Research Article

Identification of Differences in Body Composition Measures Using 3D-Derived Artificial Intelligence from Multiple CT Scans across the L3 Vertebra Compared to a Single Mid-Point L3 CT Scan

Table 2

Average percent difference (%) in muscle, VAT, SAT area, and radiodensity between the mid-L3 slice and non-mid-L3 slices in all patients and by sex. For each patient, the average percent difference was calculated by averaging (absolute value ((each L3 slice (excluding mid-L3) body composition–mid-L3 body composition)/mid-L3 body composition) × 100).

All (n = 203)Sex split
Female (n = 106 patients)Male (n = 97 patients) value (male vs female)
Average percent difference (%) median (interquartile range)

SM surface area3.58% (2.62–4.66)3.64% (2.62–4.67)3.54% (2.57–4.63)0.96
Muscle radiodensity2.85% (2.00–4.00)3.02% (2.03–4.26)2.74% (1.89–3.71)0.09
VAT surface area6.28% (3.94-10.79)6.90% (4.62-11.27)5.23% (3.33–8.99)0.02
VAT radiodensity1.28% (0.86–2.04)1.32% (0.85–2.05)1.23% (0.90–2.00)0.85
SAT surface area5.49% (3.30–7.35)4.33% (2.38–6.22)6.6% (4.64–8.31)<0.001
SAT radiodensity0.85% (0.57–1.27)0.76% (0.50–1.13)0.97% (0.65–1.35)0.007