Research Article

Effect of the Antioxidant Lipoic Acid in Aortic Phenotype in a Marfan Syndrome Mouse Model

Table 5

Evolution of structural aorta remodeling in WT and MFS mice with 6 months of age after losartan or lipoic acid treatments.

UntreatedLosartan treatmentLipoic acid treatment
WT6MFS6WT6MFS6WT6MFS6
()()()()()()

Aortic arch
Thickness (mm2)28 ± 140 ± 3a19 ± 4b23 ± 3b32 ± 248 ± 3c–e
Total CVF (%)11 ± 223 ± 6a11 ± 1f10 ± 1b18 ± 229 ± 2c–e,g
Collagen I/III ratio1.0 ± 0.112.1 ± 4.1c1.0 ± 0.1i5.2 ± 0.4c,d0.8 ± 0.1e,i9.2 ± 1.7c,d,h
EFD (number/mm2)0.01 ± 0.031.30 ± 0.08c0.01 ± 0.01i0.04 ± 0.01i0.02 ± 0.01i1.70 ± 0.02c–e,h
FBN1 (area %)101 ± 133 ± 5c94 ± 1i45 ± 5c,d110 ± 2e,i39 ± 2c,d,h
Thoracic aorta
Thickness (mm2)25 ± 126 ± 425 ± 220 ± 127 ± 133 ± 1
Total CVF (%)15 ± 219 ± 112 ± 320 ± 316 ± 121 ± 6c–e,j
Collagen I/III ratio1.0 ± 0.13.1 ± 0.7c1.3 ± 0.2i1.5 ± 0.1c,d1.5 ± 0.1e,i3.1 ± 0.2c,d,f,h
EFD (number/mm2)0.10 ± 0.020.92 ± 0.13c0.11 ± 0.01i0.38 ± 0.01i0.13 ± 0.02i1.01 ± 0.25c–e,h
FBN1 (area %)100 ± 148 ± 5c90 ± 1i57 ± 3c,d101 ± 1e,i39 ± 3c,d,h
Abdominal aorta
Thickness (mm2)23 ± 134 ± 3k27 ± 6f20 ± 223 ± 334 ± 4
Total CVF (%)10 ± 131 ± 2a10 ± 1f12 ± 2f11 ± 232 ± 3c,d,f,h,i
Collagen I/III ratio1.1 ± 0.111.7 ± 3.2c0.8 ± 0.1i1.1 ± 0.1c,d1.0 ± 0.3e,i10.2 ± 0.1c,d,f,h
EFD (number/mm2)0.10 ± 0.010.95 ± 0.19c0.11 ± 0.01b0.50 ± 0.10i0.12 ± 0.21.40 ± 0.50c–e,h
FBN1 (area %)100 ± 244 ± 6c87 ± 1i31 ± 6c,d98 ± 4e,i38 ± 3c,d,h

WT: wild type; MFS: Marfan syndrome; 6: 6 months of age; CVF: collagen volume fraction; EFD: elastic fiber disruptions; FBN 1: fibrillin-1; a versus untreated WT6; b versus untreated MFS6; c versus untreated WT6; d versus losartan treatment WT6; e versus losartan treatment MFS6; f versus untreated MFS6; g versus lipoic acid treatment WT6; h versus lipoic acid treatment WT6; i versus untreated MFS6; j versus lipoic acid treatment WT6; k versus untreated WT6.