Pain Research and Management / 2022 / Article / Tab 3 / Research Article
Assessment of C Fibers Evoked Potentials in Healthy Subjects by Nd : YAP Laser Table 3 Values of latencies and amplitudes of N2P2 components for the a-delta and C modalities of stimulation in 20 healthy subjects. Results of statistical analysis are reported.
Stimulation type N Mean SD Error ds Student’s t test Leven test (F ) Face N2 latency (msec) Ad 20 161.00 19.167 4.286 −6.95 <0.001 15.77 <0.001 C 18 283.52 76.283 17.980 P2 latency (msec) Ad 20 330.08 51.120 11.431 −6.76 <0.001 6.61 0.014 C 18 493.51 93.751 22.097 N2 amplitude (uV) Ad 20 −17.14 9.81 2.19 4.96 <0.001 9.21 0.004 C 18 −5.42 2.09 0.49 P2 amplitude (uV) Ad 20 9.31 5.15 1.15 6.61 <0.001 6.61 0.014 C 18 3.78 2.76 0.65 Hand N2 latency (msec) Ad 20 228.33 57.90 13.28 3.23 0.001 21.72 <0.001 C 16 455.42 276.14 69.03 P2 latency (msec) Ad 20 345.31 34.05 7.81 −8.37 <0.001 35.74 <0.001 C 16 1062.84 355.73 88.93 N2 amplitude (uV) Ad 20 −17.04 11.13 2.55 −3.54 <0.001 6.59 0.02 C 16 −7.18 4.37 1.09 P2 amplitude (uV) Ad 20 10.95 5.71 1.31 2.04 0.025 0.29 0.58 C 16 7.26 4.89 1.22 Knee N2 latency (msec) Ad 20 206.64 22.76 5.09 −7 <0.001 30.83 <0.001 C 17 1026.84 431.91 104.75 P2 latency (msec) Ad 20 374.22 36.28 8.11 11.89 <0.001 29.55 <0.001 C 17 1319.12 325.91 79.05 N2 amplitude (uV) Ad 20 −14.83 9.36 2.09 -3.11 0.002 8.37 0.007 C 17 −7.33 4.92 1.19 P2 amplitude (uV) Ad 20 8.10 5.42 1.21 1.75 0.045 7.97 0.008 C 17 5.76 2.31 0.56 Foot N2 latency (msec) Ad 20 243.36 27.47 6.14 −12.34 <0.001 21.85 <0.001 C 17 1048.44 267.77 64.94 P2 latency (msec) Ad 20 400.20 82.64 18.48 −13.16 <0.001 18.37 <0.001 C 17 1348.52 287.01 69.61 N2 amplitude (uV) Ad 20 −14.06 9.00 2.01 −2.88 0.006 2.05 0.61 C 17 −6.91 5.22 1.27 P2 amplitude (uV) Ad 20 9.75 4.68 1.05 2.76 0.006 0.12 0.72 C 17 5.95 3.85 0.93