Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Radiology Research and Practice
Volume 2011, Article ID 108438, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/108438
Clinical Study

Intraoperative Three-Dimensional Imaging in Selective Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Useful Tool in Theory but Also in Everyday Practice?

Department of Neurosurgery, German Armed Forces Hospital of Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 40, 89070 Ulm, Germany

Received 20 November 2010; Revised 28 February 2011; Accepted 31 March 2011

Academic Editor: Paul E. Kinahan

Copyright © 2011 Uwe Max Mauer et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. Thomé, D. Zevgaridis, O. Leheta et al., “Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy,” Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 129–141, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  2. P. L. Sanderson and C. J. M. Getty, “Long-term results of partial undercutting facetectomy for lumbar lateral recess stenosis,” Spine, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 1352–1356, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. U. M. Mauer and U. Kunz, “Intraoperative 3D-bildgebung zur kontrolle der selektiven dekompression bei lumbaler wirbelkanalstenose,” Orthopade, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 1258–1260, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  4. C. Rock, D. Kotsianos, U. Linsenmaier et al., “Untersuchungen zur Bildqualität, Hochkontrastauflösung und Dosis am Stamm- und Gliedmaßenskelett mit einem neuen dedizierten CT-System (ISO-C-3D),” RöFo, vol. 174, no. 2, pp. 170–176, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  5. V. V. Patel, A. Dwyer, S. Estes, and E. Burger, “Intraoperative 3-dimensional reconstructed multiplanar fluoroscopic imaging for immediate evaluation of spinal decompression,” Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 209–212, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  6. J. Baldauf, J. U. Müller, S. Fleck, P. Hinz, A. Chiriac, and H. W. S. Schroeder, “The value of intraoperative three dimensional fluoroscopy in anterior decompressive surgery of the cervical spine,” Zentralblatt für Neurochirurgie, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 30–34, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  7. M. Beck, T. Mittlmeier, P. Gierer, C. Harms, and G. Gradl, “Benefit and accuracy of intraoperative 3D-imaging after pedicle screw placement: a prospective study in stabilizing thoracolumbar fractures,” European Spine Journal, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 1469–1477, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  8. H. Nakashima, K. Sato, T. Ando, H. Inoh, and H Nakamura, “Comparison of the percutaneous screw placement precision of C-arm 3-dimensional fluoroscopy-navigated pedicle screw implantation and conventional fluoroscopy method within minimally invasive surgery,” Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 468–472, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  9. A. T. Villavicencio, S. Burneikiene, K. R. Bulsara, and J. J. Thramann, “Utility of computerized isocentric fluoroscopy for minimally invasive spinal surgical techniques,” Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 369–375, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. T. Stübig, D. Kendoff, M. Citak et al., “Comparative study of different intraoperative 3-D image intensifiers in orthopedic trauma care,” The Journal of Trauma, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 821–830, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  11. T. Hüfner, T. Stübig, T. Gösling, D. Kendoff, J. Geerling, and C. Krettek, “Kosten- und nutzenanalyse der intraoperativen 3D-bildgebung,” Unfallchirurg, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 14–21, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  12. E. Euler, S. Heining, S. Wirth et al., “3D-C-arm-bildgebung,” Aktuelle Traumatologie, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 183–190, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar