Research Article
Ultrasound Assessment of Carotid Intima-Media Thickness: Comparison between Diabetes and Nondiabetes Subjects, and Correlation with Serum Vitamin D
Table 3
Comparison between mean and average CIMT among both diabetic and nondiabetic groups in correlation to serum vitamin D, age, BMI, and sex.
| Variables | Nondiabetic | Diabetic | Mean ± SD in mm | Mean Rt | Mean Lt | Average | Mean Rt | Mean Lt | Average |
| Serum vitamin D | Normal | 0.75 ± 0.26 | 0.76 ± 0.24 | 0.75 ± 0.24 | 1.11 ± 0.32 | 1.07 ± 0.31 | 1.09 ± 0.28 | Low | 0.72 ± 0.25 | 0.73 ± 0.24 | 0.73 ± 0.23 | 1.0 ± 0.23 | 1.07 ± 0.29 | 1.04 ± 0.22 | value | 0.390 | 0.775 | 0.429 | 0.65 | 0.861 | 0.116 |
| Age group | ≤44 | 0.61 ± 0.13 | 0.63 ± 0.13 | 0.62 ± 0.12 | 0.77 ± 0.09 | 0.85 ± 0.08 | 0.81 ± 0.08 | 45–60 | 0.86 ± 0.24 | 0.84 ± 0.23 | 0.85 ± 0.23 | 1.05 ± 0.25 | 1.00 ± 0.23 | 1.02 ± 0.20 | 61–75 | 1.08 ± 0.33 | 1.09 ± 0.31 | 1.08 ± 0.27 | 1.13 ± 0.33 | 1.21 ± 0.37 | 1.17 ± 0.31 | ≥76 | 1.13 ± 0.24 | 1.17 ± 0.26 | 1.15 ± 0.18 | 1.46 ± 0.18 | 1.46 ± 0.04 | 1.46 ± 0.07 | value | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.026 | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| BMI | Under wt | 0.98 ± 0.39 | 0.84 ± 0.47 | 0.91 ± 0.41 | 1.12 ± 0.43 | 1.02 ± 0.19 | 1.07 ± 0.26 | Normal | 0.71 ± 0.31 | 0.71 ± 0.26 | 0.71 ± 0.28 | 1.08 ± 0.26 | 1.10 ± 0.35 | 1.09 ± 0.27 | Over wt | 0.67 ± 0.19 | 0.71 ± 0.20 | 0.69 ± 0.18 | 1.00 ± 0.22 | 1.04 ± 0.29 | 1.02 ± 0.24 | Obese | 0.79 ± 0.22 | 0.79 ± 0.24 | 0.79 ± 0.21 | 1.04 ± 0.25 | 1.08 ± 0.33 | 1.06 ± 0.25 | value | 0.038 | 0.287 | 0.100 | 0.712 | 0.844 | 0.876 |
| Sex | Male | 0.72 ± 0.25 | 0.76 ± 0.27 | 0.74 ± 0.24 | 1.07 ± 0.29 | 1.10 ± 0.36 | 1.09 ± 0.31 | Female | 0.75 ± 0.26 | 0.71 ± 0.20 | 0.73 ± 0.22 | 1.06 ± 0.29 | 1.05 ± 0.26 | 1.06 ± 0.22 | value | 0.605 | 0.063 | 0.571 | 0.928 | 0.123 | 0.136 |
|
|