Review Article
Virtual Reality Rehabilitation from Social Cognitive and Motor Learning Theoretical Perspectives in Stroke Population
Table 2
Quality assessment of selected studies using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database Scale [
26].
| ā | Jaffe et al., 2004 [28] | You et al., 2005 [29] | Yang et al., 2008 [30] | Kim et al., 2009 [31] | Mirelman et al., 2009 [32] | Mirelman et al., 2010 [33] | Yang et al., 2011 [34] | Cho et al., 2012 [35] | Jung et al., 2012 [36] |
Cho and Lee, 2013 [37] | Fritz et al., 2013 [38] |
| Random allocation | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Concealed allocation | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | Baseline comparability | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | Subject blinded | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Clinician blinded | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Assessor blinded | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Data for at least 1 outcome from >85% of subjects | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | No missing data or if missing, intention-to-treat analysis | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Between group analysis | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Point estimates and variability | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Total score (/10) | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 6 |
|
|
1 = yes; 0 = no.
|