<i>Mycobacterium genavense</i> Infections in a Tertiary Hospital and Reviewed Cases in Non-HIV Patients

Santos, M.; Gil-Brusola, A.; Escandell, A.; Blanes, M.; Gobernado, M.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/371370

Pathology Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References Copyright Related Articles

Clinical Study | Open Access

Volume 2014 | Article ID 371370 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/371370

Mycobacterium genavense Infections in a Tertiary Hospital and Reviewed Cases in Non-HIV Patients

M. Santos,¹A. Gil-Brusola,²A. Escandell,³M. Blanes,³and M. Gobernado¹

Academic Editor: Maria M. Picken

Received25 Jul 2013

Accepted10 Jan 2014

Published19 Feb 2014

Abstract

Mycobacterium genavense is a relatively new species of nontuberculous mycobacterium reported to cause disseminated infections in patients with AIDS and later on in non-HIV immunosuppressed patients. We describe clinical and laboratory features and response to therapy in 7 patients, three of them with HIV infection and four non-HIV—three organ transplant recipients and one with hyper-IgE syndrome—in Valencia, Spain, in a ten years period. We then summarize the published cases of M. avium complex infection, with invasion of peripheral blood, liver, spleen, bone marrow, lymph nodes, and lungs. In clinical samples a large number of acid-fast bacilli were observed. M. genavense grew only from liquid media and after a prolonged incubation period. Its identification was accomplished through molecular methods. Patients were treated with prolonged combinations of antimicrobial agents. There was clinical favourable outcome in 4 patients.

1. Introduction

Mycobacterium genavense is a nontuberculous mycobacterium (NTM), first described in 1990 [1], proposed as a new species in 1992 [2, 3], and characterized in 1993 [4]. It is a slowly growing fastidious mycobacterium that has been found in tap water [5], animals (birds, rabbits, cats, ferrets, and rabbits) [6–9], and intestinal tract of healthy humans [10]. No human to human transmission has been demonstrated. It can cause infection in birds—it is the most frequently isolated mycobacterium in parrots and parakeets [11, 12]—and humans [13–16]. In the latter, symptoms vary from nonspecific in otherwise healthy patients to disseminated symptomatology in immunosuppressed ones. These are similar to those observed in Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) infection and can include fever, abdominal pain, diarrhea, weight loss, lymphadenitis, hepatosplenomegaly, and progressive anemia, being the bowel the most affected organ [17]. Other less frequently involved organs are the lungs [18], central nervous system [19], skin and soft tissues [20, 21], and genital tract [22]. Its tendency to colonize the small intestine suggests that the digestive tract could act as a reservoir and that transmission could be oral or intestinal [10].

Most reports of M. genavense infection are from the pre-HAART era, in AIDS patients from Europe [14, 16, 23, 24], America [3, 13, 25], Asia [26], and Australia [27, 28]. Since 1997, few cases in non-HIV patients have been reported, mainly in immunosuppressed patients, including solid organ transplant recipients [23, 29], and patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies [30] or other immunosuppressive therapy [31, 32].

M. genavense is a fastidious NTM that needs liquid media, acid pH, higher than usual temperature (45°C), mycobactin J as supplement, and at least 3 months of incubation to grow [3, 15, 17, 33]. Molecular methods are needed for its definitive identification to a species level [2, 17, 24, 34]. Nevertheless, these are also difficult since this species is related, from a phylogenetic point of view, to M. simiae and M. malmoense [35, 36]. Susceptibility testing of M. genavense is also arduous, not only due to its problematical isolation, but also due to the large incubation period required for its growth [4, 15, 17]. Several studies inform that it is resistant to isoniazid with variable results with ethambutol and susceptible to streptomycin, rifampicin, clarithromycin, amikacin, fluoroquinolones, and pyrazinamide [17, 37]. Even though its optimal treatment is not set, combinations of at least three active drugs are used, similarly to other NTM infections.

We hereon present a retrospective analysis of the clinical and microbiological aspects of the cases of M. genavense infection diagnosed in a tertiary hospital in Valencia, Spain, between 2003 and 2013, and also review the published cases from non-HIV patients in order to describe the clinical profile of this type of infection.

2. Materials and Methods

Retrospective search through the database of the Microbiology Department of the University Hospital La Fe in Valencia, Spain, of all isolates identified M. genavense between 2003 and 2013. This hospital has around 1000 beds with a catchment area of 360,000 inhabitants including 20 primary care centres. Data recovered included type of samples, culture and identification methods, and susceptibility results. The medical records of all patients with M. genavense isolation in any clinical sample were reviewed. Data collected included age, sex, underlying diseases, immune status with CD4 lymphocyte count, radiological, radioscopic and histological findings, treatment received, and outcome.

Microbiologic processing followed the standard protocol of the laboratory. Samples from nonsterile sites were decontaminated using the N-acetyl-L-cysteine-sodium hydroxide treatment. Staining with Ziehl-Neelsen method was always done. The samples were cultured in two Löwenstein-Jensen (LJ) solid media and liquid media: either BACTEC 12B Mycobacteria Medium which contains 4 mL of Middlebrook 7H12 to be periodically measured in the BACTEC 460TB radiometric instrument until 2008 or the BBL Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) with 7 mL modified Middlebrook 7H9 with the BD MGIT 960 automated fluorometric system, from that year onwards. Blood samples and bone marrow were directly inoculated in 13A radiometric medium until the year 2008 and later into BACTEC MYCO/F Lytic medium designed for use with the BACTEC 9050 automated system. Incubation was routinely done at 37°C for at least 6 weeks, extended to 3 or even 4 months when this mycobacterium was suspected. Processing of positive cultures included Ziehl-Neelsen stain, subculturing to a LJ with and without pyruvate, chocolate, Sabouraud dextrose, and blood agar plates incubated at both 37°C and 42°C. Identification was partially accomplished through biochemical methods but was then definitively made through DNA probes (GenoType HAIN Lifescience) or 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Antibiotic susceptibility testing in liquid media (BACTEC 12B Mycobacteria Medium or BD MGIT) included isoniazid, rifampicin, streptomycin, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide drugs.

To assess lung infection caused by M. genavense we used the American Thoracic Society (ATS) 2007 criteria [37], and for the intestinal infection we considered intestinal isolates in several successive samples in patients with prolonged symptoms. Disseminated infection was considered as the presence of signs or symptoms involving two or more organs or systems and/or isolation of M. genavense in blood, bone marrow, or other organs.

For the review of non-HIV cases published in literature, information from Medline databases (PubMed and Ovid) was used.

3. Results

In the period of study, 7 cases of M. genavense infection were identified, three HIV positive and four non-HIV. Table 1 shows demographic data of the patients, together with information concerning their underlying diseases, main symptoms, radiological findings, antibiotic treatment, and final outcome. Pathologic findings from biopsies (jejunal, duodenal lymph nodes, lung, and spleen) showed inflammatory changes, granulomas, and a large amount of intracytoplasmatic AFB, compatible with atypical mycobacteriosis. The three AIDS patients were receiving antiretroviral treatment and cotrimoxazole prophylaxis for Pneumocystis jirovecii, the three transplant recipients were on immunosuppressive drugs, and the child had no immunosuppressive therapy. The interval between start of immunosuppression and the M. genavense diagnosis was of 4 years in case 4, 1 year in case 5, and 6 years in case 6. In the rest of patients, initiation of immunosuppression is difficult to determine since they were attended at our hospital in a late stage of HIV infection. All patients had disseminated infection, five of them with symptoms and/or radiological images compatible with pulmonary infection, three (cases 2, 6 and 7) according to ATS criteria [37] and isolation of M. genavense.

Table 2 collects year of isolation, microbiological aspects such as type and number of samples cultured, whether AFB were observed in the initial stain, culture medium where it grew, in which samples was the mycobacterium isolated or was DNA detected, and in vitro drug susceptibility results. Culturing in liquid broth was always successful, being not the case of the solid LJ medium, in which M. genavense did not grow neither from the original samples nor from the subcultures. The identification at species level, in order to exclude M. tuberculosis and other NTM, was always done by conventional and molecular methods. All strains of M. genavense were urease producers.

Table 3 shows the cumulative cases of M. genavense infection in non-HIV patients published in the scientific literature from 1997 to present, including four of this study.

4. Discussion

All documented infections by M. genavense have been in immunocompromised hosts, mainly AIDS patients with CD4 count below 50/μL in the pre-HAART era, except for one reported case of lymphadenitis in a healthy human [44]. The incidence of M. genavense infection in the Swiss HIV cohort study was found to be 12.8% of all NTM cases, making it the second most frequent NTM, after MAC [14]. However, data concerning the frequency of infection caused by this mycobacterium is few and disperse, probably due to its difficult clinical suspicion and microbiological isolation, so the disease might be underdiagnosed. In our series, the 7 patients had a diminished immune system: 3 HIV positive, 3 transplant recipients, and one child with hyper-IgE syndrome. In the different studies more cases of infection were found in adults [14, 16, 23], being less frequent in children [44–46] and with no discrimination concerning sex.

The majority of reported cases are disseminated, so clinicians should suspect this disease when a patient presents symptoms similar to those of disseminated MAC infection. M. genavense often affects the bowel and has less frequently been related to pleuropulmonary involvement [18, 20, 29, 47]. Other less commonly reported localizations are cutaneous, cerebral as a solitary lesion, and genital tract [19, 20, 22]. It sometimes appears associated with other opportunistic infections, making its diagnosis even more difficult. In our series, all patients had disseminated infections with intestinal tract invasion. Pulmonary infection was proofed with isolation of the mycobacterium in three cases, even though five patients had fever and productive cough and four had altered chest X ray.

Clinical presentation in affected patients usually includes fever, diarrhea, weight loss, abdominal pain, swelling of lymph nodes, hepatosplenomegaly, progressive anemia, low CD4 lymphocyte count, and sometimes hyperammonemia [38]. All these signs and symptoms are difficult to differentiate from disseminated MAC infection, except for the abdominal pain, present in the seven cases in our series, which is more frequent in M. genavense infection [17].

Pathologic findings from spontaneous samples and biopsies show inflammatory changes, granulomas, and a large amount of intracytoplasmatic AFB, all indistinguishable from MAC infection [15, 23, 48], in accordance with our results.

Microbiological findings are also similar to those of MAC infection. Samples like faeces and biopsies show a large amount of AFB. These are small, thin coccobacilli and appear disperse in direct staining from samples and accumulated when cultured. In our series, we observed these same facts in all stools and biopsies (retroperitoneal, duodenal, lung, and spleen).

Culture in liquid broth is preferred, BACTEC 13A medium as a good classic option [3]. Subculture in solid media is accomplished after adjusting pH, supplementing Mycobactin J, better on Middlebrook 7H11 agar than in LJ, in microaerophilic conditions, and incubation temperature of 37–45°C [3, 4, 49]. It is important to suspect M. genavense and incubate the samples for a longer period of time, even up to 4 months if AFB were observed in the direct staining of the sample. Our strains grew only in liquid medium after a 3-4-month period of incubation, since we do not use supplemented solid media. Neither an enriched CO₂ atmosphere nor a higher temperature facilitated the growth of the mycobacterium. It is important to consider a prolonged incubation period, especially when using automated machines with closed protocols. Blood and bone marrow, biopsies, and stools were samples that showed good microbiological results—the first ones probably due to their direct inoculation in the liquid media without previous processing and the stools because of their abundant AFB load.

During the period of study, there were some samples with acid-fast coccobacilli similar to M. genavense, which neither grew nor were identified. These could have been M. genavense but also other subspecies of MAC that have similar clinical presentation and are also difficult to grow and mycobactin J dependent [3].

Biochemical identification to species level is problematic, being urease slowly positive. Chromatography and commercial DNA probes relate this species to M. simiae and M. malmoense, so 16S rRNA sequencing is actually needed for its identification [3, 15, 24]. We had good results using the GenoType HAIN Lifescience probes that do not discriminate it from M. triplex although the latter grows on solid media.

In vitro susceptibility testing is not standardized due to its difficult growth, the need of an acid pH, and its requirement of a longer time of incubation than other mycobacteria [17]. We could do it in 5 cases. All our strains, in concordance to the scientific literature [17], were resistant to isoniazid, susceptible to rifampicin and streptomycin, and with variable susceptibility to ethambutol.

In general, according to our experience and other authors’, differences between infection by M. genavense and MAC are as follows. The first is more frequently associated with abdominal pain, with more AFB found in faeces; growth in solid medium is poor in M. genavense and good in MAC; M. genavense needs a more acid pH to grow (optimal pH 5.5), as well as a longer incubation period and addition of supplements; MAC is more resistant to standard anti-TB drugs [17].

No optimal treatment protocols for M. genavense disease have been reported [37], but animal models found an important reduction in AFB after 15–30 days of treatment with clarithromycin and rifabutin, after 30 days of amikacin and ethambutol, and no effect with ciprofloxacin [50]. Antimycobacterial therapy should be similar to that used in MAC infection, during several months, and must be prolonged until one year of negative culture. A combination of antibiotics should be used, among them clarithromycin, although some studies discuss the in vitro susceptibility of this drug [51], rifampicin, ethambutol, amikacin, moxifloxacin, and others [17]. In addition to antibiotics, immunosuppressants should be minimized. Standardized antituberculous treatment is not useful in these cases. During treatment and also similar to MAC infection, patients may develop immune reconstitution syndrome (IRIS), requiring gamma interferon [23, 52].

Outcome is poor, mainly because most patients have an underlying deep immunodeficiency. Nevertheless, survival has improved over the years—in the pre-HAART era it was around 10% in AIDS patients, while as in 2011, data of 53% survival rate at 5 years follow-up was recorded [23]. Four of our patients had good evolution, including the child who required retreatment for partial lack of compliment. The other three died during the treatment—case 1, after a month secondary to terminal AIDS; case 5, with good initial evolution, but final multiorganic failure after 8 months of treatment; and case 6, after 3 months of therapy, by pulmonary complication with respiratory insufficiency. Due to the complexity of the underlying diseases of the patients, it is difficult to determine whether any of the deaths was attributable to M. genavense.

In the review of non-HIV patients published from 1997 until now, we have found 29 cases of infection with M. genavense, mainly collected in recent years (Table 3). The prototype patient is one who, due to an underlying disease, either innate or acquired, or secondary to immunosuppressive treatments, has reached a chronic immunosuppressant situation. All were adults except a child. Nearly half of the cases [13/29] were transplant recipients and the remaining had either hematological or immunological disorders, connective diseases, or others. Most patients had disseminated infection with serious mortality [8/21], focusing on the group of transplant recipients [6/10].

In summary, M. genavense is an emerging opportunistic pathogen with increasingly frequency in varied immunocompromised patients. The disease mimics that of other disseminated NTM, being very similar to MAC infection, but with more abdominal involvement. There is therefore a need to obtain biopsies of enlarged lymph nodes and do a systematic analysis of stool samples, to search for AFB or nucleic acid of M. genavense, for early diagnosis and treatment of infection. The slow and special culture requirements are useful to confirm the diagnosis. Susceptibility testing is difficult and not always accomplished. However, treatment, although long and complex, can lead to recovery. Nevertheless, mortality remains serious.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

B. Hirschel, H. R. Chang, N. Mach et al., “Fatal infection with a novel, unidentified mycobacterium in a man with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 323, no. 2, pp. 109–113, 1990.
View at: Google Scholar
E. C. Bottger, A. Teske, P. Kirschner et al., “Disseminated “Mycobacterium genavense” infection in patients with AIDS,” The Lancet, vol. 340, no. 8811, pp. 76–80, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. B. Coyle, L. D. C. Carlson, C. K. Wallis et al., “Laboratory aspects of “Mycobacterium genavense” a proposed species isolated from AIDS patients,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 3206–3212, 1992.
View at: Google Scholar
E. C. Bottger, B. Hirschel, and M. B. Coyle, “Mycobacterium genavense sp. Nov,” International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 841–843, 1993.
View at: Google Scholar
M. E. Hillebrand-Haverkort, A. H. J. Kolk, L. F. F. Kox, J. J. A. M. Ten Velden, and J. H. Ten Veen, “Generalized mycobacterium genavense infection in HIV-infected patients: detection of the mycobacterium in hospital tap water,” Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 63–68, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. E. Kiehn, H. Hoefer, E. C. Bottger et al., “Mycobacterium genavense infections in pet animals,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 1840–1842, 1996.
View at: Google Scholar
M. S. Hughes, N. W. Ball, D. N. Love et al., “Disseminated Mycobacterium genavense infection in a FIV-positive cat,” Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 23–29, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Lucas, A. Lucas, H. Furber et al., “Mycobacterium genavense infection in two aged ferrets with conjunctival lesions,” Australian Veterinary Journal, vol. 78, no. 10, pp. 685–689, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Ludwig, U. Reischl, D. Janik, and W. Hermanns, “Granulomatous pneumonia caused by mycobacterium genavense in a dwarf rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus),” Veterinary Pathology, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 1000–1002, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J.-M. Dumonceau, P.-A. Fonteyne, L. Realini, A. Van Gossum, J. P. Van Vooren, and F. Portaels, “Species-specific Mycobacterium genavense DNA in intestinal tissues of individuals not infected with human immunodeficiency virus,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 2514–2515, 1995.
View at: Google Scholar
R. K. Hoop, E. C. Bottger, P. Ossent, and M. Salfinger, “Mycobacteriosis due to Mycobacterium genavense in six pet birds,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 990–993, 1993.
View at: Google Scholar
F. Portaels, L. Realini, L. Bauwens, B. Hirschel, W. M. Meyers, and W. De Meurichy, “Mycobacteriosis caused by Mycobacterium genavense in birds kept in a zoo: 11-Year survey,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 319–323, 1996.
View at: Google Scholar
M. T. Bessesen, J. Shlay, B. Stone-Venohr, D. L. Cohn, and R. R. Reves, “Disseminated Mycobacterium genavense infection: clinical and microbiological features and response to therapy,” AIDS, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 1357–1361, 1993.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Pechere, M. Opravil, A. Wald et al., “Clinical and epidemiologic features of infection with Mycobacterium genavense,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 155, no. 4, pp. 400–404, 1995.
View at: Google Scholar
P. Rodríguez, F. March, M. Garrigó et al., “Disseminated Mycobacterium genavense infection in patients with HIV infection. Description of 5 cases and review of the literature,” Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica, vol. 14, pp. 220–226, 1996.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Tortoli, F. Brunello, A. E. Cagni et al., “Mycobacterium genavense in AIDS patients, report of 24 cases in Italy and review of the literature,” European Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 219–224, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Ø. Thomsen, U. B. Dragsted, J. Bauer, K. Fuursted, and J. Lundgren, “Disseminated infection with Mycobacterium genavense: a challenge to physicians and mycobacteriologists,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 3901–3905, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Rammaert, L.-J. Couderc, E. Rivaud et al., “Mycobacterium genavense as a cause of subacute pneumonia in patients with severe cellular immunodeficiency,” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 11, article 311, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Berman, R. C. Kim, D. Haghighat, M. E. Mulligan, J. Fierer, and F. C. Wyle, “Mycobacterium genavense infection presenting as a solitary brain mass in a patient with AIDS: Case report and review,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1152–1154, 1994.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Bogdan, P. Kern, E. Richter et al., “Systemic infection with Mycobacterium genavense following immunosuppressive therapy in a patient who was seronegative for human immunodeficiency virus,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1245–1247, 1997.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Léautez, D. Boutoille, P. Bemer-Melchior, T. Ponge, and F. Raffi, “Localized Mycobacterium genavense soft tissue infection in an immunodeficient HIV-negative patient,” European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 51–52, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Vergnaud, C. Dauga, A. Dompmartin, B. Malbruny, C. Bazin, and P. A. D. Grimont, “Genital infection due to Mycobacterium genavense in a patient with AIDS,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 27, no. 6, p. 1531, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
P. Charles, O. Lortholary, A. Dechartres et al., “Mycobacterium genavense infections: a retrospective multicenter study in France, 1996–2007,” Medicine, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 223–230, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Hoefsloot, J. van Ingen, E. J. G. Peters et al., “Mycobacterium genavense in the Netherlands: an opportunistic pathogen in HIV and non-HIV immunocompromised patients. An observational study in 14 cases,” Clinical Microbiology and Infection, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 432–437, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. J. Hadad, S. C. Smole, C. C. Martins et al., “Disseminated Mycobacterium genavense in an HIV-infected patient from South America,” International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 502–503, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
J.-J. Yan, W.-C. Ko, H.-M. Tsai, Y.-T. Jin, and I.-J. Su, “Disseminated mycobacterium genavense infection in a patient with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: first case report in Taiwan,” Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 62–65, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
K. J. Lu, A. Grigg, D. Leslie, M. Finlay, and J. Sasadeusz, “Mycobacterium genavense duodenitis following allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation: case report,” Transplant Infectious Disease, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 534–536, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Sharifian, J. Humphris, R. W. L. Leong, and D. B. Jones, “Gastrointestinal: Mycobacterium genavense enteritis in an immunosuppressed patient,” Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 24, no. 8, p. 1474, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. S. Doggett and L. Strasfeld, “Disseminated Mycobacterium genavense with pulmonary nodules in a kidney transplant recipient: case report and review of the literature,” Transplant Infectious Disease, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 38–43, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Krebs, S. Zimmerli, T. Bodmer, and B. Lämmle, “Mycobacterium genavense infection in a patient with long-standing chronic lymphocytic leukaemia,” Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 248, no. 4, pp. 343–348, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Lorenzen, D. Meyer-Olson, M. Haubitz et al., “Infection with Mycobacterium genavense in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus,” Clinical Rheumatology, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. S39–S41, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Dumouchel-Champagne, C. Charlier-Woerther, A. Boibieux et al., “Disseminated nontuberculous infections with Mycobacterium genavense during sarcoidosis,” European Respiratory Review, vol. 18, no. 114, pp. 299–301, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. C. Böttger, “Mycobacterium genavense: an emerging pathogen,” European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, vol. 13, pp. 932–936, 1994.
View at: Google Scholar
O. Esparcia, M. Español, M. Garrigo et al., “Utilización de diferentes técnicas de biología molecular integradas en un algoritmo de identificación de micobacterias no tuberculosas,” Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica, vol. 30, pp. 3–10, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Roth, M. Fischer, M. E. Hamid, S. Michalke, W. Ludwig, and H. Mauch, “Differentiation of phylogenetically related slowly growing mycobacteria based on 16S-23S rRNA gene internal transcribed spacer sequences,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 139–147, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Tortoli, “Phylogeny of the genus Mycobacterium: many doubts, few certainties,” Infection, Genetics and Evolution, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 827–831, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. E. Griffith, T. Aksamit, B. A. Brown-Elliott et al., “An official ATS/IDSA statement: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 175, no. 4, pp. 367–416, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Nurmohamed, A. Weenink, H. Moeniralam, C. Visser, and F. Bemelman, “Hyperammonemia in generalized Mycobacterium genavense infection after renal transplantation,” American Journal of Transplantation, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 722–723, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Daum, V. Moos, C. Loddenkemper et al., “Immunrekonstitutionssyndrom des Dünndarms bei einer immunsupprimierten Patientin mit systemischem Lupus erythematodes und nichttuberkulöser Mykobakteriose,” Z Rheumatol, vol. 67, pp. 277–283, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
V. de Lastours, R. Guillemain, J.-L. Mainardi et al., “Early diagnosis of disseminated mycobacterium genavense infection,” Emerging Infectious Diseases, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 346–347, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Potjewijd, R. A. de Paus, A. van Wengen, J. Damoiseaux, A. Verbon, and E. van de Vosse, “Disseminated Mycobacterium genavense infection in a patient with a novel partial interleukin-12 receptor β1 deficiency,” Clinical Immunology, vol. 144, pp. 83–86, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Lhuillier, O. Brugière, N. Veziris et al., “Relapsing Mycobacterium genavense infection as a cause of late death in a lung transplant recipient: case report and review of the literature,” Experimental and Clinical Transplantation, vol. 10, pp. 618–620, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Tassone, A. C. Carvalho, A. Calabresi, E. Tortoli, A. Apostoli, and O. Scomodon, “Disseminated Mycobacterium genavense infection after immunosuppressive therapy shows underlying new composite heterozygous mutations of b 1 subunit of IL-12 receptor gene,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 131, pp. 607–610, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
V. Liberek, C. Soravia, B. Ninet, B. Hirschel, and C.-A. Siegrist, “Cervical lymphadenitis caused by Mycobacterium genavense in a healthy child,” Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 269–270, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Nadal, R. Caduff, R. Kraft et al., “Invasive infection with Mycobacterium genavense in three children with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome,” European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 37–43, 1993.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Reymond, P. Birrer, and U. B. Schaad, “Mycobacterium genavense invasive infection in two children with AIDS: long-term followup,” European Journal of Pediatrics, Supplement, vol. 154, no. 4, pp. S74–S76, 1995.
View at: Google Scholar
C. D. Gaynor, R. A. Clark, F. P. Koontz, S. Emler, B. Hirschel, and L. S. Schlesinger, “Disseminated Mycobacterium genavense infection in two patients with AIDS,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 455–457, 1994.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Wilson, K. Seilstad, M. Bessesen, D. Cohn, and S. Winter, “Pathologic findings in disseminated Mycobacterium genavense infection,” American Society for Microbiology, vol. 93, article 185, 1993.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Realini, K. De Ridder, J.-C. Palomino, B. Hirschel, and F. Portaels, “Microaerophilic conditions promote growth of Mycobacterium genavense,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 2565–2570, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Vrioni, C. Nauciel, G. Kerharo, and P. Matsiota-Bernard, “Treatment of disseminated Mycobacterium genavense infection in a murine model with ciprofloxacin, amikacin, ethambutol, clarithromycin and rifabutin,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 483–487, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Rastogi and K. S. G. Khye Seng Goh, “Effect of pH on radiometric MICs of clarithromycin against 18 species of mycobacteria,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 36, no. 12, pp. 2841–2842, 1992.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Ehlers and E. Richter, “Gamma interferon is essential for clearing Mycobacterium genavense infection,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 3720–3723, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2014 M. Santos et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

4120

Downloads

890

Citations