Research Article
[Retracted] A Novel Approach Combined with MIPO Technique for the Treatment of Type C Pilon Fractures
Table 1
Comparison of general data and perioperative indicators between the ankle-C approach group and the conventional approach group.
| | Variables | a-C approach group () | Conventional approach group () | |
| | Age (years, ) | | | 0.233 | | Gender ( (%)) | | | 0.632 | | Male | 7 (58.3) | 14 (66.7) | | | Female | 5 (41.7) | 7 (33.3) | | | Preoperative soft tissue trauma Tscherne-Gotze classification evaluation ( (%)) | | | 0.466 | | 0 | 2 (16.7) | 5 (23.8) | | | 1 | 7 (58.3) | 10 (47.6) | | | 2 | 2 (16.7) | 6 (28.6) | | | 3 | 1 (8.3) | 0 (0) | | | AO/OTA fracture classification ( (%)) | | | 0.125 | | C1 | 5 (41.7) | 3 (14.3) | | | C2 | 3 (25.0) | 12 (57.1) | | | C3 | 4 (33.3) | 6 (28.6) | | | Operation time (minutes, ) | | | 0.012 | | Complications ( (%)) | 0 (0) | 4 (19.0) | 0.107 | | Complete wound healing time (days, ) | | | 0.004 | | Complete healing time of fracture (months) | | | 0.666 |
|
|
