Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Occupational Therapy International
Volume 2017, Article ID 3014579, 7 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3014579
Research Article

Test-Retest Reliability of a Measure of Independence in Everyday Activities: The ADL Profile

1School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
2Centre of Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal, QC, Canada

Correspondence should be addressed to Élisabeth Dutil; ac.laertnomu@litud.htebasile

Received 29 July 2016; Revised 22 November 2016; Accepted 26 December 2016; Published 22 January 2017

Academic Editor: Valerie Hill

Copyright © 2017 Élisabeth Dutil et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. Bottari, C. Dassa, C. Rainville, and É. Dutil, “The factorial validity and internal consistency of the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Profile in individuals with a traumatic brain injury,” Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 177–207, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. T. Shallice and P. W. Burgess, “Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man,” Brain, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 727–741, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. P. Rabbitt, “Introduction: methodologies and models in the study of executive function,” in Methodology of Frontal and Executive Function, P. Rabbitt, Ed., pp. 1–38, Psychology Press, Hove, UK, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  4. V. Poulin, N. Korner-Bitensky, and D. R. Dawson, “Stroke-specific executive function assessment: a literature review of performance-based tools,” Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 3–19, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. G. Fisher and K. Bray Jones, Assessment of Motor and Process Skills. Vol. 1: Development, Standardization, and Administration Manual, vol. 1, Three Star Press, Fort Collins, Colo, USA, 7th edition, 2010.
  6. A. G. Fisher and K. Bray Jones, Assessment of Motor and Process Skills. Volume 2: User Manual, Three Star Press, Fort Collins, Colo, USA, 7th edition, 2010.
  7. J. Ku, J. H. Lee, K. Han, S. I. Kim, Y. J. Kang, and E. S. Park, “Validity and reliability of cognitive assessment using virtual environment technology in patients with stroke,” American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 88, no. 9, pp. 702–710, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. L. Sakzewski, M. Lewis, and J. Ziviani, “Test–retest reproducibility of the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills for school-aged children with acquired brain injuries,” Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, pp. 1–6, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. E. Dutil, A. Forget, M. Vanier, and C. Gaudreault, “Development of the ADL profile: an evaluation for adults with severe head injury,” Occupational Therapy in Health Care, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 7–22, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. R. Luria, The Working Brain: an Introduction to Neuropsychology, Basic Books, New York, NY, USA, 1973.
  11. A. R. Luria, Higher Cortical Functions in Man, Basic Books, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 1966.
  12. M. P. Lawton, “Environment and other determinants of well-being in older people,” The Gerontologist, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 349–357, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. Rousseau, E. Dutil, and J. Lambert, “Fidélité inter-examinateurs du ‘Profil des AVQ-Mise en situation’ chez. la personne traumatisée cranio-encéphalique Partie 1: Étude sur la cote globale,” Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 149–158, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. Rousseau, E. Dutil, and J. Lambert, “Fidélité inter-examinateurs du ‘Profil des AVQ-Mise en situation’ chez la personne traumatisée cranio-encéphalique partie 2: étude sur la cote des opérations,” Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 159–167, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. D. L. Streiner, G. R. Norman, and J. Cairney, Health Measurement Scales. A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 4th edition, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. J. Cohen, “A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 37–46, 1960. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. R. Landis and G. G. Koch, “The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data,” Biometrics, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 159–174, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. J. Green and J. Young, “A test-retest reliability study of the Barthel Index, the Rivermead Mobility Index, the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale and the Frenchay Activities Index in stroke patients,” Disability and Rehabilitation, vol. 23, no. 15, pp. 670–676, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus