Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Occupational Therapy International
Volume 2017, Article ID 5413628, 11 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5413628
Review Article

Principal Approaches to Understanding Occupation and Occupational Science Found in the Chilean Journal of Occupational Therapy (2001–2012)

1Department of Occupational Therapy and Occupational Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
2Chilean Society of Occupational Science, Santiago, Chile
3Tedes Center, Santiago, Chile

Correspondence should be addressed to Rodolfo Morrison; moc.liamg@oflodor.nosirrom

Received 6 December 2016; Revised 24 February 2017; Accepted 5 April 2017; Published 21 May 2017

Academic Editor: Claudia Hilton

Copyright © 2017 Rodolfo Morrison et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Apablaza, “The challenge of training: a reflection from practice as trainer occupational therapists,” Chilean Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 15, no. 2, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. J. Carrasco M and D. Olivares A, “Making way to go: construction and understanding of Occupation for research and practice in Occupational Therapy,” Chilean Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 8, pp. 5–16, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. E. I. Blanche and E. Henny-Kohler, “Philosophy, science and ideology: a proposed relationship for occupational science and occupational therapy,” Occupational Therapy International, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 99–110, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. R. Morrison, “Pragmatist epistemology and Jane Addams: fundamental concepts for the social paradigm of occupational therapy,” Occupational Therapy International, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 295–304, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. P. Crist, M. Scaffa, and B. Hooper, “Occupational therapy education and the centennial vision: preface,” Occupational Therapy in Health Care, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. B. Hooper, “The occupation of teaching: elements of meaning portrayed through educators' teaching diagrams,” Journal of Occupational Science, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 167–181, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. B. Hooper, “On arriving at the destination of the centennial vision: navigational landmarks to guide occupational therapy education,” Occupational Therapy in Health Care, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 97–106, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. B. Hooper, “Shortening the distance between the ‘i’ and the ‘it’: a transformative approach to improving teaching,” Occupational Therapy in Health Care, vol. 21, no. 1-2, pp. 199–215, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. B. Hooper and W. Wood, “Pragmatism and structuralism in occupational therapy: the long conversation,” American Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 40–50, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. Mattingly and M. H. Fleming, Clinical Reasoning: Forms of Inquiry in A Therapeutic Practice, Davis, F. A., Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 1994.
  11. E. J. Yerxa, “Infinite distance between the/and the it,” American Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 490–497, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. N. Ikiugu and H. M. Rosso, “Facilitating professional identity in occupational therapy students,” Occupational Therapy International, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 206–225, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. R. Bustos, “Chilean Journal of Occupational Therapy is the most consulted of Faculty of Medicine’ jurnals in Internet,” Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, http://noticias.med.uchile.cl/actividades-decanato/9588-revista-chilena-de-terapia-ocupacional-es-la-mas-consultada-en-internet-de-la-facultad-de-medicina.html.
  14. R. Zemke and F. Clark, Occupational Science: The Evolving Discipline, F. A. Davis Company, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 1996.
  15. E. J. Yerxa, “Occupational science: a renaissance of service to humankind through knowledge,” Occupational Therapy International, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 87–98, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. G. Whiteford and C. Hocking, Occupational Science: Society, Inclusion, Participation, John Wiley & Sons, Milton, Australia, 2012.
  17. N. A. Casullo, R. Forster, and A. Kaufman, Itineraries Modernity. Currents of thought and intellectual traditions from the Enlightenment to Postmodernism, Eudeba, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1999.
  18. J. García-Arias, “Could the theory of thought modes explain some of the differences between mainstream and keynesian/post-keynesian economics?” Social Science Journal, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 573–585, 2010, http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=28012285002. View at Google Scholar
  19. T. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill, USA, 2nd edition, 1970.
  20. G. Kielhofner, Conceptual Foundations of Occupational Therapy Practice, F. A. Davis, Philadelphia, Fla, USA, 4th edition, 2009.
  21. S. L. M. Letelier, M. J. J. Manríquez, and G. G. Rada, “Systematic reviews and metaanalysis: are they the best evidence?” Medical Journal of Chile, vol. 133, no. 2, pp. 246–249, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. A. L. Strauss and J. M. Corbin, Bases of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, Univ. of Antioquia Press, Medellín, Colombia, 2002.
  23. D. Pierce, K. Atler, J. Baltisberger et al., “Occupational science: a data-based american perspective,” Journal of Occupational Science, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 204–215, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. R. Sautu, Everything Is Theory: Research Objectives And Methods, Lumiere, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2005.
  25. Knowledge Master Corporation, “Conceptualization,” http://conceptmaps.it/KM-Conceptualization-esp.htm.
  26. L. Leive, “Bedtime routine in the first years of life: first theoretical approach from an occupational Science perspective,” Chilean Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 70–83, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. P. A. Cabello, E. Henny, M. C. Hidalgo, and L. Vásquez, “The occupations of the children of parents with disabilities,” Chilean Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 8, pp. 79–83, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. D. Pierce, “Untangling occupation and activity,” American Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 138–146, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. A. Esdaile and A. Olson, Mothering Occupations. Challenge, Agency and Participation, F.A. Davis, Philadelphia, 2004.
  30. J. Evans and S. Rodger, “Mealtimes and bedtimes: windows to family routines and rituals,” Journal of Occupational Science, vol. 15, no. 2, Article ID 9686615, pp. 98–104, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. C. H. Christiansen, “Defining lives: occupation as identity: an essay on competence, coherence, and the creation of meaning [The Eleanor Clarke Slagle lecture],” American Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 547–558, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. D. Nelson and J. Jepson-Thomas, “Occupational form, occupational performance, and a conceptual framework for therapeutic occupational,” in Perspectives in Human Occupation-Participation in Life, P. Kramer, J. Hinojosa, and C. B. Royeen, Eds., pp. 87–155, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, Md, USA, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  33. B. J. Drápela, G. M. d. Huidobro, S. J. Núñez, and T. M. Palacios, “"Meanings associated to criminal activities” in men who are deprived of their liberty in Centro de Detención Preventiva Santiago Sur,” Chilean Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 8, pp. 47–58, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. M. M. E. Fernández, G. A. Gaviglio, and S. G. Adur, “An analysis on participation in productive enterprises in mental health area, in the context of social economy in Buenos Aires city- Argentina,” Chilean Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 12, no. 2, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. E. Imperatore Blanche, “Deficit Sensory Integration: Long-term effects on occupation and play,” Chilean Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 5, pp. 1–6, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. S. Mella, V. Villarroel, R. Sepúlveda, and G. Guzmán, “Occupation: a proposal for intervention with persons deprived of liberty based on occupation,” Chilean Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 8, pp. 37–46, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. J. Rodríguez and J. Gajardo, “About the contribution of occupational therapy to non-pharmacologic approaches for the treatment of psychological and behavioral symptoms associated with dementia,” Chilean Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 12, no. 2, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. P. Torrico, D. Urrutia, and M. Schliebener, “How meaningful is for the women themselves the activities they carry out?” Chilean Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 8, pp. 17–25, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. S.-P. C. Fanchiang, “The other side of the coin: growing up with a learning disability,” American Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 277–285, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. R. Zemke, Time, Space and the Kaleidoscopes of Occupation, The Eleanor Clarke Slagle Lecture, 2004 AOTA Conference, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2004.
  41. A. Wilcock, An Occupational Perspective of Health, Slack Inc., Thorofare, NJ, USA, 2nd edition, 2006.
  42. L. S. Gómez, “The occupation and its significance as a factor of personal identity,” Chilean Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 3, pp. 43–47, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. L. Da Silva Araújo, N. Fierro Jordán, P. Guitérrez Monclus, and O. Rodriguez, “Occupational science and occupational therapy: its relations and applications to clinical practice,” Chilean Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 79–87, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. E. I. Muñoz and G. P. Salgado, “Leisure occupations: approach from a perspective of development, life cycles and human needs,” Chilean Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 6, pp. 39–45, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. L. Rueda, M. A. Montenegro, D. Poblete, and F. Traipe, “Post Traumatic Stress: interference and occupational adjustment,” Chilean Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 8, pp. 27–35, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. R. Morrison J, “Rhetoric of science. Descriptions and critical reflection about creation of knowledge. Contributions to Occupational Therapy,” Chilean Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 89–101, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. F. Kronenberg, S. Simó Algado, and N. Pollard, Occupational Therapy Without Borders: learning From The Spirit of Survivors, Médica Panamericana, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2006.
  48. R. Morrison, D. Olivares, and D. Vidal, “The Philosophy of Human Occupation and The Social Paradigm of the Occupation. Some reflections and suggestions on current epistemologies in Occupational Therapy and Occupational Science,” Chilean Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 102–119, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  49. J. Díez and C. Moulines, Fundamentals of Philosophy of Science, Ariel, Barcelona, Spain, 1997.
  50. J. Echeverría, Philosophy of Science, Akal, Madrid, Spain, 2nd edition, 1998.
  51. H. Longino, The Fate of Knowledge, Princeton University Press, NJ, USA, 2002.
  52. A. Marcos, Science and Action. A Practical Philosophy of Science, Fondo de Cultura Económica, Mexico City, Mexico, 2010.
  53. E. Morin, Introduction to Complex Thought, Gedisa, Barcelona, Spain, 1998.
  54. J. Solana, With Edgar Morin, for a complex thought. Interdisciplinary implications, Akal, Madrid, Spain, 2005.
  55. R. Ramírez P and M. Schliebener T, “Occupation and dialectics, an analysis from materialistic dialectic,” Chilean Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 9, pp. 167–178, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. A. Giddens, A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism, vol. 1, Stanford University Press, Broadway, Calif, USA, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  57. A. Spirkin and O. Yajot, Fundamentals of dialectical and historical materialism, Austral, Santiago, Chile, 1972.
  58. L. Rueda Castro, “Occupation: science and technique of occupational therapy,” Chilean Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 3, pp. 1–5, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  59. J. Acevedo, Heidegger and the Technical Era, Universitaria, Santiago, Chile, 2nd edition, 1999.
  60. F. Lolas, Bioethics and Medical Anthropology, Mediterráneo, Santiago, Chile, 2000.
  61. E. Álvarez, S. Gómez, I. Muñoz et al., “Concept of occupation: definition and development. Essay about an experience of theoretical construction from a local identity,” Chilean Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 7, pp. 76–82, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  62. L. Da Silva and O. de Araújo, “Human occupation and occupational therapist practice’s in Pará Amazon: a phenomenological perspective,” Chilean Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 10, pp. 99–110, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  63. H. Zemelman, The Horizons of Reason, Anthropos, Madrid, Spain, 1992.
  64. H. Zemelman, Subject: Existence and Power, Anthropos/UNAM, Barcelona, Spain, 1998.
  65. M. Arnold and F. Osorio, Introduction to Basic Concepts of General Systems Theory, Möbius strip, 1998, http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=10100306.
  66. L. Bertalanfly, The General Systems Theory, Fondo de Cultura Económica, Mexico City, Mexico, 1976.
  67. F. Capra, The Web of Life, Harper Collins, London, UK, 1997.
  68. J. A. S. Kelso and B. Tuller, “A dynamical basis for action systems,” in Handbook of Cognitive Neuroscience, M. S. Gazzaniga, Ed., Plenum, New York, NY, USA, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  69. T. Ibáñez, Social Psychology Constructionist, Univ. de Guadalajara Press, Jalisco, México, 1994.
  70. G. Kielhofner, Model of Human Occupation, Médica Panamericana, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 3rd edition, 2004.
  71. D. L. Nelson, “Occupation: form and performance,” American Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 633–641, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  72. M. Iwama, The Kawa Model, Culturally Relevant Occupational Therapy, Churchill LivingstoneElsevier, New York, NY, USA, 2006.
  73. F. Clark and M. Lawlor, “The Making and mattering of occupational science,” in Willard and Spackman. Occupational Therapy, E. Crepeau, E. Cohn, and B. Schell, Eds., pp. 14–11e, Wolters Klover Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  74. D. L. Rudman, J. V. Cook, and H. Polatajko, “Understanding the potential of occupation: a qualitative exploration of seniors' perspectives on activity,” American Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 640–650, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus