Corrigendum

Corrigendum to “The Role of Descending Modulation in Manual Therapy and Its Analgesic Implications: A Narrative Review”

Table 1

Neurophysiological response to manual therapy variations.

StudySubjectsControl/shamVariationFindings

Degenhardt et al. 7 women and 3 men with () and without () low back painLight-touchOMTβ-endorphins
↑ PEA

McPartland et al. Osteopathic patient population ()Sham manipulationOMT↑ AEA

Vernon et al. 27 healthy males(1) Control group laid supine on a treatment table
(2) Sham group received joint play maneuvers
SMTβ-endorphins

Christian et al. 40 male subjects who were chiropractic patients and students with and without painSham (joint taken to end-range of motion)SMTβ-endorphins

Sanders et al. 9 males and 9 females with acute (<2 weeks) low back painSham group () received light touch at L4/L5–S1SMTβ-endorphins

Plaza-Manzano et al. 30 graduate school studentsNo treatmentSMTorexin A
neurotensin
oxytocin

Skyba et al. 113 male Sprague-Dawley rats(1) Vehicle w/manipulation
(2) Vehicle w/anesthesia
(3) Drugs w/anesthesia
Knee manipulationSerotonin-mediated
Norepinephrine-mediated
Non-GABA-mediated

Martins et al. 8 male Swiss mice per group(1) Control
(2) Sham
Ankle joint mobilizationEO-

Martins et al. 8 male Swiss mice per group(1) Control
(2) Sham
Ankle joint mobilizationCBR-

Martins et al. 8 male Swiss mice per group(1) Control
(2) Sham
Ankle joint mobilizationAdenosine-

Martins et al. 8 adult male Wistar rats per group(1) Sham
(2) Sham w/anesthesia
(3) Sham w/mobilization
(4) Crush
(5) Crush w/anesthesia
Ankle joint mobilization↓ glial cell activation

Paungmali et al. 7 female and 17 males with lateral epicondylalgia(1) Placebo
(2) Control
MWMNo increase in tolerance over treatment period

Paungmali et al. 4 female and 14 males with lateral epicondylalgia(1) Placebo
(2) Control
MWMNon-EO-

Santos et al. Male Wistar rats(1) Control
(2) Injury only
(3) Sham
(4) Sham w/mobilization
NMDynorphin-mediated

Kaada  and  Torsteinbø6 male and 6 female subjects with a history of myalgiaConnective tissue massageβ-endorphins

Trentini et al. Male and female Sprague-Dawley rats(1) Control
(2) Placebo
AcupressureEO-

Fassoulaki et al. 4 females and 8 males without a familiarity with acupuncture(1) Control
(2) Sham
Acupressureβ-endorphins

Day et al. 17 women and 14 men who were healthy and free of painControlConventional massageβ-endorphins
β-lipotropins

Agren et al. 13–21 Male Sprague-Dawley ratsControlConventional MassageOxytocin-

Turner et al. 26 nulliparous women that cycle(1) Positive emotion
(2) Negative emotion
Conventional massage↑ oxytocin

Bello et al. 14 malesControlConventional massage↑ oxytocin
→ arginine vasopressin

Morhenn et al. 50 females and 45 malesRestConventional massage↑ oxytocin
β-endorphins

Hernandez-Reif et al. 13 women and 11 men with >6 months low back painRelaxation therapyConventional massage↑ dopamine
↑ serotonin

Hernandez-Reif et al. 34 women with stage 1 or 2 breast cancerControl (medical treatment-only)Conventional massage↑ dopamine
↑ serotonin

Field et al. ReviewConventional massage↑ dopamine
↑ serotonin

Hart et al. Nineteen women with anorexia nervosaControl (standard treatment-only)Conventional massage↑ dopamine

Lund et al. 19 fibromyalgia patientsGuided relaxationConventional massage↑ corticotropin releasing factor

Billhult et al. 32 women with breast cancerAttentionConventional massage↑ oxytocin

Tsuji et al. 7 Japanese boys with Autism Spectrum Disorder and their mothersControl (no massage, crossover)Conventional massage↑ oxytocin

Rapaport et al. 29 females and 24 malesLight touchConventional massage→ oxytocin
↓ arginine vasopressin

Rapaport et al. 23 females and 22 malesLight touchConventional massage↑ oxytocin (acute)
→ oxytocin (chronic)

denotes review; denotes a conclusion inferred from naloxone or relevant antagonistic response.