Review Article

Nonpharmacological Complementary Interventions for the Management of Pain after Third Molar Surgery: An Umbrella Review of Current Meta-Analyses

Table 1

Characteristics of the included systematic reviews.

AuthorsComplementary interventionParticipantsIntervention protocolComparatorSources searchedRange of included studies (years)Overall no. of included studiesQuality and certainty assessment toolsAppraisal ratingMeasurement of painFindingsSig.Heterogeneity (I2)Publication bias

Nascimento-Júnior et al.[11]CT231 healthy patients with unilaterally or bilaterally impacted mandibular 3rd molarsCT using ice packs was applied on the surgery side of the face for 5 to 30 minutes followed by resting periods during the first 24 h to 48 h after surgeryNo CTPubMed, WoS, Scopus, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, OpenThesis, and GL1985–20186Cochrane RoB 1 tool + GRADE evidence certaintyRoB: considerable
GRADE: low
VASEarly: 48 hN0%NR
Early: 72 hY0%
Late: day 7N62%
Liu et al.[9]SD409 healthy patients with fully or partially impacted mandibular 3rd molarsSD using gauze, tube, or rubber drainageNo SDPubMed, WoS, and CENTRAL1988–201610Cochrane RoB 1 toolRoB: considerableVASEarly: 48 h–72 hY0%Not suspected
Late: days 5–7N0%Not suspected
Canellas et al.[28]PRF514 healthy patients with unilaterally or bilaterally impacted mandibular 3rd molarsIntrasocket application of PRF (protocol of centrifugation: 3000 rpm × 10 minutes)No PRF applicationPubMed, Embase, WoS, and CENTRAL + GL2010–201713Cochrane RoB 1 toolRoB: moderateVASEarly: 72 hY79%NR
Late: day 7Y0%
Ramos et al.[30]PRF/l-PRF/A-PRF510 healthy patients with unilaterally or bilaterally impacted mandibular 3rd molarsIntrasocket application of PRF (protocol of centrifugation: 3000 rpm × 10 minutes/2700 rpm × 12 minutes)No PRF applicationPubMed, Embase, WoS, CENTRAL, and Virtual Health Library2015–202117Cochrane RoB 1 toolRoB: moderateVASEarly: 72hY68%NR
Late: day 7N92%
Vitenson et al.[31]A-PRF132 healthy patients with unilaterally or bilaterally impacted mandibular 3rd molarsIntrasocket application of A-PRF (protocol of centrifugation: 1500 rpm × 14 minutes/1300 rpm × 13 minutes)No PRF application/other biomaterialsMEDLINE Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus + GL2019–20214Cochrane RoB 2 tool + GRADE evidence certaintyRoB: low to moderateVASEarly: 48 hYNANR
Early: 72 hY0%
Late: day 7Y31.04%
Maria de Souza et al.[10]HAA271 healthy patients with fully or partially impacted mandibular 3rd molars1-Hyaluronic acid gel: applied to the extraction socket (0.2 mL to 2 mL)
2-Hyaluronic acid spray: two puffs were applied to the extraction area
No HAACENTRAL, PubMed, Virtual Health Library, and WoS + GL2015–20185Cochrane RoB 1 tool + GRADE evidence certaintyRoB: moderate
GRADE: very low (pain)
low (trismus)
VASEarly: 72 hY0%NR
Late: day 7Y28%
Chaudhry et al.[7]OT173 healthy patients underwent 3rd molar surgeryOT was applied using extraoral prob, ozonated water, or topical ozone gelNo OTMEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Google Scholar2013–20204Cochrane RoB 1 tool + GRADE evidence certaintyRoB: Considerable
GRADE: Moderate to low
VASEarly: 72 hY82%NR
Late: day 7Y79%
Firoozi et al.[8]KT444 healthy patients underwent 3rd molar surgeryApplying KT on lymphatic nodes and ducts nearby surgical areas on the skinNo KTCENTRAL, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus + GL2013–20219Cochrane RoB 2 tool + GRADE evidence certaintyRoB: high (pain) to moderate (swelling and trismus)
GRADE: moderate (pain) to low to very low (swelling) to moderate to high (trismus)
VASEarly: 48 hY53%NR
Early: 72 hY81%
Late: day 7N98%
Dawdy et al.[34]LLLT1060 healthy subjects underwent 3rd molar surgeryLLLT was applied intraorally, extraorally, or bothNo LLLT/ShamPubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov1990–201721Cochrane RoB 1 tool + GRADE evidence certaintyRoB: considerable
Grade: low to moderate
VASEarly pain 48 hY95%Not Suspected
Late: day 7Y87%
De Barros et al.[6]LLLT648 healthy subjects underwent 3rd molar surgeryLLLT was applied intraorally, extraorally, or bothNo LLLT/ShamPubMed, WoS, and CENTRALUp to July 202015Cochrane RoB 1 toolRoB: lowVASEarly: 48 hY21%NR
Late: day 7Y78%

WoS: Web of Science; GL: grey literature; RCTs: randomized controlled trials; RoB: risk of bias; MD: mean difference; SMD: standardized mean difference; CT: cryotherapy; SD: surgical drainage; PRF: platelet-rich fibrin; L-PRF: leukocyte and platelet-rich fibrin; A-PRF: advanced platelet-rich fibrin; HAA: hyaluronic acid application; OT: ozone therapy; KT: Kinesio taping; LLLT: low-level laser therapy; VAS: visual analog scale; NR: not reported.