Review Article

New Approaches to Identify Sepsis Biomarkers: The Importance of Model and Sample Source for Mass Spectrometry

Table 3

Summary of advantages and disadvantages of animal sepsis models.

ModelAdvantagesDisadvantages

Nonsurgical
Exogenous molecules(i) Normalisation of the injected dose and route of administration
(ii) Reproduces myocardial alterations
(i) Different cytokinetics
(ii) Does not reflect the complexity of human pathophysiological responses
Bacteria(i) Normalisation of bacteria dose
(ii) Production of different infectious sites
(i) Brutal injection of bacteria
(ii) Poorly reproduces the response caused by sepsis
Caecal slurry(i) Simple to achieve
(ii) Standardisation of the injected dose and route of administration
(iii) Reproducible
(iv) Similar response to human sepsis
(i) Lack of hindsight on this model
(ii) Model exceedingly difficult to implement
Surgical
Implantation(i) Controllable and reproducible model
(ii) Progressive systemic diffusion
(iii) Limited death incidence
(i) One bacterial strain used
(ii) Complicated model to set up
CLP(i) Improved clinical relevance
(ii) Severity variable according to needle diameter, number of punctures and length of ligated caecum
(i) Develops acute sepsis or intra-abdominal abscess
(ii) Not controllable
(iii) Dependent on experimenter
(iv) Not very reproducible
(v) Long to set up
CASP(i) Adjustable sepsis severity according to the diameter of the stent(i) Continuous bacterial release
(ii) Dependent on experimenter
(iii) Long to set up
CLI(i) Polymicrobial model of sepsis
(ii) Progressive systemic diffusion
(i) High death incidence
(ii) Dependent on experimenter
(iii) Poorly reproducible
(iv) Long to set up

Adapted from the work of Murando et al. [50]. CLP: caecal ligation and puncture; CLI: caecal ligation and incision; CASP: colon ascendant stent peritonitis.