Prostate Cancer / 2011 / Article / Tab 1 / Clinical Study
Development and External Validation of a Nomogram Predicting the Probability of Significant Gleason Sum Upgrading among Japanese Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer Table 1 Descriptive characteristics of subgroups according to institutions.
Variable Chiba Cancer Center Chiba University
508 258 Age (years) Mean 66.902 65.054 SD 4.975 5.253 Median 67 65 Min 52 49 Max 78 76 PSA (ng/mL) Mean 13.977 11.616 SD 12.194 9.732 Median 9.755 8.420 Min 2.588 2.450 Max 79.710 72.000 Clinical stage (%) T1c 169 (33.3) 180 (69.8) T2a 172 (33.9) 32 (12.4) T2b 89 (17.5) 15 (5.8) T2c 12 (2.4) 16 (6.2) T3 66 (13.0) 15 (5.8) Biopsy Gleason primary (%) ≤3 318 (62.6) 172 (66.7) 4 167 (32.9) 80 (31.0) 5 23 (4.5) 6(2.3) Biopsy Gleason secondary (%) ≤3 197 (38.8) 128 (49.6) 4 227 (44.7) 112 (43.4) 5 84 (16.5) 18 (7.0) Biopsy Gleason sum (%) ≤6 123 (24.2) 91 (35.3) 7 248 (48.8) 116 (45.0) 8 58 (11.4) 31 (12.0) 9 74 (14.6) 18 (7.0) 10 5 (1.0) 2 (0.8) Pathological Gleason primary (%) ≤3 327 (64.4) 151 (58.5) 4 155 (30.5) 104 (40.3) 5 26 (5.1) 3 (1.2) Pathological Gleason secondary (%) ≤3 209 (41.1) 114 (44.2) 4 241 (47.4) 119 (46.1) 5 58 (11.4) 25 (9.7) Pathological Gleason sum (%) ≤6 93 (18.3) 44 (17.1) 7 332 (65.4) 176 (68.2) 8 21 (4.1) 11 (4.3) 9 60 (11.8) 27 (10.5) 10 2 (0.4) 0 (0.0) Significant upgrading Gleason sum (%) 92 (18.1) 64 (24.8)