Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Occupational Therapy International
Volume 2019, Article ID 5820952, 5 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5820952
Clinical Study

Effects of Whole-Body Vibration on Upper Extremity Function and Grip Strength in Patients with Subacute Stroke: A Randomised Single-Blind Controlled Trial

1Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea
2Department of Physical Therapy, Kyung Hee University Health Care System, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea
3Department of Physical Therapy, Yonsei University, Wonju 26493, Republic of Korea

Correspondence should be addressed to Hyeongsu Kim; rk.ca.ukk@lubum

Received 16 October 2018; Revised 18 January 2019; Accepted 3 March 2019; Published 1 April 2019

Academic Editor: Claudia Hilton

Copyright © 2019 Jin-Young Ahn et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background. Whole-body vibration has been used to improve motor function in chronic stroke patients, but its effect on patients with subacute strokes remains unclear. Objectives. We explored the effect of whole-body vibration on patients with subacute strokes. Methods. Participants were randomly allocated to a whole-body vibration (WBV) group () or an upper- and lower-cycle (ULC) group (). Both groups received occupational therapy after these interventions. All participants received treatment for 30 min/day, 5 days/week, for 4 weeks. Both groups received the same conventional physical therapy. Results. The manual function test (MFT) score and grip strength improved after both WBV ( and , respectively) and ULC ( and , respectively), but the improvement was more pronounced (MFT ; GS ) after WBV. Conclusions. These findings suggest that the use of WBV and ULC was effective as remedial treatments for improving upper extremity motor function and increasing grip strength for patients with subacute strokes. The improvement was more pronounced for the WBV treatment. This trial is registered with KCT0003246.

1. Introduction

Stroke, which is a leading cause of long-term disability, is often associated with persistent involvement of an upper extremity [1]. The upper extremity function in stroke patients depends on several factors, including paresis severity, degree of spasticity, and extent of motor and sensory loss [2]. Upper extremity paresis after stroke is a leading cause of serious and long-term hand disability [3]. After a stroke, patients exhibit a complex pattern of upper extremity motor impairments resulting in the loss of functional abilities, such as grip and grasp [4], causing pain, joint contracture, and discomfort, which may lead to limb disuse and impede long-term functional recovery [5]. Additionally, because patients use the unaffected side more during arm action, it is necessary to apply therapy to the affected arm [6]. Of the various approaches used to improve motor function, the first is an effort to increase somatosensory input from the paretic hand using somatosensory stimulation to enhance the brain response [7].

Improving upper extremity motor function is important for increasing occupational engagement [8]. Use of vibration stimulation as an intervention has demonstrated improvement in affected upper extremity motor function for stroke patients since 1990 [8, 9].

Upper extremity motor recovery is aided by task-oriented practice [10]. Such training has been used to facilitate motor function [11]; various desired movements are learned, and inappropriate movements are reduced, thereby improving the adaptation of stroke patients [12]. Patients control strategy is improved by task-oriented training [13], which is more effective than traditional therapies [14].

Whole-body vibration (WBV) is a form of somatosensory stimulation used to rehabilitate stroke patients [15]. WBV affects proprioceptive systems [16]. Low-amplitude WBV (<20 Hz) induces muscular relaxation; medium-amplitude WBV (>50 Hz) triggers muscle soreness and haematoma [17]. WBV enhances muscle strength and power, affording neuromuscular adaptations similar to those produced by strengthening exercises [18].

Previous studies on chronic stroke patients showed that WBV improved walking speed, step length, stride length, double-limb support [19], and balance [20] and increased upper extremity function and strength but decreased upper extremity muscle tone [21]. However, although early rehabilitation of stroke patients is very important, no study has yet investigated the effects of WBV on upper extremity motor function and grip strength in subacute stroke patients; thus, we focused on this topic in this study.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

We recruited patients with subacute stroke () treated at a local rehabilitation centre in the Republic of Korea. The inclusion criteria were (1) that they experienced their first stroke within 6 months prior to recruitment, (2) a on the Mini-Mental Status Examination-Korean version, (3) an affected upper extremity on the modified Ashworth scale, (4) an affected upper extremity of Brunnstrom , (5) Manual Muscle Test (MMT) grade of >2/5 in the hemiparetic shoulder, and (6) a visual analogue pain scale . The exclusion criteria were (1) another neurological disease, (2) any prestroke musculoskeletal abnormality, and (3) a on the star cancellation test for visual spatial neglect. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Konkuk University (7001355-201802-HR-228).

A sample size of 30 of each group was calculated with an alpha of 0.05, power of 80%, an effect size of 0.7, and a drop-out rate of 10%, using the G-power program.

2.2. Procedures

This was a prospective two-group randomised controlled trial. Each of the 60 participants was randomly allocated to a WBV group () or an upper- and lower-cycle (ULC) group (); each subject drew a card from a box containing two cards marked 1 (WBV group) or 2 (ULC group) without looking at the cards.

The WBV group received WBV (Galileo 2000, Germany; 2011 model) for 30 min prior to task-orientated training. Each subject was seated on an armless chair in front of the platform and instructed to flex both shoulders at 90°, slightly bend both elbows, and then bend the trunk forward to allow both hands to be placed on the platform. Each subject was allowed to hold the palms slightly off the platform to minimise discomfort and prevent strong stimulation of the organs, eyes, and head. The WBV protocol featured seven elements at 4 to 7, 8 to 11, 12 to 15, 16 to 19, 12 to 15, 8 to 11, and 4 to 7 Hz. Each element was delivered for 2 min, and 2 min of rest separated the elements. The frequency of each element was increased by 1 Hz weekly. Thus, the frequencies delivered in week 1 were 4, 8, 12, 16, 12, 8, and 4 Hz; those in week 2 were 5, 9, 13, 17, 13, 9, and 5 Hz; those in week 3 were 6, 10, 14, 18, 14, 10, and 6 Hz; and those in week 4 were 7, 11, 15, 19, 15, 11, and 7 Hz to prevent adaptation. The ULC group received ULC training for 30 min before task-oriented training. The intensities (five levels were possible) of both cycles were chosen by the patient. All subjects in both groups received task-orientated training for 30 min after WBV or ULC, including eating (use of a spoon and cup), dressing (donning and removing a shirt), and personal hygiene (use of a toothbrush, comb, and towel). All subjects participated for 60 min/day, 5 days per week, for 4 weeks. All also received conventional physical therapy.

2.3. Outcome Measurements

All subjects were assessed at baseline and after intervention. Motor function was measured using the MFT, and grip strength was measured using a Jamar hydraulic hand dynamometer.

The MFT was developed to assess the impairments in motor function of the affected upper extremity of stroke patients and to statistically analyse the possible recovery processes during rehabilitation. The MFT is composed of 32 test items, which examine arm motions and manipulative activities. The test-retest reliability coefficient and interrater reliability of the MFT were consistently above 0.95. Cronbach’s α coefficient as internal consistency of eight items was also 0.95. With respect to the validity of the MFT, it had a correlation of >0.8 with both the Brunnstrom stage and the Stroke Impairment Assessment Set [22].

Grip strength is useful in clinical practice for the assessment of disease and/or rehabilitation progression. The Jamar hydraulic hand dynamometer was used to measure muscle strength (isometric grip strength test). The participant was asked to squeeze the dynamometer as hard as possible with each of his or her hands. Both maximal handgrip force and endurance were assessed. The Jamar dynamometer was found to be highly and for measuring hand grip strength [23].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

All data were analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 12.0 for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). The WBV and ULC groups were compared employing the test, the Mann–Whitney -test, or the independent -test. Parameter changes in each group after treatment were compared with the aid of the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and differences in the changes between the WBV and ULC groups were compared using the Mann–Whitney test. A value < 0.05 was considered to reflect a statistical significance.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Results

The general characteristics of the WBV and ULC groups are shown in Table 1. There was no significant between-group difference in age, sex, type of stroke, days from stroke onset, Mini-Mental Status Examination-Korean version (MMSE-K) or modified Ashworth scale (MAS) scores, or Brunnstrom stage. Also, neither the MFT score () nor the grip strength () differed between the WBC and ULC group preintervention.

Table 1: Characteristics of participants.

After intervention, both groups exhibited significant increases in MFT scores (, 0.002, respectively) and grip strength (, 0.001, respectively) compared to the preintervention values (Table 2). Furthermore, the MFT score () and grip strength () improved more in the WBV than in the ULC group.

Table 2: Parameters before and after treatment.

4. Discussion

In this study, we found that the use of WBV on motor function and grip strength in patients with subacute stroke was more effective than the use of ULC. Of course, motor function and grip strength improved in both groups, but it improved more in the WBV group. Therefore, task-oriented training after WBV effectively improved motor function and increased grip strength.

All participants had subacute strokes. Although some recovery may occur spontaneously within the first 3 months after stroke [24], intensive training is essential to improve motor recovery [25]. Active upper extremity movement enhances neuroplasticity [26], improving motor recovery [27]. Early active movements were associated with improvements in both groups.

All participants received task-oriented training, which reduces upper extremity impairment and improves both motor function [28] and individual perceptions of health-related quality of life [29]. Misbah and Muhammad (2017) reported that task-oriented training greatly improved upper extremity function in subacute stroke patients [30].

In the previous studies, WBV effectively improved motor function in stroke patients [31, 32]. WBV induced tonic vibration reflexes affected the proprioceptive systems of primary and secondary afferent fibers [18]. The WBV with  Hz induced muscular relaxation [19].

Our study had several limitations. First, the sample size was small, and the results thus cannot be generalised. Second, we did not schedule follow-up after interventions ended; long-term outcomes were not explored.

5. Conclusions

These findings suggest that the use of WBV and ULC was effective as remedial treatments for improving upper extremity motor function and increasing grip strength for patients with subacute strokes. The improvement was more pronounced for the WBV treatment.

Data Availability

(1) The data used to support the findings of this study were supplied under license and so cannot be made freely available. Requests for access to these data should be made to mubul@kku.ac.kr. (2) The data used to support the findings of this study are currently under embargo while the research findings are commercialized. Requests for data, 12 months after publication of this article, will be considered by the corresponding author. (3) The data used to support the findings of this study may be released upon application to Dr. Kim, who can be contacted at mubul@kku.ac.kr.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This paper was supported by Konkuk University in 2018.

References

  1. J. G. Broeks, G. J. Lankhorst, K. Rumping, and A. J. H. Prevo, “The long-term outcome of arm function after stroke: results of a follow-up study,” Disability and Rehabilitation, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 357–364, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. T. E. Hewett, K. R. Ford, P. Levine, and S. J. Page, “Reaching kinematics to measure motor changes after mental practice in stroke,” Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 23–29, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. R. Teasell, N. Foley, S. Pereira, K. Sequeira, and T. Miller, “Evidence to practice: botulinum toxin in the treatment of spasticity post stroke,” Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 115–121, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. J. Page, P. Levine, A. Leonard, J. P. Szaflarski, and B. M. Kissela, “Modified constraint-induced therapy in chronic stroke: results of a single-blinded randomized controlled trial,” Physical Therapy, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 333–340, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. C. Cirstea and M. F. Levin, “Improvement of arm movement patterns and endpoint control depends on type of feedback during practice in stroke survivors,” Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 398–411, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. H. M. Feys, W. J. de Weerdt, B. E. Selz et al., “Effect of a therapeutic intervention for the hemiplegic upper limb in the acute phase after stroke: a single-blind, randomized, controlled multicenter trial,” Stroke, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 785–792, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. W. O'Dell, C.-C. D. Lin, and V. Harrison, “Stroke rehabilitation: strategies to enhance motor recovery,” Annual Review of Medicine, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 55–68, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. P. Caliandro, C. Celletti, L. Padua et al., “Focal muscle vibration in the treatment of upper limb spasticity : a pilot randomized controlled trial in patients with chronic stroke,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 93, no. 9, pp. 1656–1661, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. Cardinale and J. Wakeling, “Whole body vibration exercise: are vibrations good for you?” British Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 585–589, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. P. Langhorne, F. Coupar, and A. Pollock, “Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review,” Lancet Neurology, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 741–754, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. Y. R. Yang, R. Y. Wang, K. H. Lin, M. Y. Chu, and R. C. Chan, “Task-oriented progressive resistance strength training improves muscle strength and functional performance in individuals with stroke,” Clinical Rehabilitation, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 860–870, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. H. Carr and R. B. Shepherd, Stroke Rehabilitation: Guidelines for Exercise and Training to Optimize Motor Skill, Butterworth Helenemann, London, 1st edition, 2003.
  13. B. H. Kim, S. M. Lee, Y. H. Bae, J. H. Yu, and T. H. Kim, “The effect of a task-oriented training on trunk control ability, balance and gait of stroke patients,” Journal of Physical Therapy Science, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 519–522, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. Rensink, M. Schuurmans, E. Lindeman, and T. Hafsteinsdóttir, “Task-oriented training in rehabilitation after stroke: systematic review,” Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 737–754, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. I. J. W. van Nes, H. Latour, F. Schils, R. Meijer, A. van Kuijk, and A. C. H. Geurts, “Long-term effects of 6-week whole-body vibration on balance recovery and activities of daily living in the postacute phase of stroke,” Stroke, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 2331–2335, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Cardinale and J. Rittweger, “Vibration exercise makes your muscles and bones stronger: fact or fiction?” The Journal of the British Menopause Society, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 12–18, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. Rittweger, M. Mutschelknauss, and D. Felsenberg, “Acute changes in neuromuscular excitability after exhaustive whole body vibration exercise as compared to exhaustion by squatting exercise,” Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 81–86, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. Cardinale and J. Lim, “Electromyography activity of vastus lateralis muscle during whole-body vibrations of different frequencies,” Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 621–624, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  19. E. T. Choi, Y. N. Kim, W. S. Cho, and D. K. Lee, “The effects of visual control whole body vibration exercise on balance and gait function of stroke patients,” Journal of Physical Therapy Science, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 3149–3152, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. Y. H. Uhm and D. J. Yang, “The effects of whole body vibration combined biofeedback postural control training on the balance ability and gait ability in stroke patients,” Journal of Physical Therapy Science, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 2022–2025, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. S. Lee, C. Y. Kim, and H. D. Kim, “Short-term effects of whole-body vibration combined with task-related training on upper extremity function, spasticity, and grip strength in subjects with poststroke hemiplegia: a pilot randomized controlled trial,” American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, vol. 95, no. 8, pp. 608–617, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. S. Miyamoto, T. Kondo, Y. Suzukamo, A. Michimata, and S.-I. Izumi, “Reliability and validity of the manual function test in patients with stroke,” American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 247–255, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. V. Bellace, D. Healy, M. P. Besser, T. Byron, and L. Hohman, “Validity of the Dexter Evaluation System’s Jamar dynamometer attachment for assessment of hand grip strength in a normal population,” Journal of Hand Therapy, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 46–51, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. S. A. Maulden, J. Gassaway, S. D. Horn, R. J. Smout, and G. Dejong, “Timing of initiation of rehabilitation after stroke,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 86, no. 12, pp. 34–40, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. R. J. Nudo and K. M. Friel, “Cortical plasticity after stroke: implications for rehabilitation,” Revue Neurologique, vol. 155, no. 9, pp. 713–717, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  26. B. French, L. Thomas, M. Leathley et al., “Does repetitive task training improve functional activity after stroke? A Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis,” Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 9–14, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. H. Woldag and H. Hummelsheim, “Evidence-based physiotherapeutic concepts for improving arm and hand function in stroke patients: a review,” Journal of Neurology, vol. 249, no. 5, pp. 518–528, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. G. Kwakkel, B. Kollen, and E. Lindeman, “Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories,” Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, vol. 22, no. 3–5, pp. 281–299, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  29. S. L. Wolf, C. J. Winstein, J. P. Miller et al., “Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial,” JAMA, vol. 296, no. 17, pp. 2095–2104, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. M. Misbah and U. Muhammad, “Effectiveness of task oriented training in improving upper limb function after stroke,” RMJ, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 341–343, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  31. W. Choi, D. Han, J. Kim, and S. Lee, “Whole-body vibration combined with treadmill training improves walking performance in post-stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial,” Medical Science Monitor, vol. 23, pp. 4918–4925, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. A. T. Silva, M. P. F. Dias, R. Calixto Jr et al., “Acute effects of whole-body vibration on the motor function of patients with stroke,” American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 310–319, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus