Research Article
Impairment in Theory of Mind in Parkinson’s Disease Is Explained by Deficits in Inhibition
Table 3
Performance on the standard measures of ToM, social cognition, and executive functioning in the two groups (mean ± SD).
| | PD patients (n = 18) | Healthy controls (n = 22) |
| Social | Ekman | 49.42 ± 5.34 | 47.91 ± 4.30 | Cognition | RMET | 23.59 ± 3.28 | 26.77 ± 3.01 | Inhibition | Stroop—total | 85.83 ± 19.49 | 91.53 ± 17.83 | Hayling—total scaled score | 16.35 ± 2.12 | 18.70 ± 1.22 | Elevator counting with distraction | 7.65 ± 3.02 | 8.94 ± 1.21 | Set-shifting | Plus/Minus ratio | 1.38 ± 0.27 | 1.43 ± 0.17 | Brixton—overall score | 4.44 ± 2.50 | 4.95 ± 2.54 | Updating | Digit span: forwards and backwards | 7.65 ± 3.02 | 8.94 ± 1.21 | Fluency | FAS—total | 40.00 ± 14.25 | 40.95 ± 10.80 | Animals—total | 19.06 ± 4.25 | 21.60 ± 2.58 |
|
|
; RMET: reading the mind in the eyes test, revised version. |