Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Psyche
Volume 2012, Article ID 145930, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/145930
Research Article

Flight Dynamics and Abundance of Ips sexdentatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) in Different Sawmills from Northern Spain: Differences between Local Pinus radiata (Pinales: Pinaceae) and Southern France Incoming P. pinaster Timber

Neiker-Basque Institute of Agricultural Research and Development, Arkaute, 01080 Vitoria, Spain

Received 12 April 2012; Accepted 22 May 2012

Academic Editor: Kleber Del-Claro

Copyright © 2012 Sergio López and Arturo Goldarazena. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

In January 2009, the windstorm “Klaus” struck the southern part of France, affecting 37.9 million m3 of maritime pine Pinus pinaster Aiton (Pinales: Pinaceae). This breeding plant material favored the outbreak of Ips sexdentatus (Börner) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae). As much of this timber is imported to the Basque Country (northern Spain), a potential risk to conifer stands is generated, due to the emergence of the incoming beetles. Thus, flight dynamics and beetle abundance were compared in different sawmills, according to the timber species (either local P. radiata D. Don or imported P. pinaster). A maximum flight peak of I. sexdentatus was observed in mid-June in P. pinaster importing sawmills, whereas a second lighter peak occurred in September. In contrast, only a maximum peak in mid-June was observed in P. radiata inhabiting beetles, being significantly smaller than in local P. pinaster trading sawmills. In addition, significant differences were found between imported P. pinaster and P. radiata regarding the number of insects beneath the bark. The development of IPM strategies for controlling I. sexdentatus populations is recommended, due to the insect abundance found in P. pinaster imported timber.

1. Introduction

Bark beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) are an insect group that contains at least 6,000 species from 181 genera around the world [1]. Bark beetles are considered as important agents of forest succession and initiate the sequence of nutrient cycling in infested tree material [2]. However, it is well known that some species are among the most destructive insects of coniferous forests, representing a continuous threat [1, 3]. Although bark beetles tend to colonize dead or weakened trees, it is well reported that some species can attack healthy trees under epidemic conditions. Frequently, improper forestry management or adverse abiotic and climatic conditions (e.g., storms, fires, and droughts) act as precursors by providing breeding substrate that unleashes population outbreaks for these bark beetles species [46]. For instance, the storms “Vivian/Wiebke” in February/March 1990 and “Lothar” in December 1999 triggered the propagation of Ips typographus (L.) in Centre Europe [7]. Recently, “Klaus” named windstorm affected 37.9 million m3 of maritime pine Pinus pinaster Aiton (Pinales: Pinaceae) in Aquitaine (southern France) during January 2009 [8]. As a consequence a great amount of windthrown timber was left as suitable breeding material for the six-toothed beetle I. sexdentatus (Börner) Figure 1. Despite its preference for weak, decaying or dead trees, the six-toothed beetle can attack healthy trees under outbreak conditions. Much of this timber from Landes region is imported to many sawmill and timber-processing industries located at the Basque Country (northern Spain), due to its low cost. The long-time storage of such infested logs could put into risk the local forestry management, since new emerging I. sexdentatus would disperse beyond sawmills and attack the adjacent Monterey pine (P. radiata D. Don) stands, which is the most common tree species planted in the Basque Country [9].

fig1
Figure 1: Ips sexdentatus (Börner) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae), lateral (a) and dorsal views (b), and detail of the elytral declivity of male (left) and female (right). Note the fusion at the base of the 3rd and 4th teeth in male (white arrow).

Ips sexdentatus is a Palearctic species distributed throughout Europe which is capable of breeding in many coniferous genera, including Pinus L., Picea A. Dietr. (Pinaceae), Larix Mill. (Pinaceae), and Abies Mill. (Pinaceae) [10, 11]. Concerning the Basque Country, it has been trapped in both P. radiata and P. sylvestris L. stands [12]. It is associated with several species of ophiostomatoid fungi (Sordariomycetes: Ophiostomatales) [13, 14], which are involved in many tree diseases and sapstain [15]. Not only with blue-staining fungi, but also the association with the fungus Fusarium circinatum Niremberg and O’Donnell (= F. subglutinans f. sp. pini Correll et al. (Hypocreales: Nectriaceae), causal agent of the pitch canker disease, has been detected in P. radiata inhabiting populations in the Basque Country [16].

Thus, the aim of the current work was to determine the flight dynamics of I. sexdentatus in different sawmills from the Basque Country, according to different timber species (either P. radiata or imported P. pinaster). Secondly, in order to evaluate the infestation level of maritime pine, the density of beetles was evaluated, through direct observation on debarked logs. These primary objectives would allow inferring the significance and risk of importing maritime pine to the Basque Country.

2. Material and Methods

Monitoring trapping took place from 1st April to 31th October 2011. Six different commercial sawmills were chosen. Three of them use P. radiata planted in the Basque Country as primary resource, whereas the other three import maritime pine timber from Landes region (southwestern France). The locations of sampling sites are provided in Table 1.

tab1
Table 1: Sampling sawmills located at the Basque Country (northern Spain). Pinus L. species (Pinales: Pinaceae) is also indicated within each row.

Two eight-unit Lindgren multiple funnel traps (Econex S.L., Murcia, Spain) were placed in each sawmill. Each trap was hung with the top of the trap at 2 m above the ground and the distance between traps was at least 50 m. One trap was unbaited, as a blank control, whereas the other trap was baited with a synthetic I. sexdentatus-specific pheromone (a mixture of ipsdienol (212.9 mg), cis-verbenol (60.8 mg), and ipsenol (13.6 mg), SEDQ, Barcelona, Spain). Baits were replaced every two months. Fifty mL of propylene glycol were added to each trap cup to kill and preserve captured insects. Not only I. sexdentatus, but also other bark beetles species and other accidentally trapped beetles were collected. Samples were removed every fifteen days and taken to the laboratory. Voucher specimens have been deposited at the Entomology Collection of the NEIKER-Basque Institute for Agricultural Research and Development, Arkaute, Basque Country, Spain.

In order to determine what Pinus species showed the largest density of I. sexdentatus, sections of 70 cm × 30 cm of seven randomly chosen logs (from both P. radiata and P. pinaster) were peeled off every week from 2nd May to 31th July in each sawmill. Debarking was made with the aid of a chisel. All I. sexdentatus present in the galleries beneath the bark were collected. The number of galleries was also recorded.

Data of mean catches of flying beetles caught in baited traps were subjected to a two-way ANOVA analysis (with pine species and date considered as factors). Subsequent Tukey post-hoc tests at a significance level of were applied to compare mean catches between dates within each Pinus species. Concerning density data, Student’s -test was used to compare mean number of galleries and beetle collections in different Pinus species for each month. A square root transformation was used to normalize the data and correct the heteroscedasticity. All the analyses were performed with the statistical software SPSS 2004 SYSTAT statistical package (version 13.0, SPSS, Chicago).

3. Results

A total of 15,184 specimens of I. sexdentatus were trapped in P. pinaster importing sawmills, whereas 2,774 were captured in P. radiata sawmills. As expected, pheromone-baited traps caught significant more insects in P. pinaster sawmills when compared with captures in P. radiata sawmills (F = 108.927, df = 1, ). An interaction between sampling dates and Pinus species was found (F = 7.2440, df = 13, ). A maximum flight peak was observed from the end of May to middle June for maritime pine, whereas a slighter peak occurred on September (Figure 2). Regarding P. radiata sawmills, a significant peak was observed only at the end of June. No statistical differences were observed in catches of other accidentally trapped insects.

145930.fig.002
Figure 2: Number (mean ± SE) of Ips sexdentatus (Börner) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) captured in Pinus pinaster Aiton (Pinales: Pinaceae) (dark grey) and P. radiata D. Don (light grey) sawmills from 1 April to 14 October 2011. Dates within each Pinus L. species with different letters are significantly different at a significance level of . Control catches in both cases were insignificant to perform any statistical analysis.

Significant differences were found between the mean number of beetles and galleries under the bark during the three months. Maritime pine sections showed significant more galleries (May: , df = 12, ; June: , df = 12, ; July: , df = 12, ) (Figure 3(a)) and beetles (May: , df = 12, ; June: , df = 12, ; July: , df = 12, ) (Figure 3(b)) than in local P. radiata.

fig3
Figure 3: Number (mean ± SE) of (a) galleries and (b) Ips sexdentatus (Börner) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) found under the bark of Pinus pinaster Aiton (Pinales: Pinaceae) (dark grey) and Pinus radiata D. Don (Pinales: Pinaceae) (light grey) logs from May to July ( ). Means within each month with different letters are significantly different at a significance level of .

In addition, many other bark and ambrosia beetles species were accidentally captured in pheromone-baited traps. Table 2 details the different bark and ambrosia beetles caught per locality, along with other xylophagous species (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) and bark beetle predators (Coleoptera: Cleridae).

tab2
Table 2: Total number of accidentally trapped species of bark and ambrosia beetles (Curculionidae: Scolytinae), cerambycid (Cerambycidae) and checkered beetles (Cleridae). Species within family/subfamily are sorted by alphabetical order.

4. Discussion

Current work demonstrates that maritime pine timber imported from France to commercial sawmills is highly infested compared to P. radiata timber, according to observed differences in the amount of insects caught in both field trapping and log debarking.

The six-toothed beetle has two generations per year, with adult flight periods from April to May and July to August. However, I. sexdentatus can undergo a third generation in Mediterranean regions of Europe [17]. Our results are consistent with other studies. Similar maximum flight peaks have been observed in Picea orientalis (L.) Link (in Turkey) and Pinus sylvestris (in Romania) stands [18, 19]. In contrast, I. sexdentatus showed three different peak flights in P. pinaster stands at the province of Leon (northern Spain), with the maximum peak occurring in September [20]. It has been suggested that this latter increase might be due to a strong increasing of the population during that season or a seasonal pheromone production, as it occurs in I. pini (Say) [21].

Ipssexdentatus is apolygamousspecies in which male is the pioneer sex which initiates the host seeking process. Afterwards, up to 2–5 females join each male within the gallery systems [10]. Galleries are star shaped, with a central nuptial chamber built by the male and in which mating occurs. Females bore egg galleries, which radiate outwards from the nuptial chamber. All the observed galleries in the current study had more than two arms.

Among accidentally trapped bark beetles species, it is worth noting the find of a female exemplar of the small spruce bark beetle Polygraphus poligraphus (L.), which would represent the first record for the Iberian Peninsula. Polygraphus poligraphus inhabits Picea abies (L.) H. Karst. and P. obovata Ledeb. [11], rarely breeding in Pinus sylvestris and P. strobus L. [10, 11, 22]. This unique specimen was trapped in the sawmill located at Berrobi, in which P. radiata timber is used. In addition, its distribution area is supposed to extend from Central Europe to Northern Europe and Siberia [11], being absent in the Mediterranean region [10]. Thus, the presence of this insect in the sampling area should be clearly stated.

Moreover, two species of Monochamus Dejean (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) were also trapped, mainly in two P. pinaster trading sawmills: M. sutor (L.) and M. galloprovincialis (Olivier). The latter shows special relevance, as it is known to be the vector of the pine wood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Steiner and Buhrer) Nickle (Aphelenchida, Parasitaphelenchidae), causal agent of the pine wilt disease in different countries, including in Europe (Portugal and Spain) [2326]. The kairomonal attraction to bark beetle pheromone components has been previously reported in some long-horned beetles, including M. galloprovincialis in Spain, another North American species of the genus [2729].

The checkered beetle Thanasimus formicarius (L.) (Coleoptera: Cleridae) was the most common predator found in traps (527 individuals in P. pinaster sawmills and 113 in P. radiata sawmills). This insect is a common predator of European conifer bark beetles [30], and it is capable of locating their preys by detecting bark beetle produced-pheromones as kairomonal signals [31]. Moreover, it has been reported that they recognize conifer volatiles and even volatiles from angiosperm trees that act as nonhost volatiles to conifer bark beetles [32]. Allonyx quadrimaculatus (Schaller) is also considered as a predatorof Tomicus piniperda L. [33], although there are not concrete studies about the mechanisms involved in prey detection.

As in other species of the genus, management programs should be focused on minimizing attacks on living trees, the sanitation of infested trees and the establishment of a trapping system [7]. The use of semiochemicals with antiaggregative effects should be considered as a useful management tool for trees protection. (1S, 4S)-(-)-Verbenone (4,6,6-trimethylbicyclo-[3.1.1]hept-3-en-2-one, hereafter (-)-verbenone), has been demonstrated to be capable of disrupting the pheromone-mediated attraction of I. sexdentatus [16, 34]. Romón et al. [16] detected a significant negative dose-dependent relationship between different (-)-verbenone release rates (0.01, 0.2, 1.8, and 3.1 mg/24 h) and catches of I. sexdentatus in a P. radiata stand. Etxebeste and Pajares [34] also found significant reduction in catches when testing (-)-verbenone at 2 and 40 mg/day in a mixed pine stand (ca. 40-year-old P. pinaster with younger ca. 30-year-old P. sylvestris). In addition, the spyroketal trans-7-methyl-1,6-dioxaspiro[4.5]decane (commonly known as trans-conophthorin) has also shown promising results. There are evidences of its electrophysiological detection by I. sexdentatus [35],and the antiaggregative effect is supported by field assays, although with some disparities. Despite Jactel et al. did not find any significant reduction in trap catches when testing trans-conophthorin at 5 mg/day [35], a 16-time lower release rate (i.e., 0.3 mg/day) is capable of reducing the response of I. sexdentatus to aggregation pheromone [34]. Moreover, trans-conophthorin seems to achieve stronger effects when combined either with (-)-verbenone or NHV alcohols [34, 35]. Thus, taken into account these results, we suggest the development of “push-pull” strategies [36], using pheromone-baited traps inside the park (to favor insect mass trapping) and blends of disruptant semiochemicals at the edges of close pine stands, in order to repel incoming beetles. Long-time buildup of logs should also be not recommended. Future field studies are needed to evaluate the impact of these incoming I. sexdentatus populations upon local conifer stands.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express thanks to the Basque Country Forest Confederation for financial support and the owners of sampling sawmills for allowing our experimental work. They would like to thank to members of NEIKER for technical assistance. The present study was funded by The Government of the Basque Country.

References

  1. M. P. Ayres and M. J. Lombardero, “Assessing the consequences of global change for forest disturbance from herbivores and pathogens,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 262, no. 3, pp. 263–286, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. W. Stark, “Generalized ecology and life cycle of bark beetles,” in Bark Beetles in North American Conifers: A System for the Study of Evolutionary Biology, J. B. Mitton and K. B. Sturgeon, Eds., pp. 21–45, University of Texas Press, Austin, Tex, USA, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  3. S. L. Wood, “The bark and ambrosia beetles of North and Central America, a taxonomic monograph,” Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs, vol. 6, pp. 1–1359, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  4. M. Peltonen, “Windthrows and dead-standing trees as bark beetle breeding material at forest-clearcut edge,” Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 505–511, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Eriksson, A. Pouttu, and H. Roininen, “The influence of windthrow area and timber characteristics on colonization of wind-felled spruces by Ips typographus (L.),” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 216, no. 1–3, pp. 105–116, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. M. Fernández, “Colonization of fire-damaged trees by Ips sexdentatus (Boerner) as related to the percentage of burnt crown,” Entomologica Fennica, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 381–386, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. B. Wermelinger, “Ecology and management of the spruce bark beetle Ips typographus—a review of recent research,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 202, no. 1–3, pp. 67–82, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. Inventaire Forestier Nationale, “Tempête Klaus du 24 janvier 2009: estimations pour l’ensemble de la zone évaluée,” 2011, http://www.ifn.fr/spip/spip.php?article618.
  9. M. Michel, El pino radiata (Pinus radiata D.Don) en la historia de la Comunidad Autónoma de Euskadi. Análisis de un proceso de forestalismo intensivo [Ph.D. dissertation], University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain, 2004.
  10. A. Balachowksy, Faune de France, Volume 50: Coléoptères Scolytides, Fédération Française des Sociétés de Sciences:, Paris, France, 1949.
  11. A. Pfeffer, Zentral- und westpalaearktische Borken- und Kenkäfer, Pro Entomologia, c/o Naturhistorisches Museum Basel:, Basel, Switzerland, 1995.
  12. S. López, P. Romón, J. C. Iturrondobeitia, and A. Goldarazena, Conifer Bark Beetles of the Basque Country: Practical Guide for Their Identification and Control, Servicio Central de Publicaciones del País Vasco, Vitoria, Spain, 2007.
  13. P. Romón, X. Zhou, J. C. Iturrondobeitia, M. J. Wingfield, and A. Goldarazena, “Ophiostoma species (Ascomycetes: Ophiostomatales) associated with bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytinae) colonizing Pinus radiata in northern Spain,” Canadian Journal of Microbiology, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 756–767, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. A. Bueno, J. J. Díez, and M. M. Fernández, “Ophiostomatoid fungi transported by Ips sexdentatus (Coleoptera; Scolytidae) in Pinus pinaster in NW Spain,” Silva Fennica, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 387–397, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. T. Kirisits, “Fungal associates of European bark beetles with special emphasis to ophiostomatoid fungi,” in Bark and Wood Boring Insects in Living Trees in Europe, A Synthesis, F. Lieutier, K. R. Day, A. Battisti, J. C. Grégoire, and H. F. Evans, Eds., pp. 181–235, Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrech, The Netherlands, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  16. P. Romón, J. C. Iturrondobeitia, K. Gibson, B. S. Lindgren, and A. Goldarazena, “Quantitative association of bark beetles with pitch canker fungus and effects of verbenone on their semiochemical communication in Monterey Pine Forests in Northern Spain,” Environmental Entomology, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 743–750, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. F. Abgrall and A. Soutrenon, La Forêt et ses Ennemis, Centre National du Machinisme Agricole du Genie Rural des Eaux et des Forets, Paris, France, 1991.
  18. G. Isaia, A. Manea, and M. Paraschiv, “Study on the effect of pheromones on the bark beetles of the Scots pine,” Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov, vol. 3, no. 52, pp. 67–72, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  19. G. E. Ozcan, M. Eroglu, and H. A. Akinci, “Use of pheromone-baited traps for monitoring Ips sexdentatus (Boerner) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in oriental spruce stand,” African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 10, no. 72, pp. 16351–16360, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  20. J. M. Sierra and A. B. Martín, “Pheromone-baited traps effectiveness in the massive capture of Ips sexdentatus Boern. (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), bark beetle of pines,” Boletín Sanidad Vegetal, Plagas, vol. 30, pp. 745–752, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  21. G. N. Lanier, M. C. Birch, R. F. Schmitz, and M. M. Furniss, “Pheromones of Ips pini (Coleoptera: Scolytidae): variation in response among three populations,” Canadian Entomologist, vol. 104, no. 12, 1917. View at Google Scholar
  22. B. Lekander, B. Bejer-Peterson, E. Kangas, and A. Bakke A, “The distribution of bark beetles in the Nordic countries,” Acta Entomologica Fennica, vol. 32, pp. 1–36, 1977. View at Google Scholar
  23. M. J. Wingfield, R. A. Blanchette, T. H. Nichols, and K. Robbins, “The pine wood nematode: a comparison of the situation in the United States and Japan,” Canadian Journal of Forest Research, vol. 12, pp. 71–75, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. Y. Mamiya, “Pathology of the pine wilt disease caused by Bursaphelenchus xylophilus,” Annual Review of Phytopathology, vol. 21, pp. 201–220, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. M. M. Mota, H. Braasch, M. A. Bravo et al., “First report of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus in Portugal and in Europe,” Nematology, vol. 1, no. 7-8, pp. 727–734, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. A. Abelleira, A. Picoaga, J. P. Mansilla, and O. Aguin, “Detection of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, causal agent of Pine Wilt Disease on Pinus pinaster in Northwestern Spain,” Plant Disease, vol. 95, no. 6, p. 776, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  27. J. A. Pajares, F. Ibeas, J. J. Díez, and D. Gallego, “Attractive reponses by Monochamus galloprovincialis (Col., Cerambycidae) to host and bark bettle semiochemicals,” Journal of Applied Entomology, vol. 128, no. 9-10, pp. 633–638, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. D. R. Miller and C. Asaro, “Ipsenol and ipsdienol attract Monochamus titillator (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) and associated large pine woodborers in Southeastern United States,” Journal of Economic Entomology, vol. 98, no. 6, pp. 2033–2040, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. D. R. Miller, C. Asaro, C. Crowe, and D. Duerr, “Bark Beetle pheromones and pine volatiles: attractant kairomone lure blend for Longhorn Beetles (Cerambycidae) in pine stands of the southeastern United States,” Journal of Economic Entomology, vol. 104, no. 4, pp. 1245–1257, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  30. R. Gauß, “Der Ameisenbuntkäfer Thanasimus (Clerus) formicarius Latr. als Borkenkäferfeind,” in Die Grosse Borkenkäferkalamität in Südwestdeutschland 1944–1951, G. Wellenstein and G. Ringingen, Eds., pp. 417–442, Selbstverlag der Forstschutzstelle Südwest, Ringingen, Germany, 1954. View at Google Scholar
  31. A. Bakke and T. Kvamme, “Kairomone response in Thanasimus predators to pheromone components of Ips typographus,” Journal of Chemical Ecology, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 305–312, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. Q. H. Zhang and F. Schlyter, “Inhibition of predator attraction to kairomones by non-host plant volatiles for herbivores: a bypass-trophic signal,” PloS one, vol. 5, no. 6, Article ID e11063, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. F. Herard and G. Mercadier, “Natural enemies of Tomicus piniperda and lps acuminatus (col, scolytidae) on Pinus sylvestris near orléans, france: temporal occurrence and relative abundance, and notes on eight predatory species,” Entomophaga, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 183–210, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. I. Etxebeste and J. A. Pajares, “Verbenone protects pine trees from colonization by the six-toothed pine bark beetle, Ips sexdentatus Boern. (Col.: Scolytinae),” Journal of Applied Entomology, vol. 135, no. 4, pp. 258–268, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. H. Jactel, I. van Halder, P. Menassieu, Q. H. Zhang, and F. Schlyter, “Non-host volatiles disrupt the response of the stenographer bark beetle, Ips sexdentatus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), to pheromone-baited traps and maritime pine logs,” Integrated Pest Management Reviews, vol. 6, no. 3-4, pp. 197–207, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. B. S. Lindgren and J. H. Borden, “Displacement and aggregation of mountain pine beetles, Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), in response to their antiaggregation and aggregation pheromones,” Canadian Journal of Forest Research, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 286–290, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus