Research Article
Effects of Rhythmic Sensory Stimulation on Ehlers–Danlos Syndrome: A Pilot Study
Table 3
Comparison of mean scores across time for all responders (n = 6).
| Outcome measure | Preintervention | Postintervention | Washout | value | Effect size (partial η2) |
| BPI-severity | 24.2 ± 7.8 | 21.2 ± 6.7 | 24.3 ± 3.7 | 0.234 | 0.252 | BPI-interference | 51.5 ± 16 | 43.5 ± 16.4 | 44.5 ± 11.2 | 0.028 | 0.510 | CES-D | 34.0 ± 15.9 | 26.8 ± 12.1 | 28.5 ± 10.0 | 0.031 | 0.499 | POMS_total | 51.83 ± 27.06 | 45.33 ± 28.72 | 43.67 ± 20.20 | 0.31 | 0.211 | SF_general | 141.67 ± 106.85 | 162.50 ± 102.16 | 150.00 ± 75.83 | 0.44 | 0.151 |
|
|
Analysis was done by repeated measures ANOVA. Numbers represent mean and standard deviation. No significant findings for POMS-SF or SF-36. . |