Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Occupational Therapy International
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 7602805, 8 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7602805
Research Article

Integrating Occupational Therapy Specific Assessments in Practice: Exploring Practitioner Experiences

1Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences, and Society (NVS), Division of Occupational Therapy, Karolinska Institutet, Alfred Nobels Allé 23, B4, Huddinge, Sweden
2Unit for Research, Education, and Development (FoUU), Stockholms Sjukhem Foundation, Stockholm, Sweden
3Department of Occupational Therapy, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan
4Department of Occupational Therapy, International University of Health and Welfare, Narita, Japan
5Karolinska University Hospital, Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy Practice Areas, Huddinge, Sweden
6Faculty for Health and Society, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden

Correspondence should be addressed to Eric Asaba; es.ik@abasa.cire

Received 13 July 2017; Revised 22 October 2017; Accepted 30 October 2017; Published 3 December 2017

Academic Editor: Patricia Belchior

Copyright © 2017 Eric Asaba et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Law, S. Baptiste, M. A. McColl, A. Opzoomer, H. Polatajko, and N. Pollock, “The Canadian occupational performance measure: an outcome measure for occupational therapy,” Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 82–87, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. G. Fisher, Assessment of Motor and Process Skills: Development, Standardization and Administration Manual, vol. 1, Three Star Press, Fort Collins, Colo, USA, 5th edition, 2003.
  3. G. Eriksson, K. Tham, and J. Borg, “Occupational gaps in everyday life 1–4 years after acquired brain injury,” Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 159–165, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. G. Fisher and L. A. Griswold, Evaluation of Social Interaction, Three Star Press, Fort Collins, Colo, USA, 2009.
  5. A. G. Fisher, “Occupation-centred, occupation-based, occupation-focused: Same, same or different?” Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 162–173, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Sirkka, K. Zingmark, and M. Larsson-Lund, “A process for developing sustainable evidence-based occupational therapy practice,” Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 429–437, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. N. M. Alotaibi, K. Reed, and M. S. Nadar, “Assessments used in occupational therapy practice: an exploratory study,” Occupational Therapy in Health Care, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 302–318, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. G. Chard, “An investigation into the use of the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) in clinical practice,” The British Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 63, no. 10, pp. 481–488, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. I. K. Öhman and E. Asaba, “Goal setting in occupational therapy: a narrative study exploring theory and practice in psychiatry,” World Federation of Occupational Therapists Bulletin, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 22–28, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. T. Kaneyama and K. Inoue, “A survey of ADL assessment approaches used by occupational therapists in practice,” Okayama Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 13–22, 2010 (Japanese). View at Google Scholar
  11. M. Iwama, “Toward culturally relevant epistemologies in occupational therapy,” American Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 582–588, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. C. Mattingly, “In search of the good: Narrative reasoning in clinical practice,” Medical Anthropology Quarterly, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 273–297, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. C. Mattingly, Healing Dramas and Clinical Plots: The Narrative Structure of Experience, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1998.
  14. E. Asaba, I. Petersson, P. Bontje, and A. Kottorp, “The assessment of awareness of ability (A3) in a Japanese context: A Rasch model application,” Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 370–376, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. D. E. Polkinghorne, “Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis,” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 5–23, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. C. Pope, S. Ziebland, and N. Mays, “Analysing qualitative data,” in Qualitative Research in Healthcare, C. Pope and N. Mays, Eds., Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Malden, Mass, USA, 3rd edition, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  17. E. Asaba and A. Asaba, “Towards client-centered and occupation-based evaluation and intervention: A case study,” Okayama Journal of Occupational Therapy, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  18. A. G. Fisher, L. A. Griswold, M. Munkholm, and A. Kottorp, “Evaluating domains of everyday functioning in people with developmental disabilities,” Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. Kottorp, B. Heuchemer, I. P. Lie, and C. H. Gumpert, “Evaluation of activities of daily living ability and awareness among clients in a forensic psychiatry evaluation unit in Sweden,” The British Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 23–30, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. Kottorp, L. Ekstam, and I. Petersson Lie, “Differences in awareness between persons with left and right hemispheric stroke,” Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 37–44, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. Kottorp and I. Petersson, “Psychometric evaluation of an assessment of awareness using two different Rasch models,” Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 219–230, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. Öhman, L. Nygård, and A. Kottorp, “The relationship between occupational performance and awareness of disability in older adults with cognitive impairment or dementia,” Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 18, pp. 133–142, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  23. R. L. Anderson, S. E. Doble, B. K. Merritt, and A. Kottorp, “Assessment of awareness of disability measures among persons with acquired brain injury,” Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 22–29, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. I. Seidman, Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences, Teachers College Press, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 1998.
  25. L. Ayres, “Thematic coding and analysis,” in The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, L. Given, Ed., Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks, Calif, USA, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  26. T. Muhr, ATLAS.ti. WIN 4.2 Build 061, Scientific Software Development, Berlin, Germany, 1997.
  27. G. Kielhofner, Model of Human Occupation: Theory and Application, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Balitmore, Md, USA, 4th edition, 2008.
  28. A. Wilcock, An Occupational Perspective of Health, SLACK Inc, Thorofare, NJ, USA, 1998.
  29. M. P. Cutchin, R. M. Aldrich, A. L. Bailliard, and S. Coppola, “Action theories for occupational science: The contributions of Dewey and Bourdieu,” Journal of Occupational Science, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 157–165, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. K. K. Maitra and F. Erway, “Perception of client-centered practice in occupational therapists and their clients,” American Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 298–310, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. E. Wressle and K. Samuelsson, “Barriers and bridges to client-centred occupational therapy in Sweden,” Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 12–16, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. M. Sirkka, M. Larsson-Lund, and K. Zingmark, “Occupational therapists' experiences of improvement work: A journey towards sustainable evidence-based practice,” Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 90–97, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. C. R. May, M. Johnson, and T. Finch, “Implementation, context and complexity,” Implementation Science, vol. 11, no. 1, article 141, pp. 1–12, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. D. Upton, D. Stephens, B. Williams, and L. Scurlock-Evans, “Occupational therapists' attitudes, knowledge, and implementation of evidence-based practice: A systematic review of published research,” The British Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 24–38, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. E. A. Balas and S. A. Boren, “Managing clinical knowledge for health care improvement,” in Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2000: Patient-Centered Systems, J. Bemmel and A. T. McCray, Eds., pp. 65–70, Schattauer Verlagsgesellschaft, Stuttgart, Germany, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  36. L. Nygård, A. Kottorp, and L. Rosenberg, “Making use of research: Clinical views on an evaluation of everyday technology use,” Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 24–32, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus