Flavonols and Flavones as Potential anti-Inflammatory, Antioxidant, and Antibacterial Compounds

Chagas, Maria do Socorro S.; Behrens, Maria D.; Moragas-Tellis, Carla J.; Penedo, Gabriela X. M.; Silva, Adriana R.; Gonçalves-de-Albuquerque, Cassiano F.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9966750

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Bioactive Compounds of Food: Their Role in The Prevention and Treatment of Diseases 2021

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 9966750 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9966750

Flavonols and Flavones as Potential anti-Inflammatory, Antioxidant, and Antibacterial Compounds

Maria do Socorro S. Chagas,^1,2,3,4,5Maria D. Behrens,⁵Carla J. Moragas-Tellis,⁵Gabriela X. M. Penedo,^1,4Adriana R. Silva ,^4,6,7and Cassiano F. Gonçalves-de-Albuquerque^1,2,3,4,7

Academic Editor: Cristina Angeloni

Received22 Mar 2021

Revised04 Jun 2022

Accepted12 Aug 2022

Published06 Sept 2022

Abstract

Plant preparations have been used to treat various diseases and discussed for centuries. Research has advanced to discover and identify the plant components with beneficial effects and reveal their underlying mechanisms. Flavonoids are phytoconstituents with anti-inflammatory, antimutagenic, anticarcinogenic, and antimicrobial properties. Herein, we listed and contextualized various aspects of the protective effects of the flavonols quercetin, isoquercetin, kaempferol, and myricetin and the flavones luteolin, apigenin, 3,4-dihydroxyflavone, baicalein, scutellarein, lucenin-2, vicenin-2, diosmetin, nobiletin, tangeretin, and 5-O-methyl-scutellarein. We presented their structural characteristics and subclasses, importance, occurrence, and food sources. The bioactive compounds present in our diet, such as fruits and vegetables, may affect the health and disease state. Therefore, we discussed the role of these compounds in inflammation, oxidative mechanisms, and bacterial metabolism; moreover, we discussed their synergism with antibiotics for better disease outcomes. Indiscriminate use of antibiotics allows the emergence of multidrug-resistant bacterial strains; thus, bioactive compounds may be used for adjuvant treatment of infectious diseases caused by resistant and opportunistic bacteria via direct and indirect mechanisms. We also focused on the reported mechanisms and intracellular targets of flavonols and flavones, which support their therapeutic role in inflammatory and infectious diseases.

1. Introduction

Flavonoids are an essential and diversified class of secondary plant metabolites present in different concentrations in the leaves, flowers, roots, and fruits. Flavonoid concentrations are influenced by natural factors such as temperature, ultraviolet (UV) radiation, season, pollutant, drought, and salinity stress owing to their effect on plant metabolism (Li [1]). The preparations containing flavonoids has been used to treat various human diseases. Flavonoids have anti-inflammatory, antimutagenic, anticarcinogenic, and antimicrobial properties [2–4]. They modulate the activities of several enzymes, including xanthine oxidase (XO), cyclooxygenase (COX), lipoxygenase (LOX), and phosphoinositide 3-kinase [5]) involved in pathological processes.

Inflammation is a complex biological response to noxious stimuli. It protects organisms against pathogens, cell damage, and irritating chemicals. Moreover, it initiates the healing process, which involves different cells and chemical mediators [6, 7]. Nevertheless, exacerbated and uncontrolled inflammation can also cause deleterious tissue damage. Flavonoids can alter cellular responses and production of chemical mediators related to inflammatory processes [8] caused by many agents, including natural toxins, pharmaceuticals, heavy metals, and environmental chemicals [9].

Oxidative stress is induced by mitochondrial dysfunction and inflammation [10, 11]. Continuous oxidative stress generates reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS), causing lipid peroxidation, protein and nucleic acid oxidation, and even cell death [12]. These effects are dependent on redox balance because they act as damaging agents and physiological regulators of cell functions [13]. Plant extracts are valuable sources of bioactive compounds with antioxidant properties. For example, honey shows antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties owing to its high flavonoid content [14–16]. Moreover, honey intake led to reduction in malondialdehyde and ROS levels generated by high physical activity in athletes and murine models [17–20]. A recent review discussed the role of consuming plant foods rich in antioxidants in protection against cognitive decline [12].

Similar to all secondary plant metabolites, plant defense mechanisms include flavonoid production; for example, a plant under attack by microorganisms may trigger the production of flavonoids having antimicrobial effects [21]. Herein, we discussed many aspects of the protective effects of flavonols and flavones in detail.

2. Flavonoids: Structural Characteristics and Subclasses

Flavonoids present a C6-C3-C6 carbon skeleton structure that consists of at least two aromatic rings, called A and B, linked by the three carbons chain that can form a heterocyclic ring containing oxygen (ring C) with ring A (Figure 1) [175]. Flavonoids are divided into flavones, flavonols, flavanones, flavanols, isoflavones, leucoanthocyanidins, anthocyanidins, and chalcones [5] (Figure 2). The subclasses are determined by minor structural variations, including the absence of ring C, position of the bond between ring B and ring C, degree of unsaturation, and ring C oxidation [22, 23]. In addition, substitutions at these rings can lead to differences in hydrogenation, hydroxylation, methylation, malonylation, sulfation, and glycosylation, which determine different pharmacological activities [5]. Currently, there have been reported more than 9000 different flavonoids [24].

We focused on two groups: (a) flavones that have a double bond between C2 and C3 in the flavonoid skeleton, without substitution at C3 and oxidized at C4, and (b) flavonols that differ from flavones by a hydroxyl group at C3 (Figure 2).

2.1. Flavonols and Flavones: Importance, Occurrence, and Food Sources

Almost all natural flavonoids exist in plants in O-glycosides or C-glycosides forms. C-glycosides are sugar moieties combined directly to flavonoid backbone as C–C covalent bonds. O-glycosides are formed by attaching sugar to hydroxyl oxygen [25]. The most common sugars attached to these flavonoids are D-glucose and L-rhamnose, but at least eight monosaccharides or combinations thereof may bind to different hydroxyl groups of flavonoids, resulting in a large number of known glycosides [26, 27]. They are widely present in plants and are potential metabolites involved in plant signaling and defense mechanism. Furthermore, they are vital ingredients in human diet and have significant health benefits [28–30]. Flavonols, which are primary flavonoids in nature, are found in various fruits and vegetables, such as apples, berries, grapes, tomatoes, and onions, and play a key role in attracting pollinators and seed disseminators [27, 31].

Flavones and flavonols have antioxidant effects and are essential for protecting plants from UV radiation [32, 33]. Quercetin (3,3,4,5,7-pentahydroxyflavone) is one of the most representative flavonoids, widely distributed in nature, and an abundant dietary flavonol, found in food, such as onions, peas, and apples [22, 26]. Quercetin-3-O-rutinoside, known as rutin (3,3,4,5,7-pentahydroxyflavone-3-rhamnoglucoside) and also called vitamin P due to contribute to reducing the permeability of blood vessels, was introduced in the market and has been explored for important pharmacological effects [34]. Luteolin (3,4,5,7-tetrahydroxyflavone) and apigenin (4,5,7-trihydroxyflavone) are the main flavones found in food, such as onions, celery, red pepper, and grapes, and have a wide range of effects in biological systems, including anti-inflammatory and anticarcinogenic [35]. Luteolin is found in cereals and herbs, and glycosylated luteolin in vegetables such as carrots and broccoli [31, 36]. Luteolin inhibits cancer in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) xenograft in a mouse model by inhibiting p300 lysine acetyltransferase activity via acting at multiple levels of gene expression, miRNA expression, and miRNA processing [37]. Luteolin effectively prevented pulmonary and hepatic fibrosis [38, 39] and reduced cancer cell proliferation [40]. Both effects are due to the reduction in oxidative stress and inflammatory responses [41]. Interestingly, luteolin can also play a protective role in inflammation and cancer by modulating the microbiota ([42]. The flavonoid hesperidin possesses antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties and plays a role in inhibition of tumor cell metastasis and angiogenesis [43]. Table 1 shows some flavones and flavonols aglycones and its natural sources and content (mg/100 g or mg/100 ml).

2.2. Inflammation

Inflammation is a complex response initiated by an insult by chemical, physical, or biological agents, which leads to resolution and promotes tissue repair [54, 55]. During the inflammatory process, immune system cells, such as neutrophils, monocytes, eosinophils, and lymphocytes, migrate to the lesion site [56, 57].

The lipid mediators eicosanoids and cytokines produced during the inflammatory response cause vascular and cellular alterations such as vasodilation, an increase in vascular permeability and activation, adhesion, and cellular transmigration [54]. The increase in the concentrations of inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)-1β and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, is crucial for leukocyte migration to the lesion [58–60]. The production of mediators and increased vascular permeability generate an exudate rich in plasma proteins [61]. The production of inflammatory mediators leads to endothelial increased permeability and leukocyte activation and migration to the injury site, cellular, and tissue damage and triggers the characteristic symptoms of inflammation, known by the five cardinal signs: pain, redness, heat, edema, and loss of function [54, 62]. When leukocytes reach the inflammation site, they are activated and respond to eliminate noxious stimuli, thus releasing the content of their toxic granules, which includes ROS, reactive nitrogen species (RNS), proteinase, cathepsin G, and elastase [61, 63].

The inflammatory process involves the production of numerous cytokines that bind to cellular receptors triggering intracellular signaling, such as JAK kinase, phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K), V-Akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog 1 (AKT1), inhibitory kappa B kinase (IKK), and mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), which are responsible for the activation and nuclear translocation of transcriptional factors (signal transducer and activator of transcription [STAT], nuclear factor kappa B [NF-κB], and activator protein 1[AP-1]) [64–67].

Inflammatory responses must be fine-tuned because if exacerbated, it will damage tissues and, if insufficient, will not cause complete elimination of pathogens. Exacerbation of immune response with uncontrolled inflammation results in poor outcomes [68]. Drugs or natural compounds with strong anti-inflammatory effects allow microbes to grow and decrease survival [69]. However, adequate anti-inflammatory effects may prevent organ damage and improve host survival [69, 70].

2.3. ROS and Oxidative Stress

ROS are presented by one or more unpaired electrons produced in cells during mitochondrial oxidative metabolism and in cellular response to xenobiotics, cytokines, bacterial invasion, UV radiation, and pollutants, collectively known as oxidizing agents [71]; they promote cascade reactions and cause oxidative damage [71, 72].

Normal metabolism generates reactive species that play a prominent role in physiological functions, including gene expression, cell signaling, and immune responses. Antioxidants neutralize reactive species in excess [71, 72]. An antioxidant is a molecule able to donate an electron to a rampaging free radical and neutralize it [73]. Some antioxidants can interact with other antioxidants regenerating their original properties called the “antioxidant network” [74]. They neutralize ROS by different mechanisms including directly scavenging free radicals, directly scavenging free radicals, and inhibiting lipid peroxidation between others [75]. Antioxidant system can be enzymatic or nonenzymatic. The nonenzymatic system blocks the initiation of oxidation. The enzymatic system comprises antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), and glutathione reductase (GR). In the nonenzymatic antioxidant system, glutathione (GSH); ascorbate (AsA); numerous simple phenolic acids such as hydroxybenzoic acids, hydroxycinnamic acids, and different flavonoid compounds; carotenoids such as xanthophylls, beta-carotene, and α-carotene; vitamin E; and pigments such as chlorophylls, betaxanthins, betalains, and betacyanins such as amaranthine, isoamaranthine, betanidine, and isobetadine are the most noticeable components ([76]). Antioxidants act by stabilizing ROS. An imbalance in ROS production and antioxidant activity in biological systems causes oxidative stress. As a result of this imbalance, cellular dysfunction may occur via modulating gene expression, protein stability, and membrane fluidity, leading to cell damage and death [72]. An increase in reactive species levels occurs with aging and the development of diseases, including cancer, Parkinson’s disease, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases [77]. ROS increase is linked to different diseases, reviewed by [78]. For instance, excessive ROS accumulation leads to glutathionylation modification and proteasomal degradation of MAP kinase phosphatase-1, which prevents insulin signaling. Also, ROS in excess inactivates AKT, inhibiting glucose uptake, which eventually causes type 2 diabetes. In addition, mitochondria-derived ROS elicit the production of NLRP3 and IL-1β, accounting for an inflammatory phenotype in atherosclerosis pathogenesis. Furthermore, phosphorylated tau protein and Aβ are risk factors in Alzheimer’s disease, which originate from the downregulated Nrf2 and increased ROS burden. Finally, extracellular and intracellular ROS activate TGF-β signaling triggering the epithelial-mesenchymal transition of epithelial cells and survival of circulating tumor cells during cancer metastasis [78].

The search for new antioxidant compounds as therapeutic agents for diseases associated with imbalance in reactive species production and clearance is gaining attraction of researchers. Natural antioxidants, such as phenolic compounds (flavonoids and phenolic acids), have emerged as primary therapeutic agents as nonenzymatic antioxidants because they can sequester ROS [79]. They also act as anti-inflammatory agents.

2.4. Limitations Associated with the Use of Flavonoids

We consume fruits and vegetables that containing flavonoids, such as apples, berries, onions, and broccoli, on a daily basis [80, 81]. However, their bioavailability can vary. A trial conducted with 97 humans showed that the plasma concentrations of total polyphenolic metabolites was 0–4 μmol/L after an intake of 50 mg aglycone equivalents, and the urinary excretion was 0.3–43% of the ingested dose [82]. Flavonoids are absorbed in the small intestine. Flavonoids that cannot be absorbed in the small intestine are degraded in the colon by microorganisms to phenolic acids [83].

The absorption of flavonoids from food was long considered to be very low, as they are present in foods linked to sugars such as β-glycosides (except catechins). Only aglycones forms were considered able to pass the gut wall, and no enzymes that can split these predominantly β-glycosidic bonds are secreted into the gut or present in the intestinal wall [84]. Unlike terpenes with high bioavailability, flavonoids can have low bioavailability due to the extensive first-pass effect and glucuronidation [85]. However, research on the mechanisms for aglycone transfer across the gut wall is lacking. In a study on ileostomized humans, the absorption of orally administered quercetin was 24%. These data show that humans absorb appreciable amounts of quercetin and that absorption of glycosides in the small intestine is possible. Humans consume, on average, between 0.45 and 1.17 mg of apigenin daily [86]. Apigenin when taken orally (whose bioavailability is about 30%) is systemically absorbed and recirculated by enterohepatic and local intestinal pathways [87].

Despite these concerns about bioavailability, which seems to be influenced by their chemical nature, flavonoids effectively prevent or improve diseases. There are three possible explanations for this: (1) act in the lumen or intestinal epithelium, (2) act in the peripheral tissues even at very low circulating levels, or (3) the microbial metabolites of flavonoids are also active in the peripheral tissues [88]. Flavonoid amount consumed through food is generally nontoxic. However, when consumed in large amount, they can show toxic effects. Administration of high doses (≥200 mg/kg) and prolonged use of luteolin may increase hepatic enzyme activity; however, no significant liver damage was observed, whereas low doses (≤50 mg/kg) are hepatoprotective [89].

The purification or production of bioactive compounds on a large scale is challenging. Although a specific bioactive compound has been identified and proven to be beneficial in treating inflammatory or infectious diseases, its purification or bioengineering remains a challenge. Moreover, where bioactive flavonols have been identified in natural food, the among ingested is difficult to determine because it varies from place to place depending on the environment in which the plant grows. Another crucial challenge is the development of optimum delivery formulations. Nevertheless, the flavonoid properties in biological systems are indisputable because they are bioactive compounds with the potential to treat or prevent diseases; therefore, future studies based on better delivery systems, such as nanoformulations, should be encouraged [90, 91].

2.5. Flavonols and Inflammation

The current strategies for treating inflammatory and infectious diseases often present side effects that markedly affect the quality of life of patients. In addition, the use of immunosuppressants may be essential to control the immune response in infectious diseases; however, it can increase the risk of spread of the infection and should be used with caution. Flavonols, such as quercetin, kaempferol, and myricetin, are the most common plant flavonoids. We discussed recent studies on anti-inflammatory effects of flavonols and listed them in Table 1.

2.6. Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Quercetin, Isoquercetin, Kaempferol, and Myricetin

First isolated in 1857 from oak (Quercus), quercetin is probably the most investigated flavonoid. It has strong and prolonged anti-inflammatory effects [75, 92, 93]. Quercetin acts through several mechanisms such as by inhibiting lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced TNF- production in macrophages [94], inhibiting LPS-induced IL-8 in A549 lung carcinoma epithelial cells [95], and inhibiting the production of inflammatory mediator-producing enzymes such as COX and LOX [96, 97]. Quercetin showed cardioprotective effect against isoproterenol-induced myocardial infarction in rats [98] (Figure 3). Additionally, it reduced levels of biomarkers of ischemic induction, such as creatine kinase myocardial band (CK-MB) and cardiac troponin I (cTnl), inhibited inflammatory cell infiltration into the myocardium, reduced the expression of TNF- and IL-6, and inhibited upregulation of calpain genes 1 and 2 that protect the myocardium [98].

Treatment with quercetin improved LPS-induced inflammatory damage in pulmonary fibroblasts by increasing cell viability, Treatment with quercetin improvedaverting apoptosis, and reducing pro-inflammatory cytokine production (TNF-α and IL-6) [95]. In an experimental model of acetic acid-induced gastric ulcers in rats, quercetin, isolated from Madhuca indica, inhibited cytokines (IL-1β and TNF-α), NO, and prostaglandin production by downregulating COX-2 expression [99]. Similarly, quercetin treatment reduced IL-1β and TNF-α levels [100]. Macrophage inflammatory protein 1α/chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 3 (MIP-1α/CCL3) is a key to monocytes/macrophage recruitment, and the release from adipocytes and macrophages tissue causes tissue inflammation [101]. Quercetin suppressed MIP-1α effects by downregulation of CCR1/CCR5 and inhibition of activation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), p38 mitogen-activated-protein kinase (MAPK), and IKK and IκBα degradation [3].

Oral administration of quercetin for the treatment of arthritis induced by inactive Mycobacterium butyricum in a rat model showed that quercetin could diminish inflammatory markers, such as IL-1β, C-reactive protein, and MPC-1 and restore the plasma antioxidant capacity. In addition, it inhibited 12/15-LOX activity in the lungs and liver and increased heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) expression in joints and lungs [102]. Quercetin treatment decreased inflammation and attenuated pathological alterations in the pancreas and ileum of animals with acute necrotizing pancreatitis. This suggests that the flavonoid acts by partial inhibition of TLR4/MyD88/P38 and MAPK ERK, thus reducing inflammation and interrupting intestinal damage [103]. In a model of monohydrate crystal–induced arthritis fatty acids activates TLR2 inducing interleukin-1β production via the ASC/caspase 1 pathway [104]. In addition, quercetin inhibited the release of ROS, IL-1β, and IL-18, resulting in the protection of mitochondrial integrity in Caco-2 cells stimulated with Escherichia coli [105]. It also blocked the inflammasome NLRP3 activation in the rat kidneys [106, 107].

Moreover, quercetin suppressed the CXCR4 upregulation in otitis media induced by non-typificable gram-negative bacillus Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi), both in vitro and in vivo [102]. It downregulated the TLR3/Myd88 signaling by blocking NF-κB activation [108] and IKKα and p38 phosphorylation in mice inoculated with NTHi [102]. A recent study showed that isoquercetin treatment reversed weight loss, decreased glucose levels, and increased insulin production in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Furthermore, isoquercetin reduced lipid peroxidation by increasing SOD and CAT activity, which improved the lipid profile in the diabetic group. In addition, this flavonol suppressed inflammatory genes that code for NF-κB, IL-1, IL-6, TLR, TNF-α, and COX-2 [109].

Kaempferol (from genus Kaempferia) is a flavonol abundantly present in various species and plant-derived foods; it has been shown to inhibit adipogenesis by blocking 3 T3-L1 differentiation and lipid accumulation in mature adipocytes. It modulated adipogenic gene expression and decreased lipid accumulation in mature adipocytes (CEBPA) via upregulating mRNA expression of Pnpla2 and Lipe [110]. Similarly, kaempferol treatment reduced lipid and protein accumulation along with the expression of the adipogenic markers PPARγ and C/EBPα in 3 T3-L1 cells [108]. These changes in adipocyte lipid metabolism affect the response of adipocytes to the production of inflammatory mediators.

First isolated from the bark of Myrica nagi, myricetin is a common flavonol occurring also in both free or glycosylated forms, with anti-inflammatory activity and cardioprotective effect, which prevents myocarditis by reducing apoptosis [111]. It markedly reduced cleaved caspase-3 and Bcl-2 levels and increased Bax levels in H9c2 cells. The flavonol decreased MCP-1 and IB phosphorylation levels by blocking the NF-κB activation in LPS-challenged H9c2 cells. Treatment with semisynthetic flavone derived from myricetin (the M10 compound) prevented chronic inflammation and ulcerative colitis induced by azoxymethane/dextran in colorectal tumorigenesis [24].

2.7. Flavones and Inflammation

Flavones are characterized by the absence of a hydroxyl group at C3 when compared to flavonol that also exhibit structural variations of hydroxylation, O-methylation, C-methylation, or prenylation. This wide range of structural combinations results in several types of flavones, making them as an abundant subclass [112]. Herein, we discussed the most frequent flavones present in human diet, luteolin, and apigenin. Luteolin modulates the immune response more efficiently than other naturally derived compounds such as quercetin, genistein, and hesperidin [113] (Table 2). Besides, apigenin is also known for its anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects by inhibiting cytokine secretion and downregulating enzymes such as inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and COX-2 [114].

2.8. Luteolin, Apigenin, and Inflammation

Luteolin and apigenin are the most abundant flavones occurring in nature. They differ structurally by the presence of a hydroxyl group at C3` (Figure 4).

Luteolin was first isolated in 1829 as the main yellow-colored compound extracted from Reseda luteola and structure confirmed by synthesis in 1900 [115]. Luteolin has antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, chemopreventive, chemotherapeutic, cardioprotective, antidiabetic, neuroprotective, and antiallergic properties [116–119]. Moreover, consumption of luteolin-rich food reduces the risk of developing chronic diseases [120].

Luteolin exhibited its anti-inflammatory effect by reducing the production of pro-inflammatory agents, such as NO, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), TNF-α, MMP-2, MMP-8, and MMP-9, and by downregulating COX-2, iNOS, MMP-3, and MMP-13 expression in both in vitro and in vivo arthritis models [1, 113]. Luteolin also showed effects in human neutrophils by inhibiting NET formation, elastase release, CD11 expression, chemotaxis, and the RAF1-MEK-1-Erk signaling pathway, resulting in decreased neutrophil infiltration and activation, thereby attenuating the inflammatory response [1]. It also blocked ROS, TNF-α, IL-6, and nitric oxide (NO) production in human and mouse cells [121].

In addition, luteolin showed a cardioprotective effect in cardiomyocyte cultures and experimental type 1 diabetes. This flavone reduced inflammation by inhibiting the NF-κB signaling, cytokine production, and oxidative stress by blocking the activation of the nuclear factor 2 (NRF2) pathway. It has also been shown to prevent cardiac fibrosis, hypertrophy, and dysfunction in diabetic rats [122]. Moreover, luteolin inhibited the production of IL-8 and COX-2 and reduced the expression of iNOS and NO in colon HT-29 cells [123]. Hence, it has emerged as a potential candidate for the treatment of bowel disease because of its ability to modulate intracellular inflammatory signaling cascade. Inhibition of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway seems to be a key mechanism for anti-inflammatory action of luteolin in bowel diseases [124]. These results indicate that luteolin negatively modulates the main signaling pathways involved in the intestinal inflammation.

Luteolin inhibited the expression of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6; suppressed IκBα and NF-κB p65 phosphorylation levels; and downregulated the expression of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in S. aureus-induced mastitis [125], showing its potential in reducing tissue damage and inflammation caused by S. aureus-induced mastitis. Moreover, luteolin showed effects in arthritis models through the involvement of metalloproteinase [113]. Luteolin plays a critical role as an anti-inflammatory agent by reducing the production of inflammatory mediators, inhibiting crucial inflammatory intracellular pathways, and blocking the translocation and activation of inflammatory transcription factors. Therefore, it is a potential agent for the treatment and prevention of inflammatory, infectious, and metabolic diseases.

Apigenin, a constituent from celery (Apium graveolens) also common in other food plants, such as parsley and chamomile [49], has therapeutic potential for various diseases (diabetes, cancer, and neurological and cardiovascular disorders) [126], considering its anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anticancer effects. The mechanism of action of apigenin involved the suppression of p65 phosphorylation in monocytes and macrophages and reduction in the expression of COX-2 and NO in rat macrophages [8]. Zhang et al. have reported that apigenin inhibited CD38, an inflammatory biomarker, reduced pro-inflammatory cytokines, and led to reduction in adipose tissue mass in a metabolic syndrome model [127]. Treatment with apigenin prevented pulmonary fibrosis and bleomycin-induced inflammation by decreasing TNF-α and TGF-β1 levels and attenuating the reduction in SOD activity [128]. An in vivo experiment on concanavalin A-stimulated rat splenocytes showed that apigenin prevented iNOS induction, downregulated COX-2 expression, and reduced pro-inflammatory cytokine production (TNF-α, IFN-γ, and IL-2). The flavone has also demonstrated an antiproliferative effect on lymphocytes [114].

2.9. Effect of Other Flavones on Inflammation

Other flavones with anti-inflammatory effects, such as 3,4-dihydroxyflavone, baicalein, scutellarein, lucenin-2, vicenin-2, diosmetin, nobiletin, tangeretin, and 5-O-methyl-scutellarein, have been described (Figure 5).

3,4-Dihydroxyflavone suppressed the MAPK and NF-κB signaling pathways, in addition to the inhibition of NO, PGE2, and pro-inflammatory cytokine production in microglial cells and mice [129]. Baicalein, one of the main constituents of Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi [127] improved motor deficit and attenuated brain injury in rats chronically exposed to rotenone. Baicalein inhibited IL-6, TNF-α, and NO production, blocked IκBα phosphorylation and NF-κB translocation, and negatively modulated TLR4 in BV2 microglial cells. Similarly, scutellarein (Scutellaria barbata) improved LPS-induced cognitive deficit in rats and decreased the levels of hippocampal malondialdehyde (MDA) and antioxidant defense elements such as SOD, catalase, and GSH [130]. Thus, the authors suggest possible mechanisms underlying anti-inflammatory activity as inhibition of the levels of NF-κB, TNF-α, IL-6, and NRF2, in addition to the inhibition of autophagy markers and decreased expression of matrix metalloproteinase.

Diosmetin (3,5,7-trihydroxy-4-methoxyflavone) is a flavone common in Citrus species, which exerts anti-inflammatory and other effects [131]. Diosmetin-7-O-rutinoside, known as diosmin (3,5,7-trihydroxy-4-methoxyflavone 7-rhamnosylglucoside), is well stablished to treat vessel permeability and inflammatory diseases. A recent study was showed that diosmetin attenuates experimental ulcerative colitis in rats via suppression of NF-κB, TNF-α, and IL-6 signaling pathways correlated with downregulation of apoptotic events [132].

Glycosylated flavones, lucenin-2, vicenin-2, and scutellarein-2, obtained from Korthalsella japonica, possess anti-inflammatory activity [133]. Both the extract and isolated flavones inhibited the production of NO and reduced the expression of iNOS and COX-2 in LPS-stimulated RAW 264 cells (M. K. [133]). Vicenin-2 negatively regulated the secretion of cytokines (TNF-α and IL-1β) and increased the expression of IL-10 and IL-1Ra in LPS-induced mononuclear cells [134]. Furthermore, vicenin-2 inhibited the reporter activity of NF-κB and increased homodimerization of P50 subunit of transcription factor by heterodimerization of P50/P65 [135].

Nobiletin, a polymethoxyflavone (3,4,5,6,7,8-hexamethoxyflavone), reduced the myeloperoxidase activity in the pancreas, cellular damage, and phosphorylation of p38 and AKT in a model of acute peritonitis. It also reduced the levels of TNF-, IL-1, IL-6, and IL-10, attributing to its anti-inflammatory activity [136].

Tangeretin, a flavone isolated from dried fruit shells of Citrus tachibana, attenuated colitis parameters such as colon shortening; activation of myeloperoxidase, NF-κB, and MAPKs; production of IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-17; and expression of COX-2 and iNOS. Therefore, it has shown significant anti-inflammatory effect [137]. Hydroethanolic extract of Arrabidaea chica leaves and its isolated flavone 4,6,7-tri-hydroxy-5-methoxyflavone (5-O-methyl-scutellarein) dose-dependently inhibited inflammatory cell recruitment and TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-10 production [138].

A recent study reviewed preclinical and clinical data on anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties of flavonoids; most data demonstrated the potential therapeutic role and efficacy of flavonoids in cardiovascular diseases, osteoarthritis, Parkinson’s disease, colitis, cancer pain, arthritis, and neuropathic pain. Nevertheless, the mechanisms of action of flavonoids have yet to be fully elucidated. Considering the pharmacological activities of flavonoids, it would be promising to further develop delivery formulations containing flavonoids to treat inflammatory diseases and pain [139].

Different approaches to evaluate the anti-inflammatory activity of flavones described above, both in vitro and in vivo, showed a reduction in the production of pro-inflammatory mediator, and inhibition of activation of the signaling pathway and nuclear factor. Regardless of the chosen model of arthritis, colitis, or gastric ulcer, flavones inhibited different signaling pathways, production of mediators, transcription factor activation, and ROS production.

2.10. Antioxidant Effects of Flavonols and Flavones

The balance between ROS production and antioxidant cell mechanisms regulates oxidative stress in cells and can lead to cell damage when unregulated. Antioxidant enzymes, SOD and CAT, can directly detoxify the generated ROS or facilitate antioxidant activity using GSH as a reducing agent [143]. CAT is responsible for peroxide decomposition in a cell [144].

The antioxidant activity of quercetin can be explained by its direct effect on GSH, signal transduction pathways, enzymatic activity, and ROS, which maintain oxidative balance. Quercetin regulates the levels of GSH, a hydrogen donor in decomposition of H₂O₂ to H₂O, by inducing its synthesis. By influencing the signal transduction pathways, the compound can inhibit the enzymatic activity of numerous enzymes associated with oxidative mechanisms, such as acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BChE), and enhance the expression levels of antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, CAT, and GSH peroxidase. Finally, quercetin can remove ROS through various mechanisms involved in regulation of ROS production and modulation of antioxidant-related gene expression. Clinically, quercetin exhibits antitumor effect and is used for cancer and metastasis prevention [145]. It has also been shown to have therapeutic effects in cardiovascular diseases and significant antidepressant outcome [146]. Quercetin isolated from Flaveria bidentis (L.) inhibited ROS production in human mononuclear cells and polymorphic leukocytes more efficiently than that of vitamin C [147]. Quercetin reversed the oxidative damage induced by FeSO₄ ferrous ions in bovine sperm cells [148]. The flavonol also induced the expression of HO-1 and the subsequent end product, suppressing oxidative stress derived from NADPH oxidase [142]. Furthermore, quercetin decreased MDA levels in the myocardial tissue and activated SOD and GPx enzymes [98, 142], demonstrating the antioxidant activity of quercetin in a rat model of myocardial infarction. In a similar study, treatment with quercetin decreased MDA levels in the myocardial tissue and further stimulated SOD and GPx enzymes [149].

Luteolin attenuated oxidative damage and reduced the generation of intracellular ROS by inducing the expression of the antioxidant enzyme HO-1, thus counteracting the damage induced by H₂O₂ in rat cortical primary cell cultures [141]. Treatment with the flavone normalized AST and ALT levels. The protective role of luteolin against ROS and oxidative damage occurs by normal GSH level restoration and lipoperoxidation suppression in the plasma and liver tissues [140]. Moreover, the flavone blocked superoxide anion and ROS production in human neutrophils [150], strengthening the role of luteolin as an antioxidant agent. Chanput et al. evaluated the antioxidant activity of three classes of flavonoids: (i) flavonol: quercetin and myricetin; (ii) flavanone: eriodictyol and naringenin; and (iii) flavone: luteolin and apigenin [151]. The flavonol group (myricetin and quercetin) showed the best antioxidant activity among the three groups, which might be due to the presence of more hydroxyl groups in their structure and the presence of double bond between C2 and C3 of the aromatic ring that improve their antioxidant properties by the electron distribution pattern [152] compared to the other groups.

2.11. Antibacterial Activity of Flavones and Flavonols

Several studies have supported the use of medicinal plants for their antimicrobial activities. Flavonoids act on different microorganisms. Herein, we discuss their effects on resistant and opportunistic bacteria. Antibiotic abuse may lead to the select bacterial resistance to current drugs. Medicinal plant extracts contain a variety of phytochemical substances that can act synergistically to inhibit the bacterial growth and prevent the development of drug resistance. Table 3 shows the flavonoids used for antibacterial purposes and their mechanisms of action.

Methanolic fraction of the extract from Justicia wynaadensis contains 3,3,4-trihydroxyflavone that exhibits antimicrobial activity against multiresistant and opportunistic organisms. Flavones can effectively kill bacteria present in diabetic wounds such as Enterococcus faecalis, Streptococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter aerogenes, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [153]. The methanolic extract of J. wynaadensis also showed antibacterial activity against K. pneumoniae (Ponnamma SU2015). The methanolic extract of Tragia involucrata was effective against Enterobacter aerogenes, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, Proteus vulgaris, and E. coli associated with diabetic foot ulcer and ICU [154].

The methanolic root extract from Garcinia macrophylla is an important medicinal herb used to treat diverse diseases and disorders in Traditional Chinese Medicine and showed antimicrobial activity against bacterial strains of Micrococcus luteus, E. faecalis, S. aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus uberis, P. aeruginosa, E. coli, and K. pneumoniae isolated from burn wounds, with the lowest minimum inhibitory concentration against S. epidermidis and the highest MIC value against E. coli [150]. The authors observed equivalent values for minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC). The antibacterial activity of Gentiana kurroo methanolic extract overcame the results presented by other comparable studies [155].

The methanolic extract of B. purpurascens leaves, a medicinal herb containing diverse flavonoids (bergenin, catechin, naringenin, and myricetin), is used to treat wounds and bacterial infections. The extract exhibited strong antibacterial properties, particularly against S. aureus and Streptococcus spp. These results corroborate those of previous studies demonstrating the inhibition of growth of different bacteria by Bergenia spp. [156, 157] and that silver-plated nanoparticles from Bergenia cilita crude extract had antimicrobial activity against several bacterial strains. Moreover, B. purpurascens extract reduced the mortality caused by infection of mice with S. aureus in vivo [158, 159].

Microorganisms’ growth and survival are associated with biofilm formation. Quorum sensing (QS) is an intercellular signaling or cell-cell communication process that is necessary for coordinating biofilm formation. The QS system is related to opportunism and resistance mechanisms developed by many bacterial strains. Blocking QS in bacteria is a far-reaching strategy for attenuating their virulence and making them more susceptible to elimination by the host immune system at lower doses of antibiotics. The modulatory effect of kaempferol-loaded chitosan nanoparticles on autoinducer (AI)-mediated anti-QS activity by Chromobacterium violaceum CV026 was used to evaluate the effect of this flavonol. Changes in bacterial cell density led to AI production via signaling molecules involved in communication among bacteria, composing QS, and managing growth. The results of anti-QS evaluation using the disk diffusion method showed that kaempferol produces a remarkable anti-QS effect; thus, its use against resistant bacteria is promising [158, 159].

Baicalin, a flavonol extracted from the Chinese medicinal plant Scutellaria baicalensis, has also demonstrated in vitro and in vivo anti-QS activities [160]. Baicalin concentrations below the MIC (sub-MIC) inhibited Pseudomonas biofilm formation, which increased the bactericidal effects of various conventional antibiotics. MIC and broth microdilution methods were used to evaluate the MIC and MBC of baicalin and antibiotics, biofilm inhibition assay, biofilm dispersion evaluation, and combined antibiotic use. Treatment with different concentrations of baicalin inhibited P. aeruginosa biofilm formation in a dose-dependent manner. The lower number of viable cells and lower biomass indicated a synergistic effect compared to treatment with flavonol alone and antibiotics [161], demonstrating that baicalin co-treatment increased the antimicrobial activities of three different antibiotics.

Treatment with sub-MIC of baicalein reduced QS. It decreased most virulence factors, corroborating previously reported data and demonstrating that baicalin exerts anti-QS activity against P. aeruginosa PAO1 by inhibiting the QS gene expression and production of signaling molecules such as acyl-homoserine lactone (AHL). Treatment with a sub-MIC of baicalin also considerably increased the survival rate of C. elegans. Moreover, baicalin inhibited the motility and production of the QS molecule pyocyanin and significantly reduced the number of colony-forming units (CFUs) of P. aeruginosa in implants [160]. Previous studies have also demonstrated reduced bacterial growth in implants treated with baicalin and antibiotics, particularly levofloxacin, ampicillin/clavulanic acid, and ceftazidime [162]). In vivo experiments have shown a higher survival rate of worms in the baicalin-treated group, which indicates that treatment with baicalin reduced the pathogenicity of P. aeruginosa in C. elegans. In addition, baicalin treatment increased the clearance of P. aeruginosa from the implants of infected animals in a peritoneal implant infection model.

Quercetin, both free and chitosan-associated, and baicalein have shown a potential inhibitory effect on biofilm formation, QS formation, and cytotoxicity in free mammalian cells treated with chitosan-based nanocapsules [163]. A transformed E. coli Top 10 biosensor strain showed QS formation. These results are in line with the data of a previous study [164] that suggested that these phytochemicals may inhibit biofilm formation [163]. Indeed, baicalin inhibited P. aeruginosa PAO1 biofilm formation, whereas quercetin showed the highest anti-QS effect in PAO1 strain [165].

The flavonol rutin inhibited QS, biofilm formation, and virulence genes in pathogenic E. coli APEC-O78 in vitro. Bioluminescence assay demonstrated that AI-2 secretion and activity were significantly decreased after rutin treatment, resulting in marked inhibition of biofilm formation. The expression of APEC virulence genes (csgA, csgB, Flic, FyuA, IucD, LsrB, LsrK, Rpos, H-NS, Luxs, and Pf) decreased after treatment with rutin. These results highlight the role of rutin in controlling E. coli pathogenicity. Furthermore, flavonols reduced cellular damage in type II pneumocytes infected with pathogenic E. coli by interfering with the QS, thereby inducing a decrease in AI-2 production, biofilm formation, and virulence gene expression [162].

The efflux pump proteins encoded by genes involved in bacterial cellular functions may cause antibiotic resistance. Crude extracts and 3,4,7-trihydroxyflavone compound extracted from Myristica fragrans Houtt. (MSF) have shown in vitro antibacterial and antibiotic sensitizing activity against E. coli AG102, which is a multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative enteric bacterium, and against P. stuartii strains. This study observed a synergistic effect of these substances with a PAN efflux pump inhibitor. The antibacterial potential was improved by 73.37% with crude MFS against the tested MDR, whereas it was improved by 100% with 3,4,7-trihydroxyflavone. Therefore, both substances are considered substrates for efflux pumps because they have intracellular targets [166]. There was a synergistic action between the extracts and at least one of the six antibiotics tested against 50% of MDR bacterial strains. The compound 3,4,7-trihydroxyflavone improved the activity of 70% of the antibiotics tested. These results suggest that this compound may be considered as a potential efflux pump inhibitor because of its antibacterial effect and antibiotic-modifying activity [166].

The effects of the hydroalcoholic extract of Glycyrrhiza glabra and its flavonoids were evaluated in an in vivo model of P. aeruginosa-induced pulmonary infection in rats. The study elucidated the mechanism of action, inhibition of biofilm formation, pathogenesis, and efflux activity of one of its pure glycyrrhizic acid components [167]. The findings were validated using molecular docking analysis using ExoS segmentation, which confirmed the potential of the herb G. glabra [153]. Isolated G. glabra glycosides altered membrane permeability and inhibited efflux activity and biofilm formation by P. aeruginosa [166]. These flavonoids isolated from licorice showed inhibitory effects on acute lipopolysaccharide-induced pneumonia [167]. These studies provide evidence of preclinical efficacy of G. glabra in P. aeruginosa pneumonia.

In addition to interfering with the QS and efflux pump, antimicrobials act by direct killing of microbial cells. Antibacterial activity was evaluated by MIC in DNA fragmentation test, caspase activity, lipid peroxidation, inner and external membrane permeabilization, membrane fluidity disturbance, and membrane damage. Isoquercitrin isolated from the perennial herb Aster yomena, generally found in Korea and Japan, inhibited E. coli growth or completely destroyed bacterial cells. Sub-MIC concentrations of isoquercitrin led to a rapid increase in DNA fragmentation and caspase activation, which are characteristics of apoptosis. The antibacterial activity of isoquercitrin in E. coli is attributed to membrane alterations, most likely caused by the induction of oxidative stress and apoptosis [167]. A double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial showed that propolis oral spray could be used to improve and immediately resolve the symptoms of uncomplicated upper respiratory tract bacterial infections, without any pharmacological treatment [168].

The antibacterial actions of flavonoids and flavonols range from QS disturbance and alterations in the efflux pump to direct induction of apoptosis (Table 4). Unfortunately, there are few studies detailing the mechanisms involved, but their microbicidal and synergistic effects with antibiotics should be further explored in the future.

3. Concluding Remarks

Conclusively, flavonoids are bioactive components found in fruits and vegetables being recognized as highly versatile substances with therapeutic applications, representing a vast source of pharmacological potential. Herein, we discuss the pivotal role of some flavonoids against inflammation and bacterial infection, which are responsible for millions of casualties every year and severely affect hospitalized and susceptible individuals. Currently available drugs used to treat of these individuals will probably no longer be effective shortly. Bioactive compounds derived from plants play a critical role in treating or preventing diseases either individually or synergistically with antibiotics. Furthermore, flavonoids play a critical role in modulating oxidative stress and treating inflammatory and infectious diseases, particularly those caused by resistant and opportunistic bacteria, through diverse mechanisms of action. Despite their low bioavailability, a proper delivery system such as nanoformulation may aid in their clinical applications. Nanotechnology offers multiple benefits in treating chronic human diseases by site-specific and target-oriented delivery of precise medicines, improving the efficacy of drugs and natural products [169, 170]. For instance, phytochemical cyclodextrin complexes have the potential for transformation into drug delivery systems [171], and nanotechnology-based drug delivery for therapeutics are bioactive compounds from plant sources [172]. Besides, plant phenolic compounds have potential use as a natural feed additive [173], enhancing antioxidant status, immune function, and growth performance of farm animals [174]. We focused on the reported mechanisms and intracellular targets of flavonols and flavones (Figure 6) to boost research on discovering bioactive compounds and their mechanisms of action, anticipating that they can be used as standard treatment for inflammatory and infectious diseases in the future.

Figure 6

Summary of the effects of flavonols and flavones. The figure presents a range of signaling pathways of the inflammatory process and the stages where the compounds block the signaling cascade. The number represents the pathways inhibited by different compounds. For example, pathway 1 is blocked by the following compounds: quercetin, luteolin, 3,4-dihydroxyflavone, baicalein, nobiletin, and tangeretin. Scutellarin, vicenin-2, apigenin, 5-O-methyl-scutellarin, and the substances are able to block pathway 1 and inhibit pathway 2. Only luteolin and lucenin-2 inhibit pathway 3. Furthermore, pathway 4 can only be inhibited by luteolin. Most of the compounds previously mentioned in this review block pathway 5, except nobiletin, tangeretin, vicenin-2, and lucenin-2. Furthermore, luteolin, scutellarin, vicenin-2, and lucenin-2 inhibited pathway 6. Only isoquercetin blocks pathway 7, and luteolin blocks pathway 8.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contributions

Adriana R. Silva and Cassiano F. Gonçalves-de-Albuquerque contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the Universidade Federal Fluminense (PROPPI/UFF), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) (grant 001), Programa de Biotecnologia da Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), Programa de Pós Graduação em Biologia Molecular Celular (UNIRIO), Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO), Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ) (grants E-26/010.000983/2019, E-26/203.290/2017, and E-26/2010.592/2019), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), and Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fiocruz. We also acknowledge the financial support by the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7-2007-2013) under grant agreement (HEALTH-F4-2011-282095) (TARKINAID).

References

S. C. Yang, P. J. Chen, S. H. Chang et al., “Luteolin attenuates neutrophilic oxidative stress and inflammatory arthritis by inhibiting Raf1 activity,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 1, no. 154, pp. 384–396, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. I. Ahmed, M. Q. Hayat, M. Tahir et al., “Pharmacologically active flavonoids from the anticancer, antioxidant and antimicrobial extracts of Cassia angustifolia Vahl,” BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 460, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Carullo, A. R. Cappello, L. Frattaruolo, M. Badolato, B. Armentano, and F. Aiello, “Quercetin and derivatives: useful tools in inflammation and pain management,” Future Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 79–93, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Y. Park, G. O. Jung, K. T. Lee et al., “Antimutagenic activity of flavonoids from the heartwood of Rhus verniciflua,” The Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 73–79, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. N. Panche, A. D. Diwan, and S. R. Chandra, “Flavonoids: an overview,” Journal of Nutritional Science, vol. 5, article e47, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Chen, H. Deng, H. Cui et al., “Inflammatory responses and inflammation-associated diseases in organs,” Oncotarget, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 7204–7218, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Medzhitov, “Inflammation 2010: new adventures of an old flame,” Cell, vol. 140, no. 6, pp. 771–776, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Ginwala, R. Bhavsar, D. G. I. Chigbu, P. Jain, and Z. K. Khan, “Potential role of flavonoids in treating chronic inflammatory diseases with a special focus on the anti-inflammatory activity of apigenin,” Antioxidants, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 35, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Naraki, R. Rezaee, and G. Karimi, “A review on the protective effects of naringenin against natural and chemical toxic agents,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 4075–4091, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Gao, C. Liu, Y. Chen, Q. Wang, and Z. Hao, “Protective effects of natural products against drug-induced nephrotoxicity: a review in recent years,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 153, p. 112255, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Li, N. Zheng, and X. Ding, “Mitochondrial abnormalities: a hub in metabolic syndrome-related cardiac dysfunction caused by oxidative stress,” Heart Failure Reviews, vol. 27, no. 4, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Baroni, A. R. Sarni, and C. Zuliani, “Plant foods rich in antioxidants and human cognition: a systematic review,” Antioxidants, vol. 10, no. 5, p. 714, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Abate, M. Vezzoli, M. Sandri, W. Rungratanawanich, M. Memo, and D. Uberti, “Mitochondria and cellular redox state on the route from ageing to Alzheimer's disease,” Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, vol. 192, no. 192, article 111385, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Gośliński, D. Nowak, and L. Kłębukowska, “Antioxidant properties and antimicrobial activity of Manuka honey versus polish honeys,” Journal of Food Science and Technology, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 1269–1277, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Shen, J. Wang, X. Chen, T. Liu, Q. Zhuo, and S.-Q. Zhang, “Evaluation of cellular antioxidant components of honeys using UPLC-MS/MS and HPLC-FLD based on the quantitative composition-activity relationship,” Food Chemistry, vol. 293, pp. 169–177, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Silva, F. C. Biluca, L. V. Gonzaga et al., “In vitro anti-inflammatory properties of honey flavonoids: a review,” Food Research International, vol. 141, article 110086, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. S. Ahmad, A. A. Aziz, and K. W. Kong, “Dose–response effect of Tualang honey on postprandial antioxidant activity and oxidative stress in female athletes: a pilot study,” The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 989–995, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. P. Hills, P. Mitchell, C. Wells, and M. Russell, “Honey supplementation and exercise: a systematic review,” Nutrients, vol. 11, no. 7, p. 1586, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Jurcău and I. Jurcău, “Effect of Manuka honey administration on malondialdehyde, in intense exercise,” Palestrica Of The Third Millennium-Civilization And Sport, vol. 18, pp. 201–205, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Martinez-Armenta, M. C. Camacho-Rea, G. A. Martínez-Nava et al., “Therapeutic potential of bioactive compounds in honey for treating osteoarthritis,” Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 12, no. April, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. Al-Omar, H. A. Mohammed, S. A. Mohammed et al., “Anti-microbial, anti-oxidant, and α-amylase inhibitory activity of traditionally-used medicinal herbs: a comparative analyses of pharmacology, and phytoconstituents of regional halophytic plants’ diaspora,” Molecules, vol. 25, no. 22, p. 5457, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. Aherne and N. M. O’Brien, “Dietary flavonols: chemistry, food content, and metabolism,” Nutrition, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 75–81, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. J. Nijveldt, E. van Nood, D. E. C. van Hoorn, P. G. Boelens, K. van Norren, and P. A. M. van Leeuwen, “Flavonoids: a review of probable mechanisms of action and potential applications,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 418–425, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Wang, X. Fang, G. Lin et al., “Antitumor, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of kaempferol and its corresponding glycosides and the enzymatic preparation of kaempferol,” PLoS One, vol. 13, no. 5, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Xie, Z. Deng, J. Zhang et al., “Comparison of flavonoid O-glycoside, C-glycoside and their aglycones on antioxidant capacity and metabolism during in vitro digestion and in vivo,” Foods (Basel, Switzerland), vol. 11, no. 6, p. 882, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Crozier, J. Burns, A. A. Aziz et al., “Antioxidant flavonols from fruits, vegetables and beverages: measurements and bioavailability,” Biological Research, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 79–88, 2000, PMID: 15693274.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Wiczkowski, J. Romaszko, A. Bucinski et al., “Quercetin from shallots (Allium Cepa L. Var. Aggregatum) is more bioavailable than its glucosides,” The Journal of Nutrition, vol. 138, no. 5, pp. 885–888, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. M. Ferreira, A. H. Macedo, C. de Oliveira, and N. S. dos Santos, “Divulgação Científica Flavonas e Flavonóis: Novas Descobertas sobre Sua Estrutura Química e Função Biológica flavones and Fl Avonols: new insights into their chemical structure and biological function,” Revista Agro@mbiente On-Line, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 57–60, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
N. Jiang, A. I. Doseff, and E. Grotewold, “Flavones: from biosynthesis to health benefits,” Plants (Basel)., vol. 5, no. 2, p. 27, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Shen, T. Wang, Q. Gan, S. Liu, L. Wang, and B. Jin, “Plant flavonoids: classification, distribution, biosynthesis, and antioxidant activity,” Food Chemistry, vol. 383, article 132531, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. C. Dias, D. C. G. A. Pinto, and A. M. S. Silva, “Plant flavonoids: chemical characteristics and biological activity,” Molecules, vol. 26, no. 17, p. 5377, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. L. F. Ferreyra, P. Serra, and P. Casati, “Recent advances on the roles of flavonoids as plant protective molecules after UV and high light exposure,” Physiologia Plantarum, vol. 173, no. 3, pp. 736–749, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Wittayathanarattana, P. Wanichananan, K. Supaibulwatana, and E. Goto, “Enhancement of bioactive compounds in baby leaf Amaranthus tricolor L. using short-term application of UV-B irradiation,” Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 1, no. 182, pp. 202–215, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. V. David, R. Arulmoli, and S. Parasuraman, “Overviews of biological importance of quercetin: A bioactive flavonoid,” Pharmacognosy reviews, vol. 10, no. 20, p. 84, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Harnly, R. F. Doherty, G. R. Beecher et al., “Flavonoid content of U.S. fruits, vegetables, and nuts,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 54, no. 26, pp. 9966–9977, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. H. Miean and S. Mohamed, “Flavonoid (myricetin, quercetin, kaempferol, luteolin, and apigenin) content of edible tropical plants,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 3106–3112, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. B. Selvi, A. Swaminathan, S. Chatterjee et al., “Inhibition of p300 lysine acetyltransferase activity by luteolin reduces tumor growth in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) xenograft mouse model,” Oncotarget, vol. 6, no. 41, pp. 43806–43818, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C.-Y. Chen, W.-H. Peng, W. Li-Chen, W. Chun-Chi, and S.-L. Hsu, “Luteolin ameliorates experimental lung fibrosis both in vivo and in vitro: implications for therapy of lung fibrosis,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 58, no. 22, pp. 11653–11661, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Domitrović, H. Jakovac, J. Tomac, and I. Šain, “Liver fibrosis in mice induced by carbon tetrachloride and its reversion by luteolin,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 241, no. 3, pp. 311–321, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Deng, L. Jiang, X. Lin, K.-F. Tseng, L. Zhigang, and X. Wang, “Luteolin, a novel P90 ribosomal S6 kinase inhibitor, suppresses proliferation and migration in leukemia cells,” Oncology Letters, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1370–1378, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Hytti, N. Piippo, E. Korhonen, P. Honkakoski, K. Kaarniranta, and A. Kauppinen, “Fisetin and luteolin protect human retinal pigment epithelial cells from oxidative stress-induced cell death and regulate inflammation,” Scientific Reports, vol. 5, no. 1, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Franza, V. Carusi, E. Nucera, and F. Pandolfi, “Luteolin, inflammation and cancer: special emphasis on gut microbiota,” BioFactors, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 181–189, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Aggarwal, H. S. Tuli, F. Thakral et al., “Molecular mechanisms of action of hesperidin in cancer: recent trends and advancements,” Experimental Biology and Medicine (Maywood, N.J.), vol. 245, no. 5, pp. 486–497, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. M. Dabeek and M. V. Marra, “Dietary quercetin and kaempferol: bioavailability and potential cardiovascular-related bioactivity in humans,” Nutrients, vol. 11, no. 10, p. 2288, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. J. Hossen, M. B. Uddin, S. S. Ahmed, Z. L. Yu, and J. Y. Cho, “Kaempferol: review on natural sources and bioavailability,” Kaempferol: Biosynthesis, Food Sources and Therapeutic Uses, Nova Science Publishers, pp. 101–150, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
L.-Z. Lin, L. Shengmin, and J. M. Harnly, “Detection and quantification of glycosylated flavonoid malonates in celery, Chinese celery, and celery seed by LC-DAD-ESI/MS,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 1321–1326, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L.-Z. Lin, S. Mukhopadhyay, R. J. Robbins, and J. M. Harnly, “Identification and quantification of flavonoids of Mexican oregano (Lippia graveolens) by LC-DAD-ESI/MS analysis,” Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 361–369, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Ren, H. Endo, and T. Hayashi, “Antioxidative and antimutagenic activities and polyphenol content of pesticide-free and organically cultivated green vegetables using water-soluble chitosan as a soil modifier and leaf surface spray,” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 81, no. 15, pp. 1426–1432, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Shankar, A. Goel, K. Gupta, and S. Gupta, “lant Flavone Apigenin: An Emerging Anticancer Agent,” Current Pharmacology Reports, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 423–446, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Donald, K. Hertzer, and G. Eibl, “Baicalein--an Intriguing Therapeutic Phytochemical in Pancreatic Cancer,” Current Drug Targets, vol. 13, no. 14, pp. 1772–1776, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Zhao, X.-Y. Chen, and C. Martin, “Scutellaria baicalensis, the golden herb from the garden of Chinese medicinal plants,” Science Bulletin, vol. 61, no. 18, pp. 1391–1398, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. G. Pan, P. A. Kilmartin, B. G. Smith, and L. D. Melton, “Detection of orange juice adulteration by tangelo juice using multivariate analysis of polymethoxylated flavones and carotenoids,” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 421–427, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. C. Whitman, E. M. Kurowska, J. A. Manthey, and A. Daugherty, “Nobiletin, a citrus flavonoid isolated from tangerines, selectively inhibits class A scavenger receptor-mediated metabolism of acetylated LDL by mouse macrophages,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 178, no. 1, pp. 25–32, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Trepat, Z. Chen, and K. Jacobson, “Cell Migration,” Comprehensive Physiology, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Y. Zhou, E. M. Shin, L. Y. Guo et al., “Anti-inflammatory activity of 21(α, β)-methylmelianodiols, novel compounds from Poncirus trifoliata Rafinesque,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 572, no. 2-3, article S0014299907007819, pp. 239–248, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Kundu and Y. Surh, “Inflammation: gearing the journey to cancer,” Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research, vol. 659, no. 1-2, pp. 15–30, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. M. Richardson, C. J. Calo, and L. E. Hind, “Microphysiological systems for studying cellular crosstalk during the neutrophil response to infection,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 12, no. April, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. M. Henkels, M. Kathleen Frondorf, E. Gonzalez-Mejia, A. L. Doseff, and J. Gomez-Cambronero, “IL-8-induced neutrophil chemotaxis is mediated by Janus kinase 3 (JAK3),” FEBS Letters, vol. 585, no. 1, pp. 159–166, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Jeong, Y.-S. Yi, G.-H. Sung et al., “Anti-inflammatory activities and mechanisms of Artemisia asiatica ethanol extract,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 152, no. 3, pp. 487–496, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. E. Manning, J. W. Lewis, L.-J. Marsh, and H. M. McGettrick, “Insights into leukocyte trafficking in inflammatory arthritis–imaging the joint,” Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 9, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Cheng, T. Ma, W. Liu et al., “In in vivo evaluation of the anti-inflammatory and analgesic activities of compound Muniziqi granule in experimental animal models,” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 20, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. N. Serhan, “Treating inflammation and infection in the 21st century: new hints from decoding resolution mediators and mechanisms,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 1273–1288, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Sagnia, D. Fedeli, R. Casetti, C. Montesano, G. Falcioni, and V. Colizzi, “Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of extracts from Cassia Alata, Eleusine Indica, Eremomastax Speciosa, Carica Papaya and Polyscias Fulva medicinal plants collected in Cameroon,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 8, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. D. Cuong, T. M. Hung, J. S. Lee, K. Y. Weon, M. H. Woo, and B. S. Min, “Anti-inflammatory activity of phenolic compounds from the whole plant of Scutellaria indica,” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1129–1134, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. M. Olson, M. N. Hedrick, H. Izadi, T. C. Bates, E. R. Olivera, and J. Anguita, “P38 mitogen-activated protein kinase controls NF-ΚB transcriptional activation and tumor necrosis factor alpha production through RelA phosphorylation mediated by mitogen- and stress-activated protein kinase 1 in response toBorrelia burgdorferiAntigens,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 270–277, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. L. Rosa, G. M. Nardi, A. G. Januário et al., “Anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and immunostimulatory effects of Luehea divaricata Mart. & Zucc.(Malvaceae) bark,” Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 50, pp. 599–610, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. N. Yang, K. G. Ma, X. L. Chen et al., “Mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways are involved in regulating Α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor-mediated amyloid-β uptake in SH-SY5Y cells,” Neuroscience, vol. 278, pp. 276–290, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A.-L. Buicu, S. Cernea, I. Benedek, C.-F. Buicu, and T. Benedek, “Systemic inflammation and COVID-19 mortality in patients with major noncommunicable diseases: chronic coronary syndromes, diabetes and obesity,” Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 10, no. 8, p. 1545, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. F. Gonçalves-de-Albuquerque, I. Rohwedder, A. R. Silva et al., “The Yin and Yang of tyrosine kinase inhibition during experimental polymicrobial sepsis,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 9, no. April, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. M. Medeiros-de-Moraes, C. F. Gonçalves-de-Albuquerque, A. R. M. Kurz et al., “Omega-9 oleic acid, the main compound of olive oil, mitigates inflammation during experimental sepsis,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2018, no. November, Article ID 6053492, 13 pages, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Halliwell and J. M. C. Gutteridge, Free radicals in biology and medicine, Oxford University Press, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site
M. Edeas, “Strategies to target mitochondria and oxidative stress by antioxidants: key points and perspectives,” Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 2771–2779, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Lobo, A. Patil, A. Phatak, and N. Chandra, “Free radicals, antioxidants and functional foods: impact on human health,” Pharmacognosy Reviews, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 118–126, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Dumanović, E. Nepovimova, M. Natić, K. Kuča, and V. Jaćević, “The significance of reactive oxygen species and antioxidant defense system in plants: a concise overview,” Frontiers in Plant Science., vol. 11, article 552969, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Yang, T. Wang, M. Long, and P. Li, “Quercetin: its main pharmacological activity and potential application in clinical medicine,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2020, Article ID 8825387, 13 pages, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Bhattacharya, “Reactive oxygen species and cellular defense system,” Free Radicals in Human Health and Disease, Springer India, New Delhi, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Faria and S. J. Persaud, “Cardiac oxidative stress in diabetes: mechanisms and therapeutic potential,” Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 172, pp. 50–62, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Zuo, Z. Zhang, M. Luo et al., “Redox signaling at the crossroads of human health and disease,” MedComm, vol. 3, no. 2, article e127, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Hodaei, M. Rahimmalek, A. Arzani, and M. Talebi, “The effect of water stress on phytochemical accumulation, bioactive compounds and expression of key genes involved in flavonoid biosynthesis in Chrysanthemum morifolium L.,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 120, pp. 295–304, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. Butt, A. Imran, M. K. Sharif et al., “Black tea polyphenols: a mechanistic treatise,” Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 1002–1011, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. de Pascual-Teresa, C. Santos-Buelga, and J. C. Rivas-Gonzalo, “Quantitative analysis of flavan-3-Ols in Spanish foodstuffs and beverages,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 48, no. 11, pp. 5331–5337, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Manach, G. Williamson, C. Morand, A. Scalbert, and C. Rémésy, “Bioavailability and bioefficacy of polyphenols in humans. I. Review of 97 bioavailability studies,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 230S–242S, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. L. A. Sesink, K. A. O’Leary, and P. C. H. Hollman, “Quercetin glucuronides but not glucosides are present in human plasma after consumption of quercetin-3-glucoside or quercetin-4-glucoside,” The Journal of Nutrition, vol. 131, no. 7, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. C. H. Hollman and M. B. Katan, “Dietary flavonoids: intake, health effects and bioavailability,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 37, no. 9-10, pp. 937–942, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Tao, F. Zhu, M. Pan, Q. Liu, and P. Wang, “Pharmacokinetic, metabolism, and metabolomic strategies provide deep insight into the underlying mechanism of Ginkgo biloba flavonoids in the treatment of cardiovascular disease,” Frontiers in Nutrition, vol. 23, no. 9, article 857370, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Meyer, A. Bolarinwa, G. Wolfram, and J. Linseisen, “Bioavailability of apigenin from apiin-rich parsley in humans,” Annals of Nutrition & Metabolism, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 167–172, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. F. DeRango-Adem and J. Blay, “Does oral apigenin have real potential for a therapeutic effect in the context of human gastrointestinal and other cancers?” Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 12, no. May, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M.-P. Gonthier, J. L. Donovan, O. Texier, C. Felgines, C. Remesy, and A. Scalbert, “Metabolism of dietary procyanidins in rats,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 837–844, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. E. Orji, C. K. Okpoko, C. Agbata, J. Okoyeh, A. Okeke, and C. Ihekwereme, “Evaluation of the effect of luteolin on the hepatic and hematopoietic systems in albino rats,” Journal of Clinical Toxicology, vol. 10, pp. 1–5, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Jaime and S. Santoyo, “The health benefits of the bioactive compounds in foods,” Foods, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 325, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Kusari, S. Singh, and C. Jayabaskaran, “Biotechnological potential of plant-associated endophytic fungi: hope versus hype,” Trends in Biotechnology, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 297–303, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Li, J. Yao, C. Han et al., “Quercetin, inflammation and immunity,” Nutrients, vol. 8, no. 3, p. 167, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Salehi, L. Machin, L. Monzote et al., “Therapeutic potential of quercetin: new insights and perspectives for human health,” ACS Omega, vol. 5, no. 20, pp. 11849–11872, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. R. Manjeet and B. Ghosh, “Quercetin inhibits LPS-induced nitric oxide and tumor necrosis factor-α production in murine macrophages,” International Journal of Immunopharmacology, vol. 21, no. 7, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Wang, Z. Qu, L. Kong et al., “Quercetin ameliorates lipopolysaccharide-caused inflammatory damage via down-regulation of miR-221 in WI-38 cells,” Experimental and molecular pathology, vol. 1, no. 108, pp. 1–8, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. P. Kim, I. Mani, L. Iversen, and V. A. Ziboh, “Effects of naturally-occurring flavonoids and biflavonoids on epidermal cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenase from guinea-pigs,” Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 17–24, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. M. Lee, M. K. Hwang, D. E. Lee, K. W. Lee, and H. J. Lee, “Protective effect of quercetin against arsenite-induced COX-2 expression by targeting PI3K in rat liver epithelial cells,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 58, no. 9, pp. 5815–5820, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kumar, E. R. Kasala, L. N. Bodduluru, V. Kumar, and M. Lahkar, “Molecular and biochemical evidence on the protective effects of quercetin in isoproterenol-induced acute myocardial injury in rats,” Journal of Biochemical and Molecular Toxicology, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Mohod, A. D. Kandhare, and S. L. Bodhankar, “Gastroprotective potential of Pentahydroxy flavone isolated from Madhuca indica J. F. Gmel. leaves against acetic acid-induced ulcer in rats: The role of oxido-inflammatory and prostaglandins markers,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 182, pp. 150–159, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S.-C. Cheng, W.-C. Huang, J.-H. S. Pang, W. Yi-Hong, and C.-Y. Cheng, “Quercetin inhibits the production of IL-1β-induced inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in ARPE-19 cells via the MAPK and NF-ΚB signaling pathways,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 20, no. 12, p. 2957, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H.-J. Noh, C.-S. Kim, J.-H. Kang et al., “Quercetin suppresses MIP-1α–induced adipose inflammation by downregulating its receptors CCR1/CCR5 and inhibiting inflammatory signaling,” Journal of Medicinal Food, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 550–557, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y.-K. Ma, Y.-B. Chen, and P. Li, “Quercetin inhibits NTHi-triggered CXCR4 activation through suppressing IKKα/NF-ΚB and MAPK signaling pathways in otitis media,” International Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 248–258, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Junyuan, X. Hui, H. Chunlan et al., “Quercetin protects against intestinal barrier disruption and inflammation in acute necrotizing pancreatitis through TLR4/MyD88/p38 MAPK and ERS inhibition,” Pancreatology, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 742–752, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. A. B. Joosten, M. G. Netea, E. Mylona et al., “Engagement of fatty acids with toll-like receptor 2 drives interleukin-1β production via the ASC/caspase 1 pathway in monosodium urate monohydrate crystal–induced gouty arthritis,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 62, no. 11, pp. 3237–3248, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Xue, M. Du, and M. J. Zhu, “Quercetin suppresses NLRP3 inflammasome activation in epithelial cells triggered by Escherichia coli O157: H7,” Free radical biology and medicine, vol. 1, no. 108, pp. 760–769, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q.-H. Hu, X. Zhang, Y. Pan, Y.-C. Li, and L.-D. Kong, “Allopurinol, quercetin and rutin ameliorate renal NLRP3 inflammasome activation and lipid accumulation in fructose-fed rats,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 113–125, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Wang, Y. Pan, Q.-Y. Zhang, F.-M. Wang, and L.-D. Kong, “Quercetin and allopurinol ameliorate kidney injury in STZ-treated rats with regulation of renal NLRP3 inflammasome activation and lipid accumulation,” PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 6, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y.-J. Lee, H.-S. Choi, M.-J. Seo, H.-J. Jeon, K.-J. Kim, and B.-Y. Lee, “Kaempferol suppresses lipid accumulation by inhibiting early adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 cells and zebrafish,” Food & Function, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 2824–2833, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Jayachandran, Z. Wu, K. Ganesan, S. Khalid, S. M. Chung, and B. Xu, “Isoquercetin upregulates antioxidant genes, suppresses inflammatory cytokines and regulates AMPK pathway in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats,” Chemico-Biological Interactions, vol. 303, no. February, pp. 62–69, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Torres-Villarreal, A. Camacho, H. Castro, R. Ortiz-Lopez, and A. L. de la Garza, “Anti-obesity effects of kaempferol by inhibiting adipogenesis and increasing lipolysis in 3T3-L1 cells,” Journal of Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 83–88, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Sun, J. Sun, and X. Zhou, “Protective functions of myricetin in LPS-induced cardiomyocytes H9c2 cells injury by regulation of MALAT1,” European Journal of Medical Research, vol. 24, no. 1, p. 20, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Erlund, “Review of the flavonoids quercetin, hesperetin, and naringenin. Dietary sources, bioactivities, bioavailability, and epidemiology,” Nutrition Research, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 851–874, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Fei, B. Liang, C. Jiang, H. Ni, and L. Wang, “Luteolin inhibits IL-1β-induced inflammation in rat chondrocytes and attenuates osteoarthritis progression in a rat model,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, vol. 109, pp. 1586–1592, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. López-Posadas, I. Ballester, A. C. Abadía-Molina et al., “Effect of flavonoids on rat splenocytes, a structure–activity relationship study,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 76, no. 4, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. A. Perkin and E. A. Everest, The Natural Organic Coloring Matters, Longmans, Green and Co., London, 1918.
View at: Publisher Site
K.-S. Baek, Y.-S. Yi, Y.-J. Son et al., “In vitro and in vivo anti-inflammatory activities of Korean red ginseng- derived components,” Journal of Ginseng Research, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 437–444, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Fan, D. Kexin, N. Li et al., “Evaluation of anti-nociceptive and anti-inflammatory effect of luteolin in mice,” Journal of Environmental Pathology, Toxicology and Oncology, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 351–364, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. S. Ko, D. Y. Choi, and Y. T. Han, “A study of the changes of antibiotic sensitivity to the causative organisms of urinary tract infection for recent 5 years,” Korean Journal of Urology, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 809–816, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Yu, T. Ye, Y. Xiang et al., “Quercetin inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition, decreases invasiveness and metastasis, and reverses IL-6 induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition, expression of MMP by inhibiting STAT3 signaling in pancreatic cancer cells,” Oncotargets and Therapy, vol. 10, pp. 4719–4729, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Si, R. P. Wyeth, and D. Liu, “The flavonoid luteolin induces nitric oxide production and arterial relaxation,” European Journal of Nutrition, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 269–275, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. E. Peter, B. V. Sandeep, B. G. Rao, and V. L. Kalpana, “Calming the storm: natural Immunosuppressants as adjuvants to target the cytokine storm in COVID-19,” Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 11, article 583777, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Li, L. Wu, Y. Qian et al., “Luteolin protects against diabetic cardiomyopathy by inhibiting NF-κB-mediated inflammation and activating the Nrf2-mediated antioxidant responses,” Phytomedicine, vol. 59, no. June, p. 152774, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Nunes, L. Almeida, R. M. Barbosa, and J. Laranjinha, “Luteolin suppresses the JAK/STAT pathway in a cellular model of intestinal inflammation,” Food & Function, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 387–396, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Aneknan, V. Kukongviriyapan, A. Prawan, S. Kongpetch, B. Sripa, and L. Senggunprai, “Luteolin arrests cell cycling, induces apoptosis and inhibits the JAK/STAT3 pathway in human cholangiocarcinoma cells,” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 5071–5076, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y.-f. Guo, X. Nian-nian, W. Sun, Y. Zhao, C.-y. Li, and M.-y. Guo, “Luteolin reduces inflammation in staphylococcus aureus-induced mastitis by inhibiting NF-kB activation and MMPs expression,” Oncotarget, vol. 8, no. 17, pp. 28481–28493, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Bruno, L. Siena, S. Gerbino et al., “Apigenin affects leptin/leptin receptor pathway and induces cell apoptosis in lung adenocarcinoma cell line,” European Journal of Cancer, vol. 47, no. 13, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X.-J. Zhang, L. I. U. Shu, J.-P. Xing, Z.-Q. Liu, and F.-R. Song, “Effect of type 2 diabetes mellitus on flavonoid pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution after oral administration of Radix Scutellaria extract in rats,” Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 418–427, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Chen and W. Zhao, “Apigenin protects against bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis in rats,” Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 230–234, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Kim, H.-S. Yoo, J. Yeon-Joo et al., “Synthetic 3’,4’-dihydroxyflavone exerts anti-neuroinflammatory effects in BV2 microglia and a mouse model,” Biomolecules & Therapeutics, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 210–217, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Baluchnejadmojarad, H. Zeinali, and M. Roghani, “Scutellarin alleviates lipopolysaccharide-induced cognitive deficits in the rat: Insights into underlying mechanisms,” International Immunopharmacology, vol. 54, no. January, pp. 311–319, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Patel, M. Gadewar, V. Tahilyani, and D. K. Patel, “A review on pharmacological and analytical aspects of diosmetin: a concise report,” Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 792–800, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Yu and Y. Liu, “Diosmetin attenuate experimental ulcerative colitis in rats via suppression of NF-κB, TNF-α and IL-6 signalling pathways correlated with down-regulation of apoptotic events,” European Journal of Inflammation, vol. 19, p. 205873922110672, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. K. Kim, K. J. Yun, D. H. Lim, J. Kim, and Y. P. Jang, “Anti-Inflammatory properties of flavone Di-C-glycosides as active principles of camellia mistletoe, Korthalsella Japonica,” Biomolecules & Therapeutics, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 630–637, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Roos, R. van Bruggen, and C. Meischl, “Oxidative killing of microbes by neutrophils,” Microbes and Infection, vol. 5, no. 14, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Hassan, A. Ali, C. Withycombe et al., “TET-2 up-regulation is associated with the anti-inflammatory action of vicenin-2,” Cytokine, vol. 108, no. August, pp. 37–42, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Liu, Y. Zhangjie, X. Huang et al., “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) mediates the protective effect of quercetin against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury via suppressing the NF-ΚB pathway,” American Journal of Translational Research, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 5169–5186, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
S.-H. Eun, J.-T. Woo, and D.-H. Kim, “Tangeretin inhibits IL-12 expression and NF-ΚB activation in dendritic cells and attenuates colitis in mice,” Planta Medica, vol. 83, no. 6, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. Lima, R. G. de Oliveira, V. C. Silva et al., “Anti-inflammatory activity of 4,6,7-trihydroxy-5-methoxyflavone from Fridericia chica(Bonpl.) L.G.Lohmann,” Natural product research, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 726–730, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. R. Ferraz, T. T. Carvalho, M. F. Manchope et al., “Therapeutic potential of flavonoids in pain and inflammation: mechanisms of action, pre-clinical and clinical data, and pharmaceutical development,” Molecules, vol. 25, no. 3, p. 762, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Zhang, J. Yang, and J. Wang, “Modulatory effect of luteolin on redox homeostasis and inflammatory cytokines in a mouse model of liver cancer,” Oncology Letters, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 4767–4772, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Kim, Y.-W. Chin, and J. Cho, “Protection of cultured cortical neurons by luteolin against oxidative damage through inhibition of apoptosis and induction of heme oxygenase-1,” Biological & Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 256–265, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Luo, R. Tian, Z. Yang, Y. Y. Peng, and N. Lu, “Quercetin suppressed NADPH oxidase-derived oxidative stress via heme oxygenase-1 induction in macrophages,” Archives of biochemistry and biophysics, vol. 671, pp. 69–76, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. A. Allen and A. K. Criss, “Cell intrinsic functions of neutrophils and their manipulation by pathogens,” Current opinion in immunology, vol. 60, no. 60, pp. 124–129, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Gebicka and J. Krych-Madej, “The role of catalases in the prevention/promotion of oxidative stress,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vol. 197, article 110699, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Hur, E. Jang, and J.-H. Lee, “Beneficial actions of Orostachys japonica and its compounds against tumors via MAPK signaling pathways,” Nutrients, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 555, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Xu, H. Meng-Jiao, Y.-Q. Wang, and Y.-L. Cui, “Antioxidant activities of quercetin and its complexes for medicinal application,” Molecules, vol. 24, no. 6, p. 1123, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. S. Bustos, R. Deza-Ponzio, P. L. Páez et al., “Protective effect of quercetin in gentamicin-induced oxidative stress in vitro and in vivo in blood cells. Effect on gentamicin antimicrobial activity,” Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, vol. 48, pp. 253–264, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Tvrdá, E. Tušimová, A. Kováčik, D. Paál, Ľ. Libová, and N. Lukáč, “Protective effects of quercetin on selected oxidative biomarkers in bovine spermatozoa subjected to ferrous ascorbate,” Reproduction in Domestic Animals, vol. 51, no. 4, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Liu, J. Huang, and B. Zhang, “Nobiletin protects against murine l-arginine-induced acute pancreatitis in association with downregulating P38MAPK and AKT,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, vol. 81, no. July, pp. 104–110, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Yin, L. Xie, and Y. Guo, “Phytochemical analysis and antibacterial activity of _Gentiana macrophylla_ extract against bacteria isolated from burn wound infections,” Microbial Pathogenesis, vol. 114, pp. 25–28, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Chanput, N. Krueyos, and P. Ritthiruangdej, “Anti-oxidative assays as markers for anti-inflammatory activity of flavonoids,” International Immunopharmacology, vol. 40, no. November, pp. 170–175, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Aaby, E. Hvattum, and G. Skrede, “Analysis of flavonoids and other phenolic compounds using high-performance liquid chromatography with Coulometric array detection: relationship to antioxidant activity,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 52, no. 15, pp. 4595–4603, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Souza and L. Nanjaiah, “Antibacterial activity of 3,3,4-Trihydroxyflavone from Justicia wynaadensis against diabetic wound and urinary tract infection,” Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 152–161, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Chelladurai and B. Suresh, “In vitro studies on medicinal plants used against bacterial diabetic foot ulcer (BDFU) and urinary tract infected (UTI) causing pathogens,” Journal of Parasitic Diseases, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 667–673, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. S. Chakotiya, R. Chawla, M. Tomar et al., “In silico herbal bioprospection targeting multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa,” International Journal of Interdisciplinary and Multidisciplinary Studies, vol. 2, pp. 163–176, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
L. M. Fedoseeva, S. I. Kerasheva, and E. B. Karabasova, “Antimicrobial activity of dry extract from leaves of Bergenia crassifolia (L.) Fritsch. With respect to pathogens of some suppurative inflammatory diseases,” Rastitel’nye Resursy, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 53–57, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Sinha, T. Murugesan, J. R. Kuntal Maiti, B. P. Gayen, M. Pal, and B. P. Saha, “Antibacterial activity of _Bergenia ciliata_ rhizome,” Fitoterapia, vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 550–552, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Ilk, N. Sağlam, M. Özgen, and F. Korkusuz, “Chitosan nanoparticles enhances the anti-quorum sensing activity of kaempferol,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 94, no. January, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Liu, M. Wang, and X. Wang, “Phytochemical analysis and antibacterial activity of methanolic extract of Bergenia purpurascens against common respiratory infection causing bacterial species in vitro and in neonatal rats,” Microbial Pathogenesis, vol. 117, pp. 315–319, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Luo, B. Dong, K. Wang et al., “Baicalin inhibits biofilm formation, attenuates the quorum sensing-controlled virulence and enhances pseudomonas aeruginosa clearance in a mouse peritoneal implant infection model,” PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 4, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Brackman, P. Cos, L. Maes, H. J. Nelis, and T. Coenye, “Quorum sensing inhibitors increase the susceptibility of bacterial biofilms to antibiotics in vitro and in vivo,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 2655–2661, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P.,. L. Yuan, M. Yuan, Z. Q. Cui et al., “Rutin inhibits quorum sensing, biofilm formation and virulence genes in avian pathogenic Escherichia coli,” Microbial Pathogenesis, vol. 119, no. January, pp. 54–59, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. O. Omwenga, A. Hensel, A. Shitandi, and F. M. Goycoolea, “Chitosan nanoencapsulation of flavonoids enhances their quorum sensing and biofilm formation inhibitory activities against an E.coli Top 10 biosensor,” Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, vol. 164, pp. 125–133, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Hentzer, H. Wu, J. B. Andersen et al., “Attenuation of pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence by quorum sensing inhibitors,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 22, no. 15, pp. 3803–3815, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. S. Chakotiya, A. Tanwar, P. Srivastava, A. Narula, and R. K. Sharma, “Effect of aquo-alchoholic extract of Glycyrrhiza glabra against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Mice Lung Infection Model,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, vol. 90, no. June, pp. 171–178, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. K. Dzotam, I. K. Simo, G. Bitchagno et al., “In vitro antibacterial and antibiotic modifying activity of crude extract, fractions and 3,4,7-trihydroxyflavone from Myristica Fragrans Houtt against MDR gram-negative enteric bacteria,” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 15, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. E. Yun, E.-R. Woo, and D. G. Lee, “Effect of isoquercitrin on membrane dynamics and apoptosis-like death in _Escherichia coli_,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes, vol. 1860, no. 2, pp. 357–363, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Esposito, E. U. Garzarella, B. Bocchino et al., “A standardized polyphenol mixture extracted from poplar-type propolis for remission of symptoms of uncomplicated upper respiratory tract infection (URTI): a monocentric, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial,” Phytomedicine, vol. 80, no. January, article 153368, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Das, M. K. Das, T. Deka, L. R. Singha, and P. Das, “Nanomedicines and nanodrug delivery systems: trends and perspectives,” Nano medicine and nano safety, Springer, Singapore, pp. 99–141, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. S. Das, P. R. P. Verma, S. Kar, and S. K. Singh, “Quercetin-loaded nanomedicine as oncotherapy,” Nanomedicine for Bioactives: Healthcare Applications, Springer, Singapore, pp. 155–183, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Suvarna, B. Bore, C. Bhawar, and R. Mallya, “Complexation of phytochemicals with cyclodextrins and their derivatives- an update,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, vol. 149, article 112862, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Gorain, M. Pandey, N. H. Leng et al., “Advanced drug delivery systems containing herbal components for wound healing,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vol. 617, p. 121617, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Mahfuz, H.-S. Mun, M. A. Dilawar, K. M. B. Ampode, and C.-J. Yang, “Potential role of protocatechuic acid as natural feed additives in farm animal production,” Animals, vol. 12, no. 6, p. 741, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Mahfuz, Q. Shang, and X. Piao, “Phenolic compounds as natural feed additives in poultry and swine diets: a review,” Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 48, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T.-y. Wang, Q. Li, and K.-s. Bi, “Bioactive flavonoids in medicinal plants: structure, activity and biological fate,” Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 12–23, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Maria do Socorro S. Chagas et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

2718

Downloads

1540

Citations