Comparative Study of the Morphology of the Ovipositor of Platygaster diplosisae (Hymenoptera: Platygasteridae) and Aprostocetus procerae (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) Two Parasitoids Associated with the African Rice Gall Midge, Orseolia oryzivora (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae)
We studied the morphology of the ovipositor of Platygaster diplosisae (Hymenoptera: Platygasteridae) and Aprostocetus procerae (= Tetrastichus pachydiplosisae) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), two parasitoids associated with the African rice gall midge (AFRGM), and Orseolia oryzivora (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). Scanning electron microscope techniques were used for this study. The ovipositor of P. diplosisae was short (40 m), and most of the sensillae found on it were mechanoreceptors and located on the distal portion of the 3rd valvulae. These sensillae may be involved in selection of an egg or larval host. The shortness of this ovipositor may be an adaptation to a host whose egg envelope thickness is not more than 0.7 m. The ovipositor of A. procerae was 30 times (1.2 mm) the length of the P. diplosisae ovipositor. It was not only well equipped with mechanoreceptive sensillae, but these sensillae were very diverse and distributed along the length of the valvulae. The 10 denticulations of the lancet of this ovipositor allow this parasitoid to exploit hosts that are not otherwise readily accesible. These two parasitoids share the same resource by infesting different life stages of the host. The ovipositor of each species of parasitoid enhanced resource sharing, due to its length and its sensillae type and distribution.
The African rice gall midge (AfRGM), Orseolia oryzivora Harris & Gagné (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae), is an insect pest indigenous to Africa. It was considered a minor pest prior to the 1970s but has since caused increasingly severe damage to rice crops .
The young larva feeds on tillers at the growing point of the rice plant and induces the plant to form an oval, hollow gall. Each gall prevents production of a panicle. The amount of yield loss caused by the gall midge larva varies among rice varieties. Nacro et al. , and Williams et al.  showed that an increase in 1% in the percentage of tillers with galls at the stem-elongation stage reduced yield by 2 to 3%.
It has been reported that early and synchronized plantings of rice reduce the damage by the AfRGM . Unfortunately, these cultural control methods are very often insufficient because of problems with water management and the conflicting management of both upland cereal crops and irrigated rice. The use of insecticides to control AfRGM is not ideal because of the cost, the risk to human health and the environment, and the destruction of natural enemies . Furthermore, only systemic insecticides are likely to be effective in the control of the midge because of its feeding habit inside plant tissue. The conservation of natural enemies of the AfRGM may be a good alternative to insecticidal control.
So far, little is known about the predators of AfRGM. Some egg predators have been reported . These include tiny predatory mites (Neoseiulus sp., Phytoseiidae), the bug Cyrtorhinus viridis Linnavuori (Miridae), and the sword-tailed crickets Anexipha longipennis Serville, and Trigonidium cicindeloides Rambur (Gryllidae). Ladybird beetles (Coccinellidae) and the long-horned grasshopper Conocephalus (Tettigoniidae) are also egg predators. Two common parasitoids are known to be associated with the AfRGM. These are Platygaster diplosisae Risbec (Hymenoptera: Platygastridae) and Aprostocetus procerae Risbec (=Tetrastichus pachydiplosisae) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). These two parasitoids are the primary biological control agents. P. diplosisae is a gregarious larval parasitoid whereas A. procerae is a solitary pupal parasitoid of the AfRGM . P. diplosisae oviposits inside the eggs or the larvae of AfRGM. The parasitoid’s larvae hatch inside the young AfRGM larva. They feed inside the larva and kill it when it is fully grown. They then pupate inside the corpse, from which the adults emerge. The adults cut one or more very small exit holes in the gall and disperse. The adult A. procerae lays its eggs onto AfRGM pupae, or occasionally onto large larvae. It does this by piercing through the wall of the gall with the tip of its abdomen. The host is stung and paralyzed by the female parasitoid as the egg is laid. A. procerae feeds on, rather than inside, the host, and only one larva develops on each host. After it has finished feeding, the parasitoid larva changes into a pupa inside the gall. The adult that emerges cuts an exit hole in the gall to escape. Cumulative parasitism due to these two hymenopterans has been reported to reach 77% [6–9]. However, sometimes, such a high level of parasitism occurs too late to prevent damage by the pest.
The ovipositor of parasitic hymenopterans is primarily used to deposit an egg into or onto a host . The structure of the ovipositor in different species of parasitic hymenoptera varies both in length and in its arrangement on the terminal metasomal segments. The general organization of the ovipositor includes 3-paired valvulae (1, 2, and 3), one paired valvifers. The paired 1st valvulae and the 2nd paired valvulae are fused in their distal portion to form the lancet, which is the piercing organ.
This study compares the ovipositor of A. procerae and P. diplosisae in terms of morphology and function of the associated sensillae. Furthermore, we hypothesize about the possible effect of the sensillae richness and diversity on the parasitism rate of A. procerae and P. diplosisae.
2. Material and Methods
Adult parasitoids were captured from irrigated rice fields in Burkina Faso and kept in a 90% alcohol solution and sent to France where all the laboratory work was completed. The average age of the specimen was 7. We used about 100 individuals of each parasitoid species in 5 replicates. Unfortunately, due to the smallness of the ovipositor of P. diplosisae only a few samples were observed under electron microscope. Ovipositors of A. procerae and P. diplosisae were dehydrated in successive alcohol solutions (70%, 80%, 95%, and 100%) and acetone solutions (50%, 70%, 90%, and 100%). Ovipositors were then mounted on a lead object-holder. Samples were critical point dried in a Balzers CPD 010 apparatus with liquid gas and then gold palladium coated with a JEOL JFC-100 sputter. These samples were observed under a JSM 6400 electron-scanning microscope (JEOL Ltd, Japan).
3.1. Description of the Ovipositor of Platygaster diplosisae
The ovipositor of P. diplosisae measures 40 m in length (Figure 1(a)).
3.1.1. 3rd Valvulae
The paired 3rd valvulae are 40 m in length and protect the 1st and 2nd valvulae when the ovipositor is at rest (Figure 1(a); see arrow). 3rd valvulae are connected distally, which causes a cone that has a slightly flat peak (Figure 1(b)).
3.1.2. 1st and 2nd Valvulae
The two pairs of 1st and 2nd valvulae are fused and form the ovipositor stylet (Figure 1(g)).
At rest, this ovipositor stylet is entirely embedded in the cavity of the 3rd valvulae (Figure 1(b)). The paired valvulae are larger in their proximal portion and come to a sharp point distally (Figure 1(h)). The extremity of the paired 2nd valvulae, also called the lancet, is equipped with five denticles (Figure 1(g); see arrow).
3.2. Sensillae on the Ovipositor of P. diplosisae
The sensillae on the ovipositor are relatively simple.
3.2.1. 3rd Valvulae
Two-thirds of these sensillae are campaniform sensillae whose external process is a dome embedded in a cuticular depression (Figure 1(e)). The distal of the 3rd valvulae possesses four types of sensillae (Figures 1(b), 1(f)). Following is a list and description of the four sensillae types:(i)3 trichoid sensillae of type a, nonaligned. They are slightly curved and measure 12 m in length.(ii)1 trichoid sensillum of type b, slightly straighter than the other three but as long as them (13 m length) (Figures 1(b), 1(c)).(iii)1 unique sensillum of type c, 3 m in length, so 4 times shorter than the trichoid sensillae described early (Figures 1(b), 1(d)). Unlike the trichoid sensillae, the base of the type c sensillum is not embedded in a cuticular depression. Its diameter is more continuous and its extremity is less sharp.(iv)1 unique sensillum of type d, located near the sensillum of the type c (Figures 1(b), 1(d), 1(f)). It measures 2.5 m. The base is embedded in a depression similar to the trichoid sensillum. It is grooved and its extremity ends with a bludgeon. It measures 2.5 m in length. This type of sensillum resembles the chaetica of type 1 observed by Van Baaren , on the antenna of Epidinocarsis lopezi (de Santis) (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) a solitary endoparasitoid of the cassava mealybug, Phenacoccus manihoti Matile-Ferrero (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). The extremity of this sensillum which was not explored by scanning electron microscopy could bear a pore. The trichoid sensillae, the campaniform sensillae and the sensillum of type c may be mechanoreceptors.
3.2.2. 1st and 2nd Valvulae
The 1st paired valvulae are equipped with campaniform sensillae aligned on a line that runs the length of the valvulae (Figure 1(i)). These sensillae are the same type as those observed on the distal two thirds of the 3rd valvulae. These are mechanoreceptive sensillae similar to those described on the ovipositor valvulae of several hymenopteran parasitoids .
The size and the low number of ovipositors examined did not allow us to determine whether the 2nd valvulae are equipped with sensillae.
Table 1 summarizes the different types of sensillae and their possible function.
3.3. Description of the Ovipositor of A. procerae
The ovipositor of A. procerae consists of a stylet surrounded by the paired 3rd valvulae (Figure 2(a)).
3.3.1. 3rd Valvulae
3.3.2. 1st and 2nd Valvulae
The ovipositor stylet of A. procerae is 1.2 mm in length, surrounded by the paired 3rd valvulae. The paired 2nd valvulae are coupled by the 1st valvulae. A sliding system allows the lancet formed by the fusion of the paired 2nd valvulae to move backward and forward. The lancet bears a notch that limits the movements of the paired 2nd and 1st valvulae. This lancet is 92 m long and bears 10 denticles on its external surface (Figures 2(e), 2(f)). These denticles are increasingly smaller from proximal to distal, which gives the perforating system of the ovipositor its sharp form.
3.4. Sensillae on the Ovipositor of A. procerae
The paired 3rd valvulae bear four types of sensillae, three of which are trichoid sensillae.(i)Type 1: a long trichoid sensillum, 104 m in length. It is located proximally (Figure 2(a)).(ii)Type 2: this type of trichoid sensillum is the most common on the paired 3rd valvulae. These sensillae are nearly straight, 51 m in length and distributed on the 3rd paired valvulae up to 58 m from the base. They appear smooth when observed under the scanning electron microscope (Figure 2(b)).(iii)Type 3: these are trichoid sensillae, 38 m in length, curved and observed from 42 m distally on the 3rd paired valvulae where 6 sensillae of this type are observed. They are channeled and slightly rounded distally (Figures 2(b), 2(c)).(iv)Type A: this unique sensillum is observed at the proximal end of the 3rd paired valvulae. It is 5.3 m in length and originates from a depression. It is slightly curved and half of its proximal part is sharper than its basal part. This styloconic sensillum is the shortest sensillum of all sensillae observed on the 3rd paired valvulae (Figure 2(c)).
3.4.1. 1st Paired Valvulae
The 1st paired valvulae are very rich in sensillae. Eight types of sensillae were observed on these valvulae.(i)Type b: the external process is located in a large groove. This type of sensillum is located in the proximal half of the 1st paired valvulae. It is basiconic (Figure 2(i)).(ii)Type c: basiconic sensillum has a large groove. The external process is prominent, almost perpendicular to the axis of the valvula (Figure 2(j)).(iii)Type d: styloconic sensillum, unique, with an appearance similar to a trichoid sensillum. It is located basally and is 4.7 m in length (Figure 2(k)).(iv)Type e: a basiconic sensillum. Five sensillae of this type are arranged randomly, and the last one is located at 120 m distally from the base of the valvula (Figure 2(l)).(v)Type f: 3 sensillae arranged in a triangle at the distal portion of the valvulae (Figure 2(m)). The external process is short. In their morphology and distribution, these sensillae look like the sensilla observed by Le Ralec  on the 1st paired valvulae of Encarsia formosa Gahen (Hymenoptera: Aphilinidae), larval parasitoid of the greenhouse Aleyrodid Trialeurodes vaporariorum Westwood (Homoptera: Aleyrididae).(vi)Type g: the process is stretched and embedded in a depression (Figure 2(n)).(vii)Campaniform sensillum: the external process is a dome. This sensillum is located on the basal of the valvulae. Its diameter is 2 m (Figure 2(o)).(viii)Styloconic sensillae of type 1 and type 2: one row of type 2 is enclosed by two rows of type 1. Type one has an external process that is entirely embedded in a depression. Three rows of styloconic sensillae are distributed on the external surface of the basic portion of the valvulae. They are 0.7 m in length (Figure 2(p)).
3.4.2. 2nd Paired Valvulae
The sensillae on the paired 2nd valvulae are less abundant than those of the paired 1st valvulae.
They include(i)styloconic sensillae of type 3. Three of these sensillae are observed on the basal external surface of the valvulae. Their external process is more developed than that observed on the other types of styloconic sensillae. This process appears erect and oblique as compared to the axis of the valvula. The sensillum is embedded in a narrow depression. Its external process is 0.7 m in length (Figure 2(g));(ii)sensillae of type g: they are located on the distal half of the valvula but are not illustrated.
The distribution of the sensillae on the valvulae of the ovipositor of A.procerae and their possible functions are summarized in the Table 2. The sensillae of the ovipositor of this eulophid are as abundant as diverse and probably mainly function as mechanoreceptors. The main biological features of the host (O. oryzivora) and its two parasitoids are presented in Table 3.
Table 3 explains the main biological features of the host and its associated parasitoids. The reproductive biology of hymenopterans has been used to explain the nature of their parasitism. Price  showed that larval parasitoids of the wood fly, Neodiprion swainei, had a high fecundity and were gregarious. Their hosts were relatively abundant and easy to find. In contrast, the pupal parasitoids of the fly were ectoparasitoids with low fecundity. We are in a similar situation, where P. diplosisae and A. procerae share the same host at its different developmental stages due to the adaptations of their reproductive biology.
The ovipositor plays an essential role in the success of parasitism in Hymenoptera. Le Ralec , showed adaptive morphological features, according to the type of hosts, in 22 parasitoid hymenopteran species. These features are related not only to the morphology of the ovipositor (length and width of the diameter) but also to the quantity, the quality, and the way the sensillae are distributed on it. Thus, the species that easily access their hosts have ovipositors well equipped with mechanoreceptive sensillae spread along the length of the valvulae. The species that have difficulty accessing their hosts have poorly equipped ovipositors with mechanoreceptive sensillae that are generally grouped at the distal end of the valvulae. The case of these two parasitoid species associated with O. oryzivora is consistent with what was stated above.
Indeed, we have already observed that most of the sensillae found on the ovipositor of P. diplosisae are mechanoreceptors located essentially at the extremity of the 3rd valvulae. These sensillae may be important for host selection, which for this parasitoid is either an egg or a larva. So, these sensillae could “inform” the parasitoid on the status of the surface of the host. The sensillae of type B, observed at the extremity of the 3rd valvulae, probably of chemoreceptor type, could “inform” the parasitoid on the interior status (parasitized or unparasitized) of the host. Lastly, the short length of the ovipositor (40 m) seems an adaptation to this type of host where the thickness of the egg envelope is not more than 0.7 m.
The ovipositor of A. procerae is not only well equipped with mechanoreceptive sensillae, but these sensillae are diverse and distributed along the length of the valvulae. In addition to these features, the length of the stylet of the ovipositor (1.2 mm) is 30 times the length of the ovipositor of P. diplosisae, and the 10 denticulations of the lancet meet the conditions of a parasitoid that exploits a host that is less accessible. As for P. diplosisae, the very abundant mechanoreceptive sensillae observed at the distal end of the paired 3rd valvulae could be used by A. procerae to detect the substrate within which the host is located and to determine the depth at which it is located. The three chemoreceptive sensillae of type F observed at the distal end of the paired 1st valvulae could “inform” the parasitoid on the depth and the condition of the host. The length of the ovipositor has already been recognized as an adaptive feature for several parasitoids that exploit the same host, Tryporyza incertulas Walker, a lepidoperan rice stemborer whose egg masses have different layers . The two parasitoid species examined share the same resource by infesting different stages of the host and by the ovipositor of each species differing in length and associated sensillae. In fact, the parasitic action of the two parasitoids may be complimentary.
The role of the two examined parasitoids in the natural regulation of the AfRGM has already been investigated by several authors [1, 4–7]. These parasitoids parasitize the midge simultaneously, and they can find and kill up to 70% of the immature populations of the pest. However, sometimes, such a high level of parasitism occurs too late in the season to prevent large AfRGM populations from building up and causing serious yield losses. The role of these parasitoids could be integrated into an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) strategy that could include also cultural control (early and synchronized planting, management of alternative hosts and fertilizer), host plant resistance, and chemical control.
C. T. Williams, K. M. Harris, M. N. Ukwungwu et al., African Rice Gall Midge Research Guide, West Africa Rice Development Association and CABI Bioscience, Wallingford, UK, 2002.
C. T. Williams, M. N. Ukwungwu, B. N. Singh, and O. Okhidievbie, “Assessment of host plant resistance in Oryza sativa to the African rice gall midge, Orseolia oryzivora Harris and Gagné (Dipt., Cecidomyiidae), with a description of a new method for screening under artificial infestation,” Journal of Applied Entomology, vol. 125, no. 6, pp. 341–349, 2001.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Nacro, “Etude de la bio-écologie de la Cécidomyie du riz, Orseolia oryzivora sp.n. et de deux méthodes de lutte contre ce ravageur sur le périmètre irrigué de Karfiguéla, Sud-Ouest du Burkina Faso, Mémoire de fin d'études,” I.S.P., Université de Ouagadougou, p. 70, 1984.View at: Google Scholar
D. Dakouo, S. Nacro, and M. Sié, “Evolution saisonnière des infestations de la cécidomyie du riz, Orseolia oryzivora H. & G. (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae) dans le Sud-Ouest du Burkina Faso,” Insect Science and Its Application, vol. 9, pp. 467–472, 1988.View at: Google Scholar
N. M. Bâ, Cycle annuel de la cécidomyie africaine du riz, Orseolia oryzivora H. et G. (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) en relation avec ses plantes hôtes, ses parasitoïdes et certaines pratiques culturales au Sud-Ouest du Burkina Faso, Doctoral thesis, Université de Ouagadougou, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, 2003.
C. T. Williams, O. Okhidievbie, K. M. Harris, and M. N. Ukwungwu, “The host range, annual cycle and parasitoids of the African rice gall midge Orseolia oryzivora (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) in central and southeast Nigeria,” Bulletin of Entomological Research, vol. 89, no. 6, pp. 589–597, 1999.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Hidaka, “Recent studies on natural enemies of the rice gall midge, Orseolia oryzae (Wood Mason),” Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly, vol. 22, pp. 175–180, 1988.View at: Google Scholar
P. Marshall, “Recherches sur la biologie et le développement des hyménoptères parasites: les Platygasters,” Archives de la Zoologie Expérimentale et Générale. IVème Série, vol. 4, pp. 485–640; pl. 17–24, 1906.View at: Google Scholar
J. Van Baaren, Capacité discriminatoire, installation et régulation du superparasitisme chez les hyménoptères parasitoïdes: analyse expérimentale, Thèse d'Université. Rennes I, Université de Rennes I, Rennes, France, 1994.
A. Le Ralec, Les hyménoptères parasitoïdes: adaptations, de l'appareil reproducteur femelle; morphologie et ultrastructure de l'ovaire de l'œuf et de l'ovipositeur, Thèse d'Université. Rennes I, Université de Rennes I, Rennes, France, 1991.
C. Vu Quang and V. S. Nguyen, “The effectiveness of egg-parasites (Hymenoptera) in relation to the structure of the abdomen of parasites and types of egg-mass in Lepidopterous rice pests,” Zoologecheskii Zhurnal, vol. 66, pp. 60–65, 1987.View at: Google Scholar