Clinical Study

Needle Tip Position and Bevel Direction Have No Effect in the Fluoroscopic Epidural Spreading Pattern in Caudal Epidural Injections: A Randomized Trial

Table 5

The rates of bilateral and ventral epidural spread in groups U and D after injection of 4 mL of contrast medium or 14 mL of injectates.

Injection drugEpidural spreadingGroup U ()Group D () value

4 mL of contrast mediumBilateral spreading at L5/S155/83 (66.3%)60/92 (65.2%)0.232
Bilateral spreading at L4/516/25 (64.0%)19/31 (61.3%)0.835
Ventral spreading at L5/S144/83 (53.8%)57/92 (62.0%)0.232
Ventral spreading at L4/510/25 (40.0%)14/31 (45.2%)0.698

14 mL of injectatesBilateral spreading at L5/S178/95 (82.1%)92/104 (88.5%)0.204
Bilateral spreading at L4/558/69 (84.1%)66/79 (83.5%)0.933
Ventral spreading at L5/S169/95 (72.6%)80/104 (76.9%)0.486
Ventral spreading at L4/541/69 (59.4%)53/79 (67.1%)0.334

Individuals from group U had the bevel of the needle headed to the dorsal side.
Individuals from group D had the bevel of the needle headed to the ventral side.
The data is expressed as “the number of cases with spreading/total number of cases” (percent of cases with spreading).