Current Approaches for Image Fusion of Histological Data with Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Table 1

Quantitative comparison of different slice-to-volume registration approaches through the calculation of the relative accuracy.

Author	Matching criteria	Stated similarity	3D resolution (per pixel)	Relative accuracy
Lundin et al. [14]	Feature	106.3 μm	10.7 μm (nominal)	0.1
Becker et al. [11]	Landmark	L score: 91/100	8.6 μm (nominal)	—
Chicherova et al. [20]	Feature	250 μm	4 µm	0.02
Chicherova et al. [22]	Intensity	21.6 µm	7 µm	0.3
Khimchenko et al. [21]	Feature	4 μm	0.9 μm	0.2
Museyko et al. [35]	Intensity	XOR-score	15 μm	—
Osechinskiy and Kruggel [38]	Intensity	Similarity measure of CC, LC, RC…	350 μm × 350 µm × 700 µm	—