Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Letter to the Editor
Research Article
Plastic Surgery International
Volume 2018, Article ID 5731290, 4 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5731290
Corrigendum

Corrigendum to “Evaluation of Complication Rates after Breast Surgery Using Acellular Dermal Matrix: Median Follow-Up of Three Years”

1Department of Plastic, Aesthetic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Agaplesion Diakonieklinikum Rotenburg, Elise-Averdieck-Straße 17, 27356 Rotenburg (Wümme), Germany
2Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
3Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic and Hand Surgery, Alfried Krupp Krankenhaus, Hellweg 100, 45276 Essen, Germany
4Department of Plastic, Aesthetic, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neubergstraße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
5Department of Pathology, Agaplesion Diakonieklinikum Rotenburg, Elise-Averdieck-Straße 17, 27356 Rotenburg, Germany
6Department of Surgery, Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney St, London, UK
7Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany

Correspondence should be addressed to Felix J. Paprottka; moc.em@akttorpap.xilef

Received 29 April 2018; Accepted 17 May 2018; Published 11 July 2018

Copyright © 2018 Felix J. Paprottka et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


In the article titled “Evaluation of Complication Rates after Breast Surgery Using Acellular Dermal Matrix: Median Follow-Up of Three Years” [1], there were errors, which should be corrected as follows.

(1) The title should be changed to “Evaluation of complication rates after breast surgery using two different kinds of Acellular Dermal Matrix and one Bovine Pericardium Collagen Membrane: median follow-up of three years.”

(2) Tables , , and along with their legends should be corrected as below.

(3) In the “Material and Methods,” the sentence reading “Sixteen patients had a history of radiotherapy prior to ADM implementation; see Table ” should be changed to “Sixteen patients had a history of radiotherapy prior to ADM implementation; see Table .

(4) In the “Discussion,” the sentence reading “Other limitations of our study include the relative brevity of follow-up with a mean time period of 36 months” should be changed to “Other limitations of our study include the relative brevity of follow-up with a median time period of 36 months.”

(5) The legends of Figures and 4 should be corrected where “capsular contracture and” should be added to the legend of Figure and “and capsular contracture, followed by” should be added to the legend of Figure . The corrected figures are as below.

Table 1: Patient collective with ADM-implementation.
Table 2: Indications for ADM implementation.
Table 4: Overall complication probabilities for used ADMs.
Figure 3: Case I: A 57-year-old female patient suffering from capsular contracture and implant malposition with lateral deviation, bottoming out, rippling, ptosis with different nipple-areola complex (NAC), and IMF positions preoperatively; (a) frontal view; (b) lateral view; one-year postoperative results after BADM implantation (Strattice/LifeCell) with frontal (c) and lateral view (d).
Figure 4: Case II: skin sparing mastectomy and breast augmentation performed in a 54-year-old female patient with a history of breast carcinoma, complicated by shell rupture of the left-sided implant and capsular contracture, followed by subsequent breast-expander implantation; (a) frontal view; (b) lateral view; three-month postoperative results after HADM usage (Epiflex/DIZG) with frontal (c) and lateral view (d).

References

  1. F. J. Paprottka, N. Krezdorn, H. Sorg et al., “Evaluation of Complication Rates after Breast Surgery Using Acellular Dermal Matrix: Median Follow-Up of Three Years,” Plastic Surgery International, vol. 2017, Article ID 1283735, pp. 1–9, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar