Review Article

Role of Oxycodone Hydrochloride in Treating Radiotherapy-Related Pain

Table 1

Studies evaluating the analgesic efficacy of oxycodone hydrochloride in treating radiotherapy-related pain.

StudyType of cancerSample sizeDose of oxycodoneRadiation doseAdministration timeMain outcomesSide effects

Hu et al. [36]Bone metastasis4720 mg, 40 mg, 60 mg10–40 GyAdministrated a week before radiotherapy until the fifth week of radiotherapy endedThe remission rate was 97.9% until the fifth week ended. The KPS score was increased by ≥20 in 23 patients (48.9%) and 10–20 in 17 patients (36.2%) when the treatment concludedThere were local responses to radiotherapy and adverse drug reactions, which were all relieved by symptomatic treatment

Yi [17]Metastases of boneOxycodone alone (21): combined radiotherapy with oxycodone (21)10 mgNAAdministrated 3–7 days before radiotherapy till the sixth week of radiotherapy endedThe pain relief rate in the combined group was significantly higher than that in the oxycodone alone group in the 6th week of radiotherapy (95.1% vs. 71.4%, )No significant difference was found between the two groups (23.8% vs. 28.5%, )

Yu et al. [37]Nasopharyngeal carcinomaOxycodone group (34) and fentanyl group (32)∼10 mg70∼75 GyAdministrated when the VAS score reached 4 or more in patients affected by radiation-induced oral mucositisThe analgesic effect in the oxycodone group was significantly better than that in the fentanyl group during 5th to 7th weeks of radiotherapy (VAS in 7th week of radiotherapy: 3.59 ± 0.28 vs. 4.42 ± 0.33, )The incidence of adverse reactions (constipation, nausea, vomiting, and dizziness) was not statistically significant between the two groups ()

Huang and Zheng [26]Nasopharyngeal carcinoma102∼10 mg68∼70 GyAdministered in the 2nd and 3rd week of radiotherapyIn the group given oxycodone for mild pain, the outcomes were more beneficial in terms of VAS score and QOL score compared with those treated for severe painThe incidence of adverse reactions in the group treated with oxycodone for mild pain was significantly less than that in the group treated for severe pain ()
Lin and Wang [38]Cancer patients affected by radiation-induced oral mucositisConventional therapy (30) and oxycodone combined with conventional therapy (30)∼5 mgNAAdministered when the pain from radiation-induced oral mucositis reached a moderate levelAfter adding oxycodone hydrochloride to conventional therapy, the pain from radiation-induced oral mucositis was effectively controlled (96.7% vs. 33.4%) and significantly improved patient eating (83.4% vs. 33.4%, )

Wu et al. [39]Nasopharyngeal carcinomaConventional therapy (28) and oxycodone combined with conventional therapy (28)∼5 mg66∼70 GyAdministered when the VAS score reached 4 or more in the 3rd week of radiotherapyAfter adding oxycodone hydrochloride to conventional treatment, pain relief rate was significantly increased compared to the conventional therapy (92.8% vs. 32.1%, )The adverse reactions can be relieved by symptomatic treatment. There were no withdrawal symptoms when medication was discontinued

Hisamitsu et al. [40]Head and neck cancerMild pain (23) and moderate pain (20)16.1 ± 0.8 mg vs 31.4 ± 4.4 mg60 GyAdministered when the pain reached a mild or moderate levelBetween a cumulative dose of 25 and 50 Gy, opioid was introduced for pain control at a significantly
Lower VAS in the mild pain group than the moderate pain group
No significant difference was found between the two groups ()

Cai and Liu [41]Nasopharyngeal carcinomaModerate pain (11) and severe pain (24)20–60 mg every 12 hNAAdministered from the preparation period to the 2nd week of radiotherapyThe pain relief rate of both groups was 100%The adverse reactions were relieved by symptomatic treatment

NA: not applicable; —: not mentioned.