Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Occupational Therapy International
Volume 2017, Article ID 6493472, 6 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6493472
Research Article

Establishing Concurrent Validity of the Role Checklist Version 2 with the OCAIRS in Measurement of Participation: A Pilot Study

1Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
2Franciscan Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA
3NCA Therapy, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
4Autism Treatment Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
5Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Patricia J. Scott; ude.ui@pttocs

Received 19 July 2016; Revised 16 November 2016; Accepted 15 December 2016; Published 22 January 2017

Academic Editor: Kathleen M. Matuska

Copyright © 2017 Patricia J. Scott et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. G. Kielhofner, Model of Human Occupation: Theory and Application, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, Md, USA, 4th edition, 2008.
  2. L. G. Richards, N. K. Latham, D. U. Jette, L. Rosenberg, R. J. Smout, and G. DeJong, “Characterizing occupational therapy practice in stroke rehabilitation,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 86, no. 12, pp. S51–S60, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. N. K. Latham, D. U. Jette, W. Coster et al., “Occupational therapy activities and intervention techniques for clients with stroke in six rehabilitation hospitals,” The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 369–378, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. R. K. Bode, A. W. Heinemann, P. Semik, and T. Mallinson, “Patterns of therapy activities across length of stay and impairment levels: peering inside the ‘black box’ of inpatient stroke rehabilitation,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 85, no. 12, pp. 1901–1908, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. Smallfield and J. Karges, “Classification of occupational therapy intervention for inpatient stroke rehabilitation,” The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 408–413, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. F. Oakley, G. Kielhofner, R. Barris, and R. K. Reichler, “The role checklist: development and empirical assessment of reliability,” Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 157–170, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. K. Forsyth, S. Deshpande, G. Kielhofner et al., The Occupational Circumstances Assessment Interview and Rating Scale (OCAIRS), University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Ill, USA, 2005.
  8. P. J. Scott, “Participation in valued roles post-liver transplant,” The British Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 73, no. 11, pp. 517–523, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. United Network for Organ Sharing, United Network for Organ Sharing, 2014, http://www.unos.org/data/.
  10. D. M. Bravata and E. B. Keeffe, “Quality of life and employment after liver transplantation,” Liver Transplantation, vol. 7, no. 11, supplement 1, pp. S119–S123, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. Desai, N. V. Jamieson, A. E. Gimson et al., “Quality of life up to 30 years following liver transplantation,” Liver Transplantation, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 1473–1479, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. S. Bajaj, L. R. Thacker, D. M. Heuman et al., “The stroop smartphone application is a short and valid method to screen for minimal hepatic encephalopathy,” Hepatology, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 1122–1132, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. P. J. Scott, R. McFadden, K. Yates, S. Baker, and S. McSoley, “The role checklist V2: QP: establishment of reliability and validation of electronic administration,” British Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 96–102, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. P. J. Scott, “Measuring participation outcomes following life-saving medical interventions: the Role Checklist Version 2: quality of Performance,” Disability & Rehabilitation, vol. 36, no. 13, pp. 1108–1112, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. P. J. Scott, “Measuring participation outcomes following life-saving medical interventions: the role checklist version 2: quality of performance,” Disability and Rehabilitation, vol. 36, no. 13, pp. 1108–1112, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Aslaksen, P. Scott, L. Haglund, B. Ellingham, and T. Bonsaksen, “Using the role checklist version 2: quality of performance in the occupational therapy process in a mental health setting,” Ergoterapeuten, no. 4, pp. 38–45, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  17. L. Haglund and K. Forsyth, “The measurement properties of the occupational circumstances interview and rating scale—Sweden (OCAIRS-S V2),” Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 412–419, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. H. Watts, C. Brollier, D. Bauer, and W. Schmidt, “A comparison of two evaluation instruments used with psychiatric patients in occupational therapy,” Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 7–27, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. P. J. Scott, “Participation in valued roles post-liver transplant,” British Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 73, no. 11, pp. 517–523, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus