Research Article | Open Access
Shunhao Wang, Chunyang Yin, Xiaoguang Han, Anyi Guo, Xiaodong Chen, Sijin Liu, Yajun Liu, "Improved Healing of Diabetic Foot Ulcer upon Oxygenation Therapeutics through Oxygen-Loading Nanoperfluorocarbon Triggered by Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave", Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2019, Article ID 5738368, 10 pages, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5738368
Improved Healing of Diabetic Foot Ulcer upon Oxygenation Therapeutics through Oxygen-Loading Nanoperfluorocarbon Triggered by Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave
Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), the most serious complication of diabetes mellitus, can induce high morbidity, the need to amputate lower extremities, and even death. Although many adjunctive strategies have been applied for the treatment of DFUs, the low treatment efficiency, potential side effects, and high cost are still huge challenges. Recently, nanomaterial-based drug delivery systems (NDDSs) have achieved targeted drug delivery and controlled drug release, offering great promises in various therapeutics for diverse disorders. Additionally, the radial extracorporeal shock wave (rESW) has been shown to function as a robust trigger source for the NDDS to release its contents, as the rESW harbors a potent capability in generating pressure waves and in creating the cavitation effect. Here, we explored the performance of oxygen-loaded nanoperfluorocarbon (Nano-PFC) combined with the rESW as a treatment for DFUs. Prior to in vivo assessment, we first demonstrated the high oxygen affinity in vitro and great biocompatibility of Nano-PFC. Moreover, the rESW-responsive oxygen release behavior from oxygen-saturated Nano-PFC was also successfully verified in vitro and in vivo. Importantly, the wound healing of DFUs was significantly accelerated due to improved blood microcirculation, which was a result of rESW therapy (rESWT), and the targeted release of oxygen into the wound from oxygen-loaded Nano-PFC, which was triggered by the rESW. Collectively, the oxygen-saturated Nano-PFC and rESW provide a completely new approach to treat DFUs, and this study highlights the advantages of combining nanotechnology with rESW in therapeutics.
Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), the most common complication of diabetes mellitus, are caused by peripheral neuropathy, small vessel occlusion, and secondary infection or trauma, and they may lead to lower extremity amputation [1–4]. Many adjunctive strategies have been developed for the treatment of DFUs in the clinical practice, including negative pressure wound therapy, ultrasound, recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB, and acellular matrix products [5–7]. However, low efficiency, potential side effects, and high cost have limited their wide application. Hypoxia is a key inhibiting factor for wound healing of DFUs, which can block fibroblast proliferation, collagen production, and capillary angiogenesis and enhance the risk of infection [8–10]. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is the most commonly utilized adjunctive therapy for improving wound tissue hypoxia in DFU treatment [11–13], but this method has not achieved universal success in many studies and is costly [14, 15]. And the production of HBO-related oxidative stress is a concern . Thus, to improve treatment efficiency and reduce costs, a need exists for a new and effective DFU treatment method.
A nanomaterial-based drug delivery system (NDDS) could improve DFU treatment by means of targeted drug delivery and controlled drug release [17–19]. Recently, growing attention in the NDDS has given rise to the study of micro/nanobubbles, especially oxygen-filled nanobubbles [8, 20–22]. Among them, nanoperfluorocarbon (Nano-PFC) has been extensively explored as an oxygen-loaded system to overcome hypoxia-associated resistance in cancer therapies owing to its high oxygen affinity and great biocompatibility [22–24]. Additionally, oxypherol (Fluosol-43), a type of PFC, has obtained US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for improving myocardial oxygenation and preventing abnormalities in ventricular function . Thus, Nano-PFC can be used as an NDDS to deliver molecules, such as drugs and oxygen, to target tissues and release the contents in response to physical stimuli [20, 23, 26].
The radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) has been widely applied in musculoskeletal disorders, myocardial infarction, wound healing, and erectile dysfunction due to the noninvasive mode of treatment, cost effectiveness, lower energy level, and negligible side effects [27–29]. More importantly, rESW is a type of pneumatically generated pressure wave [30, 31] that can induce the cavitation effect, which refers to the rapid formation, expansion, and collapse of small vapor bubbles in liquids due to sharp pressure changes [32–34]. Thus, the rESW is a candidate trigger source to enhance inclusion release inside an NDDS. Furthermore, ESW therapy has been reported to distinctly improve and promote the healing of DFUs by mainly enhancing blood microcirculation and tissue regeneration and reducing oxidative stress [35, 36]. However, the corresponding studies about rESWT are few.
Herein, we developed a completely new strategy for the treatment of DFUs by combining the rESW with oxygen-loaded Nano-PFC, which could effectively improve blood flow and provide a targeted supply of oxygen. In our study, the rESW-responsive oxygen release feature of Nano-PFC was first proved in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, rESWT was demonstrated to improve blood microcirculation and accelerate the wound healing of DFUs. Based on our results, the rESW-responsive oxygen-loaded Nano-PFC can provide a new sight and great potential for DFU treatment.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Preparation and Characterization of Nano-PFC
PFC (300 μL perfluoro-15-crown-5-ether, Fluorochem, UK) was added to 1% human serum albumin (HSA) (Sigma-Aldrich, China) in 0.01 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution (4 mL). Then, the mixture was emulsified by an ultrasonic homogenizer (Scientz-1200E, China) for 200 s after slight oscillation. The obtained emulsion was centrifuged (8000 r/min) for 3 min, and then, the precipitate was resuspended in PBS for further use. The size and morphology of Nano-PFC were characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (SU-8020, Hitachi, Japan) after negative staining using 1.5% phosphotungstic acid and Malvern zetasizer (NANO ZS, UK).
2.2. Measurement of Oxygen Release from Nano-PFC Triggered by rESW In Vitro
Nano-PFC solution (4 mL, containing 300 μL of PFC) was stored in an aseptic oxygen chamber () for 5 min for Nano-PFC oxygenation. The oxygen-free water was obtained after N2 bubble. Then, oxygen-saturated Nano-PFC was added to 45 mL of oxygen-free water. The oxygen concentration was measured by a portable dissolved oxygen meter (Rex, JPBJ-608, China) before and after adding Nano-PFC with or without rESW (MASTERPULS® MP100, STORZ MEDICAL AG, Switzerland) treatment (1 bar, 2 Hz, 25 min).
2.3. Cellular Experiments
Murine breast cancer (4T1) and human umbilical vein endothelial (HUVE) cells were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and cultured with 1640 medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, HyClone) at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. The 4T1 and HUVE cells were seeded into separate 96-well plates ( cells/well). After 24 h, the different amounts of Nano-PFC (0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 μL) were added to the 96-well plates, and the cells were incubated for 24 h (). The cell viability was determined by the WST-8 (4-[3-(2-methoxy-4-nitrophenyl)-2-(4-nitrophenyl)-2H-5-tetrazolio]-1,3-benzene disulfonate sodium salt) assay following a standard protocol (Solarbio, 1000T, China).
2.4. Animal Model
All of the animal experiments were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Sixteen female albino Wistar rats (180–220 g) were purchased from the Peking University Laboratory Animal Research Center and randomly divided into Ctrl, rESW, Nano-PFC@O2, and rESW+Nano-PFC@O2 groups (). The rats in all groups were intraperitoneally injected with streptozotocin (STZ) solution (Sigma-Aldrich, 60 mg/kg body weight) that was freshly dissolved in 0.1 mg/L citrate-sodium citrate buffer (pH 4.5) for approximately 2 months. With respect to the blood glucose level, measured by a glucometer, it was ≥300 mg/dL for two consecutive weeks, suggesting that the STZ-induced diabetic rat model was successfully established, in agreement with previous reports . In order to faithfully reflect the realistic complex pathologies and mimic those conditions under diabetes mellitus, we did not actually add additional treatments. Therefore, during this period, we kept monitoring blood glucose levels without additional work. Nonetheless, the protocol of establishing a STZ-induced diabetic rat model has been widely applied in the wound healing studies of diabetic foot ulcers, as supported by the following references (Table S1) [10–17]. Then, a wound () was created in the left forepaw of each rat after anesthetizing with sodium pentobarbital (45 mg/kg body weight) by intraperitoneal injection. The size of the wound was measured by a Vernier caliper. BALB/c female mice (7-8 weeks old) were purchased from the Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co. Ltd. (Beijing, China). The 4T1 tumor-bearing mouse model was established following the instructions in our previous reports .
2.5. In Vivo Photoacoustic (PA) Imaging
When the tumor volume of 4T1 tumor-bearing mice reached up to 100 mm3, the tumor oxygenation levels were detected using a PA imaging system (Vevo 2100, FUJIFILM VisualSonics Inc., Canada) utilizing the oxy-hemo mode (750 and 850 nm). The 4T1 tumor-bearing mice were injected with oxygen-saturated Nano-PFC through the tail vein (200 μL, containing 30 μL of PFC), and the mice breathed pure oxygen for 20 min before PA imaging.
2.6. Blood Flow by Laser Doppler Imaging
The blood flow of the wound was measured by laser Doppler imaging (Moor LDI V3.01, UK). STZ-induced diabetic rats were injected with oxygen-saturated Nano-PFC through the tail vein (500 μL, containing 80 μL of PFC), and the mice breathed pure oxygen for 20 min before imaging. The rats in the rESW+Nano-PFC@O2 group were treated with rESW for 20 min (1 bar, 2 Hz). The quantitative data were obtained from Moor FLPI measurement software (Version 2.1).
2.7. Immunohistochemistry Analysis
After various treatments for 4T1 tumor-bearing mice, the mice were sacrificed and the tumors were isolated from the mice on the 15th day and then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, embedded, and sectioned at 8 μm. Next, the immunohistochemical analysis of HIF-1α for tumor tissues was performed as the protocol. The expression levels of HIF-1α were quantified by ImageJ software (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/).
2.8. Nano-PFC plus rESW Treatment In Vivo
The STZ-induced DFU rats were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (45 mg/kg body weight) by intraperitoneal injection prior to treatment. Thereafter, the rats were injected with PBS (500 μL) through the tail vein for the control group. The rESW group received rESW treatment (1 bar, 2 Hz, 20 min). The rats were injected with oxygen-saturated Nano-PFC through tail vein intravenous injection (500 μL, containing 80 μL of PFC) and subjected to pure oxygen breath for 20 min in the Nano-PFC@O2 group. The rESW+Nano-PFC@O2 group denoted the rats that inhaled pure oxygen for 20 min after Nano-PFC@O2 injection (500 μL, containing 80 μL of PFC). Afterwards, the rats were treated with rESW (1 bar, 2 Hz) for 20 min. All administration and treatments were conducted once every other day for a total of three times. The size of the wound was measured by a Vernier caliper.
2.9. Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis of experimental data was determined by an independent -test or one-way ANOVA test using the SPSS Statistics 17.0 software. All of the data are presented as the . Statistical significance was determined with and .
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Synthesis and Characterization of Nano-PFC
The nanodroplets of HSA-stabilized Nano-PFC were obtained using the modified microemulsion method under ultrasonication, as described in previous reports (Figure 1) [22, 23]. Figures 2(a) and 2(b) show that the synthesized HSA-stabilized Nano-PFC exhibits a highly uniform size distribution with an average diameter of about 70 nm, as measured by TEM and dynamic light scattering (DLS). Moreover, the size of Nano-PFC changed negligibly after rESW treatment, which proved that Nano-PFC had great stability (Figure 2(b)).
3.2. rESW-Responsive Oxygen Release of Nano-PFC In Vitro and In Vivo
PFC, as an artificial oxygen carrier, has been used in the clinical treatment of ischemic diseases such as hemorrhagic shock and allogeneic blood transfusions owing to its excellent dissolving capacity for many gases, including oxygen and carbon dioxide [25, 38]. Thus, the abilities of Nano-PFC for oxygen loading and rESW-responsive oxygen release (Figures 1 and 2(c)) were measured by an oxygen meter. The concentration of pure oxygen saturation within Nano-PFC was about 1.50 mg/mL at 25°C (1 atm), which was consistent with previously reported results . As shown in Figure 2(c), the dissolved oxygen concentration in water speedily increased in a short time, and then, the oxygen was slowly released from the oxygen-loaded nanodroplets over time when the oxygen-loaded Nano-PFC was added to oxygen-free water. Importantly, burst-like oxygen release in a dose-dependent manner was observed under rESW treatment with different frequencies (2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 Hz). These results demonstrated the high oxygen solubility and rESW-responsive oxygen release abilities of Nano-PFC. Moreover, after one injection, Nano-PFC may reload oxygen within the lung capillaries during blood circulation. Thus, oxygen-filled Nano-PFC can deliver oxygen to the targeted area and then reversibly release oxygen triggered by the rESW. Compared to HBOT, this Nano-PFC-based treatment strategy can effectively reduce the cost of treatment and avoid serious side effects, such as barotrauma, central nervous system and pulmonary oxygen toxicity, and increased risk of claustrophobia . In addition, the cell viability of 4T1 and HUVE cells was not significantly affected by the different doses of Nano-PFC, which exhibited that Nano-PFC has great biocompatibility for different types of cells (Figure 2(d)).
Inspired by the above great performance in vitro, we further researched the oxygen release behavior in vivo based on a 4T1 tumor-bearing mouse model. It is worth mentioning that nanosized materials can achieve highly efficient accumulation in tumor tissue depending on the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect . Additionally, almost all of the solid tumors have a hypoxic region due to the deficient blood supply along with the tumor progression [41, 42]. Likewise, the disturbance of the vascular system is one of the direct reasons for DFUs because it can cause sustained oxygen deficiency and finally chronic hypoxia in the wound area . However, we had established the wound-healing models of DFUs in the rats’ forepaws, which were too large to be placed in the detector of the photoacoustic (PA) imaging system. And the scientific rationale is very sound, for the microenvironment, the microstructure, and the pathology are very similar between tumors and diabetic foot ulcers, such as hypoxia, angiogenesis, and inflammation [44–46]. Here, a 4T1 tumor-bearing mouse model was established by subcutaneously injecting 4T1 tumor cells, which belonged to the superficial tumor. And we have proved that rESW could effectively improve local blood flow, which could make more oxygen-loaded Nano-PFC deliveries to the wound location and greater oxygen release under rESW treatment. In support of this finding, our latest study uncovered that rESW could promote vessel vasodilation, tumor blood supply, and nanoparticle extravasation into tumor microenvironment . Therefore, we selected the 4T1 tumor-bearing mouse model as an alternative method to evaluate the in vivo behavior of oxygen release and improvement of the hypoxia level as a result of rESW-responsive Nano-PFC. In this process, Nano-PFC can be used as a nanosized carrier system to deliver oxygen into tumor tissue and improve tumor oxygenation under the assistance of the locally applied rESW (Figure 3(a)). The nanodroplets can reversibly release oxygen within the tumor tissue, triggered by the rESW, when Nano-PFC is injected into blood circulation. Thus, the 4T1 tumor-bearing mice breathing pure oxygen were injected with 200 μL Nano-PFC (containing 30 μL of PFC) through the tail vein. Then, the tumor oxygenation status of each mouse was detected by PA imaging after the tumor region was treated with the rESW (1 bar, 4 Hz) for 20 min. PA imaging is noninvasive and is suitable for evaluating the blood oxygenation status by capturing the absorbance of hemoglobin at 750 nm (deoxygenated status) and 850 nm (oxygenated state) . As shown in Figure 3(b), the oxygenation levels over the whole tumor region rapidly increased in the group with hyperoxic breathing plus tumor-localized rESW treatment (rESW+Nano-PFC@O2) compared with the group with only hyperoxic breathing (Nano-PFC@O2). We also evaluated the expression level of hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF-1α), a marker of tumor hypoxia status, by analyzing the immunohistochemistry after 15 days of treatment. In Figures 3(b) and 3(c), the expression levels of HIF-1α dropped 58.3% in the rESW+Nano-PFC@O2 group in comparison with the Nano-PFC@O2 group (). These results uncovered the fact that the rESW could effectively stimulate oxygen release from oxygen-loaded Nano-PFC and enhance tumor oxygenation status in vivo, which means that the oxygen-loaded Nano-PFC plus rESW could improve the hypoxic microenvironment around DFUs and accelerate the wound healing.
3.3. Blood Microcirculation by Laser Doppler Imaging
Furthermore, it has been proven that the rESW could induce tissue regeneration and improve blood microcirculation [28, 47–49]. Thus, laser Doppler imaging was used to measure the change in blood flow after different treatments. The data revealed that the blood microcirculation of the rat’s forepaw was improved about 5.4 times after rESW treatment compared to the Nano-PFC@O2 group without the rESW (Figure 4, ). Nearly every step in the wound healing process requires oxygen for inducing angiogenesis by increasing vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression [9, 50]. Thus, rESW-responsive improvement of blood microcirculation and oxygen reversible release from Nano-PFC provided the potential for accelerating foot wound healing in STZ-induced DFU models.
3.4. Nano-PFC plus rESW Treatment Accelerated Diabetic Foot Wound Healing
Nano-PFC@O2 and rESW are the key factors in our strategy for the treatment of DFUs. Thus, we further evaluated whether Nano-PFC plus rESW treatment could bring any advantages for the wound healing of DFUs. First, the rat models of STZ-induced DFU were established, and then, a wound was created in each rat’s forepaw. As shown in Figure 5, the intervening treatments including rESW, Nano-PFC@O2, and rESW plus Nano-PFC@O2 inordinately accelerated the wound healing of DFUs, compared to diseased rats with DFUs that did not receive any treatment, namely, the untreated control (Ctrl). Moreover, the wound healing effect of rESW and PFC was also consistent with previous studies [2, 43, 51–57]. And the rate of wound healing in the rESW+Nano-PFC@O2 group was significantly higher than that in the Nano-PFC@O2 group and rESW group (Figure 5; # and ). The improvement of wound healing might be attributed to the rESW and the oxygen supply from Nano-PFC. First, rESW treatment could increase blood microcirculation in the wound healing process. Meanwhile, the oxygen supply from Nano-PFC could neutralize the hypoxic microenvironment due to the vascular disruption and the oxygen consumption by inflammatory and stromal cells within the wound. And rESW treatment might reduce oxidative stress, compared to HBOT, which overcame the drawbacks of HBOT [35, 36].
At present, although many adjunctive therapies have been applied for the healing of DFUs, just as previously discussed [5–7, 12], the clinic treatment of DFUs remained as an enormous challenge due to the multifactors of that. Fortunately, recent studies found that ESW therapy was an effective treatment approach for DFUs, being more effective than HBOT in clinical observations [2, 58, 59]. Moreover, focused ESW was used as a major therapeutic modality in most studies. Thus, herein, we garnered a new sight into the treatment of DFUs. On the other hand, PFC-based bioagents have been shown to be effective in the treatment of chronic wound [43, 51, 60]. Importantly, PFC has been clinically approved by FDA [23, 61]. Based on the above desirable features, we therefore developed the rESW for DFU treatment in combining oxygen-saturated Nano-PFC, which brought a completely new treatment strategy for DFUs. To this end, this strategy provided a great potential for further clinical trials. However, the potential safety issues of PFC-based micro/nanomaterials should not be neglected. Thus, we will continue this study forward.
In conclusion, the Nano-PFC developed herein exhibited uniform size and achieved the abilities of high-efficiency oxygen loading and rESW-responsive oxygen reversible release in vitro and in vivo. More importantly, the synergistic effect of the rESW and Nano-PFC accelerated foot wound healing in STZ-induced type 1 diabetes mellitus rats by improving blood microcirculation and providing a targeted supply of oxygen to the wound. This study proved the benefits of combining rESW and Nano-PFC to treat DFUs, which is a novel strategy for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.
The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors report no conflict of interests.
Shunhao Wang and Chunyang Yin contributed equally to this work.
The authors thank Prof. Zhuang Liu and Dr. Xuejiao Song (Soochow University) for the help in the synthesis of Nano-PFC. And we thank LetPub (http://www.letpub.com) for its linguistic assistance during the preparation of this manuscript. This research was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 21425731, 21637004, 21621064, and 11772343), the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDB14000000), and the Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission Research Foundation (Z181100006218014 and Z171100000417025).
Supplementary description. Table S1: references related to the wound healing studies of diabetic foot ulcers. (Supplementary Materials)
- B. E. Sumpio, “Contemporary evaluation and management of the diabetic foot,” Scientifica, vol. 2012, Article ID 435487, 17 pages, 2012.
- C.-J. Wang, J.-H. Cheng, Y.-R. Kuo, W. Schaden, and R. Mittermayr, “Extracorporeal shockwave therapy in diabetic foot ulcers,” International Journal of Surgery, vol. 24, Part B, pp. 207–209, 2015.
- L. N. Kasiewicz and K. A. Whitehead, “Recent advances in biomaterials for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers,” Biomaterials Science, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 1962–1975, 2017.
- C.-J. Wang, R.-W. Wu, and Y.-J. Yang, “Treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a comparative study of extracorporeal shockwave therapy and hyperbaric oxygen therapy,” Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 187–193, 2011.
- J. A. Thackham, D. L. Sean McElwain, and R. J. Long, “The use of hyperbaric oxygen therapy to treat chronic wounds: a review,” Wound Repair and Regeneration, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 321–330, 2008.
- C.-J. Wang, J.-Y. Ko, Y.-R. Kuo, and Y.-J. Yang, “Molecular changes in diabetic foot ulcers,” Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 105–110, 2011.
- A. Hingorani, G. M. LaMuraglia, P. Henke et al., “The management of diabetic foot: a clinical practice guideline by the Society for Vascular Surgery in collaboration with the American Podiatric Medical Association and the Society for Vascular Medicine,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 3S–21S, 2016.
- L. Wang, X. Miao, J. Ali, T. Lyu, and G. Pan, “Quantification of oxygen nanobubbles in particulate matters and potential applications in remediation of anaerobic environment,” ACS Omega, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 10624–10630, 2018.
- H. M. Kimmel, A. Grant, and J. Ditata, “The presence of oxygen in wound healing,” Wounds: A Compendium of Clinical Research and Practice, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 264–270, 2016.
- M. C. Heng, J. Harker, G. Csathy et al., “Angiogenesis in necrotic ulcers treated with hyperbaric oxygen,” Ostomy/Wound Management, vol. 46, pp. 18–28, 2000.
- V. G. Sunkari, F. Lind, I. R. Botusan et al., “Hyperbaric oxygen therapy activates hypoxia–inducible factor 1 (HIF–1), which contributes to improved wound healing in diabetic mice,” Wound Repair and Regeneration, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 98–103, 2015.
- P. Kranke, M. H. Bennett, M. M.-S. James, A. Schnabel, S. E. Debus, and S. Weibel, “Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for chronic wounds,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 6, article CD004123, 2015.
- B. R. Johnston, A. Y. Ha, B. Brea, and P. Y. Liu, “The mechanism of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the treatment of chronic wounds and diabetic foot ulcers,” Rhode Island Medical Journal, vol. 99, pp. 24–27, 2016.
- S. Bhutani and G. Vishwanath, “Hyperbaric oxygen and wound healing,” Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 316–324, 2012.
- A. Sultan, G. J. Hanna, D. N. Margalit et al., “The use of hyperbaric oxygen for the prevention and management of osteoradionecrosis of the jaw: a Dana–Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center multidisciplinary guideline,” The Oncologist, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 343–350, 2017.
- L. Ma, P. S. Li, Z. H. Shi, T. Hou, X. Chen, and J. Du, “A prospective, randomized, controlled study of hyperbaric oxygen therapy: effects on healing and oxidative stress of ulcer tissue in patients with a diabetic foot ulcer,” Ostomy/Wound Management, vol. 59, pp. 18–24, 2013.
- W. Cui, J. Li, and G. Decher, “Self-assembled smart nanocarriers for targeted drug delivery,” Advanced Materials, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1302–1311, 2016.
- S. Senapati, A. K. Mahanta, S. Kumar, and P. Maiti, “Controlled drug delivery vehicles for cancer treatment and their performance,” Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 7, 2018.
- O. P. Varghese, J. Liu, K. Sundaram, J. Hilborn, and O. P. Oommen, “Chondroitin sulfate derived theranostic nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery,” Biomaterials Science, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 1310–1313, 2016.
- F. Marano, M. Argenziano, R. Frairia et al., “Doxorubicin-loaded nanobubbles combined with extracorporeal shock waves: basis for a new drug delivery tool in anaplastic thyroid cancer,” Thyroid, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 705–716, 2016.
- L. R. Sayadi, D. A. Banyard, M. E. Ziegler et al., “Topical oxygen therapy & micro/nanobubbles: a new modality for tissue oxygen delivery,” International Wound Journal, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 363–374, 2018.
- H.-J. Kim, H. Matsuda, H. Zhou, and I. Honma, “Ultrasound–triggered smart drug release from a poly (dimethylsiloxane)–mesoporous silica composite,” Advanced Materials, vol. 18, no. 23, pp. 3083–3088, 2006.
- X. Song, L. Feng, C. Liang, K. Yang, and Z. Liu, “Ultrasound triggered tumor oxygenation with oxygen-shuttle nanoperfluorocarbon to overcome hypoxia-associated resistance in cancer therapies,” Nano Letters, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 6145–6153, 2016.
- G. Song, C. Liang, X. Yi et al., “Cancer Therapy: Perfluorocarbon-loaded hollow Bi2Se3 nanoparticles for timely supply of oxygen under near-infrared light to enhance the radiotherapy of cancer,” Advanced Materials, vol. 28, no. 14, pp. 2654–2654, 2016.
- C. I. Castro and J. C. Briceno, “Perfluorocarbon–based oxygen carriers: review of products and trials,” Artificial Organs, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 622–634, 2010.
- F. Marano, R. Frairia, L. Rinella et al., “Combining doxorubicin-nanobubbles and shockwaves for anaplastic thyroid cancer treatment: preclinical study in a xenograft mouse model,” Endocrine-Related Cancer, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 275–286, 2017.
- R.-F. Chen, C.-H. Chang, C.-T. Wang, M. Y. Yang, C. J. Wang, and Y. R. Kuo, “Modulation of vascular endothelial growth factor and mitogen-activated protein kinase-related pathway involved in extracorporeal shockwave therapy accelerate diabetic wound healing,” Wound Repair and Regeneration, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 69–79, 2019.
- H. Gollwitzer, T. Gloeck, M. Roessner et al., “Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) induces new bone formation in vivo: results of an animal study in rabbits,” Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 126–133, 2013.
- J. Zhang, N. Kang, X. Yu, Y. Ma, and X. Pang, “Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy enhances the proliferation and differentiation of neural stem cells by notch, PI3K/AKT, and Wnt/β-catenin signaling,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, article 15321, 2017.
- C. Contaldo, D. C. Högger, M. Khorrami Borozadi et al., “Radial pressure waves mediate apoptosis and functional angiogenesis during wound repair in ApoE deficient mice,” Microvascular Research, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 24–33, 2012.
- T.-Y. Li, C.-Y. Chang, Y.-C. Chou et al., “Effect of radial shock wave therapy on spasticity of the upper limb in patients with chronic stroke: a prospective, randomized, single blind, controlled trial,” Medicine, vol. 95, no. 18, article e3544, 2016.
- A. J. Coleman, J. E. Saunders, L. A. Crum, and M. Dyson, “Acoustic cavitation generated by an extracorporeal shockwave lithotripter,” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 69–76, 1987.
- N. B. M. Császár, N. B. Angstman, S. Milz et al., “Radial shock wave devices generate cavitation,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 10, article e0140541, 2015.
- C. Schmitz, N. B. M. Császár, J.-D. Rompe, H. Chaves, and J. P. Furia, “Treatment of chronic plantar fasciopathy with extracorporeal shock waves (review),” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 31–31, 2013.
- Y.-R. Kuo, C.-T. Wang, F.-S. Wang, Y.-C. Chiang, and C.-J. Wang, “Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy enhanced wound healing via increasing topical blood perfusion and tissue regeneration in a rat model of STZ-induced diabetes,” Wound Repair and Regeneration, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 522–530, 2009.
- R. Saggini, A. Saggini, S. Carmignano et al., “The role of extracorporeal shock wave therapy and manual lymphatic drainage in chronic ulcers treatment,” International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Research, vol. 3, no. 1, article 3:IJPSR-119, p. 6, 2016.
- W. Guo, S. Zhang, and S. Liu, “Establishment of a novel orthotopic model of breast cancer metastasis to the lung,” Oncology Reports, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 2992–2998, 2015.
- D. R. Spahn, “Blood substitutes artificial oxygen carriers: perfluorocarbon emulsions,” Critical Care, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. R93–R97, 1999.
- M. Heyboer III, D. Sharma, W. Santiago, and N. McCulloch, “Hyperbaric oxygen therapy: side effects defined and quantified,” Advances in Wound Care, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 210–224, 2017.
- D. Rosenblum, N. Joshi, W. Tao, J. M. Karp, and D. Peer, “Progress and challenges towards targeted delivery of cancer therapeutics,” Nature Communications, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 1410, 2018.
- V. Petrova, M. Annicchiarico-Petruzzelli, G. Melino, and I. Amelio, “The hypoxic tumour microenvironment,” Oncogene, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 10, 2018.
- B. Muz, P. de la Puente, F. Azab, and A. K. Azab, “The role of hypoxia in cancer progression, angiogenesis, metastasis, and resistance to therapy,” Hypoxia, vol. 3, pp. 83–92, 2015.
- J. Dissemond, K. Kröger, M. Storck, A. Risse, and P. Engels, “Topical oxygen wound therapies for chronic wounds: a review,” Journal of Wound Care, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 53–63, 2015.
- M. Crowther, N. Brown, E. Bishop, and C. Lewis, “Microenvironmental influence on macrophage regulation of angiogenesis in wounds and malignant tumors,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 478–490, 2001.
- I. Kareva, A. Abou-Slaybi, O. Dodd, O. Dashevsky, and G. L. Klement, “Normal wound healing and tumor angiogenesis as a game of competitive inhibition,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 12, article e0166655, 2016.
- H. F. Dvorak, “Tumors: wounds that do not heal,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 315, no. 26, pp. 1650–1659, 1986.
- C. Yin, S. Wang, Q. Ren et al., “Radial extracorporeal shock wave promotes the enhanced permeability and retention effect to reinforce cancer nanothermotherapeutics,” Science Bulletin, vol. 64, no. 10, pp. 679–689, 2019.
- N. Kang, J. Zhang, X. Yu, and Y. Ma, “Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy improves cerebral blood flow and neurological function in a rat model of cerebral ischemia,” American Journal of Translational Research, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 2000–2012, 2017.
- H. Qi, S. Jin, C. Yin, L. Chen, L. Sun, and Y. Liu, “Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy promotes osteochondral regeneration of knee joints in rabbits,” Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 3478–3484, 2018.
- W. W. Li, K. E. Talcott, A. W. Zhai, E. A. Kruger, and V. W. Li, “The role of therapeutic angiogenesis in tissue repair and regeneration,” Advances in Skin & Wound Care, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 491–500, 2005.
- S. C. Davis, A. L. Cazzaniga, C. Ricotti et al., “Topical oxygen emulsion: a novel wound therapy,” JAMA Dermatology, vol. 143, no. 10, pp. 1252–1256, 2007.
- R. Dymarek, T. Halski, K. Ptaszkowski, L. Slupska, J. Rosinczuk, and J. Taradaj, “Extracorporeal shock wave therapy as an adjunct wound treatment: a systematic review of the literature,” Ostomy/Wound Management, vol. 60, pp. 26–39, 2014.
- L. H. Hitchman, J. P. Totty, A. Raza et al., “Extracorporeal shockwave therapy for diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Annals of Vascular Surgery, vol. 56, pp. 330–339, 2019.
- C. Kengla, Y. Seol, H.-W. Kang, J. J. Yoo, A. Atala, and S. J. Lee, “Biofabrication of tissue constructs for craniomaxillofacial reconstruction,” Tissue Engineering Part A, vol. 20, pp. S33–S33, 2014.
- R. Mittermayr, V. Antonic, J. Hartinger et al., “Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) for wound healing: technology, mechanisms, and clinical efficacy,” Wound Repair and Regeneration, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 456–465, 2012.
- P. S. Patil, N. Fountas-Davis, H. Huang et al., “Fluorinated methacrylamide chitosan hydrogels enhance collagen synthesis in wound healing through increased oxygen availability,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 36, pp. 164–174, 2016.
- A. A. Qureshi, K. M. Ross, R. Ogawa, and D. P. Orgill, “Shock wave therapy in wound healing,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 128, no. 6, pp. 721e–727e, 2011.
- S. M. Jeppesen, K. B. Yderstraede, B. S. B. Rasmussen, M. Hanna, and L. Lund, “Extracorporeal shockwave therapy in the treatment of chronic diabetic foot ulcers: a prospective randomised trial,” Journal of Wound Care, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 641–649, 2016.
- W. Chou, C. Wang, J. Cheng, J. H. Chen, C. C. Chen, and Y. R. Kuo, “Extended extracorporeal shockwave therapy for chronic diabetic foot ulcers: a case series,” Wounds: A Compendium of Clinical Research and Practice, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 132–136, 2019.
- S. Akula, I. K. Brosch, and N. D. Leipzig, “Fluorinated methacrylamide chitosan hydrogels enhance cellular wound healing processes,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 2693–2702, 2017.
- W. Wang, Y. Cheng, P. Yu et al., “Perfluorocarbon regulates the intratumoural environment to enhance hypoxia-based agent efficacy,” Nature Communications, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 1580, 2019.
Copyright © 2019 Shunhao Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.