Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Rehabilitation Research and Practice
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 186156, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/186156
Clinical Study

Validity and Reproducibility of the Measurements Obtained Using the Flexicurve Instrument to Evaluate the Angles of Thoracic and Lumbar Curvatures of the Spine in the Sagittal Plane

1Physiotherapy Faculty, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS), 93022-000 São Leopoldo, RS, Brazil
2Physical Education Department, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), 90690-200 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil

Received 21 October 2011; Revised 22 January 2012; Accepted 13 February 2012

Academic Editor: Francois Prince

Copyright © 2012 Tatiana Scheeren de Oliveira et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. B. O'Sullivan and T. J. Schmitz, Physical Rehabilitation, Davis Company, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 5th edition, 2007.
  2. A. W. S. Watson and C. Mac Donncha, “A reliable technique for the assessment of posture: assessment criiteria for aspects of posture,” Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 260–270, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  3. P. J. Salisbury and R. W. Porter, “Measurement of lumbar sagittal mobility: a comparison of methods,” Spine, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 190–193, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. T. Vrtovec, F. Pernuš, and B. Likar, “A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of spinal curvature,” European Spine Journal, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 593–607, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. Y. L. Chen, “Vertebral centroid measurement of lumbar lordosis compared with the Cobb technique,” Spine, vol. 24, no. 17, pp. 1786–1790, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. N. A. Tayyab, D. Samartzis, H. Altiok et al., “The reliability and diagnostic value of radiographic criteria in sagittal spine deformities: comparison of the vertebral wedge ratio to the segmental Cobb angle,” Spine, vol. 32, no. 16, pp. E451–E459, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. C. Tanure, A. P. Pinheiro, and A. S. Oliveira, “Reliability assessment of Cobb angle measurements using manual and digital methods,” Spine Journal, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 769–774, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. Morin Doody, J. E. Lonstein, M. Stovall, D. G. Hacker, N. Luckyanov, and C. E. Land, “Breast cancer mortality after diagnostic radiography: findings from the U.S. scoliosis cohort study,” Spine, vol. 25, no. 16, pp. 2052–2063, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. M. Bone and G. H. Hsieh, “The risk of carcinogenesis from radiographs to pediatric orthopaedic patients,” Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 251–254, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. R. W. Poolman, H. D. Been, and L. H. Ubags, “Clinical outcome and radiographic results after operative treatment of Scheuermann's disease,” European Spine Journal, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 561–569, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. M. Briggs, T. V. Wrigley, E. A. Tully, P. E. Adams, A. M. Greig, and K. L. Bennell, “Radiographic measures of thoracic kyphosis in osteoporosis: cobb and vertebral centroid angles,” Skeletal Radiology, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 761–767, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Brazil. Ministério da Saúde, “Data SUS,” 2011, http://www.datasus.gov.br/.
  13. I. A. F. Stokes and M. S. Moreland, “Concordance of back surface asymmetry and spine shape in idiopathic scoliosis,” Spine, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 73–78, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. C. J. Goldberg, M. Kaliszer, D. P. Moore, E. E. Fogarty, and F. E. Dowling, “Surface topography, Cobb angles, and cosmetic change in scoliosis,” Spine, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. E55–E63, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. Willner, “Spinal pantograph—a non-invasive technique for describing kyphosis and lordosis in the thoraco-lumbar spine,” Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 525–529, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. D. L. Hart and S. J. Rose, “Reliability of a noninvasive method for measuring the lumbar curve,” Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 180–184, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. F. A. Teixeira and G. A. Carvalho, “Reliability and validity of thoracic kyphosis measurements using flexicurve method,” Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 199–204, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  18. G. Mellin, “Measurement of thoracolumbar posture and mobility with a myrin inclinometer,” Spine, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 759–762, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. F. D'Osualdo, S. Schierano, and M. Iannis, “Validation of clinical measurement of kyphosis with a simple instrument, the arcometer,” Spine, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 408–413, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. F. O. Chaise, C. T. Candotti, M. L. Torre, T. S. Furlanetto, P. P. T. Pelinson, and J. F. Loss, “Validation, repeatability and reproducibility of a noninvasive instrument for measuring thoracic and lumbar curvature of the spine in the sagittal plane,” Revista Brasileira de Fisioterapia, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 511–517, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. G. Ohlen, E. Spangfort, and C. Tingvall, “Measurement of spinal sagittal configuration and mobility with Debrunner's kyphometer,” Spine, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 580–583, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. D. E. Harrison, J. W. Haas, R. Cailliet, D. D. Harrison, B. Holland, and T. J. Janik, “Concurrent validity of flexicurve instrument measurements: sagittal skin contour of the cervical spine compared with lateral cervical radiographic measurements,” Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 597–603, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. G. J. Fon, M. J. Pitt, and A. C. Thies, “Thoracic kyphosis: range in normal subjects,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 134, no. 5, pp. 979–983, 1980. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. A. Leroux, K. Zabjek, G. Simard, J. Badeaux, C. Coillard, and C. H. Rivard, “A noninvasive anthropometric technique for measuring kyphosis and lordosis: an application for idiopathic scoliosis,” Spine, vol. 25, no. 13, pp. 1689–1694, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. S. Goh, R. I. Price, P. J. Leedman, and K. P. Singer, “A comparison of three methods for measuring thoracic kyphosis: implications for clinical studies,” Rheumatology, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 310–315, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. D. E. Harrison, D. D. Harrison, R. Cailliet, T. J. Janik, and B. Holland, “Radiographic analysis of lumbar lordosis: centroid, Cobb, TRALL, and Harrison posterior tangent methods,” Spine, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. E235–E242, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Lawrence Erlbaum Associetes, Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 2th edition, 1988.
  28. J. M. Bland and D. G. Altman, “Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement,” Lancet, vol. 1, no. 8476, pp. 307–310, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. J. M. Bland and D. G. Altman, “Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading,” Lancet, vol. 346, no. 8982, pp. 1085–1087, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. J. L. Fleiss, B. Levin, and M. C. Paik, Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2003.
  31. M. Bernhardt and K. H. Bridwell, “Segmental analysis of the sagittal plane alignment of the normal thoracic and lumbar spines and thoracolumbar junction,” Spine, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 717–721, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. F. W. Lovell, J. M. Rothstein, and W. J. Personius, “Reliability of clinical measurements of lumbar lordosis taken with a flexible rule,” Physical Therapy, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 96–105, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. M. L. Walker, J. M. Rothstein, S. D. Finucane, and R. L. Lamb, “Relationships between lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, and abdominal muscle performance,” Physical Therapy, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 512–516, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. J. M. Bryan, E. A. Mosner, R. Shippee, and M. A. Stull, “Investigation of the flexible ruler as a noninvasive measure of lumbar lordosis in black and white adult female sample populations,” Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 3–7, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  35. R. T. Morrissy, G. S. Goldsmith, E. C. Hall, D. Kehl, and G. H. Cowie, “Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. Evaluation of intrinsic error,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery A, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 320–327, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. M. T. Haneline and M. Young, “A review of intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability of static spinal palpation: a literature synthesis,” Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 379–386, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. A. Lundberg, “On the use of bone and skin markers in kinematics research,” Human Movement Science, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 411–422, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. J. C. Harlick, S. Milosavljevic, and P. D. Milburn, “Palpation identification of spinous processes in the lumbar spine,” Manual Therapy, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 56–62, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. E. V. Billis, N. E. Foster, and C. C. Wright, “Reproducibility and repeatability: errors of three groups of physiotherapists in locating spinal levels by palpation,” Manual Therapy, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 223–232, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus