Dietary Phytochemicals Targeting Nrf2 to Enhance the Radiosensitivity of Cancer

Wang, Pinghan; Long, Fangyi; Lin, Hong; Wang, Song; Wang, Ting

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7848811

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusions Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 7848811 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7848811

Dietary Phytochemicals Targeting Nrf2 to Enhance the Radiosensitivity of Cancer

Pinghan Wang,¹Fangyi Long,¹Hong Lin,²Song Wang,²and Ting Wang²

Academic Editor: H. P. Vasantha Rupasinghe

Received07 Jan 2022

Revised18 Feb 2022

Accepted11 Mar 2022

Published23 Mar 2022

Abstract

Nowadays, cancer has become the second leading cause of death worldwide. Radiotherapy (RT) is the mainstay in management of carcinoma; however, overcoming radioresistance remains a great challenge to successfully treat cancer. Nrf2 is a key transcription factor that is responsible for maintaining cellular redox homeostasis. Activation of Nrf2 signaling pathway could upregulate multifarious antioxidant and detoxifying enzymes, further scavenging excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS). Despite its cytoprotective roles in normal cells, it could also alleviate oxidative stress and DNA damage caused by RT in cancer cells, thus promoting cancer cell survival. Accumulating evidence indicates that overactivation of Nrf2 is associated with radioresistance; therefore, targeting Nrf2 is a promising strategy to enhance radiosensitivity. Dietary phytochemicals coming from natural products are characterized by low cost, low toxicity, and general availability. Numerous phytochemicals are reported to regulate Nrf2 and intensify the killing capability of RT through diverse mechanisms, including promoting oxidative stress, proapoptosis, and proautophagy as well as inhibiting Nrf2-mediated cytoprotective genes expression. This review summarizes recent advances in radiosensitizing effects of dietary phytochemicals by targeting Nrf2 and discusses the underlying mechanisms, including N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification of Nrf2 mediated by phytochemicals in cancer.

1. Introduction

Currently cancer is the second leading cause of death worldwide [1], and it is also the most important risk factor of mortality in 112 countries estimated by the World Health Organization (WHO) [2]. The data from GLOBOCAN 2020 showed that new cases and deaths of cancer worldwide have exceeded 19.3 million and 9.9 million, respectively [3]. Obviously, the rapidly increasing burden of cancer throughout the world is alarming [4], and it is extremely urgent for us to utilize various strategies to combat cancer.

Radiotherapy (RT) is a mainstay of cancer therapy, which is used alone or in combination with chemotherapy, surgery, and immunotherapy by cancer patients [5]. And RT was conducted with multiple ionizing radiation includes α- or β-particles, X-rays, γ-rays, and neutron beams [6]. RT might inhibit the growth of tumor cells effectively by generating high levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) via water radiolysis, which further destroy cellular materials including lipids, proteins, and DNA [7]. However, some cancer cells could alleviate the detrimental effects induced by radiation through enhancing redox and antioxidant defenses, thus resulting in radioresistance [8, 9]. Furthermore, the change of micro-environment in radioresistant cells would further restrict the efficacy of RT and eventually promote tumor metastasis and recurrence [10]. Therefore, it is significantly crucial to overcome radioresistance of cancer cells to improve the therapeutic efficacy.

Accumulating scientific evidence suggests that the elevated levels of antioxidants prevent cancer cells from radiation-induced damages; therefore, blocking these defense networks would restore their response to radiation [11–13]. NF-E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) is a predominant transcription factor that regulates the expression of antioxidant enzymes. It contains a basic-region leucine zipper (bZIP) DNA-binding domain, which could bind to the promoter region of antioxidant responsive element/electrophile responsive element (ARE/EpRE) and induce cytoprotective downstream genes including antioxidant enzymes [14]. Thus, suppressing Nrf2 might become a promising strategy to increase the radiosensitivity of cancer cells. Despite the fact that Nrf2 regulators are not currently in clinical use, however, it has been shown that some dietary phytochemicals could resensitize tumor cells to RT by inhibiting Nrf2 in some preclinical studies [15, 16]. In this review, we aim to summarize the dietary phytochemicals targeting Nrf2 to increase the radiosensitivity of tumor cells and also provide novel insights on the potential epigenetic regulation of Nrf2 by the phytochemicals.

2. Nrf2/ARE Signaling Pathway

Nrf2 (Figure 1) is a 66 KD protein encoded by NFE2L2 gene, and it is a key transcription regulatory factor that plays important roles in the maintenance of the cellular redox homeostasis [17, 18]. Nrf2 has seven highly conserved functional domains, called Nrf2-ECH homology (Neh 1-7) [18]. Among these functional domains, Neh2 was located in the N-terminal, which contains ETGE and DLG motifs for binding the inhibitory protein Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (Keap1) [19–21]. Neh1, with a cap “n” collar (CNC)-type bZIP motif, allows the binding of Nrf2 to ARE/EpRE by regulating the heterodimerization of Nrf2 with small musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcomas (sMaf) family, such as MafF, MafG, or MafK [22–24]. The C-terminal Neh3 domain possesses a VFLVPK motif, which is crucial for interactions with CHD6, the transcription co-activator of Nrf2, to mediate the transactivation of ARE-dependent genes [25, 26]. Neh4 and Neh5 domains act synergistically with Nrf2 and responsible for ARE transactivation by interacting with the coactivator CBP (CREB-binding protein) [24, 27]. The redox-insensitive Neh6 domain is riched in serine residues and contains two motifs (DSGIS and DSAPGS) which could negatively modulate Nrf2 stability through β-TrCP-dependent regulation [28–30]. Neh7 domain could directly bind to the retinoic X receptor α (RXRα) and further transcriptionally inhibit Nrf2 target genes [31].

Keap1 (Figure 2), a cysteine-rich and highly conserved protein encoded by the KEAP1 gene, was first identified in 1999 as negative regulator of Nrf2 by binding to the Neh2 domain [21, 32]. As a substrate adaptor for Cullin3 (Cul3)-based ubiquitin E3 ligase, Keap1 could contribute to Nrf2 ubiquitination and subsequent proteasome-dependent degradation [33, 34]. Structurally, Keap1 is composed of five distinct functional regions: an N-terminal region (NTR), a broad-complex, Tramtrack and Bric-a-brac (BTB) domain, an intervening region (IVR), a double-glycine repeat (DGR, namely, six Kelch motifs) domain, and the C-terminal region (CTR) [35]. The BTB domain is responsible for both Keap1 homodimerization and the recruitment of Cul3 protein [36]. The cysteine-rich IVR region could interact with Cul3-Roc1-E3 ubiquitin ligases complex and regulate the activity of Keap1 [37, 38]. The DGR domain could recognize the ETGE and DLG motifs within the Neh2 region of Nrf2, enabling ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation [29, 39].

Keap1-Nrf2-ARE signaling acts as master pathway for the maintenance of cellular redox state [40]. As depicted in Figure 3, under physiological state conditions, Nrf2 is sequestered in the cytosol by Keap1, which constitutively brings Nrf2 to the Cul3-RBx1-E3 ubiquitin ligase and targets Nrf2 to proteasomal degradation [41–43]. Under oxidative stress, Keap1 is inactivated due to the modified cysteine residues, leading to the accumulation and nuclear translocation of the newly synthesized Nrf2, which forms a heterodimer with sMaf and interacts with the ARE to transcribe its target genes including heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), NAD[P]H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1), glutathione reductase (GR), and superoxide dismutase (SOD), thus protecting cells from oxidative damages [38, 41, 44].

Figure 3

Schematic representation of the Keap1-Nrf2-ARE pathway. Under basal condition, the DLG and ETGE motifs of Nrf2 interact with the BTB domain contained within Keap1, which brings Nrf2 to the Cul3-based ubiquitin E3 ligase and targets the 26S proteasome for degradation in cytoplasm. Under stressed condition, the modified cysteine residues disturb the binding between Keap1 and Cul3, which protect Nrf2 from proteasomal degradation. The accumulated Nrf2 subsequently translocates into the nucleus, dimerizes with sMaf, and binds to the ARE which is located in the promoter of the target cytoprotective genes, ultimately driving their robust expression.

Moreover, phosphorylation of Nrf2 Serine 550 residue mediated by adenosine 5-monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is essential for the nuclear translocation of Nrf2 [45]. Additionally, there are other pathways leading to this process; for example, Nrf2 could also be activated via the Akt-mediated inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta (GSK-3β) [46]. Furthermore, various posttranslational modification (PTM)- related proteins are involved in the dissociation of Nrf2 from Keap1, such as extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and c-Jun NH2-terminal protein kinase (JNK), hence resulting in the activation of Nrf2 [46]. And certain factors like p21, p62, or breast cancer gene 1 (BRCA1) facilitate the stabilization of Nrf2 through inhibiting its ubiquitination and degradation, accomplished by interfering with the interaction of Keap1 and Nrf2 [46, 47]. Despite these regulations confer cytoprotective effects in normal cells, interestingly, the upregulation of antioxidant enzymes by abundant accumulation of Nrf2 might induce cell growth or enhance the resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy in cancer cells [47, 48].

3. Role of Nrf2 in Cancer Radioresistance

Nowadays, RT is a commonly accepted and effective approach to treat various types of malignancies [49]. The basic principle of RT to eradicate cancer cells is to directly destroy single- or double-strand nucleic acid molecules, or indirectly lead to DNA breaks via free radicals, largely by means of ROS production (such as O₂^-, H₂O₂, and OH^-), and ultimately induce cells necrosis or apoptosis [6, 50]. Meanwhile, an increasing number of studies demonstrated that the accumulation of ROS plays a crucial role in RT by damaging DNA biomolecules and triggering cell death-related signaling pathways [51–54]. Under physiological circumstance, intracellular ROS is kept at a relatively low level and is precisely controlled by the scavengers, such as glutathione, thioredoxin, peroxidase, and catalase [55]. However, the increased ROS scavenging substances levels or the enhancements of antioxidant defense systems might contribute to radioresistance in cancer cells [56, 57]. Radioresistance is the process by which the tumor cells or tissues adapt to RT and develop resistance to it [58]. Despite significant therapeutic achievements in recent years, radioresistance still hinders tumor loco-regional control and promotes tumor progression in most patients [59, 60]. The mechanisms underlying cancer cell radioresistance usually involve several factors as below: enhanced DNA repair capabilities, activated cell cycle control proteins, dysregulation of oncogenes and tumor suppressors, changes in the tumor microenvironment (TME), dysfunctional autophagy, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), generation of cancer stem cells (CSCs), tumor metabolism alterations, and activation of intracellular ROS scavenging [55, 58]. In addition, a growing number of studies have shown that upregulated expression of antioxidant enzymes contributes lower cellular ROS levels and leads to poor response to RT, while impeding these ROS-elimination systems, such as the Nrf2 pathway, could increase radiation sensitivity and promote radiation-mediated apoptosis [61–64].

Persistent expression of Nrf2, a status termed “Nrf2 addiction,” may coordinate the positive regulation of multiple hallmarks of cancer, including promotion of metastasis and metabolic changes [65, 66]. There is substantial preclinical data implicated in Nrf2 addiction for various causes, for instance, (1) the genetic and epigenetic changes of Keap1 or Nrf2 or noncoding RNAs modulation; (2) the activation of oncogenic signaling such as K-Ras and c-Myc; (3) stress stimulation such as hypoxia, starvation, and genotoxic stress; (4) altered protein-protein interactions, such as the p62-Keap1 or p21-Nrf2 linkage, and the posttranslational dysregulation of the Keap1-Nrf2 pathway; and (5) ROS-inducing gonadotropins and sex steroid hormones [43, 67]. Indeed, hyperactivation of Nrf2 drives malignant phenotype of cancers by significantly increasing resistance to chemo- and radiotherapy and also promotes the aggressive development of many different types of tumors [65]. This phenomenon was described by Wang et al. as a “dark side” of Nrf2 [68]. Moreover, fractionated or single doses of ionizing radiation could activate Nrf2 by elevating ROS levels [69, 70], which further conferring enhanced target genes expression, including HO-1, NQO1, peroxiredoxin 1, and glutathione [48, 71, 72]. Nrf2 also interacts with some signaling networks associated with radioresistance, such as hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) and nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) to enhance the resistance against RT [48, 71]. To date, several studies have reported that increased activity of Nrf2 results in radioresistance, while inhibiting Nrf2 expression resensitizes cancer cells to RT, including lung [73, 74], esophageal [72, 75], breast [76], and prostate carcinoma [77]. These findings indicate that Nrf2 is critical in mediating radioresistance against RT, and researchers have paid considerable attention to target Nrf2 in tumors by chemical inhibitors, especially dietary phytochemicals, which have the ability to sensitize cancer cells to RT [71]. The impacts of Nrf2 on radiation resistance are described in Figure 4.

Figure 4

The signaling pathways involved in Nrf2-mediated radioresistance and the potential targets of dietary phytochemicals. Radiation produces abundant ROS, leading to the activation of signaling pathways including Nrf2, p38 MAPK, and Akt/PI3K. Upregulation of Nrf2 would further elevate the levels of antioxidants, such as HO-1, NQO1, Trx1, GPx, and GSH in cancer cells, ultimately leading to tumor radioresistance. Nrf2 has also been implicated in the roles of other genes in cancer radioresistance via interactions with NF-κB, HIF-1α, ATM, ATR, and p21^Cip1/WAF1. Among these dietary phytochemicals, EGCG is capable to enhance the killing effects of RT by promoting Nrf2 expression; however, other phytochemicals, such as BBR, BRU, CGN, AIF, ISL, DADS, FA, genistein, and cordycepin, have been shown to enhance radiosensitivity through inhibiting Nrf2 expression, or suppressing Nrf2 nuclear translocation, Akt/PI3K/NF-κB pathway, and p38 MAPK/NF-κB pathway, or promoting Keap1 expression.

4. Targeting Nrf2 to Enhance the Radiosensitivity by Dietary Phytochemicals

Dozens of phytochemicals have been reported to modulate Nrf2 to exert the preventive or therapeutic effects in various cancers [78, 79]. Natural Nrf2 activators are mainly a class of electrophilic or redox-active compounds, such as sulforaphane, curcumin, andrographolide, resveratrol, and quercetin, which could covalently modify the cysteine residues of Keap1 by oxidation or alkylation, thus stabilizing Nrf2 [79, 80], and they play antitumor or chemopreventive roles in tumourigenesis [81]. Nevertheless, the natural Nrf2 inhibitors, like halofuginone, luteolin, wogonin, trigonelline, malabaricone A, and ascorbic acid, could function as anti-carcinogens or chemosensitizers in tumors via reducing Nrf2 generation or its nuclear localization [79, 82]. Interestingly, there are some opposing studies, which claimed that luteolin [83] and wogonin [84] could activate Nrf2 pathway, while curcumin [85] could negatively regulate Nrf2. Therefore, future studies may focus on exploring the dual functions of these natural products to develop more applications for Nrf2.

As aberrant regulation of Nrf2 protects cancer cells from RT injury, pharmacological modulation of the Nrf2 pathway offers novel therapeutic opportunities to reduce radioresistance. A large number of natural compounds included in our dietary spectrums have been identified as Nrf2 inhibitors [86]. Here, citations for this review were searched and selected from the PubMed and Google Scholar (from January 1989 to January 2022). Experimental papers on natural radiosensitizers and Nrf2 as therapeutic mechanisms for these compounds were identified. The keywords used in the literature research were “Nrf2” or “Nrf-2,” “NFE2L2” or “nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2,” in combination with “radiosensitivity,” “radiotherapy,” “radioresistance” or “radiosensitizer.” Only literatures involving the above inclusion criteria were then manually screened. Here, the bioactive phytochemicals currently available for RT radiosensitization via Nrf2 inhibition mechanisms are summarized below (Table 1). Their structures are presented in Figure 5. The mechanisms by which these Nrf2 modulators mitigates radioresistance are illustrated in Figure 4.

4.1. Isoliquiritigenin (ISL)

ISL ((E)-1-(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)prop-2-en-1-one), a flavonoid with a chalcone structure, is mainly isolated from the roots of the plant licorice, which generally known as Glycyrrhiza, including Glycyrrhiza uralensis, Glycyrrhiza radix, and Glycyrrhiza glabra [97]. ISL displays a wide range of potent biological functions and pharmacological effects, such as antioxidation, antitumor, antiaging, anti-inflammation, and antidiabetes [98]. Recently, Sun et al. showed that ISL substantially sensitized HepG2 cells to 4 Gy X-rays after pretreatment with low concentration of ISL for 6 h by using cells and xenograft models [87]. It was also found that the effectiveness of ISL was associated with inhibition of HepG2 cell proliferation and increased DNA impairment and apoptosis, mainly due to Keap1-dependent downregulation of Nrf2 and elevating NADPH oxidase 2 (Nox2) expression [87, 88]. However, despite these advantages, ISL was also reported to cause developmental toxicity in zebrafish pups [99].

4.2. Genistein

Genistein (5,7-dihydroxy-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)chromen-4-one) is nontoxic isoflavone and phytoestrogen, mainly derived from soybean and with high bioavailability and low water solubility. It exhibits various biological and pharmacological activities, such as antitumor, proapoptotic, antiproliferative, tyrosine- and topoisomerase-inhibiting, and anti-osteoporotic effects [100, 101]. Genistein is also found in other edible plants such as alfalfa, broccoli, sunflower, caraway, and clover seeds [101]. In recent years, a large quantity of studies have pinpointed that genistein has radiosensitizing effects on various tumors including liver cancer, mammary tumor, lung cancer, and leukemia through multiple mechanisms [11, 89, 102, 103]. Specifically, in A549 cancer cells, 10 μM genistein combined with 4 Gy X-ray irradiation markedly promoted cellular oxidative damage and apoptosis by restraining CpG island methylation of the Keap1 promoter sequence and reducing nuclear translocation of Nrf2 along with its downstream targets NQO1, HO-1, and GSH, to alleviate radioresistance [89].

4.3. Coroglaucigenin (CGN)

Cardenolides, a subclass of cardiac glycosides (CGs), are widely distributed in numerous long-term cardioprotective medicinal plants with steroid-like structures and potential anti-tumor activities [104]. CGN (3-[(3S,5S,8R,9S,10R,13R,14S,17R)-3,14-dihydroxy-10-(hydroxymethyl)-13-methyl-1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,11,12,15,16,17-tetradecahydrocyclopenta[a]phenanthren-17-yl]-2H-furan-5-one), belonging to cardenolides, derived from the roots or stems of plant Calotropis gigantea, and has significant cytotoxicity against several cancers including liver, gastric, colorectal and lung cancer in vitro [90, 105]. Recently, Sun et al. demonstrated that physiologically achievable low doses of CGN were less toxic to BEAS-2B cells and had the potential to enhance X-rays lethality in 3 human lung cancer cells (A549, NCI-H460 and NCI-H446) via exacerbating anticipated oxidative stress and radiation-induced DNA oxidative damage. These effects are associated with repressive activation of Nrf2 and downstream proteins [90].

4.4. Cordycepin

Cordycepin ((2R,3R,5S)-2-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)-5-(hydroxymethyl)oxolan-3-ol), an adenosine analogue, is isolated from various natural plant species, such as Cordyceps sinensis, Cordyceps militaris, and Ophiocordyceps sinensis, and has multifarious physiological actions, including antioxidative, antiproliferative, antitumor, antimetastatic, immune-enhancing, and proapoptotic activities [106, 107]. More recently, a report by Dong et al. indicated that cordycepin consumption dose-dependently suppresses the proliferation of breast cancer cells in vitro following γ-rays exposure and reinforced therapeutic effects after radiation therapy in vivo. This is associated with promoting apoptosis and decreasing protein levels of Nrf2 and target gene HO-1, thus increasing intracellular ROS levels [91]. Cordycepin was also found to enhance the killing capability of RT against other tumors such as oral cancer and cervical cancer [108, 109].

4.5. Berberine (BBR)

BBR (16,17-dimethoxy-5,7-dioxa-13-azoniapentacyclo[11.8.0.02,10.04,8.015,20]henicosa-1(13),2,4(8),9,14,16,18,20-octaene), which has the characteristic of low toxicity, is a natural small molecule quaternary ammonium salt compound. It is an isoquinoline alkaloid exists in traditional Chinese medicine Coptis chinensis and Hydrastis canadensis as well as other Berberis plants; it has a wide spectrum of biological properties, including anticancer, anti-inflammatory, antiproliferative, antiviral, antioxidative, and antiapoptotic activities [110–112]. A scientific paper revealed that BBR cooperated with X-ray irradiation to inhibit Huh7 and HepG2 cells proliferation by downregulation of Nrf2 and target protein NQO1and HO-1 [16]. Meanwhile, Huh7 cells xenograft studies discovered that BBR combined with 8 Gy X-irradiation could also effectively repress tumor cells growth [16]. In addition, BBR provides RT amplified cytotoxicity against several cancers including osteosarcoma, esophagus carcinoma, nasopharyngeal, and prostate cancers [113–116].

4.6. Diallyl Disulfide (DADS)

DADS (3-(prop-2-enyldisulfanyl)prop-1-ene), also referred to as garlicin, is an oil-soluble organic diallyl polysulfide extracted from the annual bulbous herbaceous plant Garlic (Allium sativum L.), which is generally used as spices or used in the treatment or prevention of a host of human ailments, especially infectious diseases and cancer [117, 118]. Recently, investigators revealed that pretreatment with 40 μM DADS for 24 h, followed by X-irradiation, was capable of hindering A549 cells proliferation, migration, and invasion, while modulating the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-related proteins including E-cadherin and N-cadherin, and these effects were related to the decreasing levels of Nrf2 and Nrf2-driven antioxidant molecules NQO1 and HO-1 [15]. Besides, DADS could enhance radiosensitivity of cervical cancer HeLa cells to carbon ion beams [119].

4.7. Brusatol (BRU)

BRU (methyl (1R,2S,3R,6R,8R,13S,14R,15R,16S,17S)-10,15,16-trihydroxy-9,13-dimethyl-3-(3-methylbut-2-enoyloxy)-4,11-dioxo-5,18-dioxapentacyclo[12.5.0.01,6.02,17.08,13]nonadec-9-ene-17-carboxylate), the most potent and selective Nrf2 inhibitor, is a cytotoxic quassinoid natural extract from Brucea javanica and is frequently employed as a traditional Chinese herbal medicine for the treatment of amebiasis, cancer, and malaria [120–122]. Sun et al. investigated the radiosensitizing effects of BRU on the growth of A549 nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells in vitro, showing that BRU plus 6 Gy γ-rays could synergistically reduce the viability of A549 cells and promote cell death, via inducing ROS production and DNA fragmentation, which was attributed to interfering with the expression of Nrf2 protein [92]. Another report suggested that BRU and 8 Gy of gamma radiation induce Nrf2-dependent ataxia telangiectasia mutations and the Rad3-related kinase (ATR)-checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1) pathway [93].

4.8. Alpinumisoflavone (AIF)

AIF (5-hydroxy-7-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-2,2-dimethylpyrano[3,2-g]chromen-6-one), a high water-insoluble plant-derived prenylated isoflavonoid compound, originates from the medicinal plants such as Derris eriocarpa and Cudrania tricuspidata, which are commonly utilized worldwide in osteoprotection, antioxidation, anti-inflammation, antibacteria, antimetastasis, antiatherosclerosis, and neuroprotection [123, 124]. Robust results disclosed that 5 μM AIF in combination with 6 Gy X-rays exposure displayed significantly suppression of cell proliferation in Eca109 and KYSE30 cells, as well as markedly elevating the proportion of γ-H2AX foci, G2/M phase arrest and apoptotic cells, owing to downregulating Nrf2 and downstream effectors NQO1 and HO-1 [94]. Eca109 cells xenograft experiment also showed that AIF strengthen sensitivity of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma to RT thorough inducing ROS formation in an Nrf2-dependent manner [94].

4.9. Ferulic Acid (FA)

FA ((E)-3-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)prop-2-enoic acid), one of the most common simply natural phenolic acids, contains free radicals as an electron donors and exists widely in diverse edible plants and medicinal herbs, such as Triticum aestivum L. and Oryza sativa L. FA is a low-toxic natural product and has numerous pharmacological impacts including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antioncogenic, cardioprotective, neuroprotective, and enzyme-regulating effects [125, 126]. Das et al. showed that incubation with 90 μM FA for 3 h, followed by a dosage of 8 Gy γ-rays or treatment with 100 μM FA for 6 h before exposure to 7.5 Gy γ-irradiation, was able to remarkably destroy A549 lung cancer cells and hepatocytic carcinoma HepG2 cells, respectively [95]. Scientific article indicated that the combination therapy regimen could promote ROS accumulation, enhance oxidative stress, and induce apoptosis as well as block mitosis in G2/M phase in both tumor cells, partially due to repression of Nrf2 and Nrf2-dependent effectors [95]. Additionally, FA dramatically abbreviated the resistance of CT26 cells to γ-rays in vivo, too [95].

4.10. Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate (EGCG)

Green tea is one of the most consumed beverages worldwide, which derives from the leaves of the tea plant Camellia sinensis. The main bioactive polyphenol component, catechins, has broad health benefits in chronic diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, obesity, and various cancers [127]. EGCG ([(2R,3R)-5,7-dihydroxy-2-(3,4,5-trihydroxyphenyl)-3,4-dihydro-2H-chromen-3-yl] 3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoate), as the main catechin compound, is the most abundant in dried green tea leaves, with poor absorption and pluripotency. Among the numerous functions, the chemopreventive and therapeutic activities of malignant tumors have attracted great interest of researchers [128]. Laboratory studies have confirmed synergistic antitumor effects of EGCG and radiation against leucocythemia, hepatoma, nasopharyngeal, and colorectal carcinoma [96, 129–131]. Specifically, for example, 12.5 μM EGCG supplemented with 2 Gy X-rays irradiation significantly restrained HCT-116 cells survival via supporting the expression of autophagy-related gene microtubule-associated protein light chain 3 (LC3) and the apoptotic gene caspase-9 caused by Nrf2 upregulation [96].

5. Potential m6A Modification of Nrf2 Modulated by Dietary Phytochemicals

The expression of Nrf2 is strictly regulated by genetic and epigenetic mechanisms. Especially in recent years, the epigenetic regulation of Nrf2 in tumorigenesis has gained increasing attention, such as the alterations in DNA/RNA methylation patterns, histone modifications, and modulation of noncoding RNAs [132]. RNA modification is one of the most important epigenetic modifications in posttranscriptional regulation, and N6-methyladenosine (m6A) RNA methylation has been implicated in multiple biological processes, including radioresistance of cancer cells [133]. In addition, abnormalities in m6A RNA methylation regulatory proteins, such as the change of “writers” like methyltransferase-like protein 3/14 (METTL3/14), “erasers” like fat mass and obesity-associated protein (FTO) and AlkB homolog 5 (ALKBH5), and “readers” like YT521-B homology (YTH) domain family protein 1-3 (YTHDF1-3) and YTH domain-containing protein 2 (YTHDC2), are also reported to be involved in the radioresistance of cancer cells [134].

Dietary phytochemicals have been demonstrated to have the potential to regulate Nrf2 expression by modulating m6A modification. As shown in Figure 6, m6A-Nrf2 RNA methylation was related to upregulation of YTHDF1-3 and YTHDC2 and downregulation of ALKBH5 and FTO in HepG2 human hepatoma cells [135]. Furthermore, EGCG could inhibit the generation of FTO and promote the production of YTHDF2 in 3T3-L1 cells [136], and genistein could facilitate the expression of “eraser,” ALKBH5, in mice kidney [137]. Herein, we raise a hypothesis that EGCG and genistein might also regulate m6A-Nrf2 level to influence Nrf2 expression, thus enhancing the sensitivity of cancer cells to RT, but further investigations are needed. Moreover, whether the regulation of Nrf2 by other natural radiosensitizers is mediated by regulating m6A modification still warrants exploration.

Figure 6

Potential mechanisms underlying m6A modification of Nrf2 mRNA and targets of dietary phytochemicals. The m6A RNA methylation of Nrf2 is conducted by methyltransferases (writers), demethylases (erasers), and m6A-binding proteins (readers). “Writers” like METTL3/14 could catalyze m6A modification on Nrf2 mRNA. “Erasers,” including FTO and ALKBH5, could remove m6A bases. “Readers,” such as YTHDF1-3 and YTHDC2, could recognize the sites modified by m6A to mediate diverse functions such as translation and RNA degradation. In addition, the expression of Nrf2 is regulated via m6A methylation, which is accomplished by modulation of “erasers” or “readers” by the dietary phytochemical compounds, EGCG and genistein.

6. Conclusions

Overall, previous preclinical studies have provided a great abundance of natural Nrf2 inhibitors, which have radiosensitive effects on various cancers. However, there are still a few dietary phytochemicals, such as EGCG, that could activate Nrf2 and have a potent ability to enhance radiosensitivity of cancer cells. Since EGCG also has been announced as a major Nrf2 activator in other studies [138, 139], it is worthwhile to further investigate the Nrf2-modulating intrinsic mechanisms of radiosensitization by EGCG. Moreover, none of these natural radiosensitizers targeting Nrf2 mentioned above yielded strong practicable results, so researchers should pay attention to their development in clinical application. Additionally, we still ought to focus on the genotoxicity of these phytochemicals, although most of them are characterized by low toxicity. Owing to the poor bioavailability of most of these natural compounds, such as ISL [140], cordycepin [141], BRU [142], DADS [143], BBR [144], FA [145], and EGCG [146], which limits their clinical application, new technologies and advanced approaches are needed to improve the situation. A promising approach to address low bioavailability and systemic toxicity is the application of drug-loaded nanodrug delivery systems, including microemulsions, nanoemulsions, emulsions, nanoparticles, liposomes, biopolymer microgels, dendrimers, and micelles [147, 148]. Recently, several strategies have been developed to enhance the bioavailability of these phytochemicals, for instance, DADS-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles [147], cordycepin phycocyanin-based micelles [148], BBR hyaluronate liposomes [149], BRU-loaded self-microemulsions [142], EGCG-encapsulated nanoliposomes [150], AIF-loaded polymeric micelles [123], and ISL-loaded self-microemulsions [151]. These novel delivery systems could enhance the bioavailability and targeting characteristic and exhibits a superior pharmacokinetic profile.

On one hand, however, in cancer cells, Nrf2 inhibition confers radiosensitizing effects through inhibiting ROS scavenging, promoting DNA damage as well as reducing the expression of downstream target protein including NQO1 and HO-1 or cross-talk with other signal molecules like HIF-1 and NF-κB. On the other hand, in normal cells, downregulation of Nrf2 may induce radiotoxicity, thereby strengthening radiation-induced injury. Therefore, the dual roles of Nrf2 inhibition should be taken into consideration in cancer therapy. And as mentioned above, the nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems are the most encouraging means to enhance the tumor-targeting ability of these phytochemicals and could reduce damage to normal tissues. Besides, structural modifications [152] and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) [153] also have been widely used to selectively deliver chemical drugs directly to the target cancer cells, thus decreasing drug toxicity and improving drug bioavailability.

Finally, Nrf2 could be regulated by multiple signal molecules, such as PKC, Akt, and ERK. And a number of phytochemicals, such as ferulic acid, apigenin, and baicalein, have been shown to modulate Nrf2 expression in doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity [154] or other diseases [155] by affecting these upstream proteins. Consequently, these studies proved us a possible orientation to discover other natural substances that could inhibit Nrf2 or design novel Nrf2 inhibitors, via indirectly inhibiting its upstream targets. Moreover, we speculated that dietary phytochemicals may regulate m6A modification to affect Nrf2 levels based on current evidence, and it might be a better strategy to explore the indirect means in Nrf2 regulation, such as the modulation of noncoding RNAs including microRNAs (miRNAs), circular RNAs (circRNAs), and long-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), or other epigenetic-related enzymes. Thus, more exhaustive regulatory roles of dietary phytochemicals on Nrf2 deserve further investigated to elucidate their pharmacological effects.

Data Availability

The data supporting this review article are from previously reported studies and datasets, which have been cited. The processed data are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Authors’ Contributions

Ting Wang initiated the idea of this review. Pinghan Wang and Fangyi Long wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Hong Lin and Song Wang performed the literature search and data curation. All authors commented on the previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Pinghan Wang and Fangyi Long contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

This work was mainly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81803931, 81703922), the Sichuan Science and Technology Program (No. 2021YFH0144) and Chengdu Key Research and Development Project (2019-YF05-01173-SN).

References

F. Bray, M. Laversanne, E. Weiderpass, and I. Soerjomataram, “The ever-increasing importance of cancer as a leading cause of premature death worldwide,” Cancer, vol. 127, pp. 3029-3030, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
WHO, Global Health Estimates 2020: Deaths by Cause, Age, Sex, by Country and by Region, 2000-2019, World Health Organization, Geneva, 2020, August 2021, https://who.int/data/gho/data/themes/mortality-and-global-health-estimates/ghe-leading-causes-of-death.
J. Ferlay, M. Ervik, F. Lam et al., Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Today, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2021, August 2021, https://gco.iarc.fr/today/home.
H. Sung, J. Ferlay, R. L. Siegel et al., “Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries,” Cancer Research, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 209–249, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. R. Hughes and J. L. Parsons, “FLASH radiotherapy: current knowledge and future insights using proton-beam therapy,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 21, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Wang, X. Mu, H. He, and X. D. Zhang, “Cancer Radiosensitizers,” Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 39, pp. 24–48, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. P. Pouget, A. G. Georgakilas, and J. L. Ravanat, “Targeted and off-target (bystander and abscopal) effects of radiation therapy: redox mechanisms and risk/benefit analysis,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 29, pp. 1447–1487, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Diehn, R. W. Cho, N. A. Lobo et al., “Association of reactive oxygen species levels and radioresistance in cancer stem cells,” Nature, vol. 458, pp. 780–783, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. C. Lee, D. W. Kim, K. Y. Jung et al., “Increased expression of antioxidant enzymes in radioresistant variant from U251 human glioblastoma cell line,” International Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 883–887, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. M. Ozpiskin, L. Zhang, and J. J. Li, “Immune targets in the tumor microenvironment treated by radiotherapy,” Theranostics, vol. 9, pp. 1215–1231, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. G. Kim, J. S. Kim, J. H. Lee, and E. W. Cho, “Genistein decreases cellular redox potential, partially suppresses cell growth in HL-60 leukemia cells and sensitizes cells to γ-radiation-induced cell death,” Molecular Medicine Reports, vol. 10, pp. 2786–2792, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Wang, S. Bouzakoura, S. de Mey et al., “Auranofin radiosensitizes tumor cells through targeting thioredoxin reductase and resulting overproduction of reactive oxygen species,” Oncotarget, vol. 8, pp. 35728–35742, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. O. Brown, K. Salem, B. A. Wagner et al., “Interleukin-6 counteracts therapy-induced cellular oxidative stress in multiple myeloma by up-regulating manganese superoxide dismutase,” The Biochemical Journal, vol. 444, pp. 515–527, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Tonelli, I. I. C. Chio, and D. A. Tuveson, “Transcriptional regulation by Nrf2,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 29, pp. 1727–1745, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Xu, H. Huang, D. Tang et al., “Diallyl disulfide attenuates ionizing radiation-induced migration and invasion by suppressing Nrf2 signaling in non-small-cell lung cancer,” Dose-Response, vol. 19, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. You, X. Cao, and Y. Lin, “Berberine enhances the radiosensitivity of hepatoma cells by Nrf2 pathway,” Frontiers in Bioscience, vol. 24, pp. 1190–1202, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Robertson, A. T. Dinkova-Kostova, and J. D. Hayes, “NRF2 and the ambiguous consequences of its activation during initiation and the subsequent stages of tumourigenesis,” Cancers, vol. 12, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. I. Adelusi, L. Du, M. Hao et al., “Keap 1/Nrf2/ARE signaling unfolds therapeutic targets for redox imbalanced-mediated diseases and diabetic nephropathy,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, vol. 123, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. I. Tong, Y. Katoh, H. Kusunoki, K. Itoh, T. Tanaka, and M. Yamamoto, “Keap1 recruits Neh2 through binding to ETGE and DLG motifs: characterization of the two-site molecular recognition model,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 26, pp. 2887–2900, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. I. Tong, B. Padmanabhan, A. Kobayashi et al., “Different electrostatic potentials define ETGE and DLG motifs as hinge and latch in oxidative stress response,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 27, pp. 7511–7521, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Itoh, N. Wakabayashi, Y. Katoh et al., “Keap1 represses nuclear activation of antioxidant responsive elements by Nrf2 through binding to the amino-terminal Neh2 domain,” Genes & Development, vol. 13, pp. 76–86, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Sun, Y. E. Chin, and D. D. Zhang, “Acetylation of Nrf2 by p 300/CBP augments promoter-specific DNA binding of Nrf2 during the antioxidant response,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 29, pp. 2658–2672, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Singh, S. Venkannagari, K. H. Oh et al., “Small molecule inhibitor of NRF2 selectively intervenes therapeutic resistance in KEAP1-deficient NSCLC tumors,” ACS Chemical Biology, vol. 11, pp. 3214–3225, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Motohashi, F. Katsuoka, J. D. Engel, and M. Yamamoto, “Small Maf proteins serve as transcriptional cofactors for keratinocyte differentiation in the Keap1-Nrf2 regulatory pathway,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, pp. 6379–6384, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Nioi, T. Nguyen, P. J. Sherratt, and C. B. Pickett, “The carboxy-terminal Neh 3 domain of Nrf2 is required for transcriptional activation,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 25, pp. 10895–10906, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Krajka-Kuźniak, J. Paluszczak, and W. Baer-Dubowska, “The Nrf2-ARE signaling pathway: an update on its regulation and possible role in cancer prevention and treatment,” Pharmacological Reports, vol. 69, pp. 393–402, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Katoh, K. Itoh, E. Yoshida, M. Miyagishi, A. Fukamizu, and M. Yamamoto, “Two domains of Nrf2 cooperatively bind CBP, a CREB binding protein, and synergistically activate transcription,” Genes to Cells, vol. 6, pp. 857–868, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Chowdhry, Y. Zhang, M. McMahon, C. Sutherland, A. Cuadrado, and J. D. Hayes, “Nrf2 is controlled by two distinct β-TrCP recognition motifs in its Neh6 domain, one of which can be modulated by GSK-3 activity,” Oncogene, vol. 32, pp. 3765–3781, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. McMahon, N. Thomas, K. Itoh, M. Yamamoto, and J. D. Hayes, “Redox-regulated turnover of Nrf2 is determined by at least two separate protein domains, the redox-sensitive Neh2 degron and the redox-insensitive Neh6 degron,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, pp. 31556–31567, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Rada, A. I. Rojo, S. Chowdhry, M. McMahon, J. D. Hayes, and A. Cuadrado, “SCF/{beta}-TrCP promotes glycogen synthase kinase 3-dependent degradation of the Nrf2 transcription factor in a Keap1-independent manner,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 31, pp. 1121–1133, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Wang, K. Liu, M. Geng et al., “RXRα inhibits the NRF2-ARE signaling pathway through a direct interaction with the Neh7 domain of NRF2,” Cancer Research, vol. 73, pp. 3097–3108, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Kopacz, D. Kloska, H. J. Forman, A. Jozkowicz, and A. Grochot-Przeczek, “Beyond repression of Nrf2: An update on Keap1,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 157, pp. 63–74, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. B. Cullinan, J. D. Gordan, J. Jin, J. W. Harper, and J. A. Diehl, “The Keap1-BTB protein is an adaptor that bridges Nrf2 to a Cul 3-based E3 ligase: oxidative stress sensing by a Cul3-Keap1 ligase,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 24, pp. 8477–8486, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Kobayashi, M. I. Kang, H. Okawa et al., “Oxidative stress sensor Keap1 functions as an adaptor for Cul3-based E3 ligase to regulate proteasomal degradation of Nrf2,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 24, pp. 7130–7139, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. T. Dinkova-Kostova, R. V. Kostov, and P. Canning, “Keap1, the cysteine-based mammalian intracellular sensor for electrophiles and oxidants,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 617, pp. 84–93, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. M. Zipper and R. T. Mulcahy, “The Keap1 BTB/POZ dimerization function is required to sequester Nrf2 in cytoplasm,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, pp. 36544–36552, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Ogura, K. I. Tong, K. Mio et al., “Keap1 is a forked-stem dimer structure with two large spheres enclosing the intervening, double glycine repeat, and C-terminal domains,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 107, pp. 2842–2847, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Tu, H. Wang, S. Li, Q. Liu, and H. Sha, “The anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant mechanisms of the Keap1/Nrf2/ARE signaling pathway in chronic diseases,” Aging and Disease, vol. 10, pp. 637–651, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Padmanabhan, K. I. Tong, A. Kobayashi, M. Yamamoto, and S. Yokoyama, “Structural insights into the similar modes of Nrf2 transcription factor recognition by the cytoplasmic repressor Keap1,” Journal of Synchrotron Radiation, vol. 15, pp. 273–276, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. K. Zenkov, P. M. Kozhin, A. V. Chechushkov, G. G. Martinovich, N. V. Kandalintseva, and E. B. Menshchikova, “Mazes of Nrf2 regulation,” Biochemistry, vol. 82, pp. 556–564, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. T. Dinkova-Kostova, W. D. Holtzclaw, and N. Wakabayashi, “Keap1, the sensor for electrophiles and oxidants that regulates the phase 2 response, is a zinc metalloprotein,” Biochemistry, vol. 44, pp. 6889–6899, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Nguyen, P. J. Sherratt, H. C. Huang, C. S. Yang, and C. B. Pickett, “Increased protein stability as a mechanism that enhances Nrf2-mediated transcriptional activation of the antioxidant response element. Degradation of Nrf2 by the 26 S proteasome,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, pp. 4536–4541, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Smolková, E. Mikó, T. Kovács, A. Leguina-Ruzzi, A. Sipos, and P. Bai, “Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 in regulating cancer metabolism,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 33, pp. 966–997, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Itoh, T. Chiba, S. Takahashi et al., “An Nrf2/small Maf heterodimer mediates the induction of phase II detoxifying enzyme genes through antioxidant response elements,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 236, pp. 313–322, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. Joo, W. D. Kim, K. Y. Lee, J. H. Kim, J. H. Koo, and S. G. Kim, “AMPK facilitates nuclear accumulation of Nrf2 by phosphorylating at serine 550,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 36, pp. 1931–1942, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Shaw and A. Chattopadhyay, “Nrf2-ARE signaling in cellular protection: mechanism of action and the regulatory mechanisms,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 235, pp. 3119–3130, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. P. Rupasinghe, G. Dellaire, and Z. Xu, “Regulation of Nrf2/ARE pathway by dietary flavonoids: a friend or foe for cancer management?” Antioxidants, vol. 9, no. 10, p. 973, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Wu, H. Lu, and Y. Bai, “Nrf2 in cancers: a double-edged sword,” Cancer Medicine, vol. 8, pp. 2252–2267, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. E. Donlon, R. Power, C. Hayes, J. V. Reynolds, and J. Lysaght, “Radiotherapy, immunotherapy, and the tumour microenvironment: turning an immunosuppressive milieu into a therapeutic opportunity,” Cancer Letters, vol. 502, pp. 84–96, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Yadav, C. M. Kowolik, M. Lin et al., “SMC1A is associated with radioresistance in prostate cancer and acts by regulating epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer stem-like properties,” Molecular Carcinogenesis, vol. 58, pp. 113–125, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Lei, Y. Zhang, P. Koppula et al., “The role of ferroptosis in ionizing radiation-induced cell death and tumor suppression,” Cell Research, vol. 30, pp. 146–162, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Her, D. A. Jaffray, and C. Allen, “Gold nanoparticles for applications in cancer radiotherapy: mechanisms and recent advancements,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 109, pp. 84–101, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Zulato, F. Ciccarese, V. Agnusdei et al., “LKB1 loss is associated with glutathione deficiency under oxidative stress and sensitivity of cancer cells to cytotoxic drugs and γ-irradiation,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 156, pp. 479–490, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. C. Fan, Y. Zhang, Y. Wang et al., “Quantitative proteomics reveals mitochondrial respiratory chain as a dominant target for carbon ion radiation: delayed reactive oxygen species generation caused DNA damage,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 130, pp. 436–445, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Schulz, F. Meyer, A. Dubrovska, and K. Borgmann, “Cancer stem cells and radioresistance: DNA repair and beyond,” Cancers, vol. 11, p. 862, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Borek, “Antioxidants and radiation therapy,” The Journal of Nutrition, vol. 134, pp. 3207S–3209S, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Chen, Y. Li, L. Huang et al., “Antioxidative stress: inhibiting reactive oxygen species production as a cause of radioresistance and chemoresistance,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2021, Article ID 6620306, 16 pages, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Tang, F. Wei, Y. Wu et al., “Role of metabolism in cancer cell radioresistance and radiosensitization methods,” Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 37, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. A. Domina, A. Philchenkov, and A. Dubrovska, “Individual response to ionizing radiation and personalized radiotherapy,” Critical Reviews in Oncogenesis, vol. 23, pp. 69–92, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Baumann, M. Krause, J. Overgaard et al., “Radiation oncology in the era of precision medicine,” Nature Reviews. Cancer, vol. 6, pp. 234–249, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Kamble, M. Mahajan, R. Dhat, and S. Sitasawad, “Keap1-Nrf2 pathway regulates ALDH and contributes to radioresistance in breast cancer stem cells,” Cell, vol. 10, p. 83, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. W. Zou, T. Liu, Y. Li et al., “Melatonin suppresses thyroid cancer growth and overcomes radioresistance via inhibition of p 65 phosphorylation and induction of ROS,” Redox Biology, vol. 16, pp. 226–236, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Xu, Y. Zhang, J. Ding et al., “mi R-17-3p downregulates mitochondrial antioxidant enzymes and enhances the radiosensitivity of prostate cancer cells,” Molecular Therapy--Nucleic Acids, vol. 13, pp. 64–77, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Jiang, H. Wang, and M. De Ridder, “Targeting antioxidant enzymes as a radiosensitizing strategy,” Cancer Letters, vol. 438, pp. 154–164, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Rojo de la Vega, E. Chapman, and D. D. Zhang, “NRF2 and the hallmarks of cancer,” Cancer Cell, vol. 34, pp. 21–43, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Okazaki, T. Papagiannakopoulos, and H. Motohashi, “Metabolic features of cancer cells in NRF2 addiction status,” Biophysical Reviews, vol. 12, pp. 435–441, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. M. Leinonen, E. Kansanen, P. Pölönen, M. Heinäniemi, and A. L. Levonen, “Dysregulation of the Keap1-Nrf2 pathway in cancer,” Biochemical Society Transactions, vol. 43, pp. 645–649, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. J. Wang, Z. Sun, N. F. Villeneuve et al., “Nrf2 enhances resistance of cancer cells to chemotherapeutic drugs, the dark side of Nrf2,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 29, pp. 1235–1243, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. T. McDonald, K. Kim, A. J. Norris et al., “Ionizing radiation activates the Nrf2 antioxidant response,” Cancer Research, vol. 70, pp. 8886–8895, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Marampon, S. Codenotti, F. Megiorni et al., “NRF2 orchestrates the redox regulation induced by radiation therapy, sustaining embryonal and alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma cells radioresistance,” Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, vol. 145, pp. 881–893, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Zhou, W. Ye, Q. Shao, M. Zhang, and J. Liang, “Nrf2 is a potential therapeutic target in radioresistance in human cancer,” Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, vol. 88, pp. 706–715, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Xia, X. R. Zhang, Y. L. Ma, Z. J. Zhao, R. Zhao, and Y. Y. Wang, “Nrf2 promotes esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) resistance to radiotherapy through the CaMKIIα-associated activation of autophagy,” Cell & Bioscience, vol. 10, p. 90, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Singh, M. Bodas, N. Wakabayashi, F. Bunz, and S. Biswal, “Gain of Nrf2 function in non-small-cell lung cancer cells confers radioresistance,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 13, pp. 1627–1637, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Zhao, A. Mao, J. Yan et al., “Downregulation of Nrf2 promotes radiation-induced apoptosis through Nrf2 mediated Notch signaling in non-small cell lung cancer cells,” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 48, pp. 765–773, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Feng, K. Zhao, L. Sun et al., “SLC7A11 regulated by NRF2 modulates esophageal squamous cell carcinoma radiosensitivity by inhibiting ferroptosis,” Journal of Translational Medicine, vol. 19, p. 367, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Qin, X. He, H. Lin et al., “Nrf2 inhibition sensitizes breast cancer stem cells to ionizing radiation via suppressing DNA repair,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 169, pp. 238–247, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Zhang, A. Singh, S. Yegnasubramanian et al., “Loss of Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 function in prostate cancer cells causes chemoresistance and radioresistance and promotes tumor growth,” Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, vol. 9, pp. 336–346, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Thiruvengadam, B. Venkidasamy, U. Subramanian et al., “Bioactive compounds in oxidative stress-mediated diseases: targeting the NRF2/ARE signaling pathway and epigenetic regulation,” Antioxidants, vol. 10, p. 1859, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Robledinos-Antón, R. Fernández-Ginés, G. Manda, and A. Cuadrado, “Activators and inhibitors of NRF2: a review of their potential for clinical development,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2019, Article ID 9372182, 20 pages, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Magesh, Y. Chen, and L. Hu, “Small molecule modulators of Keap1-Nrf2-ARE pathway as potential preventive and therapeutic agents,” Medicinal Research Reviews, vol. 32, pp. 687–726, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Shu, K. L. Cheung, T. O. Khor, C. Chen, and A. N. Kong, “Phytochemicals: cancer chemoprevention and suppression of tumor onset and metastasis,” Cancer Metastasis Reviews, vol. 29, pp. 483–502, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. He, L. Antonucci, and M. Karin, “NRF2 as a regulator of cell metabolism and inflammation in cancer,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 41, pp. 405–416, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. A. Kang, M. J. Piao, Y. J. Hyun et al., “Luteolin promotes apoptotic cell death via upregulation of Nrf2 expression by DNA demethylase and the interaction of Nrf2 with p 53 in human colon cancer cells,” Experimental & Molecular Medicine, vol. 51, pp. 1–14, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Bei, L. Jing, and N. Chen, “Cardio protective role of wogonin loaded nanoparticle against isoproterenol induced myocardial infarction by moderating oxidative stress and inflammation,” Colloids and Surfaces. B, Biointerfaces, vol. 185, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Y. Dang, H. Luo, Y. M. Li et al., “Curcumin prevents As³⁺-induced carcinogenesis through regulation of GSK3β/Nrf2,” Chinese Medicine, vol. 16, p. 116, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Menegon, A. Columbano, and S. Giordano, “The dual roles of NRF2 in cancer,” Trends in Molecular Medicine, vol. 22, pp. 578–593, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Sun, Z. H. Wang, X. X. Liu et al., “Disturbance of redox status enhances radiosensitivity of hepatocellular carcinoma,” American Journal of Cancer Research, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1368–1381, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Sun, H. Zhang, X. F. Ma et al., “Isoliquiritigenin enhances radiosensitivity of Hep G2 cells via disturbance of redox status,” Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 65, pp. 433–444, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Liu, C. Sun, B. Liu et al., “Genistein mediates the selective radiosensitizing effect in NSCLC A549 cells via inhibiting methylation of the keap 1 gene promoter region,” Oncotarget, vol. 7, pp. 27267–27279, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Sun, D. Pan, Y. Chen, Y. Li, K. Gao, and B. Hu, “Coroglaucigenin enhances the radiosensitivity of human lung cancer cells through Nrf2/ROS pathway,” Oncotarget, vol. 8, pp. 32807–32820, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Dong, Y. Li, H. Xiao et al., “Cordycepin sensitizes breast cancer cells toward irradiation through elevating ROS production involving Nrf2,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 364, pp. 12–21, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Sun, Q. Wang, Y. Wang, L. Du, C. Xu, and Q. Liu, “Brusatol enhances the radiosensitivity of A549 cells by promoting ROS production and enhancing DNA damage,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 17, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Sun, Y. Wang, K. Ji et al., “NRF2 preserves genomic integrity by facilitating ATR activation and G2 cell cycle arrest,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 48, pp. 9109–9123, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Zhang, X. Fan, Z. Wang, W. Zhu, and J. Li, “Alpinumisoflavone radiosensitizes esophageal squamous cell carcinoma through inducing apoptosis and cell cycle arrest,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, vol. 95, pp. 199–206, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
U. Das, K. Manna, A. Adhikary et al., “Ferulic acid enhances the radiation sensitivity of lung and liver carcinoma cells by collapsing redox homeostasis: mechanistic involvement of Akt/p 38 MAPK signalling pathway,” Free Radical Research, vol. 53, pp. 944–967, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Enkhbat, M. Nishi, K. Yoshikawa et al., “Epigallocatechin-3-gallate enhances radiation Sensitivity in colorectal cancer cells through Nrf2 activation and autophagy,” Anticancer Research, vol. 38, pp. 6247–6252, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. L. Wang, Y. C. Yu, and S. M. Hsia, “Perspectives on the role of isoliquiritigenin in cancer,” Cancers, vol. 13, p. 115, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. T. Zhao, Y. Q. Xu, H. M. Hu, H. B. Gong, and H. L. Zhu, “Isoliquiritigenin (ISL) and its formulations: potential antitumor agents,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 26, pp. 6786–6796, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Song, Y. Zhang, H. Zhang et al., “Isoliquiritigenin triggers developmental toxicity and oxidative stress-mediated apoptosis in zebrafish embryos/larvae via Nrf2-HO1/JNK-ERK/mitochondrion pathway,” Chemosphere, vol. 246, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Spagnuolo, G. L. Russo, I. E. Orhan et al., “Genistein and cancer: current status, challenges, and future directions,” Advances in Nutrition, vol. 6, pp. 408–419, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Jaiswal, J. Akhtar, S. P. Singh, and A. F. Badruddeen, “An overview on genistein and its various formulations,” Drug Research, vol. 69, pp. 305–313, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Yan, J. Jiang, A. Du, J. Gao, D. Zhang, and L. Song, “Genistein enhances radiosensitivity of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells by inducing G2/M arrest and apoptosis,” Radiation Research, vol. 193, pp. 286–300, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Liu, C. Sun, X. Jin et al., “Genistein enhances the radiosensitivity of breast cancer cells via G₂/M cell cycle arrest and apoptosis,” Molecules, vol. 18, pp. 13200–13217, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. R. El-Seedi, S. A. M. Khalifa, E. A. Taher et al., “Cardenolides: Insights from chemical structure and pharmacological utility,” Pharmacological Research, vol. 141, pp. 123–175, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. H. Huang, J. Lei, G. H. Yi et al., “Coroglaucigenin induces senescence and autophagy in colorectal cancer cells,” Cell Proliferation, vol. 51, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Y. Yoon, S. J. Park, and Y. J. Park, “The anticancer properties of cordycepin and their underlying mechanisms,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 19, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Tang, C. C. Zhao, H. Yi et al., “Traditional Tibetan medicine in cancer therapy by targeting apoptosis pathways,” Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 11, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Y. Ho, W. S. Wu, L. C. Lin et al., “Cordycepin enhances radiosensitivity in oral squamous carcinoma cells by inducing autophagy and apoptosis through cell cycle arrest,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 20, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Seong da, S. Hong, S. Muthusami, W. D. Kim, J. R. Yu, and W. Y. Park, “Cordycepin increases radiosensitivity in cervical cancer cells by overriding or prolonging radiation-induced G2/M arrest,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 771, pp. 77–83, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Song, J. Hao, and D. Fan, “Biological properties and clinical applications of berberine,” Frontiers in Medicine, vol. 14, pp. 564–582, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Wang, Y. Liu, X. Du, H. Ma, and J. Yao, “The anti-cancer mechanisms of berberine: a review,” Cancer Management and Research, vol. 12, pp. 695–702, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Warowicka, R. Nawrot, and A. Goździcka-Józefiak, “Antiviral activity of berberine,” Archives of Virology, vol. 165, pp. 1935–1945, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Wang, K. F. Zhang, G. Du, J. Wang, and J. Zhao, “Berberine enhances the radiosensitivity of osteosarcoma by targeting Rad 51 and epithelial-mesenchymal transition,” Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics, vol. 16, pp. 215–221, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Yang, B. Yang, J. Cai et al., “Berberine enhances radiosensitivity of esophageal squamous cancer by targeting HIF-1α in vitro and in vivo,” Cancer Biology & Therapy, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 1068–1073, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Zhang, C. Zhang, X. Yang et al., “Berberine inhibits the expression of hypoxia induction factor-1alpha and increases the radiosensitivity of prostate cancer,” Diagnostic Pathology, vol. 9, p. 98, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Wang, M. Kang, Q. Wen et al., “Berberine sensitizes nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells to radiation through inhibition of Sp1 and EMT,” Oncology Reports, vol. 37, pp. 2425–2432, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Shang, S. Y. Cao, X. Y. Xu et al., “Bioactive compounds and biological functions of garlic (Allium sativum L.),” Food, vol. 8, p. 246, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. He, Y. Ma, H. Huang et al., “A comprehensive understanding about the pharmacological effect of diallyl disulfide other than its anti-carcinogenic activities,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 893, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Di, C. Sun, H. Li et al., “Diallyl disulfide enhances carbon ion beams-induced apoptotic cell death in cervical cancer cells through regulating Tap73/ΔNp73,” Cell Cycle, vol. 14, pp. 3725–3733, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Zhao, S. T. Lau, P. S. Leung, C. T. Che, and Z. X. Lin, “Seven quassinoids from Fructus Bruceae with cytotoxic effects on pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell lines,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 25, pp. 1796–1800, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Yang, Z. Tian, R. Guo, and F. Ren, “Nrf2 Inhibitor, Brusatol in combination with trastuzumab exerts synergistic antitumor activity in HER2-positive cancers by inhibiting Nrf2/HO-1 and HER2-AKT/ERK1/2 pathways,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2020, Article ID 9867595, 14 pages, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. D. Zhang and E. Chapman, “The role of natural products in revealing NRF2 function,” Natural Product Reports, vol. 37, pp. 797–826, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. J. Jo, Y. H. Jo, Y. J. Lee et al., “Physicochemical, pharmacokinetic, and toxicity evaluation of methoxy poly (ethylene glycol)-b-poly (d,l-lactide) polymeric micelles encapsulating alpinumisoflavone extracted from unripe Cudrania tricuspidata Fruit,” Pharmaceutics, vol. 11, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. B. Ateba, M. A. Mvondo, S. Djiogue, S. Zingué, L. Krenn, and D. Njamen, “A pharmacological overview of alpinumisoflavone, a natural prenylated isoflavonoid,” Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 10, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Chaudhary, V. S. Jaswal, S. Choudhary et al., “Ferulic acid: a promising therapeutic phytochemical and recent patents advances,” Recent Patents on Inflammation & Allergy Drug Discovery, vol. 13, pp. 115–123, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Zduńska, A. Dana, A. Kolodziejczak, and H. Rotsztejn, “Antioxidant properties of ferulic acid and its possible application,” Skin Pharmacology and Physiology, vol. 31, pp. 332–336, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Ouyang, K. Zhu, Z. Liu, and J. Huang, “Prooxidant effects of epigallocatechin-3-gallate in health benefits and potential adverse effect,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2020, Article ID 9723686, 14 pages, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Y. Gan, H. B. Li, Z. Q. Sui, and H. Corke, “Absorption, metabolism, anti-cancer effect and molecular targets of epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG): an updated review,” Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, vol. 58, pp. 924–941, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Kang, X. Zhang, N. Cao et al., “EGCG enhances cancer cells sensitivity under 60Coγ radiation based on mi R-34a/Sirt 1/p 53,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 133, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Baatout, H. Derradji, P. Jacquet, and M. Mergeay, “Increased radiation sensitivity of an eosinophilic cell line following treatment with epigallocatechin-gallate, resveratrol and curcuma,” International Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 337–352, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Chen, F. Zhang, X. Ren et al., “Targeting fatty acid synthase sensitizes human nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells to radiation via downregulating frizzled class receptor 10,” Cancer Biology & Medicine, vol. 17, pp. 740–752, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Bhattacharjee and R. H. Dashwood, “Epigenetic regulation of NRF2/KEAP1 by phytochemicals,” Antioxidants, vol. 9, p. 865, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Xu, B. Peng, Y. Cai et al., “N6-methyladenosine RNA modification in cancer therapeutic resistance: current status and perspectives,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 182, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Xiang, W. Liu, W. Tian, A. You, and D. Deng, “RNA N-6-methyladenosine enzymes and resistance of cancer cells to chemotherapy and radiotherapy,” Epigenomics, vol. 12, pp. 801–809, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Arumugam, T. Ghazi, and A. A. Chuturgoon, “Fumonisin B1 alters global m6A RNA methylation and epigenetically regulates Keap1-Nrf2 signaling in human hepatoma (Hep G2) cells,” Archives of Toxicology, vol. 95, pp. 1367–1378, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Wu, Y. Yao, Q. Jiang et al., “Epigallocatechin gallate targets FTO and inhibits adipogenesis in an mRNA m6A-YTHDF2-dependent manner,” International Journal of Obesity, vol. 42, pp. 1378–1388, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Ning, J. Chen, Y. Shi et al., “Genistein ameliorates renal fibrosis through regulation snail via m6A RNA demethylase ALKBH5,” Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 11, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. J. Huang, K. L. Wang, H. Y. Chen, Y. F. Chiang, and S. M. Hsia, “Protective effects of epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) on endometrial, breast, and ovarian cancers,” Biomolecules, vol. 10, p. 1481, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. K. Na and Y. J. Surh, “Modulation of Nrf2-mediated antioxidant and detoxifying enzyme induction by the green tea polyphenol EGCG,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 46, pp. 1271–1278, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Qiao, X. Zhang, T. Wang, L. Liang, W. Chang, and H. Xia, “Pharmacokinetics, biodistribution and bioavailability of isoliquiritigenin after intravenous and oral administration,” Pharmaceutical Biology, vol. 52, pp. 228–236, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Jia, H. Li, H. Bao et al., “Cordycepin (3'-deoxyadenosine) promotes remyelination via suppression of neuroinflammation in a cuprizone-induced mouse model of demyelination,” International Immunopharmacology, vol. 75, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Zhou, L. Tan, J. Xie et al., “Characterization of brusatol self-microemulsifying drug delivery system and its therapeutic effect against dextran sodium sulfate-induced ulcerative colitis in mice,” Drug Delivery, vol. 24, pp. 1667–1679, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Germain, J. Auger, C. Ginies, M. H. Siess, and C. Teyssier, “In vivo metabolism of diallyl disulphide in the rat: identification of two new metabolites,” Xenobiotica, vol. 32, pp. 1127–1138, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Habtemariam, “Berberine pharmacology and the gut microbiota: a hidden therapeutic link,” Pharmacological Research, vol. 155, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Gupta, A. K. Singh, M. Loka, A. K. Pandey, and A. Bishayee, “Ferulic acid-mediated modulation of apoptotic signaling pathways in cancer,” Advances in Protein Chemistry and Structural Biology, vol. 125, pp. 215–257, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. Almatroodi, A. Almatroudi, A. A. Khan, F. A. Alhumaydhi, M. A. Alsahli, and A. H. Rahmani, “Potential therapeutic targets of epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), the most abundant catechin in green tea, and its role in the therapy of various types of cancer,” Molecules, vol. 25, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. V. Talluri, G. Kuppusamy, V. V. Karri et al., “Application of quality-by-design approach to optimize diallyl disulfide-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles,” Artificial Cells, Nanomedicine, and Biotechnology, vol. 45, pp. 474–488, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Zhao, L. Chen, W. Chen et al., “Packaging cordycepin phycocyanin micelles for the inhibition of brain cancer,” Journal of Materials Chemistry B, vol. 5, pp. 6016–6026, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. I. Kutbi, H. Z. Asfour, A. K. Kammoun, A. Sirwi, S. Cavalu, and H. A. Gad, “Optimization of hyaluronate-based liposomes to augment the oral delivery and the bioavailability of berberine,” Materials, vol. 14, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. C. de Pace, X. Liu, M. Sun et al., “Anticancer activities of (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate encapsulated nanoliposomes in MCF7 breast cancer cells,” Journal of Liposome Research, vol. 23, pp. 187–196, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Zhang, Q. Wang, Q. Yang et al., “Enhancement of oral bioavailability and anti-hyperuricemic activity of isoliquiritigenin via self-microemulsifying drug delivery system,” AAPS PharmSciTech, vol. 20, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Alam Khan and M. Jawaid Akhtar, “Structural modification and strategies for the enhanced doxorubicin drug delivery,” Bioorganic Chemistry, vol. 120, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. H. Chau, P. S. Steeg, and W. D. Figg, “Antibody-drug conjugates for cancer,” Lancet, vol. 394, pp. 793–804, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Yarmohammadi, R. Rezaee, and G. Karimi, “Natural compounds against doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity: a review on the involvement of Nrf2/ARE signaling pathway,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 35, pp. 1163–1175, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Paunkov, D. V. Chartoumpekis, P. G. Ziros, N. Chondrogianni, T. W. Kensler, and G. P. Sykiotis, “Impact of antioxidant natural compounds on the thyroid gland and implication of the Keap1/Nrf2 signaling pathway,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 25, pp. 1828–1846, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Pinghan Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

786

Downloads

604

Citations