Review Article
Gastroesophageal Reflux and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Review
Table 1
Prominent clinical studies evaluating gastroesophageal reflux in IPF.
| Study | Methodology | Number of subjects | Prevalence of GERD | Other outcomes |
| Tobin et al. 1998 [35] | Prospective with non-IPF ILD control | 17 IPF8 controls | 94% IPF50% controls | 25% of IPF patients had typical reflux symptoms | Raghu et al. 2006 [36] | Prospective, control group without ILD | 65 IPF133 asthmatics | 87% IPF68% Asthma | 47% of IPF patients had heartburn and regurgitation. No significant difference in proximal reflux in IPF and asthma, 63% versus 61%, respectively | Raghu et al. 2006 [19] | Retrospective case review | 4 IPF | 100% as one of the inclusion criteria | 2ā6 year follow up with stable FVC and TLCO with proton pump inhibitors | Salvioli et al. 2006 [37] | Prospective | 18 IPF10 secondarypulmonary fibrosis | 67% of IPF patients had abnormal distal reflux | 57% of total patients had heartburn and regurgitation | Bandiera et al. 2009 [38] | Prospective | 28 IPF | 35.7% | Participants divided into GRED+ and GERDā groups |
|
|