Pulmonary Medicine

Pulmonary Medicine / 2014 / Article

Clinical Study | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 727323 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/727323

Ramesh Bhat Yellanthoor, Vidya Ramdas, "Frequency and Intensive Care Related Risk Factors of Pneumothorax in Ventilated Neonates", Pulmonary Medicine, vol. 2014, Article ID 727323, 4 pages, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/727323

Frequency and Intensive Care Related Risk Factors of Pneumothorax in Ventilated Neonates

Academic Editor: Dimitris Georgopoulos
Received13 Nov 2013
Revised25 Mar 2014
Accepted07 Apr 2014
Published28 Apr 2014

Abstract

Objectives. Relationships of mechanical ventilation to pneumothorax in neonates and care procedures in particular are rarely studied. We aimed to evaluate the relationship of selected ventilator variables and risk events to pneumothorax. Methods. Pneumothorax was defined as accumulation of air in pleural cavity as confirmed by chest radiograph. Relationship of ventilator mode, selected settings, and risk procedures prior to detection of pneumothorax was studied using matched controls. Results. Of 540 neonates receiving mechanical ventilation, 10 (1.85%) were found to have pneumothorax. Respiratory distress syndrome, meconium aspiration syndrome, and pneumonia were the underlying lung pathology. Pneumothorax mostly (80%) occurred within 48 hours of life. Among ventilated neonates, significantly higher percentage with pneumothorax received mandatory ventilation than controls (70% versus 20%; ). Peak inspiratory pressure >20 cm and overventilation were not significantly associated with pneumothorax. More cases than controls underwent care procedures in the preceding 3 hours of pneumothorax event. Mean airway pressure change () and endotracheal suctioning () were not significantly associated with pneumothorax. Reintubation (), and bagging () were significantly associated with pneumothorax. Conclusion. Pneumothorax among ventilated neonates occurred at low frequency. Mandatory ventilation and selected care procedures in the preceding 3 hours had significant association.

1. Introduction

Pneumothorax is the most common air-leak syndrome resulting in significant morbidity and mortality in neonates [13]. Increased mortality and chronic lung disease with pneumothorax (about 13 times) in very low birth weight (VLBW) neonates have been reported by Powers and Clemens [3]. Its relationship with underlying primary lung disorders is well recognized [1, 4, 5]. However, higher incidences of pneumothorax in ventilated neonates [35] with mild increase among those receiving continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and dramatic increase with mandatory modes of ventilation have been addressed by only few studies [1, 4]. Similarly studies addressing association of pneumothorax to various ventilation strategies are scarce. Such strategies with high incidence of pneumothorax include high peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) and mean airway pressure (MAP), active expiratory reflex, administration of bag and mask ventilation, endotracheal tube displacement, an increase in clinical interventions [69], long inspiratory time [10], and high frequency ventilation [11]. Ventilator rates greater than 60/min associated with decreased risk of pneumothorax were found by Greenough et al. [9]. Maximal PIP and suction have been found to be risk factors for pneumothorax in a study by Klinger et al. [4]. A mortality of 10% to 38.6% with neonatal pneumothorax has been reported by various studies [12, 13]. Whether associated variables are causative or merely a result of an undiagnosed air leak is debatable. Studies in this regard can help define care practices or risk factors associated with pneumothorax. We aimed to study the association of ventilator mode, selected settings, and care procedures with the development of pneumothorax in ventilated neonates.

2. Methods

Newborns who were detected to have pneumothorax while receiving mechanical ventilation between May 2006 and August 2008 were studied. Clinically suspected pneumothorax was subjected to transillumination test using cold light (Karl Storz endoscopy) and chest X-ray. Pneumothorax was defined as accumulation of air in the pleural cavity as confirmed by chest radiograph. To study the association of ventilator parameters and other potential risk events with the development of pneumothorax among the ventilated neonates, birth weight and gestational age matched controls were selected [6]. The subsequent two neonates who were ventilated following each case without developing an air leak and gestation within two weeks and birth weight within 500 g of the cases constituted the controls. A PaCO2 < 30 mm Hg was considered as an indicator of overventilation. To assess this, the minimum PaCO2 for each case in the preceding 3–6 hours of the diagnosis of pneumothorax and the minimum PaCO2 of the matched control before that same age were noted. Ventilatory details and arterial blood gases were retrieved up to the age of diagnosis in the cases. For the preceding three hours, the data regarding procedures such as endotracheal suction, reintubation, and bagging were retrieved from the neonatal case records. The three-hour period was chosen similar to the previous study [6]. Newborns were ventilated using Drager 8000 Neonatal Ventilator (Drager Ltd, Hemel Hempstead, UK), Bear Cub Infant Ventilator, or Infant Star Ventilator. Mode of ventilation and sedation with fentanyl were selected as per clinician’s choice. The initial ventilation mode was intermittent mandatory ventilation/assist control (IMV/AC); subsequently it was changed to synchronised IMV (SIMV)/CPAP as guided by arterial blood gas analysis and clinical improvement. The sedation involved infusion of fentanyl, 2–4 microgram/kg/hour. Surfactant was used as an early rescue therapy only. We did not use neuromuscular blockade in any case. Any increase in the mean airway pressure (MAP) in the preceding 3 hours of pneumothorax was considered as MAP change. Ethical approval for the study from the hospital ethical committee and informed consents from parents were obtained. Data was analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 11.5. Proportions were compared and analyzed using Fischer’s exact test or chi-square test.

3. Results

During the study period, 10 (1.85%) neonates had pneumothorax out of 540 who received mechanical ventilation. Mean (SD) birth weight of cases was 2250 (450) g and controls were 2150 (530) g. Birth weight range was 775–3820 g among cases and 840 g–4000 g among controls. Median gestational age of cases was 36 weeks (range, 26–40 weeks) and controls 36 weeks (range 28–40 weeks). Mode of delivery by vaginal route and cesarean section were not significantly different among cases and controls. Six among cases and 10 among controls received mask or tube ventilation at birth. Among cases, 6 had hyaline membrane disease (HMD), 3 had meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS), and 1 had pneumonia. Among controls, 14 had HMD and 6 had MAS. Most of the pneumothoraces (80%) were diagnosed within the first 48 hours of life. Three pneumothoraces among infants with HMD and two among infants with MAS were diagnosed between 24 and 72 hours. Of 10 neonates with pneumothorax receiving mechanical ventilation, 5 died. The mortality among ventilated neonates with pneumothorax was nearly twice that of neonates without pneumothorax (50% versus 26.7%).

Table 1 shows relationship of selected ventilator variables and overventilation to pneumothorax. Among neonates with pneumothorax who were on ventilator, 70% were on mandatory positive pressure ventilation as compared to 20% among controls. Pneumothorax event had significant association () with mandatory positive pressure ventilation as compared to other modes. Peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) > 20 cm H2O or overventilation as evidenced by PaCO2 <30 mmHg was not significantly ( and 0.79, resp.) associated with occurrence of pneumothoraces.


ParameterCases ( )Controls ( ) value
% %

Mode of ventilation at pneumothorax event
 IMV7704200.007
 AC220420
 SIMV00420
 CPAP110840
PIP >20 cm H2O4406300.58
PaCO2 <30 mmHg in ABG55011550.79

IMV: intermittent mandatory ventilation; AC: assist control; SIMV: synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation; CPAP: continuous positive airway pressure; PIP: peak inspiratory pressure; ABG: arterial blood gas.

Table 2 shows the relationship of care procedures in the preceding 3 hours of pneumothorax event. Endotracheal suctioning and mean airway pressure (MAP) change were observed in higher proportions among cases as compared to controls. However, these differences were not statistically significant. Reintubation and bagging had significant association () with occurrence of pneumothorax.


Risk eventsCases ( )Controls ( )OR95% CI value
% %

Endotracheal suctioning6606303.50.7–17.10.05
Mean airway pressure change4402106.00.8–41.40.052
Reintubation66021013.51.9–93.20.003
Bagging5502109.01.3–61.10.015

OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.

4. Discussion

Pneumothorax in newborn results in significant morbidity and mortality [15, 14]. It may even increase chronic lung disease in VLBW neonates [3] and intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm neonates [12]. Hence pneumothorax warrants preventive measures. Mechanical ventilation is said to increase the pneumothorax incidence in neonates and such incidence varies widely. Watkinson and Tiron [6] reported that 8.7% ventilated neonates developed at least one pneumothorax during the first two weeks of life. A higher incidence of 10%–13.4% has been reported by studies from UK [15, 16] and of 26% by Malek et al. from Iran [17]. We observed a low pneumothorax incidence of 1.85% among ventilated neonates. However, this low incidence refers to pooled neonates of low and normal body weight together and symptomatic pneumothoraces only. Morley et al. [18] reported incidence of pneumothorax as 9% after CPAP. In a case-control study on VLBW infants from 1997 to 2002, pneumothorax rate was 10.9% [4].

Improvement in mechanical ventilator strategies to reduce pulmonary complications and improve long-term outcomes has been debated. Pneumothorax event, in the present study, had significant association with mandatory positive pressure ventilation than other modes. Different rates of pneumothorax with different modes of ventilation are recognised. Pneumothorax rate of about 16% among those receiving CPAP and 34% for those being ventilated was observed by Greenough and Millner [5]. An analysis of 16 trials comparing elective high-frequency ventilation with conventional ventilation [11] showed a significant increase in air leakage in the high-frequency group (29% versus 24%).

Although higher percentage of newborns among cases had PIP >20 cm H2O than control group in the present study, this difference was not statistically significant. This is similar to a previous observation [6]. In contrast, a study on VLBW infants found maximal PIP during the 24 hours before diagnosis of pneumothorax as significant risk factor for pneumothorax [4]. Watkinson and Tiron [6] in their analysis of 606 ventilated neonates reported that overventilation defined as a PaCO2 <30 mm Hg was not associated with pneumothorax. Our study agrees with this report. These findings suggest the need for further studies to resolve the controversial association of higher PIP with occurrence of pneumothorax in ventilated neonates.

A number of care procedures in neonates receiving ventilation associated with pneumothorax have been reported [68, 19]. They include an increase in clinical interventions such as suction procedures, chest radiography, reintubation, chest compressions, and active expiration. The number of suction procedures during the 8 hours before diagnosis of pneumothorax with an odds ratio of 1.56 (95% CI, 1.09–2.23) was previously reported [4]. McIntosh et al. [20] reported that in most cases endotracheal tube was aspirated and at least 40% of newborns were reintubated before the diagnosis of pneumothorax. On the other hand, Primhak had found that slightly elevated PIP and MAP had association with pneumothorax but finally it was longer inspiratory time which was the major risk factor responsible for pneumothorax [21]. In the present study, reintubation and bagging in the preceding three hours were significantly associated with pneumothorax. Higher percentage of cases had MAP change than controls but it was not statistically significant. Together, these findings suggest the need for more supervision and monitoring of these potential risk procedures.

The mortality among ventilated newborns with pneumothorax was nearly twice that of neonates without pneumothorax. This increased mortality is at least partly related to pneumothorax than solely to comorbidities. Comorbidities included persistent pulmonary hypertension (PPHN) in two and one case each of sepsis, pulmonary hemorrhage, and intraventricular hemorrhage. It is likely that pneumothorax had some association with PPHN and IVH also. Identifying risk factors for pneumothorax in ventilated neonates may reduce mortality and improve long-term outcome among survivors if subsequent air leak is prevented. The findings of the present study also positively reinforce an earlier statement that an apparent need to reintubate or bagging procedures in ventilated neonates must be accompanied by a prompt search for a pneumothorax [6].

The present study had certain limitations. Firstly, it was a single centre study. The study samples were small due to low incidence of pneumothorax although a large number of neonates received mechanical ventilation. Secondly, the adequacy of sedation among study population was monitored only clinically and not objectively by any sedation score.

In conclusion, the incidence of pneumothorax among ventilated neonates in the present study is much lower than previous studies. High mortality of pneumothorax among neonates receiving mechanical ventilation remains as a cause of concern. Regardless of whether associated variables are causative or merely a result of an undiagnosed air leak, more attention to these potential care procedures is warranted.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contribution

Ramesh Bhat Yellanthoor was involved in conceptualization, study design, treatment, data interpretation, analysis, paper writing, and draft. Vidya Ramdas was involved in data collection, treatment, data analysis, and help in paper preparation. Both authors approved the paper and Ramesh Bhat Yellanthoor would act as guarantor of the study.

Acknowledgments

Authors thank the head of the department of paediatrics and all staff members for their kind help, suggestions, and encouragement during the study.

References

  1. J. D. Miller and W. A. Carlo, “Pulmonary complications of mechanical ventilation in neonates,” Clinics in Perinatology, vol. 35, no. 1, Article ID 27381, pp. 273–281, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. H. Maksić, S. Heljić, S. Maksić, and F. Jonuzi, “Pulmonary complications during mechanical ventilation in the neonatal period,” Medicinski Arhiv, vol. 54, no. 5-6, pp. 271–272, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  3. W. F. Powers and J. D. Clemens, “Prognostic implications of age at detection of air leak in very low birth weight infants requiring ventilatory support,” Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 123, no. 4, pp. 611–617, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  4. G. Klinger, S. Ish-Hurwitz, M. Osovsky, L. Sirota, and N. Linder, “Risk factors for pneumothorax in very low birth weight infants,” Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 398–402, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. A. Greenough and A. D. Millner, “Pulmonary airleaks,” in Roberton’s Text Book of Neonatology, J. M. Rennie, Ed., pp. 487–491, Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 4th edition, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  6. M. Watkinson and I. Tiron, “Events before the diagnosis of a pneumothorax in ventilated neonates,” Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. F201–F203, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  7. R. Niwas, A. M. Nadroo, V. G. Sutija, M. Gudavalli, and P. Narula, “Malposition of endotracheal tube: association with pneumothorax in ventilated neonates,” Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. F233–F234, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. S. Ngerncham, P. Kittiratsatcha, and P. Pacharn, “Risk factors of pneumothorax during the first 24 hours of life,” Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, vol. 88, no. 8, pp. S135–S141, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  9. A. Greenough, A. D. Milner, and G. Dimitriou, “Synchronized mechanical ventilation for respiratory support in newborn infants,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 4, Article ID CD000456, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  10. C. O. Kamlin and P. G. Davis, “Long versus short inspiratory times in neonates receiving mechanical ventilation,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 4, Article ID CD004503, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  11. U. H. Thome, W. A. Carlo, and F. Pohlandt, “Ventilation strategies and outcome in randomised trials of high frequency ventilation,” Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition, vol. 90, no. 6, pp. F466–F473, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. A. Hill, J. M. Pariman, and J. J. Volpe, “Relationship of pneumothorax to occurrence of intraventricular hemorrhage in the premature newborn,” Pediatrics, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 144–149, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
  13. Z. Ilçe, G. Gündogdu, C. Kara, B. Ilikkan, and S. Celayir, “Which patients are at risk? Evaluation of the morbidity and mortality in newborn pneumothorax,” Indian Pediatrics, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 325–328, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  14. H. Esme, Ö. Doǧru, Ş. Eren, M. Korkmaz, and O. Solak, “The factors affecting persistent pneumothorax and mortality in neonatal pneumothorax,” Turkish Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 242–246, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  15. J. H. Baumer, “International randomised controlled trial of patient triggered ventilation in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome,” Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. F5–F10, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  16. B. N. J. Shaw, R. W. I. Cooke, A. B. Gill, and M. Saeed, “Randomised trial of routine versus selective paralysis during ventilation for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome,” Archives of Disease in Childhood, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 479–482, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  17. A. Malek, N. Afzali, M. Meshkat, and N. H. Yazdi, “Pneumothorax after mechanical ventilation in newborns,” Iranian Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 45–50, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  18. C. J. Morley, P. G. Davis, L. W. Doyle, L. P. Brion, J.-M. Hascoet, and J. B. Carlin, “Nasal CPAP or intubation at birth for very preterm infants,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 358, no. 7, pp. 700–708, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. A. Greenough, S. Wood, C. J. Morley, and J. A. Davis, “Pancuronium prevents pneumothoraces in ventilated premature babies who actively expire against positive pressure inflation,” The Lancet, vol. 1, no. 8367, pp. 1–3, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  20. N. McIntosh, J.-C. Becher, S. Cunningham et al., “Clinical diagnosis of pneumothorax is late: use of trend data and decision support might allow preclinical detection,” Pediatric Research, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 408–415, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  21. R. A. Primhak, “Factors associated with pulmonary air leak in premature infants receiving mechanical ventilation,” Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 102, no. 5, pp. 764–767, 1983. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Ramesh Bhat Yellanthoor and Vidya Ramdas. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views4406
Downloads1193
Citations

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.