Towards a Standard Psychometric Diagnostic Interview for Subjects at Ultra High Risk of Psychosis: CAARMS versus SIPS

Table 3

Diagnostic comparison between CAARMS 12/2006 and SIPS 0.5 outcomes in subjects seeking help from high-risk services ().

			SIPS outcome
			UHR−	UHR+	Psychotic	Total
CAARMS outcome	UHR−	Count	51	0	0	51
		%	24.1%	0.0%	0.0%	24.1%
		Adj Res	13.5	−7.8	−4.8
	UHR+	Count	5	92	14	111
		%	2.4%	91.1%	6.6%	52.4%
		Adj Res	−7.7	10.8	−4.5
	Psychotic	Count	1	9	40	50
		%	0.5%	4.2%	18.9%	23.6%
		Adj Res	−4.5	−4.8	10.1
	Total	Count	57	101	54	212
		%	29.6%	47.6%	25.5%	100.0%

CAARMS, Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States; SIPS, Structured Interview for Psychosis-Risk Syndrome; UHR, ultra high risk; Adj Res, adjusted residuals; adjusted residuals lower than −3.29 or greater than 3.29 indicate that the number of cases in that cell is significantly larger or small than expected under the null hypothesis at corrected for multiple comparisons. No cells have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12.74.