Review Article
Effectiveness of Robotics in Stroke Rehabilitation to Accelerate Upper Extremity Function: Systematic Review
Table 4
Speed of recovery calculations.
| Authors | Total hours | Total weeks | Change in FMA robotics (R) | Change in FMA control (C) | Speed of recovery R (FMA points/hour) | Speed of recovery C (FMA points/hour) |
| Aprile et al. [26] | 22.50 | 6.00 | 8.50 | 8.57 | 0.38 | 0.38 | Carpinella et al. [27] | 15.00 | 4.00 | 7.00 | 6.20 | 0.47 | 0.41 | Hesse et al. [29] | 20.00 | 4.00 | 11.10 | 14.60 | 0.56 | 0.73 | Hsu et al. [28] | 10.00 | 4.00 | 4.50 | 2.20 | 0.45 | 0.22 | Jiang et al. [30] | 10.00 | 2.00 | 9.04 | 5.55 | 0.90 | 0.56 | Klamroth-Marganska et al. [31] | 18.00 | 8.00 | 3.25 | 2.47 | 0.18 | 0.14 | Lee et al. [32] | 12.00 | 6.00 | 1.58 | -0.09 | 0.13 | -0.01 | Lee et al. [33] | 40.00 | 8.00 | 8.20 | 2.33 | 0.21 | 0.06 | McCabe et al. [34] | 300.00 | 12.00 | 8.68 | 9.92 | 0.03 | 0.03 | Orihuela-Espina et al. [35] | 38.67 | 8.00 | 5.66 | 1.50 | 0.15 | 0.04 | Rodgers et al. [39] | 27.00 | 12.00 | 7.70 | 5.30 | 0.29 | 0.20 | Sale et al. [36] | 112.50 | 6.00 | 8.65 | 3.63 | 0.08 | 0.03 | Straudi et al. [37] | 50.00 | 6.00 | 9.80 | 12.80 | 0.20 | 0.26 | Takahashi et al. [38] | 56.00 | 6.00 | 9.50 | 6.90 | 0.17 | 0.12 |
|
|