Raman Spectroscopy-Assisted Characterization of Nanoform MoS<sub>2</sub> Thin Film Transistor

Saminathan, Rajasekaran; Hadidi, Haitham; Tharwan, Mohammed; Alnujaie, Ali; Khamaj, Jabril A.; Venugopal, Gunasekaran

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3255615

Scanning

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Scanning Probe Techniques to Study Interfacial Phenomena at the Nanoscale Level

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 3255615 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3255615

Raman Spectroscopy-Assisted Characterization of Nanoform MoS₂ Thin Film Transistor

Rajasekaran Saminathan,¹Haitham Hadidi,¹Mohammed Tharwan,¹Ali Alnujaie,¹Jabril A. Khamaj,¹and Gunasekaran Venugopal²

Academic Editor: Zhichao Lou

Received16 Jan 2022

Revised22 May 2022

Accepted30 May 2022

Published22 Jun 2022

Abstract

In this paper, we report the simple preparation and investigation of electrical transport properties of nanoform MoS₂ thin film transistor (TFT) devices. MoS₂ nanoparticles were synthesized by using the hydrothermal method. The physiochemical characterizations such as UV-vis, Fourier transform infrared, X-ray diffraction, and Raman spectroscopy studies were performed. Spin-coating was used to make the thin film on which silver electrodes were made. We observed nonlinear current-voltage (I-V) characteristics; however, the symmetricity was found in the I-V curve which confirms the no formation of the Schottky barrier between thin film and electrodes. Transistor transfer characteristics reveal that the TFT device is n-doped as more drain current modulation is observed when the positive gate voltage is applied. The relationship between gate-current and gate voltage studies concludes that there is no leakage gate current in the TFT device which further confirms the good reliability of transfer characteristics of a device. The device mobility was calculated as ~10.2 cm²/Vs, and the same was explained with plausible reason supported with Raman spectra analysis.

1. Introduction

Presently, two-dimensional materials (graphene, graphene-oxide, MoS₂, and Bi₂Se₃) have been known for their unique characteristics and having potential prospects in various fields such as electronics, photovoltaic, sensors, flexible displays, supercapacitors, and water purification [1, 2]. Transition metal dichalcogenide semiconductors (TMDC) have significantly attracted the scientific community because of their unique electrical and optical characteristics. Molybdenum disulfide (MoS₂) is a layered structure transition metal dichalcogenide material with weak van der Waals interlayer force, which is considered as a best candidate material for numerous applications such as supercapacitor, hydrogen generation/storage, photocatalyst, and rechargeable batteries [3–8]. MoS₂ has a hexagonal atomic arrangement similar to graphene. Mo and S atoms are stacked together in a single lattice and the weak van der Waals forces exist between the interlayers. Monolayer or bulk MoS₂ may have different functions due to bandgap. It has been reported that the bulk MoS₂ having an indirect bandgap of 1.29 eV and monolayer MoS₂ having a direct bandgap of 1.9 eV [9] exist in a few forms of crystal structures such as 1T-MoS₂ (tetragonal), 2H-MoS₂ (hexagonal), and 3R-MoS₂ (rhombohedral) [10]. As per the report by Radisavljevic et al., the pristine single crystal-based MoS₂ field effect transistors have shown mobility of 200 cm²/Vs with a current on/off ratio of 10⁸ [11]. Particularly, MoS₂ received special attention among the TMDCs and believed as an alternative material for graphene (which has zero bandgap) in electronics [12].

By having salient features such as nominal bandgap, good carrier mobility, and interesting geometry, MoS₂ rises as an important candidate material in electronics and transistor development [13]. MoS₂ thin films have shown tremendous potentiality in the applications such as nanogenerators, electrochemical supercapacitors, photovoltaic cells, sensors, and detectors [14–16]. The thermal instability of nanomaterials is the unavoidable parameter for these devices, because the materials may be heated due to photon absorption, charge carrier flow, and surrounding environment which may affect the device performance. Substrate used for material deposition also plays a key role in thermal stability. Previously, it was reported that monolayer thin film on SiO₂ substrate is thermally stable compared to bulk MoS₂. However, the preparation of large area thin film with a uniform surface is still a quite difficult process and suitable appropriate methods have to be followed. Some reports were published recently on the large area thin films which were made using physical vapor deposition (PVD), chemical vapor deposition (CVD), vapor epitaxy, pulsed-laser depositor (PLD) and sputtering methods [14, 17]. These methods involve high costs and large manpower with complicated process procedures. Hence, a simple and cost-effective method is required as an alternative. In this work, we used a hydrothermal method to produce MoS₂ nanoparticles and used spin-coating to make large area thin film. The hydrothermal method is a simple and cost-effective method through which good quality samples can be prepared and large area thin films can be formed by spin-coating with thickness control by standardizing the film-making procedures [18, 19].

In the recent past, only a few studies have been reported on the electrical transport properties of MoS₂ thin film transistors (TFT) [20, 21], and their electronic transport properties and their mechanism are not explored well and required to be investigated more. Hence in this paper, we report the simple preparation procedure of MoS₂ nanoparticles, thin film making, and the electrical transport characteristics of MoS₂ TFT in detail.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

All the research grade materials such as molybdenum oxide (MoO₃), potassium thiocyanate, HCl (35 wt%), ethanol, and NaOH were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used without further purification. Deionized water is used in all experiments.

2.2. Preparation of MoS₂ Samples

MoS₂ nanoparticles were prepared by using the hydrothermal method [18, 22] using molybdenum oxide (MoO₃) and potassium thiocyanate as precursor starting materials. Initially, 0.3 g of MoO₃ (1.5 mmol) and 0.5 g of potassium thiocyanate (4 mmol) were dissolved in 50 mL of deionized water and the same was sonicated for 1 hr. Then, HCl solution (1 mol/L) was added in order to keep the solution pH value to 2.0, and the solution has been stirred for another 45 min. Thereafter, the solution has been transferred into a stainless-steel autoclave (Teflon-lined, 100 mL capacity) for the hydrothermal treatment at 250°C for 40 hrs. After the treatment, the system is allowed to be cooled to room temperature. Then, the centrifugation is done with 5000 rpm for 20 min resulting black colored MoS₂ particles which were washed several times using ethanol and DI water. Then, the sample has been put inside a vacuum oven at 70°C (10 hrs) for drying. Spin-coating is used to prepare MoS₂ thin film and silver paste was used to make contact electrodes.

2.3. Instrumentation

The absorption spectra of MoS₂ nanoparticles were taken using the UV-vis spectrophotometer (model: Jasco V-670). Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) was performed via FT spectrometer (model: Nicolet-6700, USA). Further, MoS₂ thin film was analyzed with X-ray diffractometer (model: Shimadzu, XRD 6000) with Cu-K_α radiation from the range of 10-70. Raman studies were done in Raman spectrometer (model: Horiba Scientific, LAbRAM). All the electrical transport analyses have been performed using the semiconductor parameter analyzer (model: Agilent, B1500A).

3. Results and Discussion

Surface morphology of MoS₂ thin film has been studied by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and atomic force microscopy (AFM) techniques.

In Figure 1(a), the SEM image of MoS₂ thin film is shown which clearly shows an irregular surface morphology of MoS₂ thin film with wrinkled-like morphology. In Figure 1(b), the TEM image of MoS₂ is shown which clearly depicts the sheet-like morphology with transparent nature. The 2D topography of MoS₂ thin film was studied by using AFM ((which is shown in Figure 1(c)) which shows an average surface roughness of MoS₂ thin film with value of 64 nm. This roughness is due to the overlapping of many MoS₂ platelets so that the measured region might consist of overlapped MoS₂ layers.

(a)

(b)

(c)

The optical image of MoS₂ thin film is shown in Figure 2(a). The UV-vis spectroscopy graph as shown in Figure 2(b) reveals the absorption spectra at 208 nm. The peak observed in the near UV region is mainly caused by the excitonic characteristics of MoS₂ nanoparticles [23]. In order to study the chemical compositions and vibration bonds in the sample, FT-IR measurement has been done which is shown in Figure 2(c). There is a feeble absorption peak at near 470 cm^-1 which is ascribed to the characteristics Mo-S vibration mode and well-matched with the previous report [24].

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

The XRD pattern of the MoS₂ thin film is shown in Figure 2(d). The main characteristic diffraction peak observed at 14.5° represents the (002) plane of the hexagonal structure of MoS₂ and matched with the previous report [25]. Moreover, the other diffraction peaks were observed at 33°, 40°, 44°, 50°, and 61° representing the (100), (103), (005), (105), and (008) crystal planes of MoS₂, respectively. This XRD data shows a good agreement with JCPDS card no. 37-1492.

3.1. Electrical Transport Studies

3.1.1. Current-Voltage (I-V) Characterization of MoS₂ Thin Film

The current-voltage characteristics of MoS₂ thin film is shown in Figure 3(a).

(a)

(b)

It shows a slight nonlinear behavior. However, a clear symmetricity has been seen in I-V curve shown in Figure 3(b) which further confirms the no formation of the Schottky barrier between the contacts and thin film.

3.1.2. Characterization of MoS₂ Thin Film Transistor (TFT)

The schematic of the fabricated MoS₂ TFT device is shown in Figure 4(a).

(a)

(b)

(c)

The transistor characteristics are studied for MoS₂ thin film and their output characteristics (I_D-V_DS) for the different back-gate voltages (V_G) varying from -25 to 25 V with a step of 10 V are shown in Figure 4(b). We observed a linear I_D versus V_DS curve, confirming an ohmic contact between thin film and electrodes. The transfer characteristics (I_D-V_G) of MoS₂ TFT are shown in Figure 4(c), where the applied bias voltage is 100 mV.

When the gate voltage is increased, the drain current is also increased, which reveals the n-type behavior of TFT. Positive gate voltage produces more drain-current modulation than negative gate voltage (V_G). The appearance of the charge neutrality point (V_CNP) at the negative bias region (V_G~-20 V) further concludes that the TFT device is n-doped. Figure 5 shows the relationship between gate current (IG) and gate voltage (VG).

This shows the negligible gate current through the SiO₂ oxide layer and confirms the excellent reliability of transfer characteristics presented in Figure 4(b). In addition, we extracted the mobility of our fabricated TFT device. The mobility (μ) of MoS₂ TFT was calculated using the following. where channel length () is equal to 30 μm, the channel width () is equal to 25μm, and the capacitance between the channel and back gate per unit area is where , where is the permittivity of free space, is 3.9 for SiO₂, and is gate oxide thickness (90 nm). We determined the mobility of MoS₂ TFT as ~10.2 cm²/Vs from these data. This is comparable to the mobility of multilayer MoS₂ transistor reported by Sharma et al. [26] where the mobility was reported as μ~15.3 cm²/V.s. The reduction in mobility is due to the defects that exist in the thin film which acts as scattering centers which resist the charge conduction. The reason for the low-mobility was further supported with Raman spectra analysis which is shown in Figure 6. The Raman spectra show two active modes at 381 cm⁻¹ and 406 cm⁻¹ which represent the E1_2g and A_1g vibration modes, respectively. Out of these two vibration modes, A_1g corresponds with the thickness of the layer and A_1g mode at 406 cm⁻¹ reveals that the thin film may consist of several MoS₂ sheets interlinked each other. As per the previous reports, the spin-coated thin films consist of several layers of MoS₂ and its bulk counterpart [27, 28].

In general, the surface defects and structural disorders form traps in the form of wrinkles or folds on the surface, creating a small bulk counterpart in MoS₂ thin film [29]. These traps are answerable for the observation of lower mobility in TFT devices. Breakage of S-Mo-S bonds during the synthesis process may lead to these kinds of traps/vacancy defects.

From the obtained results, we noticed that some sophisticated sample preparation techniques such as atomic layer deposition and chemical vapour deposition could be utilized to develop the high purity thin film for ultrafast response electronics devices.

4. Conclusion

The electrical transport characteristics of nanoform MoS2 thin film transistor device were investigated. MoS₂ nanoparticles were prepared using the hydrothermal method. The as-prepared MoS₂ samples were characterized with UV-vis, FT-IR, and X-ray diffraction techniques. Back-gated MoS₂ transistor device was made with silver electrodes as a source and drain. The current-voltage characteristics show a nonlinear behaviour. But the observation of symmetricity in the I-V curves confirms the nonexistence of the Schottky contact between the thin film and contacts. Transistor characteristic studies further reveal that the TFT device is n-doped while registering the charge neutrality point at the negative bias region. The relationship between gate current and gate voltage with zero gate current shows the good solidarity of transfer characteristic results. The device mobility is calculated as ~10.2 cm²/Vs, which has a well agreement with the data reported for the MoS₂ transistor. The observation of lower mobility in our MoS₂ TFT device is further plausibly explained with Raman spectra analysis.

Data Availability

The complete data required for the representations are fully included in the research paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

S. Kim, J. Nah, I. Jo et al., “Realization of a high mobility dual-gated graphene field-effect transistor with Al₂O₃ dielectric,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 94, no. 6, article 62107, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. S. Novoselov, D. Jiang, F. Schedin et al., “Two dimensional atomic crystals,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 102, no. 30, p. 10451, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Chen, Y. Dai, J. Wang et al., “Smart combination of three-dimensional flower-like MoS₂ nanospheres/interconnected carbon nanotubes for application in supercapacitor with enhanced electrochemical performance,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 696, pp. 900–906, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Ye, Y. Gong, J. Lin et al., “Defects engineered monolayer MoS₂ for improved hydrogen evolution reaction,” Nano Letters, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 1097–1103, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. V. Prabhakar Vattikuti and J. Shim, “Synthesis, characterization and photocatalytic performance of chemically exfoliated MoS₂,” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 317, no. 1, p. 12025, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Acerce, D. Voiry, and M. Chhowalla, “Metallic 1T phase MoS₂ nanosheets as supercapacitor electrode materials,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 313–318, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Liang, R. Feng, S. Yang, H. Ma, J. Liang, and J. Chen, “Rechargeable Mg batteries with graphene-like MoS₂ cathode and ultra-small Mg nanoparticle anode,” Advanced Materials, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 640–643, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Chen, K. Nobuhiro, Y. Huatang, H. T. Takeshita, and T. Sakai, “Electrochemical hydrogen storage in MoS₂ nanotubes,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 123, no. 47, pp. 11813-11814, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. D. Yoffe, “Electronic properties of some chain and layer compounds,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 5, p. 51, 1976.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Suzuki, M. Sakano, Y. J. Zhang et al., “Valley-dependent spin polarization in bulk MoS₂ with broken inversion symmetry,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 611–617, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Radisavljevic, A. Radenovic, J. Brivio, V. Giacometti, and A. Kis, “Single-layer MoS₂ transistors,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 147–150, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Xiong, Z. Cai, L. Qu, P. Zhang, Z. Yuan, and O. K. Asare, “Three-dimensional crumpled reduced graphene oxide/MoS₂ nanoflowers: a stable anode for lithium-ion batteries,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 7, no. 23, pp. 12625–12630, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Yuan and J. Lou, “Memristor goes two-dimensional,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 389-390, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Qin, G. Fang, W. Ke et al., “In situ growth of double-layer MoO₃/MoS₂ film from MoS₂ for hole-transport layers in organic solar cell,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 2742–2756, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Zhu, Y. Wang, J. Xiao et al., “Observation of piezoelectricity in free-standing monolayer MoS₂,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 151–155, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Lopez-Sanchez, D. Lembke, M. Kayci, A. Radenovic, and A. Kis, “Ultrasensitive photodetectors based on monolayer MoS₂,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 497–501, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Ma, D. N. Nath, E. W. Lee II et al., “Epitaxial growth of large area single-crystalline few-layer MoS2 with high space charge mobility of 192 cm2 V−1 s−1,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 105, no. 7, article 72105, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Chaudhary, M. Khanuja, and S. S. I. Abid, “Hydrothermal synthesis of MoS₂ nanosheets for multiple wavelength optical sensing applications,” Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, vol. 277, pp. 190–198, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Luo, M. Shi, S. Zhao et al., “Hydrothermal synthesis of MoS₂ with controllable morphologies and its adsorption properties for bisphenol A,” Journal of Saudi Chemical Society, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 762–773, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Kim, A. Konar, and W. S. Hwang, “High-mobility and low-power thin-film transistors based on multilayer MoS₂ crystals,” Nature Communications, vol. 3, p. 1011, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Pu, Y. Yomogida, K. Liu, L.-J. Li, Y. Iwasa, and T. Takenobu, “Highly flexible MoS₂ thin-film transistors with ion gel dielectrics,” Nano Letters, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 4013–4017, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Luo, J. Li, J. Dai et al., “Bisphenol A removal on TiO₂-MoS₂-reduced graphene oxide composite by adsorption and photocatalysis,” Process Safety and Environmental Protection, vol. 112, pp. 274–279, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Chikan and D. Kelley, “Size-dependent spectroscopy of MoS₂ nanoclusters,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 106, no. 15, pp. 3794–3804, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Gao, M. Si, J. Li et al., “Ferromagnetism in freestanding MoS₂ nanosheets,” Nanoscale Research Letters, vol. 8, p. 129, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Chan and W. Chen, “In situ synthesis of MoS₂/graphene nanosheet composites with extraordinarily high electrochemical performance for lithium ion batteries,” Chemical Communications, vol. 47, pp. 4252–4254, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Sharma, A. Motayed, P. B. Shah et al., “Transfer characteristics and low-frequency noise in single- and multi-layer MoS₂ field-effect transistors,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 107, p. 162102, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Lee, H. Yan, L. E. Brus, T. F. Heinz, J. Hone, and S. Ryu, “Anomalous lattice vibrations of single- and few-layer MoS₂,” ACS Nano, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 2695–2700, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Baidyaroy and P. Mark, “Analytical and experimental investigation of the effects of oxygen chemisorption on the electrical conductivity of CdS,” Surface Science, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 53–68, 1972.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. C. Schniepp, J. L. Li, M. J. McAllister et al., “Functionalized single graphene sheets derived from splitting graphite oxide,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 110, no. 17, pp. 8535–8539, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Rajasekaran Saminathan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

447

Downloads

599

Citations

Scanning

Scanning Probe Techniques to Study Interfacial Phenomena at the Nanoscale Level

Raman Spectroscopy-Assisted Characterization of Nanoform MoS2 Thin Film Transistor

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

2.2. Preparation of MoS2 Samples

2.3. Instrumentation

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Electrical Transport Studies

3.1.1. Current-Voltage (I-V) Characterization of MoS2 Thin Film

3.1.2. Characterization of MoS2 Thin Film Transistor (TFT)

4. Conclusion

Data Availability

Conflicts of Interest

References

Copyright

Raman Spectroscopy-Assisted Characterization of Nanoform MoS₂ Thin Film Transistor

2.2. Preparation of MoS₂ Samples

3.1.1. Current-Voltage (I-V) Characterization of MoS₂ Thin Film

3.1.2. Characterization of MoS₂ Thin Film Transistor (TFT)