Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Radiology Research and Practice
Volume 2018, Article ID 6709525, 13 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6709525
Research Article

MRI-Based Quantification of Magnetic Susceptibility in Gel Phantoms: Assessment of Measurement and Calculation Accuracy

Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital Lund, 22185 Lund, Sweden

Correspondence should be addressed to Ronnie Wirestam; es.ul.dem@matseriw.einnor

Received 23 May 2018; Accepted 5 July 2018; Published 30 July 2018

Academic Editor: Paul Sijens

Copyright © 2018 Emma Olsson et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. Liu, S. Buch, Y. Chen et al., “Susceptibility-weighted imaging: current status and future directions,” NMR in Biomedicine, vol. 30, no. 4, Article ID e3552, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. L. Li and J. S. Leigh, “Quantifying arbitrary magnetic susceptibility distributions with MR,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 1077–1082, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. K. Shmueli, J. A. de Zwart, P. van Gelderen, T.-Q. Li, S. J. Dodd, and J. H. Duyn, “Magnetic susceptibility mapping of brain tissue in vivo using MRI phase data,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 1510–1522, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. Wharton, A. Schäfer, and R. Bowtell, “Susceptibility mapping in the human brain using threshold-based k-space division,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 1292–1304, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. A. Yablonskiy and A. L. Sukstanskii, “Effects of biological tissue structural anisotropy and anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility on the gradient echo MRI signal phase: theoretical background,” NMR in Biomedicine, vol. 30, no. 4, Article ID e3655, 2017. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. I. A. L. Lim, A. V. Faria, X. Li et al., “Human brain atlas for automated region of interest selection in quantitative susceptibility mapping: Application to determine iron content in deep gray matter structures,” NeuroImage, vol. 82, pp. 449–469, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. Y. Zhang, H. Wei, M. J. Cronin, N. He, F. Yan, and C. Liu, “Longitudinal atlas for normative human brain development and aging over the lifespan using quantitative susceptibility mapping,” NeuroImage, vol. 171, pp. 176–189, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. C. Stüber, D. Pitt, and Y. Wang, “Iron in multiple sclerosis and its noninvasive imaging with quantitative susceptibility mapping,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 17, no. 1, article 100, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. Stankiewicz, S. S. Panter, M. Neema, A. Arora, C. E. Batt, and R. Bakshi, “Iron in chronic brain disorders: imaging and neurotherapeutic implications,” Neurotherapeutics, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 371–386, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. K. Kudo, T. Liu, T. Murakami et al., “Oxygen extraction fraction measurement using quantitative susceptibility mapping: Comparison with positron emission tomography,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 1424–1433, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. Zhang, T. Liu, A. Gupta, P. Spincemaille, T. D. Nguyen, and Y. Wang, “Quantitative mapping of cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO2) using quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM),” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 945–952, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. H. Duyn and J. Schenck, “Contributions to magnetic susceptibility of brain tissue,” NMR in Biomedicine, vol. 30, no. 4, p. e3546, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. R. Wirestam, “Using contrast agents to obtain maps of regional perfusion and capillary wall permeability,” Imaging in Medicine, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 423–442, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. Bonekamp, P. B. Barker, R. Leigh, P. C. M. Van Zijl, and X. Li, “Susceptibility-based analysis of dynamic gadolinium bolus perfusion MRI,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 544–554, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. B. Xu, P. Spincemaille, T. Liu et al., “Quantification of cerebral perfusion using dynamic quantitative susceptibility mapping,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 1540–1548, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. X. L. Xie, A. T. Layton, N. Wang et al., “Dynamic contrast-enhanced quantitative susceptibility mapping with ultrashort echo time MRI for evaluating renal function,” American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology, vol. 310, no. 2, pp. F174–F182, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. C. Langkammer, F. Schweser, K. Shmueli et al., “Quantitative susceptibility mapping: Report from the 2016 reconstruction challenge,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 1661–1673, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. L. Bao, X. Li, C. Cai, Z. Chen, and P. C. M. Van Zijl, “Quantitative susceptibility mapping using structural feature based collaborative reconstruction (SFCR) in the human brain,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 2040–2050, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. Y. Wang and T. Liu, “Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM): decoding MRI data for a tissue magnetic biomarker,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 82–101, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. D. Zhou, J. Cho, J. Zhang, P. Spincemaille, and Y. Wang, “Susceptibility underestimation in a high-susceptibility phantom: Dependence on imaging resolution, magnitude contrast, and other parameters,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 1080–1086, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. C. Langham, J. F. Magland, C. L. Epstein, T. F. Floyd, and F. W. Wehrli, “Accuracy and precision of MR blood oximetry based on the long paramagnetic cylinder approximation of large vessels,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 333–340, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. J. Cronin, N. Wang, K. S. Decker, H. Wei, W.-Z. Zhu, and C. Liu, “Exploring the origins of echo-time-dependent quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) measurements in healthy tissue and cerebral microbleeds,” NeuroImage, vol. 149, pp. 98–113, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. C.-Y. Hsieh, Y.-C. N. Cheng, J. Neelavalli, E. M. Haacke, and R. J. Stafford, “An improved method for susceptibility and radius quantification of cylindrical objects from MRI,” Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 420–436, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. H. Xie, Y.-C. N. Cheng, P. Kokeny et al., “A quantitative study of susceptibility and additional frequency shift of three common materials in MRI,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 1263–1269, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. J. Li, S. Chang, T. Liu et al., “Reducing the object orientation dependence of susceptibility effects in gradient echo MRI through quantitative susceptibility mapping,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 1563–1569, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. E. Olsson, MRI-Based Quantification of Magnetic Susceptibility: Assessment of Measurement And Calculation Accuracy (Unpublished MSc Dissertation), Lund University, Lund, 2016.
  27. R. Cusack and N. Papadakis, “New robust 3-D phase unwrapping algorithms: application to magnetic field mapping and undistorting echoplanar images,” NeuroImage, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 754–764, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. T. Liu, I. Khalidov, L. de Rochefort et al., “A novel background field removal method for MRI using projection onto dipole fields (PDF),” NMR in Biomedicine, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 1129–1136, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. L. de Rochefort, T. Liu, B. Kressler et al., “Quantitative susceptibility map reconstruction from MR phase data using bayesian regularization: validation and application to brain imaging,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 194–206, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. D. Zhou, T. Liu, P. Spincemaille, and Y. Wang, “Background field removal by solving the Laplacian boundary value problem,” NMR in Biomedicine, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 312–319, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. H. Sun and A. H. Wilman, “Background field removal using spherical mean value filtering and Tikhonov regularization,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 1151–1157, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. R. Salomir, B. D. De Senneville, and C. T. W. Moonen, “A fast calculation method for magnetic field inhomogeneity due to an arbitrary distribution of bulk susceptibility,” Concepts in Magnetic Resonance B, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 26–34, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. J. P. Marques and R. Bowtell, “Application of a Fourier-based method for rapid calculation of field inhomogeneity due to spatial variation of magnetic susceptibility,” Concepts in Magnetic Resonance, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 65–78, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. T. Liu, C. Wisnieff, M. Lou, W. Chen, P. Spincemaille, and Y. Wang, “Nonlinear formulation of the magnetic field to source relationship for robust quantitative susceptibility mapping,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 467–476, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. J. Liu, T. Liu, L. de Rochefort et al., “Morphology enabled dipole inversion for quantitative susceptibility mapping using structural consistency between the magnitude image and the susceptibility map,” NeuroImage, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 2560–2568, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. T. Liu, J. Liu, L. De Rochefort et al., “Morphology enabled dipole inversion (MEDI) from a single-angle acquisition: Comparison with COSMOS in human brain imaging,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 777–783, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. J. O. Christoffersson, L. E. Olsson, and S. Sjöberg, “Nickel-doped agarose gel phantoms in MR imaging,” Acta Radiologica, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 426–431, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. J. A. Pople, W. G. Schneider, and H. J. Bernstein, High-Resolution Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc, New York, NY, USA, 1959.
  39. L. De Rochefort, R. Brown, M. R. Prince, and Y. Wang, “Quantitative MR susceptibility mapping using piece-wise constant regularized inversion of the magnetic field,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 1003–1009, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. Cornell MRI Research Lab, 2018, http://weill.cornell.edu/mri/pages/qsm.html.
  41. B. Kressler, L. de Rochefort, T. Liu, P. Spincemaille, Q. Jiang, and Y. Wang, “Nonlinear regularization for per voxel estimation of magnetic susceptibility distributions from MRI field maps,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 273–281, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. A.-C. Fruytier, J. Magat, F. Colliez, B. Jordan, G. Cron, and B. Gallez, “Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in mice at high field: Estimation of the arterial input function can be achieved by phase imaging,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 544–550, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. P. G. Ward, A. P. Fan, P. Raniga et al., “Improved quantification of cerebral vein oxygenation using partial volume correction,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 11, p. 89, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. A. Karsa, E. Biondetti, S. Punwani, and K. Shmueli, “The effect of large slice thickness and spacing and low coverage on the accuracy of susceptibility mapping,” in Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM), p. 1555, Singapore, 2016.
  45. A. M. Elkady, H. Sun, and A. H. Wilman, “Importance of extended spatial coverage for quantitative susceptibility mapping of iron-rich deep gray matter,” Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 574–578, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. E. Lind, L. Knutsson, R. Kämpe, F. Ståhlberg, and R. Wirestam, “Assessment of MRI contrast agent concentration by quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM): application to estimation of cerebral blood volume during steady state,” Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 555–566, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus