Evaluating Hand Function in Clients with Trigger Finger

Table 2

Mean difference in FDT, PPT, and JD scores amongst different groups TF grades.

	TF grades
	TF 1 ()		TF 2 ()		TF 3 ()		ANOVA			I versus II	I versus III	II versus III
	Mean (SD)	95% CI	Mean (SD)	95% CI	Mean (SD)	95% CI
FDT affected hand	28.34 (4.98)	13.22–43.45	37.41 (28.74)	29.67–45.14	47.39 (21.43)	30.68–64.11	1.453	0.246	0.046	0.568	0.247	0.558
PPT affected hand	13.18 (2.04)	11.83–14.53	11.55 (2.13)	10.86–12.24	10 (2.87)	10.86–12.24	5.083	0.009	0.147	0.106	0.010	0.177
PPT both hands	10.64 (1.21)	9.55–11.73	9.38 (1.89)	8.82–9.94	7.67 (1.94)	8.82–9.94	6.705	0.002	0.185	0.131	0.002	0.042
PPT assembly	28.36 (7.55)	25.12–31.61	23.88 (4.68)	22.22–25.54	19.22 (5.4)	15.64–22.81	7.191	0.002	0.196	0.056	0.002	0.070
JD affected hand	21.4 (5.29)	15.72–27.01	16.25 (9.87)	13.34–19.16	16.61 (9.48)	10.33–22.9	1.324	0.274	0.043	0.280	0.531	0.995

TF = trigger finger; FDT = Functional Dexterity Test; PPT = Purdue Pegboard Test; JD = Jamar Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer.
; .