Research Article

Implications of Regionalizing Care in the Developing World: Impact of Distance to Referral Center on Compliance to Biopsy Recommendations in a Brazilian Prostate Cancer Screening Cohort

Table 3

The association between distance and risk of PC and PC grade (n = 850).

Association between distance and risk of PC
Model: logistic regressionDistance variable formatDistance (km)OR95% CI value

UnadjustedContinuous1.050.92–1.200.45
Categorical relative to 0–249 km250–4991.050.76–1.460.37
500–9990.870.54–1.40
≥10001.450.91–2.30

MultivariableContinuous0.980.85–1.140.80
Categorical relative to 0–249 km250–4990.960.67–1.370.39
500–9990.690.41–1.17
≥10001.220.74–2.03

Association between distance and PC grade (relative to no PC)
Model: multinomial logistic regressionDistance variable formatDistance (km)OR95% CIP value

Cancer outcome: low-grade PC (Grade Group I)
UnadjustedContinuous1.040.91–1.200.56
Categorical relative to 0–249 km250–4990.970.69–1.360.27
500–9990.860.53–1.40
≥10001.380.86–2.22
MultivariableContinuous0.980.84–1.140.79
Categorical relative to 0–249 km250–4990.900.62–1.300.32
500–9990.690.40–1.17
≥10001.200.72–2.00

Cancer outcome: high-grade PC (Grade Group ≥2)
UnadjustedContinuous1.130.79–1.640.50
Categorical relative to 0–249 km250–4992.441.03–5.790.27
500–9990.960.20–4.48
≥10002.390.72–7.93
MultivariableContinuous0.980.65–1.490.94
Categorical relative to 0–249 km250–4992.150.83–5.570.32
500–9990.630.12–3.33
≥10001.470.34–6.41

Multivariable analysis adjusted for age, log PSA, education, family history of cancer, family history of PC, DRE, and screening year. CI: confidence interval; km: kilometers; OR: odds ratio; PC: prostate cancer; RRR: relative risk ratio.