Review Article

Minimally Invasive Methods for Staging in Lung Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Table 3

Summary of meta-analysis of all included studies and subgroup analysis.

ComparisonSensitivitySpecificityLR (+)

All included studies87.3% (CI 80–89%; %)99% (CI 99-100%; %)60.66 (CI 25.27–145.60; %)
EBUS + EUS85% (CI 80–89%; %)99.6% (CI 98.5–100%; %)60.66 (CI 25.27–145.6; %)
EBUS + EUS-B-FNA88% (CI 83.1–91.4%; %)100% (CI 99-100%; %)87.67 (CI 28.35–271.07; %)

LR (+): positive likelihood ratio.