Review Article
Contemporary Radical Prostatectomy
Table 4
Recovery of continence rates following RRP, RPP, and RALP.
| Author | Type | No. of patients | Criteria | Urinary continence (%) | 3 months | 12 months | 24 months |
| Eastham et al. (1996) [96] | RRP | 581 | No pad | 65 | 92 | 95 |
Harris and Iselin (2003) [97] | RPP | 508 | No pad | 62 | 96 | NA | Roumeguere et al. (2003) [98] | RRP | 51 | No pad | 62.5 | 83.9 | NA | Lepor et al. (2004) [99] | RRP | 621 | No pad | 74.4 | 92.4 | 97.1 | Matsubara et al. (2005) [92] | RPP | 41 | No pad | 65 | 87 | NA | Menon et al. (2007) [49] | RALP | 1142 | No pad | NA | 84 | NA | Zorn et al. (2007) [61] | RALP | 161 | No pad | 47 | 90 | 92 | Krambeck et al. (2009) [48] | RRP | 564 | No pad | NA | 93.7 | NA | | | 286 | No pad | NA | 91.8 | NA |
|
|
RRP: Radical retropubic prostatectomy; RPP: Radical perineal prostatectomy; RALP: Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy; NA: Not applicable.
|