Exergame Grading Scheme: Concept Development and Preliminary Psychometric Evaluations in Cancer Survivors
Table 1
Content validity index of Exergame Grading Scheme.
Domain: item
CVI first round ()
CVI second round ()
I-CVI
k
Evaluation
I-CVI
k
Evaluation
Energy expenditure: MET
1.00
1
Excellent
1
1
Excellent
Cardiorespiratory fitness: HRR%
0.80
0.76
Excellent
1
1
Excellent
Cardiorespiratory fitness: PE-CR
0.80
0.76
Excellent
1
1
Excellent
Muscular strength: PE-UE
0.80
0.76
Excellent
1
1
Excellent
Muscular strength: PE-LE
0.80
0.76
Excellent
1
1
Excellent
Muscular strength: PE-Trunk
0.80
0.76
Excellent
1
1
Excellent
Muscular endurance: ME
0.80
0.76
Excellent
1
1
Excellent
Flexibility: ROM-Shoulder
1.00
1.00
Excellent
1
1
Excellent
Flexibility: ROM-Elbow
1.00
1.00
Excellent
1
1
Excellent
Flexibility: ROM-Hip
1.00
1.00
Excellent
1
1
Excellent
Flexibility: ROM-Knee
1.00
1.00
Excellent
1
1
Excellent
Balance: BOS
0.60
0.42
Fair
1
1
Excellent
Balance: COM
0.60
0.42
Fair
1
1
Excellent
Cognitive demand: CD
0.80
0.76
Excellent
1
1
Excellent
BSO: narrowing the base of support; CD: cognitive demand; COM: displacing the center of mass; CR: cardiorespiratory fitness; CVI: content validity index; HRR%: percentage of heart rate reserve; I-CVI: item-level content validity index; IRR: interrater reliability; : kappa statistics; LE: lower extremities; ME: muscular endurance; MET: Metabolic Equivalent of Task; PE: perceived exertion; ROM: range of motion; UE: upper extremities. Number of content experts. Evaluation criteria: fair = k of 0.40 to 0.59; good = k of 0.60 to 0.74; excellent = k more than 0.74.
