Review Article
Effectiveness of Intravenous Immunoglobulin for Management of Pain in Patients with Postpolio Syndrome
Table 1
Summary of the included studies.
| # | First author, year | Study design | Number of patients (E/C) | Treatment compared with IVIG | IVIG protocol | Summary of the outcome |
| 1 | Gonzalez, 2006 [17] | RCT | 142 (73/69) | Placebo | 30 g3 days (repeated after 3 months) | No significant effect |
| 2 | Farbu, 2007 [18] | RCT | 20 (10/10) | Placebo | 2 g/kg for 2–4 days | At the 3-month follow-up, IVIG group > placebo group, IVIG group: VAS 4.5 (pretreatment) ⟶ 2.9 (3 months) |
| 3 | Werhagen, 2011 [10] | Single-arm prospective study | 45 | — | 30 g3 days | After IVIG, VAS 5.3 (pretreatment) ⟶ 4.2 (6 months) |
| 4 | Gonzalez, 2012 [19] | RCT | 41 (20/21) | Placebo | 90 g (repeated after 3 months) | IVIG group > placebo group; after IVIG, VAS 3.1 (pretreatment) ⟶ 2.3 (1 year) |
| 5 | Bertolasi, 2013 [20] | RCT | 50 (24/26) | Placebo | 0.4 g/kg/day for 5 days | IVIG: VAS 5.4 (pretreatment) ⟶ 4.4 (2 months); placebo: VAS 4.9 (pretreatment) ⟶ 4.4 (2 months) |
|
|
E: experimental group; C: comparison group; IVIG: intravenous immunoglobulin; RCT: randomized controlled trial; VAS: visual analogue scale.
|