Impact of Sex on the Nonmotor Symptoms and the Health-Related Quality of Life in Parkinson’s Disease

Kovács, Márton; Makkos, Attila; Aschermann, Zsuzsanna; Janszky, József; Komoly, Sámuel; Weintraut, Rita; Karádi, Kázmér; Kovács, Norbert

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7951840

Parkinson’s Disease

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Abbreviations Disclosure Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Clinical Study | Open Access

Volume 2016 | Article ID 7951840 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7951840

Impact of Sex on the Nonmotor Symptoms and the Health-Related Quality of Life in Parkinson’s Disease

Márton Kovács,¹Attila Makkos,¹Zsuzsanna Aschermann,¹József Janszky,^1,2Sámuel Komoly,¹Rita Weintraut,³Kázmér Karádi,³and Norbert Kovács^1,2

Academic Editor: Peter Hagell

Received01 Feb 2016

Revised27 Mar 2016

Accepted12 Apr 2016

Published16 May 2016

Abstract

Background. Female Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients seem to experience not only more severe motor complications and postural instability but also more pronounced depression, anxiety, pain, and sleep disturbances. Objective. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of sex as a possible independent predictor of HRQoL in PD. Methods. In this cross-sectional study, 621 consecutive patients treated at the University of Pécs were enrolled. Severity of PD symptoms was assessed by MDS-UPDRS, UDysRS, Non-Motor Symptoms Scale, PDSS-2, Hamilton Anxiety Scale, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, Lille Apathy Rating Scale, and Addenbrooke Cognitive Examination. HRQoL was assessed by PDQ-39 and EQ-5D. Multiple regression analysis was performed to estimate the PDQ-39 and EQ-5D index values based on various clinical factors. Results. Although females received significantly lower dosage of levodopa, they had significantly more disabling dyskinesia and worse postural instability. Anxiety, pain, sleep disturbances, and orthostatic symptoms were more frequent among females while sexual dysfunction, apathy, and daytime sleepiness were more severe among males. Women had worse HRQoL than men (EQ-5D index value: versus , , and PDQ-39 SI: versus , ). Based on multiple regression analysis, sex was an independent predictor for HRQoL in PD. Conclusions. Based on our results, female sex is an independent predictor for having worse HRQoL in PD.

1. Introduction

Recently the nonmotor symptoms (NMS) of Parkinson’s disease (PD) have been increasingly recognized as a major burden of the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) [1, 2]. In PD, the range of NMS can include high variety of problems such as mood disorders (depression and anxiety), sleep disorders, cognitive dysfunctions, dementia, autonomic dysfunctions, apathy, and fatigue [3, 4]. These NMS are not only common in patients with PD, but also usually underrecognized [5]. According to some studies, at least one NMS was reported by almost 100% of patients [6, 7], with the most common being autonomic dysfunction, mood disorders, and sleep problems [8, 9]. Although many NMS are apparent and common among de novo and nontreated PD patients, there are also some NMS that are usually considered to be secondary to pharmacotherapy, such as impulse control disorders (ICD) and psychosis. Moreover, NMS have also been reported by patient surveys to be sometimes more disabling than the motor symptoms of tremor and bradykinesia [10]. In advanced PD, the NMS can have a pattern of fluctuation similar to the motor symptoms [11, 12]. Moreover, some of the PD patients state that their nonmotor fluctuations cause a greater degree of disability and distress than the motor fluctuations [13]. This fact has been reinforced by recent studies demonstrating that in some cases the NMS have higher impact on the HRQoL than the motor symptoms do [3, 14].

Previous studies incongruently demonstrated that sex is an independent predictor for some NMS [15]. Female PD patients seem to experience not only more severe motor complications and falls but also more pronounced depression, anxiety, pain, and sleep disturbances [16–18]. On the other hand, males tend to have more pertinent apathetic symptoms and sexual dysfunction [19–21]. The role of sex being an independent predictor of HRQoL in PD is controversial. Several studies demonstrated that female sex was associated with poorer HRQoL. However, the role of gender was not unambiguous even in the studies: some of these investigations concluded that female sex was an independent negative predictor while others stated that female sex was only a nonindependent predictor of HRQoL in PD. In other words, these latter investigations suggested that not the female sex but the nonmotor symptoms associated with female sex had a direct impact on HRQoL. Indeed, several other studies have reported no gender difference for HRQoL in PD, at all, but have not specifically addressed potential reasons for this. A direct investigation of the relationship between sex and HRQoL is still lacking in a large representative pool of patients. In light of the aforementioned findings, the aim of this study was to extend recent studies investigating the association between HRQoL and disease stage in PD, motor subtype, and gender using a large pool of well-characterized patients.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients

In this cross-sectional study, 621 consecutive and nonselected patients treated at the University of Pécs were enrolled. All patients fulfilled the UK Brain Bank criteria for PD [22]. Each subject gave written informed consent in accordance with the ethical approval of the Regional Ethical Board (3617.316-24983/KK41/2009). Each patient was examined by a neurologist specialized in movement disorders. Besides recording demographic data (age, sex, and level of education) some disease-specific data were also noted (age at onset; disease duration; presence of motor complications, duration of fluctuation in years; type of PD being either tremor dominant, rigid-akinetic, or mixed type; and antiparkinsonian medication). Patients were evaluated in ON state while receiving their usual antiparkinsonian and other medications and subsequently levodopa equivalent dosage (LED) calculations were performed [23].

2.2. Assessment of Motor Symptoms

Severity of PD-related symptoms was globally assessed by the Hungarian validated version of the MDS-UPDRS [24, 25]. The recently published MDS-UPDRS is a validated scale to assess nonmotor (nM-EDL, Part I) and motor-experiences of daily living (M-EDL, Part II), motor examination (ME, Part III), and motor complications (MC, Part IV) [25]. As a part of the MDS-UPDRS, the Hoehn-Yahr Scale was also taken to detect the overall severity of PD. Based on previous reports, we analyzed separately items 3.12 “Postural instability” and 2.12 “Walking and balance” of MDS-UPDRS. Additionally, the axial items of MDS-UPDRS ME were also assessed following the method of Kotagal et al. [26] by summing items 3.1 “Speech,” 3.9 “Arising from a Chair,” 3.10 “Gait,” 3.12 “Postural Stability,” and 3.13 “Posture.”

Dyskinesia was measured by the Hungarian validated version of Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale [27, 28]. We also asked our patients to keep a patient diary measuring ON state without dyskinesia, ON state with slight nondisturbing dyskinesia, ON state with severe dyskinesia, OFF state, and sleep periods for at least 3 days prior or immediately after the examination [29, 30].

2.3. Assessment of Nonmotor Symptoms

The nM-EDL part of the MDS-UPDRS has items evaluating the presence and severity of 13 NMS including depression, anxiety, apathy, dopamine-dysregulation, cognitive impairment, fatigue, pain, hallucinations, urinary problems, sexual problems, orthostatic problems, nighttime sleep problems, and daytime sleepiness. These items are also intended to serve as screening tools for the presence of these nonmotor symptoms [31]. To assess nonmotor symptoms globally, the Non-Motor Symptoms Scale (NMSS) [32] was also included. This scale is obtained by trained professionals and capable of simultaneously capturing the severity and frequency of 30 nonmotor symptoms typical for PD. These NMSS items can group nine domains including sleep, cardiovascular, cognitive, mood, hallucinatory, gastrointestinal, urinary, sexual, and miscellaneous problems.

Presence and severity of sleep disturbances were specifically measured by the Hungarian validated version of PDSS-2 [33, 34]. The threshold indicating sleep problems is 11 points for the Hungarian version of PDSS-2 [35]. In the meantime, daytime sleepiness was assessed by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale [36] with the cutoff value of 8 points [37]. Depression, anxiety, and apathy were assessed by the Hungarian validated versions of the Montgomery Depression Scale (MADRS) [38], the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) [39], and the Lille Apathy Scale (LARS) [40]. Cognitive performance was examined by the Hungarian validated versions of Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) [41], Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) [42], Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (MDRS) [41], and Addenbrooke Cognitive Examination (ACE) [41, 43]. Presence of dementia (major neurocognitive disorder) was defined as either achieving ≤125 points on the Hungarian validated version of the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale [41, 43] and/or ≤22 points on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment [43] and/or fulfilling the criteria of dementia according to the DSM-5 [44]. Presence and severity of impulse control disorders (ICD) were assessed by the questionnaire for impulsive-compulsive disorders in Parkinson’s disease (QUIP) [45]. The global functioning was evaluated by the Schwab & England Scale (SES) [38, 46].

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was measured by the Hungarian validated version of the disease-specific PDQ-39 Summary Index (PDQ-39 SI) [47] and the nondisease specific EuroQol instrument (EQ-5D index value) [48, 49]. Generally, higher scores on PDQ-39 SI and smaller index values on the EQ-5D represent worse HRQoL states.

The whole assessment required a total of approximately 5-6 hours to complete. To reduce the burden of patients, the clinical assessments were performed on three consecutive days. Typically on Day 1 both the ME part of MDS-UPDRS and UDysRS were taken. On Day 2, the patients underwent the neurocognitive evaluation by psychologists. All the patient reported questionnaires had to be completed by Day 3 (including the PD diary).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were carried out using the IBM SPSS software package (version 22.0.1, IBM Inc., Armonk, NY, USA). Because data from these scales followed the normal distribution, mean and standard deviations (SD) were calculated. For group comparisons, independent samples -tests were applied. Evaluating significant differences in single items of MDS-UPDRS, both independent samples - and Mann-Whitney tests were utilized because they were ordinal variables. For categorical variables (e.g., having or not having a symptom) Chi-square tests were used. Statistical significance level was set at 5%.

A multiple regression modelling using a stepwise method (criteria: probability of to enter ≤0.050 and probability of to remove ≥0.100) was initiated to predict the PDQ-39 SI from various clinical variables including sex, age, age at disease onset, years of education, disease duration, fluctuations in years, handedness, disease-type, ACE, MDRS, MADRS, levodopa dosage (measured in LED), DA LED, total LED, LARS, ON time without dyskinesia, ON time with slight dyskinesia, ON time with severe dyskinesia, OFF time, PICD, PDSS-2, ESS, HAS, UDysRS, M-EDL part of MDS-UPDRS, ME part of MDS-UPDRS, and MC part of MDS-UPDRS. Subsequently, another multiple regression analysis was performed to predict the EQ-5D index values from the same variables using a stepwise method.

3. Results

3.1. Demographic and PD-Related Clinical Data

The subject population consisted of 621 consecutive PD patients (361 males, age: years, disease duration: years). Two-hundred and forty-seven patients had rigid-akinetic, 194 had tremor dominant, and 180 had mixed type of PD. In the examined sample, 234 patients (37.7%) had motor fluctuations with the average duration of years. Only 127 (20.5%) patients had either fulltime or part-time job at the time of the exam. Handedness, dominant side, and Hoehn-Yahr staging are demonstrated in Table 1, whereas the medication usage and levodopa equivalent dosages are shown in Table 2. Levodopa treatment was applied in 454 (73.1%), dopamine-agonists in 320 (51.5%), and catechol-O-methyl-transferase inhibitors in 223 (35.9%) patients. In the studied population 98 (15.8%) patients underwent deep brain stimulator implantation with electrodes targeted into the subthalamic nuclei bilaterally.

3.2. Motor Symptoms of PD

Although age at PD onset, disease duration, education years, and severity of motor symptoms (MDS-UPDRS Motor Examination) were comparable between the males and females, men received significantly higher dosage of levodopa ( mg versus mg, , Table 2). Based on the M-EDL MDS-UPDRS, the overall motor symptoms were associated with similar disabilities in both sexes. Although the axial scores on MDS-UPDRS ME were comparable, females had significantly worse postural instability (item 3.12) and gait-related disabilities (item 2.12).

In the examined population, 144 males (39.9%) and 90 females (34.6%) had fluctuations (, Chi-square test). Despite of receiving less dopaminergic medication, women had significantly worse dyskinesia compared to men (UDysRS total score: versus points, resp., , Table 2). However, the analysis of the patient diaries revealed that both sexes had comparable ON and OFF time. The only statistically significant difference was the time of daytime sleep (males: hours versus females: hours, ).

3.3. Nonmotor Symptoms of PD

In our study cohort only 6 patients (0.9%) did not report any NMS, at all. Based on the 13 screening items of nM-EDL part of MDS-UPDRS, our patients had an average of NMS symptoms. Female patients had more severe nonmotor symptoms in general. This finding is congruently supported by the nM-EDL part of MDS-UPDRS ( versus points, , Table 2) and NMSS scores ( versus points, , Table 2).

3.3.1. Affective Problems

Among female PD patients the anxiety was not only significantly more frequent (85.0% versus 76.5%, ), but also more severe (HAM-A score: versus , ). Although the prevalence of depression was comparable between both sexes (76.2% versus 73.7%, ), the severity of depression was worse in women (MADRS score: versus , ) (Table 2). Similarly, the “Mood problems” section of NMSS demonstrated more severe affective problems in the female individuals ( versus , ) (Table 2).

3.3.2. Sleep-Related Problems

Based on the Hungarian validated threshold values for PDSS-2, 72.7% of females and 63.4% of males reported sleep-related problems (Chi-square test, ). Although the female PD patients had more severe nighttime sleep disturbances (measured by the total score of PDSS-2), daytime sleepiness was more common (39.3% versus 26.9%, ) and more severe among males (Table 2).

3.3.3. Cardiovascular and Orthostatic Problems

Based on the screening item of MDS-UPDRS (1.12 orthostatic symptoms) and the “Cardiovascular” section of NMSS, female patients had more often (71.5% versus 62.6%, Chi-square test, ) and more severe orthostatic and cardiovascular problems than males (, Table 2).

3.3.4. Sexual Problems

Male patients had more frequent (31.6% versus 18.1%, , Chi-square test) and more severe sexual problems than females ( versus , , Table 2).

3.3.5. Pain

Based on the screening item of MDS-UPDRS (1.9 Pain) and the item 27 of NMSS (Pain), women had more frequent (76.5% versus 67.3%, , Chi-square test) and more severe ( versus , ) pain sensations than men.

3.3.6. Apathy

Although the prevalence of apathy was comparable (18.5% versus 21.9%, Chi-square test, ), males had more severe apathetic symptoms measured by LARS than females ( versus , ).

3.3.7. Cognition

We could not demonstrate any differences in cognition either by NMSS or specific neurocognitive screening tests (MMSE, MoCA, ACE, and MDRS) (Table 2).

3.3.8. Other NMS Problems

Both sexes had similarly frequent and severe urinary, gastrointestinal, and hallucinatory problems. Based on MDS-UPDRS nM-EDL, we could not find any differences in the prevalence and the degree of fatigue, either.

3.4. Impulse Control Disorders in PD

Based on the analysis of QUIP, 21.6% of male and 20.0% of female PD patients had any type and any degree of ICD problems (, Table 3). The prevalence and severity of pathological gambling, compulsive eating, and punding were similar in both sexes. However, men had more often hypersexuality (5% versus 0%, ) and women had more frequent and severe compulsive buying (18.5% versus 6.4%, ).

3.5. HRQoL

Although both male and female PD patients had similar everyday functioning measured by the SES ( versus points, , Table 2), female patients had worse HRQoL than males (EQ-5D index value: versus , and PDQ-39 SI: versus , ). Out of the PDQ-39 components, “Mobility,” “Emotional well-being,” “Social support,” and “Bodily discomfort” had higher impairment in women, whereas the section of “Communication” was worse in men.

3.6. Determinants of HRQoL in PD

Multiple regression analysis was performed to estimate the PDQ-39 SI based on various clinical factors. Due to collinearity, age of disease onset, MDRS, and MMSE scores were excluded from the regression analysis (tolerance < 0.001). The data met the assumption of independent errors (Durbin-Watson value = 1.911). Using a stepwise method it was found that M-EDL part of MDS-UPDRS (importance = 0,53; , ), PDSS-2 total score (importance = 0.12; , ), MADRS total score (importance = 0.09; , ), sex (coded as 1 = males and 2 = females, importance = 0.06; , ), ME part of MDS-UPDRS (importance = 0,05; , ), SES (importance = 0.04; , ), UDysRS total score (importance = 0.03; , ), HAM-A total score (importance = 0.03; , ), ACE total score (importance = 0.03; , ), QUIP total score (importance = 0.02; , ), and ESS total score (importance = 0.02; , ) explain the highest significant amount of variance in the value of the PDQ-SI score (intercept = 22.433, , , ). The other examined variables did not significantly contribute to the model.

For estimating the EQ-5D index value SES (importance = 0.47; , ), M-EDL part of MDS-UPDRS (importance = 0.33; , ), PDSS-2 total score (importance = 0.11; , ), ME part of MDS-UPDRS (importance = 0.04; , ), UDysRS total score (importance = 0.03; , ), QUIP total score (importance = 0.03; , ), MADRS total score (importance = 0.02; , ), and sex (coded as 1 = males and 2 = females, importance = 0.04; , ) contributed significantly to a model (intercept = 0.318, , , ).

4. Discussion

Although the sexual differences in PD have been previously recognized, they are poorly understood. The aim of the present study was evaluate the impact of sex on the presence and severity on various PD-related symptoms and the HRQoL.

4.1. Motor Symptoms and Motor Complications

First, we were unable to detect any sex-related differences in the major demographic data (e.g., age at disease onset, disease duration, and education level) and overall motor performance. Although females received significantly lower dose of levodopa, the severity of motor symptoms (MDS-UPDRS ME) and the disability related to motor symptoms (MDS-UPDRS M-EDL) were comparable between both sexes. These findings are congruent with the results of several previous studies [17, 50, 51].

Despite of the lower overall levodopa dosage, women had worse dyskinesia measured by UDysRS. This finding is also in agreement with the literature [52–54].

Because previous studies demonstrated that female sex is associated with significantly worse postural instability and more frequent falls [55–57], therefore, we separately analyzed items 3.12 “Postural instability” and 2.12 “Walking and balance” of MDS-UPDRS. In these two items, women had significantly worse scores (justified by both - and Mann-Whitney tests, Table 2). Item 2.12 emphasizes the need for assistance rather than the consequence (falls) that will depend on availability of help [25]. However, together with item 3.12 it reflects the postural instability, gait difficulties, and the tendency of falls. Because other items of MDS-UPDRS M-EDL and ME did not differ between man and women (data not shown), we can conclude that the worse postural instability and tendency of falls are independently more pronounced in females.

4.2. Nonmotor Symptoms

Based on our data, more than 99% of the patients had at least one NMS with an average number of 8 out of the 13 items screened by the MDS-UPDRS. The most prevalent NMS problems were fatigue, anxiety, depression, daytime sleepiness, and pain. These findings are congruent with the literature [58, 59].

Consistent with the previously published data, we demonstrated that anxiety [4, 16, 17], pain [4, 17, 18], nocturnal sleep difficulties, and orthostatic symptoms were more frequent among female PD patients while the prevalence of sexual dysfunction [4, 20, 21] and daytime sleepiness were more common among males [4, 60]. Although depression was similarly common among both sexes [9], the depressive symptoms were more severe in females [61, 62]. Contrarily, the apathetic symptoms were more pronounced in males despite of their similar occurrence in both sexes. In our cohort, we could not find any sex-related differences in the frequency and severity of fatigue. In the literature there are inconsistent data available, some supporting [4, 52, 63] and others disagreeing [64] with a possible link between sex and fatigue.

4.3. Impulse Control Disorders

In agreement with some studies [65, 66] and in opposition to other papers [67, 68], we did not find significant differences in the prevalence of global ICD symptoms between both sexes. Though total ICD frequency was similar for men and women, there were notable sex differences in the frequency of specific ICDs, with hypersexuality more common in males and compulsive buying and binge eating were more prevalent in women. These sex-related differences were previously reported [69].

4.4. Determinants of HRQoL in PD

The role of sex on HRQoL in PD is highly controversial. Indeed, some publications did not demonstrate any differences in HRQoL between males and females [3, 15, 57, 70–72]. These studies were performed in distinct areas (e.g., Australia [15], Eastern-Europe [3, 57, 73], Northern-Europe [74, 75], Western-Europe [72, 76], and America [77]) and utilized heterogeneous HRQoL questionnaires (e.g., PDQ-39 [3, 15], EQ-5D [73], MOS Short Form 36, SF-36 [77], and Nottingham Health Profile [74]).

In another group of reports, the observed differences between females and males with respect to HRQoL were not solely contributed to the sex because regression analyses did not reveal the independent role of sex. Klepac et al. examined 111 consecutive Croatian PD patients, but they failed to prove the role of sex (multiple regression coefficient: 37.961, ) in determining HRQoL. Marras et al. demonstrated that the presence and severity of dyskinesia, but not the sex alone, predicted the HRQoL (EQ-5D) in the case of 182 PD patients enrolled into a randomized trial (CALM-PD) and completed the 4-year follow-up examination [78].

A third group of investigations did not include the “sex” as a possible predictor in their statistical analyses [1, 79–81]. Morimoto et al. examined 1200 Japanese PD patients by SF-36 questionnaire; however, they did not enter the sex as a covariate into their regression models [80]. Similarly, Qin et al. examined the HRQoL in 391 Chinese patients with early Parkinson’s disease by SF-36 without entering the sex as a possible independent factor [81]. Although Santos-García and de la Fuente-Fernández aimed to investigate the role of NMS on the health-related and the perceived quality of life on the cohort of 150 nonselected PD patients, they did not analyze the independent role of sex either [1].

A fourth group of papers demonstrated that females had worse HRQoL than males and sex was an independent predictor for HRQoL [82–88]. These studies included diverse ethnical and cultural populations (e.g., Asia [82, 83, 85], Africa [88], Eastern-Europe [87], and Western-Europe [84, 86]).

We might assume heterogeneous factors behind these diverse outcomes of the aforementioned studies. One of the most important issues might be the differences in the applied outcome measures. While the majority of the examinations applied disease-specific instruments (PDQ-39, PDQ-8 or PDQL), others utilized only generic tests (SF-36, EQ-5D, or Nottingham Health Profile). Because the construct, precision, and response of these scales are highly different, the uniform and comparable interpretation of their outcomes is difficult. Another problem might be the differences in sociocultural profiles of the enrolled individuals. Because the perceived HRQoL highly depends on cultural and social attitudes of patients, some PD-related symptoms are likely to be differently interpreted by Western-European, Eastern-European, African, Asian, American, and Oceanian individuals. The disability, the reduced working capability and self-dependence associated with PD are differently understood and accepted by many cultures and societies. For example, while the HRQoL of patients with PD in Western countries is predominately affected by clinical parameters, social factors play much more pronounced role in the Eastern countries [73].

Another key factor might be the pronounced differences in the size of enrolled patient populations. While the majority of studies having negative conclusion on the independent role of sex had the typical sample size of 100–300 patients, all the larger studies (>400 patients) had positive outcome. Of note, in some negative European studies, the values were indeed close to the level of statistical significance (e.g., Kadastik-Eerme et al. [3], , and Klepac et al. [89], ), which might suggest the possibility of statistical underpower in the background (Type II error).

Our study clearly demonstrates on a large pool of patients that sex is an independent predictor of HRQoL in PD. This finding was assured by the utilization of both disease-specific and general HRQoL instruments. Based on the multivariate stepwise regression analysis we could show that female sex is independently associated with poorer HRQoL despite the sex-dependent profile of NMS. One of the assumptions behind this phenomenon might be the diverse effects of estrogen. Estrogen has numerous effects on dopamine neurotransmission inhibiting dopamine uptake and altering dopamine synthesis and release [90]. These effects are extremely complex and dependent on many factors, including the nature of the estrogen exposure (e.g., exposure to normal fluctuations in estrogen levels throughout the menstrual cycle, exposure to the estrogen-deficient state of menopause, or exposure through various estrogen treatment regimens). Basic research in experimental animals indicates the neuroprotective roles of estrogen over various forms of injury [91] and one of its consequences might be the greater incidence of PD in men than in women. However, sex-related differences are also identified in response to treatment of PD; for example, women have greater levodopa bioavailability [92]. This might contribute to our observation that females have comparable overall severity of motor symptoms and more pronounced dyskinesia despite of lower levodopa equivalent dosages [93].

4.5. Limitations of the Study

Although we endeavored to strategize this study with precision, the authors are aware of some potential limitations. One limitation may be that our study had a monocenter design instead of a more favorable multicenter one. In the role of a simultaneously primary and a tertiary center, the University of Pécs has both noncomplicated PD patients from the surrounding areas and the advanced PD patients from the nationwide primary and secondary centers. Therefore, the pool of patients are likely different from those of typical primary or secondary centers. However, in the role of a tertiary center, consider our advantage: relatively a large portion of severe (HYS 4&5) patients were also included in our study. This may have contributed to a relatively high percentage of the population featuring advanced PD and or minor/major neurocognitive disorders.

Additionally, we applied more recent and slightly different test batteries than the majority of older studies utilized. Instead of the UPDRS and PDSS, we have applied the more advantageous MDS-UPDRS and PDSS-2. Therefore, the comparison of our results with those of older studies utilizing the preceding test batteries is not straightforward and needs careful interpretation.

5. Conclusions

Based on our results, female sex is an independent predictor for having worse health-related quality of life in Parkinson’s disease. Because the main intention of PD-care is to improve not only the symptoms of PD but also the quality of life of patients, the recognition of female sex as a negative predictor of HRQoL is of the utmost importance. In clinical setup, therefore, additional attention should be paid to female patients to achieve the best obtainable health status and HRQoL. Besides, further studies are needed to reveal the pathophysiological differences between female and male patients.

Abbreviations

ACE:	Addenbrooke Cognitive Examination
BDI:	Beck Depression Inventory
EQ-5D:	EuroQol Instrument 5-layer version
EQ-5D VAS:	EuroQol Instrument Visual Analogue Scale
ESS:	Epworth Sleepiness Scale
HAM-A:	Hamilton Anxiety Scale
ICD:	Impulse control disorders
LARS:	Lille Apathy Rating Scale
LED:	Levodopa equivalent dosage
MADRS:	Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale
MDRS:	Mattis Dementia Rating Scale
MDS-UPDRS:	The Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale
MDS-UPDRS MC:	Motor Complication part of MDS-UPDRS
MDS-UPDRS ME:	Motor Examination part of MDS-UPDRS
M-EDL MDS-UPDRS:	Motor-Experiences of Daily Living part of MDS-UPDRS
MMSE:	Mini-Mental Status Examination
nM-EDL MDS-UPDRS:	Non-Motor-Experiences of Daily Living part of MDS-UPDRS
MoCA:	Montreal Cognitive Assessment
NMSS:	Non-motor Symptoms Scale
PAS:	Parkinson’s Disease Anxiety Scale
PDQ-39:	Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire
PDSS-2:	Parkinson’s Disease Sleep Scale 2nd version
QUIP:	Questionnaire for impulsive-compulsive disorders in Parkinson’s disease
SES:	Schwab-England Scale
UDysRS:	Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale.

Disclosure

GD reported no financial disclosure. Zsuzsanna Aschermann received <1000 EUR consultation fees from Hungarian subsidiaries of UCB and AbbVie. Regarding this study the author did not receive any corporate funding. PA reported no financial disclosure. EB reported no financial disclosure. József Janszky received <1000 EUR consultation fees from Hungarian subsidiaries of UCB, GlaxoSmithKline, Valeant, and Eisai. BF reported no financial disclosure. Sámuel Komoly received <1000 EUR consultation fees from Hungarian subsidiaries of Biogen, TEVA, Astellas, Pfizer, and Novartis. Regarding this pilot study the author did not receive any corporate funding. IB received <1000 EUR consultation fees from Hungarian subsidiaries of Medtronic. TD reported no financial disclosure. Norbert Kovács received <1000 EUR consultation fees from Hungarian subsidiaries of Medtronic, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, UCB, Krka, and AbbVie. Márton Kovács reported no financial disclosure. Attila Makkos reported no financial disclosure.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ Contributions

GD and Norbert Kovács were responsible for conception, organization, and execution of the research project; design, execution, review, and critique of statistical analysis; writing of the first draft, review, and critique of the paper. Zsuzsanna Aschermann, PA, Sámuel Komoly, IB, TD, and EB were responsible for organization of research project; review and critique of statistical analysis; review and critique of the paper. József Janszky was responsible for conception of research project; review and critique of the statistical analysis; review and critique of the paper. BF, Attila Makkos, and Márton Kovács were responsible for execution of research project; review and critique of statistical analysis; review and critique of the paper.

Acknowledgments

Our study was supported by the Bolyai Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, OTKA PD103964, TÁMOP 4.2.2.A-11/1/KONV-2012-0017, and the Hungarian Brain Research Program, Grant no. KTIA_13_NAP-A-II/10 government-based funds. The present scientific contribution is dedicated to the 650th anniversary of the foundation of the University of Pécs, Hungary.

References

D. Santos-García and R. de la Fuente-Fernández, “Impact of non-motor symptoms on health-related and perceived quality of life in Parkinson's disease,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 332, no. 1-2, pp. 136–140, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Martinez-Martin, C. Rodriguez-Blazquez, M. M. Kurtis, and K. R. Chaudhuri, “The impact of non-motor symptoms on health-related quality of life of patients with Parkinson's disease,” Movement Disorders, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 399–406, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Kadastik-Eerme, M. Rosenthal, T. Paju, M. Muldmaa, and P. Taba, “Health-related quality of life in Parkinson's disease: a cross-sectional study focusing on non-motor symptoms,” Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, vol. 13, article 83, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Martinez-Martin, C. F. Pecurariu, P. Odin et al., “Gender-related differences in the burden of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease,” Journal of Neurology, vol. 259, no. 8, pp. 1639–1647, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. A. Gallagher, A. J. Lees, and A. Schrag, “What are the most important nonmotor symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease and are we missing them?” Movement Disorders, vol. 25, no. 15, pp. 2493–2500, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H.-S. Kim, S.-M. Cheon, J.-W. Seo, H.-J. Ryu, K.-W. Park, and J. W. Kim, “Nonmotor symptoms more closely related to Parkinson's disease: comparison with normal elderly,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 324, no. 1-2, pp. 70–73, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Krishnan, G. Sarma, S. Sarma, and A. Kishore, “Do nonmotor symptoms in Parkinson's disease differ from normal aging?” Movement Disorders, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 2110–2113, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Hwynn, I. U. Haq, I. A. Malaty et al., “The frequency of nonmotor symptoms among advanced Parkinson patients may depend on instrument used for assessment,” Parkinson's Disease, vol. 2011, Article ID 290195, 4 pages, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. C. van der Hoek, B. A. A. Bus, P. Matui, M. A. van der Marck, R. A. Esselink, and I. Tendolkar, “Prevalence of depression in Parkinson's disease: effects of disease stage, motor subtype and gender,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 310, no. 1-2, pp. 220–224, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. W. Duncan, T. K. Khoo, A. J. Yarnall et al., “Health-related quality of life in early Parkinson's disease: the impact of nonmotor symptoms,” Movement Disorders, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 195–202, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Fauser, M. Löhle, G. Ebersbach et al., “Intraindividual variability of nonmotor fluctuations in advanced Parkinson's disease,” Journal of Parkinson's Disease, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 737–741, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Storch, C. B. Schneider, M. Wolz et al., “Nonmotor fluctuations in Parkinson disease: severity and correlation with motor complications,” Neurology, vol. 80, no. 9, pp. 800–809, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Witjas, E. Kaphan, J. P. Azulay et al., “Nonmotor fluctuations in Parkinson's disease: frequent and disabling,” Neurology, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 408–413, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Skorvanek, J. Rosenberger, M. Minar et al., “Relationship between the non-motor items of the MDS-UPDRS and Quality of Life in patients with Parkinson's disease,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 353, no. 1-2, pp. 87–91, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Lubomski, R. Louise Rushworth, W. Lee, K. L. Bertram, and D. R. Williams, “Sex differences in Parkinson's disease,” Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1503–1506, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. F. G. Leentjens, K. Dujardin, L. Marsh, P. Martinez-Martin, I. H. Richard, and S. E. Starkstein, “Symptomatology and markers of anxiety disorders in Parkinson's disease: a cross-sectional study,” Movement Disorders, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 484–492, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Guo, W. Song, K. Chen et al., “Gender and onset age-related features of non-motor symptoms of patients with Parkinson's disease—a study from Southwest China,” Parkinsonism and Related Disorders, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 961–965, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. G. Beiske, J. H. Loge, A. Rønningen, and E. Svensson, “Pain in Parkinson's disease: prevalence and characteristics,” Pain, vol. 141, no. 1-2, pp. 173–177, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Wee, N. Kandiah, S. Acharyya et al., “Baseline predictors of worsening apathy in Parkinson's disease: a prospective longitudinal study,” Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, vol. 23, pp. 95–98, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Bronner, O. S. Cohen, G. Yahalom et al., “Correlates of quality of sexual life in male and female patients with Parkinson disease and their partners,” Parkinsonism and Related Disorders, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 1085–1088, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Szewczyk-Krolikowski, P. Tomlinson, K. Nithi et al., “The influence of age and gender on motor and non-motor features of early Parkinson's disease: initial findings from the Oxford Parkinson Disease Center (OPDC) discovery cohort,” Parkinsonism and Related Disorders, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 99–105, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Litvan, K. P. Bhatia, D. J. Burn et al., “Movement Disorders Society Scientific Issues Committee report: SIC Task Force appraisal of clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinsonian disorders,” Movement Disorders, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 467–486, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. L. Tomlinson, R. Stowe, S. Patel, C. Rick, R. Gray, and C. E. Clarke, “Systematic review of levodopa dose equivalency reporting in Parkinson's disease,” Movement Disorders, vol. 25, no. 15, pp. 2649–2653, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Horváth, Z. Aschermann, P. Ács et al., “Validation of the Hungarian MDS-UPDRS: why do we need a new Parkinson scale?” Ideggyogyaszati Szemle, vol. 67, no. 3-4, pp. 129–134, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
C. G. Goetz, BC. Tilley, S. R. Shaftman et al., “Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): scale presentation and clinimetric testing results,” Movement Disorders Journal, vol. 23, no. 15, pp. 2129–2170, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Kotagal, R. L. Albin, M. L. T. M. Müller, R. A. Koeppe, K. A. Frey, and N. I. Bohnen, “Modifiable cardiovascular risk factors and axial motor impairments in Parkinson disease,” Neurology, vol. 82, no. 17, pp. 1514–1520, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Horváth, Z. Aschermann, P. Ács et al., “Validation of the Hungarian unified dyskinesia rating scale,” Ideggyogyaszati Szemle, vol. 68, no. 5-6, pp. 183–188, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. G. Goetz, J. G. Nutt, and G. T. Stebbins, “The unified dyskinesia rating scale: presentation and clinimetric profile,” Movement Disorders, vol. 23, no. 16, pp. 2398–2403, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. A. Hauser, J. Friedlander, T. A. Zesiewicz et al., “A home diary to assess functional status in patients with Parkinson's disease with motor fluctuations and dyskinesia,” Clinical Neuropharmacology, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 75–81, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Bosnyák, M. Herceg, E. Pál et al., “Are branded and generic extended-release ropinirole formulations equally efficacious? A rater-blinded, switch-over, multicenter study,” Parkinson's Disease, vol. 2014, Article ID 158353, 7 pages, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Horváth, Z. Aschermann, P. Ács et al., “Is the MDS-UPDRS a good screening tool for detecting sleep problems and daytime sleepiness in Parkinson's disease?” Parkinson's Disease, vol. 2014, Article ID 806169, 8 pages, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Martinez-Martin, C. Rodriguez-Blazquez, K. Abe et al., “International study on the psychometric attributes of the non-motor symptoms scale in Parkinson disease,” Neurology, vol. 73, no. 19, pp. 1584–1591, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Horváth, Z. Aschermann, P. Ács et al., “Test-retest validity of Parkinson's disease sleep scale 2nd version (PDSS-2),” Journal of Parkinson's Disease, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 687–691, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Kovács, K. Horváth, Z. Aschermann et al., “Independent validation of Parkinson's disease Sleep Scale 2nd version (PDSS-2),” Sleep and Biological Rhythms, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 63–73, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Horváth, Z. Aschermann, P. Ács et al., “Minimal clinically important difference on parkinson's disease sleep scale 2nd version,” Parkinson's Disease, vol. 2015, Article ID 970534, 8 pages, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Hagell and J.-E. Broman, “Measurement properties and hierarchical item structure of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale in Parkinson's disease,” Journal of Sleep Research, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 102–109, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Kovács, E. Pál, J. Janszky et al., “Parkinson's disease sleep scale-2 and epworth sleep scale,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 333, article e139, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Deli, Z. Aschermann, P. Acs et al., “Bilateral subthalamic stimulation can improve sleep quality in Parkinson's disease,” Journal of Parkinson's Disease, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 361–368, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. F. G. Leentjens, K. Dujardin, L. Marsh, I. H. Richard, S. E. Starkstein, and P. Martinez-Martin, “Anxiety rating scales in Parkinson's disease: a validation study of the Hamilton anxiety rating scale, the Beck anxiety inventory, and the hospital anxiety and depression scale,” Movement Disorders, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 407–415, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Weintraut, K. Karádi, T. Lucza et al., “Lille apathy rating scale and MDS-UPDRS for screening apathy in Parkinson’s disease,” Journal of Parkinson's Disease, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 257–265, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Kaszás, N. Kovács, I. Balás et al., “Sensitivity and specificity of Addenbrooke's cognitive examination, mattis dementia rating scale, frontal assessment battery and mini mental state examination for diagnosing dementia in Parkinson's disease,” Parkinsonism and Related Disorders, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 553–556, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Lucza, K. Karádi, J. Kállai et al., “Screening mild and major neurocognitive disorders in Parkinson's disease,” Behavioural Neurology, vol. 2015, Article ID 983606, 10 pages, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Lucza, K. Karadi, S. Komoly et al., “Diagnosis and therapy for neurocognitive disorders in Parkinson's disease,” Orvosi Hetilap, vol. 156, no. 3, pp. 915–926, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, American Psychiatric Publishing, Arlington, Va, USA, 2013.
D. Weintraub, S. Hoops, J. A. Shea et al., “Validation of the questionnaire for impulsive-compulsive disorders in Parkinson's disease,” Movement Disorders, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 1461–1467, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Schwab and A. England, “Projection technique for evaluating surgery in Parkinson's disease,” in Third Symposium on Parkinson's Disease, F. Gillingham and M. Donaldson, Eds., pp. 152–157, E & S Livingston, Edinburgh, UK, 1969.
View at: Google Scholar
N. Kovács, Z. Aschermann, P. Ács et al., “The impact of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel on health-related quality of life in Parkinson's disease,” Ideggyogyaszati Szemle, vol. 67, no. 7-8, pp. 245–250, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Szende and R. Nemeth, “Health-related quality of life of the Hungarian population,” Orvosi Hetilap, vol. 144, pp. 1667–1674, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Deli, I. Balás, T. Dóczi et al., “Deep brain stimulation can preserve working status in Parkinson's disease,” Parkinson's Disease, vol. 2015, Article ID 936865, 8 pages, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. F. Augustine, A. Pérez, R. Dhall et al., “Sex differences in clinical features of early, treated Parkinson's disease,” PLoS ONE, vol. 10, no. 7, Article ID e0133002, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Baba, J. D. Putzke, N. R. Whaley, Z. K. Wszolek, and R. J. Uitti, “Gender and the Parkinson's disease phenotype,” Journal of Neurology, vol. 252, no. 10, pp. 1201–1205, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Scott, A. Borgman, H. Engler, B. Johnels, and S. M. Aquilonius, “Gender differences in Parkinson's disease symptom profile,” Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 37–43, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. P. Roland, J. M. Jakobi, C. Powell, and G. R. Jones, “Factors related to functional independence in females with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review,” Maturitas, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 304–311, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. E. Lyons, J. P. Hubble, A. I. Tröster, R. Pahwa, and W. C. Koller, “Gender differences in Parkinson's disease,” Clinical Neuropharmacology, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 118–121, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
O. Rascol, S. Perez-Lloret, P. Damier et al., “Falls in ambulatory non-demented patients with Parkinson’s disease,” Journal of Neural Transmission, vol. 122, no. 10, pp. 1447–1455, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. A. M. Grimbergen, A. Schrag, G. Mazibrada, G. F. Borm, and B. R. Bloem, “Impact of falls and fear of falling on health-related quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease,” Journal of Parkinson's Disease, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 409–413, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Michałowska, U. Fiszer, A. Krygowska-Wajs, and K. Owczarek, “Falls in Parkinson's disease. Causes and impact on patients' quality of life,” Functional Neurology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 163–168, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
H. A. Hanagasi, S. Akat, H. Gurvit, J. Yazici, and M. Emre, “Pain is common in Parkinson's disease,” Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 11–13, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. M. Khedr, N. A. El Fetoh, H. Khalifa, M. A. Ahmed, and K. M. A. El Beh, “Prevalence of non motor features in a cohort of Parkinson's disease patients,” Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, vol. 115, no. 6, pp. 673–677, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Picillo, R. Erro, M. Amboni et al., “Gender differences in non-motor symptoms in early Parkinson's disease: a 2-years follow-up study on previously untreated patients,” Parkinsonism and Related Disorders, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 850–854, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Menon, R. Nayar, S. Kumar et al., “Parkinson's disease, depression, and quality-of-life,” Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 144–148, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Wee, N. Kandiah, S. Acharyya et al., “Depression and anxiety are co-morbid but dissociable in mild Parkinson's disease: a prospective longitudinal study of patterns and predictors,” Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, vol. 23, pp. 50–56, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Stocchi, G. Abbruzzese, R. Ceravolo et al., “Prevalence of fatigue in Parkinson disease and its clinical correlates,” Neurology, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 215–220, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Hagell and L. Brundin, “Towards an understanding of fatigue in Parkinson disease,” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 489–492, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. L. Phu, Z. Xu, V. Brakoulias et al., “Effect of impulse control disorders on disability and quality of life in Parkinson's disease patients,” Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 63–66, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Weintraub, A. D. Siderowf, M. N. Potenza et al., “Association of dopamine agonist use with impulse control disorders in Parkinson disease,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 63, no. 7, pp. 969–973, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. U. Isaias, C. Siri, R. Cilia, D. de Gaspari, G. Pezzoli, and A. Antonini, “The relationship between impulsivity and impulse control disorders in Parkinson's disease,” Movement Disorders, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 411–415, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. A. Mestre, A. P. Strafella, T. Thomsen, V. Voon, and J. Miyasaki, “Diagnosis and treatment of impulse control disorders in patients with movement disorders,” Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 175–188, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Weintraub, J. Koester, M. N. Potenza et al., “Impulse control disorders in Parkinson disease: a cross-sectional study of 3090 patients,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 589–595, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S.-E. Soh, J. L. McGinley, J. J. Watts et al., “Determinants of health-related quality of life in people with Parkinson's disease: a path analysis,” Quality of Life Research, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 1543–1553, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. E. Morris, H. B. Menz, J. L. McGinley et al., “Falls and mobility in Parkinson's disease: protocol for a randomised controlled clinical trial,” BMC Neurology, vol. 11, article 93, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Morley, S. Dummett, L. Kelly, J. Dawson, and C. Jenkinson, “Evaluating the psychometric properties of an e-based version of the 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire,” Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, vol. 13, no. 1, article 5, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Winter, S. von Campenhausen, G. Popov et al., “Social and clinical determinants of quality of life in Parkinson's disease in a Russian cohort study,” Parkinsonism and Related Disorders, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 243–248, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Hunt, S. P. McKenna, J. McEwen, J. Williams, and E. Papp, “The Nottingham Health Profile: subjective health status and medical consultations,” Social Science & Medicine A, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 221–229, 1981.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. H. Karlsen, J. P. Larsen, E. Tandberg, and J. G. Mæland, “Quality of life measurements in patients with Parkinson's disease: a community-based study,” European Journal of Neurology, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 443–450, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Chapuis, L. Ouchchane, O. Metz, L. Gerbaud, and F. Durif, “Impact of the motor complications of Parkinson's disease on the quality of life,” Movement Disorders, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 224–230, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. J. Carod-Artal, A. P. Vargas, and P. Martinez-Martin, “Determinants of quality of life in Brazilian patients with Parkinson's disease,” Movement Disorders, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1408–1415, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Marras, A. Lang, M. Krahn, G. Tomlinson, and G. Naglie, “Quality of life in early Parkinson's disease: impact of dyskinesias and motor fluctuations,” Movement Disorders, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 22–28, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Rodríguez-Violante, A. Cervantes-Arriaga, T. Corona, D. Martínez-Ramírez, H. Morales-Briceño, and P. Martínez-Martín, “Clinical determinants of health-related quality of life in mexican patients with Parkinson's disease,” Archives of Medical Research, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 110–114, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Morimoto, T. Shimbo, J. E. Orav et al., “Impact of social functioning and vitality on preference for life in patients with Parkinson's disease,” Movement Disorders, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 171–175, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Qin, L. Zhang, F. Sun et al., “Health related quality of life in early Parkinson's disease: impact of motor and non-motor symptoms, results from Chinese levodopa exposed cohort,” Parkinsonism and Related Disorders, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 767–771, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Wu, X. Y. Guo, Q. Q. Wei et al., “Determinants of the quality of life in Parkinson's disease: results of a cohort study from Southwest China,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 340, no. 1-2, pp. 144–149, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. J. Zhao, L. C. S. Tan, P. N. Lau, W. L. Au, S. C. Li, and N. Luo, “Factors affecting health-related quality of life amongst Asian patients with Parkinson's disease,” European Journal of Neurology, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 737–742, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Winter, S. von Campenhausen, J. Gasser et al., “Social and clinical determinants of quality of life in Parkinson's disease in Austria: a cohort study,” Journal of Neurology, vol. 257, no. 4, pp. 638–645, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Behari, A. K. Srivastava, and R. M. Pandey, “Quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease,” Parkinsonism and Related Disorders, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 221–226, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Spadaro, L. Bonanno, G. Di Lorenzo, P. Bramanti, and S. Marino, “Health-related quality of life in Parkinson's disease patients in northeastern Sicily, Italy: an ecological perspective,” Neural Regeneration Research, vol. 8, no. 17, pp. 1615–1622, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. R. Hristova, J. I. Hristov, N. G. Mateva, and J. V. Papathanasiou, “Quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease,” Folia Medica, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 58–64, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
S. M. Fereshtehnejad, M. Shafieesabet, F. Farhadi et al., “Heterogeneous determinants of quality of life in different phenotypes of Parkinson's disease,” PLoS ONE, vol. 10, no. 9, Article ID e0137081, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Klepac, S. Pikija, T. Kraljić et al., “Association of rural life setting and poorer quality of life in Parkinson's disease patients: a cross-sectional study in Croatia,” European Journal of Neurology, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 194–198, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Mitra, N. Chakrabarti, S. S. Dutta et al., “Gender-specific brain regional variation of neurons, endogenous estrogen, neuroinflammation and glial cells during rotenone-induced mouse model of Parkinson's disease,” Neuroscience, vol. 292, pp. 46–70, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Nakaso, Y. Horikoshi, T. Takahashi et al., “Estrogen receptor-mediated effect of delta-tocotrienol prevents neurotoxicity and motor deficit in the MPTP mouse model of Parkinson's disease,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 610, pp. 117–122, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Adams and R. Kumar, “The effect of estrogen in a man with Parkinson's disease and a review of its therapeutic potential,” International Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 123, no. 10, pp. 741–742, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Parkinson Study Group POETRY Investigators, “A randomized pilot trial of estrogen replacement therapy in post-menopausal women with Parkinson's disease,” Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 757–760, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2016 Márton Kovács et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

2099

Downloads

1160

Citations