Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Rehabilitation Research and Practice
Volume 2016, Article ID 7621690, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7621690
Research Article

Addressing Work-Related Issues in Medical Rehabilitation: Revision of an Online Information Tool for Healthcare Professionals

1Department of Medical Psychology, Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Würzburg, 97070 Würzburg, Germany
2Faculty of Applied Social Sciences, Würzburg University of Applied Sciences, 97070 Würzburg, Germany

Received 1 April 2016; Revised 24 June 2016; Accepted 4 July 2016

Academic Editor: Jae-Young Lim

Copyright © 2016 Matthias Lukasczik et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Yong, M. Nasterlack, R.-P. Pluto, S. Lang, and C. Oberlinner, “Occupational stress perception and its potential impact on work ability,” Work, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 347–354, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. T. I. J. van den Berg, L. A. M. Elders, B. C. H. de Zwart, and A. Burdorf, “The effects of work-related and individual factors on the Work Ability Index: a systematic review,” Occupational & Environmental Medicine, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 211–220, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Labriola, T. Lund, K. B. Christensen, and T. S. Kristensen, “Multilevel analysis of individual and contextual factors as predictors of return to work,” Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine, vol. 48, no. 11, pp. 1181–1188, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. E. Lahelma, M. Laaksonen, T. Lallukka et al., “Working conditions as risk factors for disability retirement: a longitudinal register linkage study,” BMC Public Health, vol. 12, article 309, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. Gilboa, A. Shirom, Y. Fried, and C. Cooper, “A meta-analysis of work demand stressors and job performance: examining main and moderating effects,” Personnel Psychology, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 227–271, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Bethge, F. M. Radoschewski, and W. Müller-Fahrnow, “Work stress and work ability: cross-sectional findings from the German Sociomedical Panel of Employees,” Disability and Rehabilitation, vol. 31, no. 20, pp. 1692–1699, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. K. Nieuwenhuijsen, D. Bruinvels, and M. Frings-Dresen, “Psychosocial work environment and stress-related disorders, a systematic review,” Occupational Medicine, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 277–286, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. Siegrist, “Chronic psychosocial stress at work and risk of depression: evidence from prospective studies,” European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 258, supplement 5, pp. 115–119, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. E.-M. Backé, A. Seidler, U. Latza, K. Rossnagel, and B. Schumann, “The role of psychosocial stress at work for the development of cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review,” International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 67–79, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. Lang, E. Ochsmann, T. Kraus, and J. W. B. Lang, “Psychosocial work stressors as antecedents of musculoskeletal problems: a systematic review and meta-analysis of stability-adjusted longitudinal studies,” Social Science & Medicine, vol. 75, no. 7, pp. 1163–1174, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. World Health Organization (WHO), International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), 2001, http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/.
  12. C. Wåhlin, K. Ekberg, J. Persson, L. Bernfort, and B. Öberg, “Associati on between clinical and work-related interventions and return-to-work for patients with musculoskeletal or mental disorders,” Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 355–362, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. Schandelmaier, S. Ebrahim, S. C. A. Burkhardt et al., “Return to work coordination programmes for work disability: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 11, Article ID e49760, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. N. Hoefsmit, I. Houkes, and F. J. N. Nijhuis, “Intervention characteristics that facilitate return to work after sickness absence: a systematic literature review,” Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 462–477, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Bethge, B. Schwarz, and S. Neuderth, “Work-related medical rehabilitation,” in Return to work—work for all, A. Weber, L. Peschkes, and W. E. de Boer, Eds., pp. 403–409, Gentner, Stuttgart, Germany, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  16. K. M. Costa-Black, “Core components of return-to-work interventions,” in Handbook of Work Disability, P. Loisel and J. R. Anema, Eds., pp. 427–440, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  17. M. Lukasczik, H.-D. Wolf, C. Gerlich et al., “Current state of vocationally oriented medical rehabilitation—a German perspective,” Disability and Rehabilitation, vol. 33, no. 25-26, pp. 2646–2655, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. German Federal Pension Insurance, “Profile of requirements regarding work-related medical rehabilitation on behalf of the German Federal Pension Insurance,” 2015, http://www.deutsche-rentenversicherung.de/cae/servlet/contentblob/207024/publicationFile/50641/mbor_datei.pdf.
  19. M. Prior, M. Guerin, and K. Grimmer-Somers, “The effectiveness of clinical guideline implementation strategies—a synthesis of systematic review findings,” Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 888–897, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. L. McGowan, R. Grad, P. Pluye et al., “Electronic retrieval of health information by healthcare providers to improve practice and patient care,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 3, Article ID CD004749, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. L. Walther, N. J. Pohontsch, and R. Deck, “Need for information concerning medical rehabilitation of the Federal German Pension Fund-findings of an online survey of general practitioners,” Gesundheitswesen, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 362–367, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. T. Takaranta and A. Reuter, “Rehabilitation portal provides up-to-date information on rehabilitation in Finland,” in Congress Program and Abstract Book, 13th Congress of European Forum for Research in Rehabilitation EFRR, May 2015, Helsinki, Finland, S. Lindstam, Ed., p. 86, Confedent International, Helsinki, Finland, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  23. S. Parzanka, C. Himstedt, and R. Deck, “Aufbau einer homepage für reha-nachsorgeangebote auf basis einer systematischen übersicht,” DRV-Schriften, vol. 107, pp. 169–171, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  24. J. Höder and R. Deck, “Informative texts for rehabilitation patients are difficult to understand,” Rehabilitation, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 178–183, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. M. Lukasczik, S. Löffler, C. Gerlich, H. D. Wolf, and S. Neuderth, “Vocational orientation in medical rehabilitation: development of a practice handbook and a homepage as user-oriented media for rehabilitative practice,” Rehabilitation, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 152–159, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. A. M. Sander, L. M. Van Veldhoven, and D. Backus, “Maximizing usability of evidence in rehabilitation practice: tips for researchers,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. S43–S48, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. Medves, C. Godfrey, C. Turner et al., “Systematic review of practice guideline dissemination and implementation strategies for healthcare teams and team-based practice,” International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 79–89, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. M. Streibelt and M. Bethge, “Prospective cohort analysis of the predictive validity of a screening instrument for severe restrictions of work ability in patients with musculoskeletal disorders,” American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 94, no. 8, pp. 617–626, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. S. Löffler, H. D. Wolf, S. Neuderth, and H. Vogel, “Screening instruments in medical rehabilitation,” in Work-Related Medical Rehabilitation, A. Hillert, W. Müller-Fahrnow, and F. M. Radoschewski, Eds., pp. 133–140, Deutscher Ärzte, Cologne, Germany, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  30. S. J. Isernhagen, “Functional capacity evaluation: rationale, procedure, utility of the kinesiophysical approach,” Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 157–168, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. H. Kaiser, M. Kersting, H. M. Schian, A. Jacobs, and D. Kasprowski, “Value of the Susan Isernhagen evaluation of functional capacity scale in medical and occupational rehabilitation,” Rehabilitation, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 297–306, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. P. L. Hudak, P. C. Amadio, C. Bombardier et al., “Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and head),” American Journal of Industrial Medicine, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 602–608, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. G. Germann, A. Harth, G. Wind, and E. Demir, “Standardisation and validation of the German Version 2.0 of the Disability of Arm, Shoulder, Hand (DASH) questionnaire,” Unfallchirurg, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 13–19, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. K. Tuomi, J. Ilmarinen, A. Jahkola, L. Katajarinne, and A. Tulkki, Work Ability Index, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, 2nd edition, 1998.
  35. H. M. Hasselhorn and G. Freude, “Der Work Ability Index—ein Leitfaden,” Schriftenreihe der Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin, Sonderschrift S 87, Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin, Dortmund, Germany, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  36. J. Siegrist, N. Wege, F. Pühlhofer, and M. Wahrendorf, “A short generic measure of work stress in the era of globalization: effort-reward imbalance,” International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, vol. 82, no. 8, pp. 1005–1013, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. A. Rödel, J. Siegrist, A. Hessel, and E. Brähler, “Psychometric test of the questionnaire measuring effort-reward imbalance at work in a representative German sample,” Journal of Individual Differences, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 227–238, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  38. A. L. Kitson, J. Rycroft-Malone, G. Harvey, B. McCormack, K. Seers, and A. Titchen, “Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework: theoretical and practical challenges,” Implementation Science, vol. 3, no. 1, article 1, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. S. Sussman, T. W. Valente, L. A. Rohrbach, S. Skara, and M. A. Pentz, “Translation in the health professions: converting science into action,” Evaluation and the Health Professions, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 7–32, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. T. Kliche, M. Post, R. Pfitzner et al., “Knowledge transfer methods in german disease prevention and health promotion. A survey of Experts in the Federal Prevention Research Program,” Gesundheitswesen, vol. 74, pp. 240–249, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar