Research Article | Open Access
Giulia Mascioli, Simone Salvolini, Gian Luca Cavola, Mara Fabri, Alfonso Giovannini, Cesare Mariotti, Luca Salvolini, Gabriele Polonara, "Functional MRI Examination of Visual Pathways in Patients with Unilateral Optic Neuritis", Radiology Research and Practice, vol. 2012, Article ID 265306, 7 pages, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/265306
Functional MRI Examination of Visual Pathways in Patients with Unilateral Optic Neuritis
The relations between brain areas involved in vision were explored in 8 patients with unilateral acute optic neuritis using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). In all patients monocular stimulation of affected and unaffected eye elicited significantly different activation foci in the primary visual cortex (V1), whereas the foci evoked in the middle temporal visual area (area V5) were similar in size and in delay of blood-oxygen-level-dependent response. DTI analysis documented lower white matter anisotropy values and reduced fibre reconstruction in the affected compared with the unaffected optic nerves. The preserved activation of area V5 observed in all our patients is an interesting finding that suggests the notion of a different sensitivity of the optic pathways to inflammatory changes.
Optic neuritis (ON) is an inflammatory disease of the optic nerves characterized by retrobulbar pain, unilateral vision impairment or loss, visual field defects, and impaired contrast and colour sensitivity [1, 2]. Evolution usually involves spontaneous recovery of vision after resolution of the inflammation and remyelinization, by virtue of cortical and subcortical visual pathway neuronal plasticity, but progression to monocular blindness may take place in a significant number of cases [1, 3–5]. Several studies of functional recovery after brain injury have suggested that changes in local connectivity [6, 7], recruitment of existing pathways, or creation of new pathways  may account for recovery of vision in these patients. For instance, the evidence of preserved visual function despite a damaged primary visual cortex (V1) in primates has generated the hypothesis of alternative visual pathways involving the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) and the middle temporal area (V5) [9–12]. In this study the responses of the visual cortex to monocular visual stimuli were investigated by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to elucidate the connections among the brain areas involved in vision during unilateral vision loss in patients with a damaged optic nerve but a healthy visual cortex.
2. Materials and Methods
fMRI and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data were collected in 8 patients with acute ON (mean age 46 years, 5 women; Table 1). In 4 patients ON was the first manifestation of multiple sclerosis and 2 further patients had, respectively, optic nerve damage connected to maxillofacial injury and ischemic optic neuropathy; the remaining two cases were classified as idiopathic, because of negative MRI findings and the absence of any clear cause.
Exhaustive ophthalmological examination and perimetry testing demonstrated unilateral vision loss or impairment (4 in the left eye and 4 in the right eye). Visual acuity in the affected eye ranged from 20/200 (1.0 LogMAR) to 20/125 (0.8 LogMAR) in all patients.
MR coronal images obtained with STIR sequences showed hyperintense areas in the affected optic nerves in all patients (Figure 1). No signal alterations were detected in the visual cortex in either occipital pole.
2.2. Imaging Protocols
Subjects were placed in a 1.5-Tesla (T) scanner (Signa Excite NV/i CV/i, General Electric Medical System, Milwaukee, WI, USA) equipped with 50 mT/m gradients with their head restrained within a circularly polarized head coil. Morphological brain MR images were obtained using sagittal Spin-echo T1-weighted sequences, axial FLAIR and T2-weighted Fast Spin-echo sequences, and coronal T2-weighted sequences. The optic nerve was explored using a coronal STIR sequence (section thickness, 3 mm).
2.2.1. Functional Imaging
The experimental procedure consisted in the acquisition of a 3D data set (IR Prep Fast SPGR 3-D; TR 15.2 ms, TE 6.9 ms, TI 500 ms, Flip Angle 15°, FOV 29 × 29 cm, slice thickness 1 mm, matrix 288 × 288, 1 Nex, and scan time 8:20 min) and of 10 contiguous 5-mm-thick axial high-resolution anatomical images (T1 FLAIR, 2D, TR 1700 ms, TE 24 ms, Field of View 24 × 24 cm, thickness 5 mm, Matrix 256 × 256, 1 Nex, scan time 2:25 min for 10 images) on which the functional activations were overlaid. fMRI data were then acquired in the same axial planes with a single-shot T2*-weighted gradient-echo EPI sequence (TR 3000 ms, TE 60 ms, Flip Angle 90°, Field of View 24 × 24 cm, Matrix 64 × 64, 1 Nex, scan time 5:12 min) to obtain, during the stimulation cycle, 1000 axial functional images (100/section, 1 image/3 s) from the 10 contiguous 5-mm-thick axial sections selected.
2.2.2. Diffusion Tensor Imaging
Axial diffusion-weighted images with a diffusion sensitising gradient ( value = 1000 s/mm2) were obtained for diffusion tensor analysis using a single shot spin-echo echo-planar sequence with the following parameters: TR = 6500 msec, TE = 7.4 msec, matrix = 128 × 128, FOV = 24 × 24 cm, slice thickness = 5.0 mm, interslice gap = 1.0 mm, Nex = 2, and scan time 5:51 min. Diffusion was measured along 25 noncollinear directions.
2.2.3. Visual Stimulation
Visual stimuli-generated using an in-house software were projected in a head-mounted display. A black and white chessboard (amplitude: 6°) was presented to the centre of the visual field (CVF) to an eye at a time (virtual Cartesian distance from viewer’s eyes: 75 cm) using a 5 min block-design experimental paradigm alternating twenty 15-s periods of rest and stimulation. Patients were instructed to fix their gaze on a cross in the centre of the display throughout the visual studies. Eye movements were monitored with an internal camera.
2.3. Data Analysis
2.3.1. Functional Imaging
After each experimental session the images were transferred to a Unix workstation (General Electric Advantage Windows 4.2) and then to a personal computer. Data were analyzed with the BrainVoyager QX software (Brain Innovation, Maastricht, the Netherlands). The first two images of each functional series were discarded to take into account the period of signal intensity variation related to progressive saturation. Data from each subject were preprocessed to remove noise and artefacts. The functional images of each subject were overlaid on the 2D anatomical images and coregistered into their 3D data sets through trilinear interpolation. Data were then transformed into Talairach space . Each scan was adjusted to the Talairach coordinate system to identify the position of activated areas.
Statistical analysis was applied to the data from each patient using the general linear model (GLM) , which aims to predict the variation of a dependent variable (fMRI time course) in terms of linear combination. To account for the haemodynamic delay the predictor time course was convolved with a standard haemodynamic response function. When the signal increase was significantly different from the baseline and correlated temporally with the stimulation pattern, activation was assumed to be evoked by the peripheral stimulus. Activated volumes were considered to consist of clusters of at least 8 voxels (1 voxel = 1 mm3).
2.3.2. Diffusion Tensor Imaging
The images were transferred to the Unix workstation, where DTI data were postprocessed using Functool 3.1.22 (GE Medical Systems). Echo-planar imaging distortion was automatically corrected. Diffusion eigenvectors and eigenvalues, reflecting the main direction of diffusion and associated diffusivity, were calculated from the diffusion tensor. Anisotropy was calculated using orientation-independent fractional anisotropy (FA). The FiberTrak option allows Functool DTI processing to create 2D colour orientation maps, 2D colour eigenvector maps, and 3D tractography maps. The 3D volume viewer permits areas with high FA to be displayed as 3D images. The anisotropy threshold for tracking termination was 0.18. Regions of interest (ROIs) measuring 105 mm2 were selected in the occipital visual cortex to visualize the optic radiations. Other ROIs were selected in the retrobulbar segment of the optic nerve and along the retrochiasmatic pathway, to reconstruct the fibres crossing through them (using the origin and destination regions method). All ROIs were defined manually on axial colour-coded maps of the main diffusion directions.
The mean volume of the activation foci and the mean signal increase elicited by stimulation of affected and unaffected eyes was calculated and subjected to a paired t test to assess differences between the two sides. A value < 0.05 was considered significant.
3.1. Functional Imaging
Visual stimulation of the unaffected eye evoked activation foci in occipitotemporal and posterior parietal areas in both hemispheres (Figure 2(a)). Blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) activation was also detected in frontal eye fields (FEF) and in other association areas, such as prefrontal areas and parietal eye fields. Presentation of the visual stimulus to the affected eye induced a significant reduction, and in three cases the disappearance, of activation foci in area V1 and in extrastriate areas (Figure 2(b)). Only foci in the middle temporal visual area (Figure 3(a)) and FEF were preserved.
The volume size of the foci elicited in area V1 of both hemispheres, that is, the number of voxels activated during stimulation, ranged from 345 to 879 (mean, 576) in the unaffected eye and from 0 to 360 (mean, 70) in the affected eye; the difference was significant ( = 0.001).
The BOLD signal increase evoked in area V1 by stimulation of the unaffected eye ranged from 0.9 to 1.7% (mean, 1.32%) and was significantly greater ( = 0.005) compared with the increase induced by stimulation of the affected eye, which ranged from 0 to 1.65% (mean, 0.69%), without differences between the two hemispheres (Figure 4, Table 2).
|Data regard activation foci contralateral to the stimulation side.|
*For technical reason only visual localization and evaluation of activation foci was possible in patients 4 and 6.
L: left; R: right.
When the same measures were calculated in the foci elicited in area V5, the differences in volume size and the delay of the BOLD response evoked by visual stimulation of the unaffected and affected eye were not significant (resp., and 0.2). In particular, the number of voxels activated during stimulation of unaffected and affected eye ranged from 338 to 726 (mean, 492) and from 322 to 700 (mean, 487), respectively. The BOLD signal increase evoked in area V5 ranged from 0.9 to 1.25% (mean, 0.96) in the unaffected eye and from 0.7 to 1.33% (mean, 0.91%) in the affected eye. (Figure 4, Table 2).
3.2. Diffusion Tensor Imaging
In this study DTI was applied as an adjunct to conventional MRI [15, 16]. Fibre reconstruction documented that the optic radiations were both intact and that all lesions were unilateral and involved the orbital tract of the optic nerve. The mean FA values calculated in the optic radiation of the affected side were slightly but not significantly different compared with the contralateral side () (Figures 5 and 6). In the affected optic nerve white matter anisotropy was lower, with reduced and sometimes no visualization of streamlines in the affected tract (Figure 7).
fMRI can be used to document functional damage and recovery in patients with optic nerve damage [4, 5, 17–20]. The decrease or disappearance of area V1 activation disclosed in this study can explain the vision impairment or loss experienced by ON patients and is in line with previous reports. Examination of the brain areas involved in vision during optic nerve inflammation highlighted the consistent activation of area V5 in all our patients.
Area V5 plays an important role in motion perception and in the integration of local signals into a global perception; it is also involved in the guidance of some eye movements and projects to eye movement-related areas in the frontal (FEF) and parietal lobes (lateral intra-parietal area) [21, 22]. Visual inputs to area V5 come from areas V1, V2, and dorsal V3 [23, 24] as well as from the LGN  and the inferior pulvinar. The projections from LGN may explain the activation foci observed in V5 neurons even when area V1 is damaged [6–8, 25]. Some researchers who found preserved visual function despite a damaged primary visual cortex, in line with earlier physiological studies of primates, have surmised the existence of alternative visual pathways involving LGN and the middle temporal area [9, 10, 12]. Connections between LGN and area V5 have been investigated with diffusion-weighted MRI by comparing normal subjects to a blind individual [8, 11].
The present study describes the cortical responses elicited in patients with a damaged optic nerve but unaffected retrochiasmatic pathways and a healthy visual cortex.
The two main pathways involved in vision [26–29], the ventral stream coursing through areas V1, V2, and V3 before reaching area V4, and the dorsal stream passing through areas V1 and V2 before reaching the dorsomedial area and area V5, are subserved by two different cell systems, the parvocellular and the magnocellular, respectively. Although they are extensively interconnected, the former system is mainly responsible for object recognition and is more sensitive to colour contrast, whereas the latter stream is mainly responsible for perception of motion and luminance contrast. Inflammatory changes are recognized as one of the major mechanisms contributing to the neural damage in multiple sclerosis and in acute optic neuritis in general . Recently, a study of neuronal changes in the anterior optic pathway in multiple sclerosis patients  showed a greater susceptibility to injury of small parvocellular LGN neurons.
The different functional activation detected in areas V1 and V5 in our patients may be related to differences in the functional specialization and physical characteristics of the relevant pathways, the ventral and the dorsal stream. Since the dominant input to area V5 is from the magnocellular stream [32–34], the cells of this system may be preserved in ON patients, ensuring the flow of visual information along the pathway connecting LGN to area V5.
The authors are grateful to Dr. Silvia Modena for language revision.
- S. J. Hickman, C. M. Dalton, D. H. Miller, and G. T. Plant, “Management of acute optic neuritis,” The Lancet, vol. 360, no. 9349, pp. 1953–1962, 2002.
- H. R. Jäger, “Loss of vision: imaging the visual pathways,” European Radiology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 501–510, 2005.
- M. J. Kupersmith, T. Alban, B. Zeiffer, and D. Lefton, “Contrast-enhanced MRI in acute optic neuritis: relationship to visual performance,” Brain, vol. 125, no. 4, pp. 812–822, 2002.
- K. Korsholm, K. H. Madsen, J. L. Frederiksen, J. B. Rowe, and T. E. Lund, “Cortical neuroplasticity in patients recovering from acute optic neuritis,” NeuroImage, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 836–844, 2008.
- T. M. Jenkins, A. T. Toosy, O. Ciccarelli et al., “Neuroplasticity predicts outcome of optic neuritis independent of tissue damage,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 99–113, 2010.
- N. Dancause, S. Barbay, S. B. Frost et al., “Extensive cortical rewiring after brain injury,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 25, no. 44, pp. 10167–10179, 2005.
- S. L. Bengtsson, Z. Nagy, S. Skare, L. Forsman, H. Forssberg, and F. Ullén, “Extensive piano practicing has regionally specific effects on white matter development,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 1148–1150, 2005.
- H. Bridge, O. Thomas, S. Jbabdi, and A. Cowey, “Changes in connectivity after visual cortical brain damage underlie altered visual function,” Brain, vol. 131, no. 6, pp. 1433–1444, 2008.
- H. R. Rodman, C. G. Gross, and T. D. Albright, “Afferent basis of visual response properties in area MT of the macaque. I. Effects of striate cortex removal,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 2033–2050, 1989.
- P. Girard, P. A. Salin, and J. Bullier, “Response selectivity of neurons in area MT of the macaque monkey during reversible inactivation of area V1,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 1437–1446, 1992.
- L. Weiskrantz, “Blindsight revisited,” Current Opinion in Neurobiology, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 215–220, 1996.
- M. G. P. Rosa, R. Tweedale, and G. N. Elston, “Visual responses of neurons in the middle temporal area of new world monkeys after lesions of striate cortex,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 20, no. 14, pp. 5552–5563, 2000.
- J. Talairach and P. Tournoux, Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain?Georg Thieme, Stuttgart, Germany, 1988.
- K. J. Friston, A. P. Holmes, K. J. Worsley, J. P. Poline, C. D. Frith, and R. S. J. Frackowiak, “Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: a general linear approach,” Human Brain Mapping, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 189–210, 1994.
- P. J. Basser and C. Pierpaoli, “Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance B, vol. 111, no. 3, pp. 209–219, 1996.
- T. E. Conturo, N. F. Lori, T. S. Cull et al., “Tracking neuronal fiber pathways in the living human brain,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 96, no. 18, pp. 10422–10427, 1999.
- D. J. Werring, P. A. Brex, I. F. Moseley et al., “Recovery from optic neuritis is associated with a change in the distribution of cerebral response to visual stimulation: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study,” Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 441–449, 2000.
- N. Levin, T. Orlov, S. Dotan, and E. Zohary, “Normal and abnormal fMRI activation patterns in the visual cortex after recovery from optic neuritis,” NeuroImage, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 1161–1168, 2006.
- K. Korsholm, K. H. Madsen, J. L. Frederiksen, A. Skimminge, and T. E. Lund, “Recovery from optic neuritis: an ROI-based analysis of LGN and visual cortical areas,” Brain, vol. 130, no. 5, pp. 1244–1253, 2007.
- T. Jenkins, O. Ciccarelli, A. Toosy et al., “Dissecting structure-function interactions in acute optic neuritis to investigate neuroplasticity,” Human Brain Mapping, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 276–286, 2010.
- J. D. G. Watson, R. Myers, R. S. J. Frackowiak et al., “Area V5 of the human brain: evidence from a combined study using positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 79–94, 1993.
- R. T. Born and D. C. Bradley, “Structure and function of visual area MT,” Annual Review of Neuroscience, vol. 28, pp. 157–189, 2005.
- L. G. Ungerleider and R. Desimone, “Cortical connections of visual area MT in the macaque,” Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 248, no. 2, pp. 190–222, 1986.
- D. J. Felleman and D. C. van Essen, “Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–47, 1991.
- L. C. Sincich, K. F. Park, M. J. Wohlgemuth, and J. C. Horton, “Bypassing V1: a direct geniculate input to area MT,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 1123–1128, 2004.
- M. A. Goodale and A. D. Milner, “Separate visual pathways for perception and action,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 20–25, 1992.
- D. Milner and M. A. Goodale, The Visual Brain in Action?Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1995.
- M. Goodale and D. Milner, “One brain—two visual systems,” Psychologist, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 660–663, 2006.
- A. D. Milner and M. A. Goodale, “Two visual systems re-viewed,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 774–785, 2008.
- V. Porciatti and F. Sartucci, “Retinal and cortical evoked responses to chromatic contrast stimuli. Specific losses in both eyes of patients with multiple sclerosis and unilateral optic neuritis,” Brain, vol. 119, no. 3, pp. 723–740, 1996.
- N. Evangelou, D. Konz, M. M. Esiri, S. Smith, J. Palace, and P. M. Matthews, “Size-selective neuronal changes in the anterior optic pathways suggest a differential susceptibility to injury in multiple sclerosis,” Brain, vol. 124, no. 9, pp. 1813–1820, 2001.
- C. Chapman, R. Hoag, and D. Giaschi, “The effect of disrupting the human magnocellular pathway on global motion perception,” Vision Research, vol. 44, no. 22, pp. 2551–2557, 2004.
- K. R. Alexander, A. S. Rajagopalan, W. Seiple, V. M. Zemon, and G. A. Fishman, “Contrast response properties of magnocellular and parvocellular pathways in retinitis pigmentosa assessed by the visual evoked potential,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 46, no. 8, pp. 2967–2973, 2005.
- C. S. J. Liu, R. N. Bryan, A. Miki, J. H. Woo, G. T. Liu, and M. A. Elliott, “Magnocellular and parvocellular visual pathways have different blood oxygen level-dependent signal time courses in human primary visual cortex,” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1628–1634, 2006.
Copyright © 2012 Giulia Mascioli et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.