, C. R. Scanzello, and M. B. Goldring, “Osteoarthritis: a disease of the joint as an organ,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 1697–1707, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  114. M. A. Rowe, L. R. Harper, M. A. McNulty et al., “Reduced osteoarthritis severity in aged mice with deletion of macrophage migration inhibitory factor,” Arthritis & Rheumatology, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 352–361, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  115. C. R. Scanzello, B. McKeon, B. H. Swaim et al., “Synovial inflammation in patients undergoing arthroscopic meniscectomy: molecular characterization and relationship to symptoms,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 391–400, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  116. J. Lieberthal, N. Sambamurthy, and C. R. Scanzello, “Inflammation in joint injury and post-traumatic osteoarthritis,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 1825–1834, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  117. B. J. E. de Lange-Brokaar, A. Ioan-Facsinay, G. J. V. M. van Osch et al., “Synovial inflammation, immune cells and their cytokines in osteoarthritis: a review,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 1484–1499, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  118. Y. S. Li, W. Luo, S. A. Zhu, and G. H. Lei, “T cells in osteoarthritis: alterations and beyond,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 8, p. 356, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  119. J. Apinun, P. Sengprasert, P. Yuktanandana, S. Ngarmukos, A. Tanavalee, and R. Reantragoon, “Immune mediators in osteoarthritis: infrapatellar fat pad-infiltrating CD8+ T cells are increased in osteoarthritic patients with higher clinical radiographic grading,” International Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 2016, Article ID 9525724, 8 pages, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  120. C. L. Wu, J. McNeill, K. Goon et al., “Conditional macrophage depletion increases inflammation and does not inhibit the development of osteoarthritis in obese macrophage Fas-induced apoptosis-transgenic mice,” Arthritis & Rheumatology, vol. 69, no. 9, pp. 1772–1783, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  121. E. Kalaitzoglou, T. M. Griffin, and M. B. Humphrey, “Innate immune responses and osteoarthritis,” Current Rheumatology Reports, vol. 19, no. 8, p. 45, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  122. C. R. Scanzello, A. Plaas, and M. K. Crow, “Innate immune system activation in osteoarthritis: is osteoarthritis a chronic wound?” Current Opinion in Rheumatology, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 565–572, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  123. M. Nefla, D. Holzinger, F. Berenbaum, and C. Jacques, “The danger from within: alarmins in arthritis,” Nature Reviews Rheumatology, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 669–683, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  124. R. F. Schelbergen, E. J. Geven, M. H. van den Bosch et al., “Prophylactic treatment with S100A9 inhibitor paquinimod reduces pathology in experimental collagenase-induced osteoarthritis,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 74, no. 12, pp. 2254–2258, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  125. A. R. Amin and A. B. Islam, “Genomic analysis and differential expression of HMG and S100A family in human arthritis: upregulated expression of chemokines, IL-8 and nitric oxide by HMGB1,” DNA and Cell Biology, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 550–565, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  126. H. Wahamaa, H. Schierbeck, H. S. Hreggvidsdottir et al., “High mobility group box protein 1 in complex with lipopolysaccharide or IL-1 promotes an increased inflammatory phenotype in synovial fibroblasts,” Arthritis Research & Therapy, vol. 13, no. 4, p. R136, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  127. N. Taniguchi, K. Yoshida, T. Ito et al., “Stage-specific secretion of HMGB1 in cartilage regulates endochondral ossification,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 27, no. 16, pp. 5650–5663, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  128. N. Taniguchi, K. Kawahara, K. Yone et al., “High mobility group box chromosomal protein 1 plays a role in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis as a novel cytokine,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 971–981, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  129. J. H. Rosenberg, V. Rai, M. F. Dilisio, and D. K. Agrawal, “Damage-associated molecular patterns in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis: potentially novel therapeutic targets,” Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 434, no. 1-2, pp. 171–179, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  130. J. H. Rosenberg, V. Rai, M. F. Dilisio, T. D. Sekundiak, and D. K. Agrawal, “Increased expression of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) in osteoarthritis of human knee joint compared to hip joint,” Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 436, no. 1-2, pp. 59–69, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  131. X. Ke, G. Jin, Y. Yang et al., “Synovial fluid HMGB-1 levels are associated with osteoarthritis severity,” Clinical Laboratory, vol. 61, no. 07/2015, pp. 809–818, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  132. R. M. Borzi, I. Mazzetti, S. Macor et al., “Flow cytometric analysis of intracellular chemokines in chondrocytes in vivo: constitutive expression and enhancement in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis,” FEBS Letters, vol. 455, no. 3, pp. 238–242, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  133. J. I. Pulai, H. Chen, H. J. Im et al., “NF-κB mediates the stimulation of cytokine and chemokine expression by human articular chondrocytes in response to fibronectin fragments,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 174, no. 9, pp. 5781–5788, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  134. E. Assirelli, L. Pulsatelli, P. Dolzani et al., “Human osteoarthritic cartilage shows reduced in vivo expression of IL-4, a chondroprotective cytokine that differentially modulates IL-1β-stimulated production of chemokines and matrix-degrading enzymes in vitro,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 5, article e96925, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  135. H. Raghu, C. M. Lepus, Q. Wang et al., “CCL2/CCR2, but not CCL5/CCR5, mediates monocyte recruitment, inflammation and cartilage destruction in osteoarthritis,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 914–922, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  136. R. M. Borzi, I. Mazzetti, L. Cattini, M. Uguccioni, M. Baggiolini, and A. Facchini, “Human chondrocytes express functional chemokine receptors and release matrix-degrading enzymes in response to C-X-C and C-C chemokines,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 1734–1741, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  137. R. M. Borzi, I. Mazzetti, K. B. Marcu, and A. Facchini, “Chemokines in cartilage degradation,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 427, pp. S53–S61, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  138. I. Mazzetti, G. Magagnoli, S. Paoletti et al., “A role for chemokines in the induction of chondrocyte phenotype modulation,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 112–122, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  139. R. M. Borzi, I. Mazzetti, G. Magagnoli et al., “Growth-related oncogene alpha induction of apoptosis in osteoarthritis chondrocytes,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 3201–3211, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  140. F. Bachelerie, A. Ben-Baruch, A. M. Burkhardt et al., “International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXXXIX. Update on the extended family of chemokine receptors and introducing a new nomenclature for atypical chemokine receptors,” Pharmacological Reviews, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 1–79, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  141. C. R. Scanzello, “Chemokines and inflammation in osteoarthritis: insights from patients and animal models,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 735–739, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  142. L. Li and B. E. Jiang, “Serum and synovial fluid chemokine ligand 2/monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 concentrations correlates with symptomatic severity in patients with knee osteoarthritis,” Annals of Clinical Biochemistry, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 276–282, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  143. R. E. Miller, A. Belmadani, S. Ishihara et al., “Damage-associated molecular patterns generated in osteoarthritis directly excite murine nociceptive neurons through Toll-like receptor 4,” Arthritis & Rheumatology, vol. 67, no. 11, pp. 2933–2943, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  144. J. Miotla Zarebska, A. Chanalaris, C. Driscoll et al., “CCL2 and CCR2 regulate pain-related behaviour and early gene expression in post-traumatic murine osteoarthritis but contribute little to chondropathy,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 406–412, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  145. M. D. Gardiner, T. L. Vincent, C. Driscoll et al., “Transcriptional analysis of micro-dissected articular cartilage in post-traumatic murine osteoarthritis,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 616–628, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  146. C. T. Appleton, S. E. Usmani, M. A. Pest, V. Pitelka, J. S. Mort, and F. Beier, “Reduction in disease progression by inhibition of transforming growth factor α-CCL2 signaling in experimental posttraumatic osteoarthritis,” Arthritis & Rheumatology, vol. 67, no. 10, pp. 2691–2701, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  147. Q. Wang, A. L. Rozelle, C. M. Lepus et al., “Identification of a central role for complement in osteoarthritis,” Nature Medicine, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 1674–1679, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  148. M. T. Jackson, B. Moradi, M. M. Smith, C. J. Jackson, and C. B. Little, “Activation of matrix metalloproteinases 2, 9, and 13 by activated protein C in human osteoarthritic cartilage chondrocytes,” Arthritis & Rheumatology, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 1525–1536, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  149. T. Wei, N. H. Kulkarni, Q. Q. Zeng et al., “Analysis of early changes in the articular cartilage transcriptisome in the rat meniscal tear model of osteoarthritis: pathway comparisons with the rat anterior cruciate transection model and with human osteoarthritic cartilage,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 992–1000, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  150. S. L. Hulin-Curtis, J. L. Bidwell, and M. J. Perry, “Association between CCL2 haplotypes and knee osteoarthritis,” International Journal of Immunogenetics, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 280–283, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  151. V. Dasa, J. M. Kramer, S. L. Gaffen, K. L. Kirkwood, and W. M. Mihalko, “Is monocyte chemotactic protein 1 elevated in aseptic loosening of TKA? A pilot study,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 470, no. 7, pp. 1879–1884, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  152. F. Wei, D. C. Moore, L. Wei et al., “Attenuation of osteoarthritis via blockade of the SDF-1/CXCR4 signaling pathway,” Arthritis Research & Therapy, vol. 14, no. 4, p. R177, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  153. M. Schiraldi, A. Raucci, L. M. Munoz et al., “HMGB1 promotes recruitment of inflammatory cells to damaged tissues by forming a complex with CXCL12 and signaling via CXCR4,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 209, no. 3, pp. 551–563, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  154. Z. Huang and V. B. Kraus, “Does lipopolysaccharide-mediated inflammation have a role in OA?” Nature Reviews Rheumatology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 123–129, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  155. T. V. Stabler, Z. Huang, E. Montell, J. Verges, and V. B. Kraus, “Chondroitin sulphate inhibits NF-κB activity induced by interaction of pathogenic and damage associated molecules,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 166–174, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  156. K. H. Collins, H. A. Paul, R. A. Reimer, R. A. Seerattan, D. A. Hart, and W. Herzog, “Relationship between inflammation, the gut microbiota, and metabolic osteoarthritis development: studies in a rat model,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 1989–1998, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  157. P. Lopez de Figueroa, M. K. Lotz, F. J. Blanco, and B. Carames, “Autophagy activation and protection from mitochondrial dysfunction in human chondrocytes,” Arthritis & Rheumatology, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 966–976, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  158. J. K. Meckes, B. Carames, M. Olmer et al., “Compromised autophagy precedes meniscus degeneration and cartilage damage in mice,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 1880–1889, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2018 Manuela Minguzzi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.