Stem Cells International

Stem Cells International / 2013 / Article
Special Issue

Stem Cells and Ion Channels

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 360573 |

Anett Illing, Marianne Stockmann, Narasimha Swamy Telugu, Leonhard Linta, Ronan Russell, Martin Müller, Thomas Seufferlein, Stefan Liebau, Alexander Kleger, "Definitive Endoderm Formation from Plucked Human Hair-Derived Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells and SK Channel Regulation", Stem Cells International, vol. 2013, Article ID 360573, 13 pages, 2013.

Definitive Endoderm Formation from Plucked Human Hair-Derived Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells and SK Channel Regulation

Academic Editor: Michael Levin
Received18 Jan 2013
Accepted13 Mar 2013
Published16 Apr 2013


Pluripotent stem cells present an extraordinary powerful tool to investigate embryonic development in humans. Essentially, they provide a unique platform for dissecting the distinct mechanisms underlying pluripotency and subsequent lineage commitment. Modest information currently exists about the expression and the role of ion channels during human embryogenesis, organ development, and cell fate determination. Of note, small and intermediate conductance, calcium-activated potassium channels have been reported to modify stem cell behaviour and differentiation. These channels are broadly expressed throughout human tissues and are involved in various cellular processes, such as the after-hyperpolarization in excitable cells, and also in differentiation processes. To this end, human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) generated from plucked human hair keratinocytes have been exploited in vitro to recapitulate endoderm formation and, concomitantly, used to map the expression of the SK channel (SKCa) subtypes over time. Thus, we report the successful generation of definitive endoderm from hiPSCs of ectodermal origin using a highly reproducible and robust differentiation system. Furthermore, we provide the first evidence that SKCas subtypes are dynamically regulated in the transition from a pluripotent stem cell to a more lineage restricted, endodermal progeny.

1. Introduction

Mammalian development is a tightly regulated process, with considerable biochemical and physiological changes occurring from the time of fertilization to the onset of gastrulation and further differentiation towards fully formed organisms. However, understanding early fate decision events, such as segregation of the three germ layers, is a prerequisite for regenerative medicine [15]. The advent of induced pluripotent stem cells and their unique features of unlimited self-renewal and nonrestricted differentiation capacity marked a milestone in the battle to dissect such processes—directly in the context of human development [68]. Given the incredible accordance of embryonic development in vivo and its respective model system in vitro, it is not surprising that most of the currently available pluripotent stem cell differentiation protocols make use of physiological, stage-specific signalling clues in order to recapitulate development of all three germ layers: ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm. Further differentiation towards more specialized cell types has also been achieved, for example, formation of primitive gut tube endoderm (SOX17/Hnf1b positive [9, 10]), pancreatic progenitor cells (Pdx1/Cpa1 positive [11, 12]), and hepatic progenitor cells (AFP/HNF4a positive [13]) from definitive endoderm progenitor cells. Nevertheless, the precise mechanisms governing such complex processes are not completely understood. Another limitation exists in achieving highly homogenous, reproducible cell type-specific yields. As a result, the current use of hiPSCs for disease modelling where the aim is to use in vitro differentiated patient-specific pluripotent stem cells to replace the patients’ damaged cells is massively hindered. In consequence, critically defined, efficient, and robust differentiation protocols are highly anticipated.

Endoderm comprises the innermost of the primary germ layers of an animal embryo and has a primary role to provide the epithelial lining of two major tubes within the body. The first tube, which extends the entire length of the body, is known as the digestive tube and undergoes budding during embryogenesis to form the liver, gallbladder, and pancreas. The second tube, the respiratory tube, forms an outgrowth of the digestive tube and gives rise to the lungs. Notably, two distinct sets of endoderm can be distinguished in the developing embryo: visceral endoderm arising directly from the inner cell mass and definitive endoderm (DE) derived from mesendoderm within the anterior primitive streak in close proximity to the cardiovascular progenitors [1, 1416]. The visceral endoderm forms the epithelial lining of the yolk sac [17] while the DE is responsible for the internal (mucosal) lining of the embryonic gut and is governed by the expression of key transcription factors such as SOX17 [18], Foxa2, or Hex1 [19].

To date, a large group of proteins has been broadly neglected concerning its role during developmental processes, namely, ion channels. In addition to the modulation of the membrane potential in various tissues and cell populations, ion channels were identified to be involved in a number of biological processes, such as proliferation, cell differentiation, and cell morphogenesis. Since these mechanisms are apparently abundant in the transition of stem or progenitor cell populations to more defined cells types of different origin and potency, a role for ion channels in developmental processes can be hypothesized [2023]. In particular, the adsorptive tissues derived from the DE are often rich in ion channels and defects in these channels are responsible for some harmful diseases. One prominent example is cystic fibrosis (CF), a common, autosomal recessive disorder due to mutations in a chloride channel known as the CFTR. Located on the plasma membrane of many epithelial cells, this simple mutation gives rise to abnormalities of salt and fluid transport in many endodermal derived tissues including lung, pancreas, and liver [24]. However the contribution of other ion channel families to diseases within the foregut has been poorly studied.

Indeed, in pluripotent stem cells, activation of small and intermediate conductance calcium activated potassium channels (SK channels; SKCas) triggers the MAPK/ERK pathway following RAS/RAF activation finally, giving rise to cytoskeletal rearrangement, cardiogenesis, and cardiac subtype specification [2, 3, 5, 25]. The group consists of four members, namely, SK1 (KCa 2.1, KCNN1), SK2 (KCa 2.2, KCNN2), SK3 (KCa 2.3, KCNN3), and SK4 (KCa 3.1, KCNN4). The functional form of the ion pore is mediated by the combination of the 4 subunits, respectively. Additionally, widely distributed functional splice variants of SKCas have been found throughout the organism in several tissues [2628]. Functional SKCas are not only constructed as homo- but also as hetero-tetrameric channel proteins, most probably serving a cellular and functional specificity [26, 29]. The pore is opened following subtle elevation of intracellular calcium levels. Calmodulin, attached in a Ca2+-dependent manner to the C-terminal of the channel subunits, specifically binds Ca2+-ions and mediates a conformational change of the channel protein, leading to the opening of the pore [30, 31]. Calcium is the only known physiological activator of SKCas and channel opening occurs within a few milliseconds [31]. SK1-3 are highly expressed in the nervous system where they modify the membrane potential; that is, they crucially contribute to the after-hyperpolarization and therefore regulate the firing pattern, frequency, and length of action potentials in different neuronal networks [3235]. On the other hand, SKCas play important roles in multiple other cellular functions, namely in cerebral and peripheral blood vessel smooth muscle, the functional myocardium, or neural progenitor cells [21, 36, 37].

In the current study, we highlight a robust and efficient differentiation protocol to drive plucked human hair-derived hiPSCs towards definitive endoderm. Furthermore, we analyse changes in protein and mRNA expression in the SKCa family of ion channels in the transition from a pluripotent cell state to a definitive endodermal committed cell type.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Keratinocyte Culture from Plucked Human Hair

Outgrowth of keratinocytes from plucked human hair was induced as described previously [25, 38]. Keratinocytes were split on 20  g/mL collagen IV-coated dishes and cultured in EpiLife medium with HKGS supplement (both Invitrogen, USA). The use of human material in this study has been approved by the ethical committee of the Ulm University (Nr. 0148/2009) and in compliance with the guidelines of the Federal Government of Germany and the Declaration of Helsinki concerning Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects.

2.2. Rat Embryonic Fibroblasts (REFs) Culture

REFs were isolated from day E14 Sprague Dawley rat embryos as described previously [38] and cultured in DMEM supplemented with 15% FCS, 2 mM GlutaMAX, 100  M nonessential amino acids, and 1% Antibiotic-Antimycotic (all Invitrogen). Cells were passaged using 0.125% trypsin digestion when reaching confluence for up to 5 passages. All animal experiments were performed in compliance with the guidelines for the welfare of experimental animals issued by the Federal Government of Germany, the National Institutes of Health, and the Max Planck Society (Nr. O.103).

2.3. Lentivirus Generation

Lentivirus containing a polycistronic expression cassette encoding OCT4, SOX2, KlF4, and cMYC was produced as described previously [3, 25, 38].

2.4. Reprogramming Keratinocytes

Keratinocytes at 75% confluence were infected with proviral genome copies in EpiLife medium supplemented with 8  g/mL polybrene on two subsequent days. On the third day, keratinocytes were transferred onto irradiated REF feeder cells ( cells per well irradiated with 30 Gy). Cells were cultured in hiPSCs medium in a 5% O2 incubator and medium was changed daily. After 3–5 days small colonies appeared, showing a typical hiPSCs like morphology. Around 14 days later, hiPSC colonies had the appropriate size for mechanically passaging and were transferred onto irradiated MEFs or onto Matrigel-coated (BD, USA) dishes for further passaging.

2.5. hiPSC Culture

hiPSCs were initially cultured on feeder cells in Knockout DMEM (Invitrogen) supplemented with 20% Knockout Serum Replacement (Invitrogen), 2 mM GlutaMAX (Invitrogen), 100  M nonessential amino acids (Invitrogen), 1% Antibiotic-Antimycotic (Invitrogen), 100  M β-mercaptoethanol (Millipore, USA), 50  g/mL ascorbic acid, and 10 ng/mL FGF2 (both PeproTech, USA) in a 5% CO2 incubator.

For later passages, hiPSCs were mechanically picked and transferred onto Matrigel-coated dishes (BD) and kept in FTDA medium that contains DMEM/F12-GlutaMax (Invitrogen), 1 ITS (Insulin-Transferrin-Selenium, Invitrogen), 0.1% HSA (Biological Industries, Israel), 1 Lipid mix (Invitrogen), 1 Penicillin-Streptomycin (Millipore), 10 ng/mL FGF2 (PeproTech), 0.5 ng/mL TGF- 1 (PeproTech), 50 nM Dorsomorphin (Sigma, Germany), and 5 ng/mL Activin A (PeproTech) [39]. hiPSCs were cultured in a 5% O2 incubator and medium was changed daily. For splitting cells, hiPSCs colonies were incubated with Dispase (StemCell Technologies, France) for 5–7 min at 37° and subsequently detached using a cell scraper. After brief centrifugation, cells were resuspended in FTDA medium and transferred onto Matrigel-coated dishes. Excision of the viral cassette was achieved by incubation with recombinant TAT-Cre protein (1.5  M for 5 h).

2.6. Monolayer-Based hiPSC Differentiation towards Definitive Endoderm

For DE differentiation, hiPSCs were plated onto Matrigel-coated dishes and cultured in FDTA medium supplemented with 10  M Rock-inhibitor Y-276342 (Ascent, UK) for 24 hours. When the cells reached about 75% confluence, medium was changed to RPMI 1640 medium (Invitrogen) containing 2% FBS (Lonza, CH) with 500 nM IDE1 (R&D systems, USA), 3  M CHIR99021 (Axonemedchem), 5  M LY294002 (Sigma, Germany), and 10 ng/mL BMP4 (PeproTech) for 24 hours. Then, medium was changed to RPMI 1640 medium containing 2% FBS and supplemented with 500 nM IDE1 and 5  L LY294002 for two days. From day 3 on, cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 500 nm IDE1, 5 µM LY294002, and 50 ng/mL FGF2. The respective figure contains an experimental outline illustrating detailed culture conditions and treatment regimens [4045] (Figure 2(a)).

2.7. Immunocytochemistry

Immunofluorescence has been previously described [5]. Nuclei were stained with DAPI. Primary antibodies were used as follows: SK1/2 (both 1 : 100, Sigma), SK3 (1 : 100, Alomone Labs, Israel), SK4 (1 : 100, Cell Applications, USA), SOX17 (1 : 500, R&D systems), and FOXA2 (1 : 100, Santa Cruz, USA). hiPSC lines were characterized using the StemLite Pluripotency Antibody Kit (Cell Signaling, USA). Fluorescence labelled secondary antibodies were Alexa Fluor 488 and Alexa Fluor 568 (both Invitrogen). Images were captured using an upright fluorescence microscope (Axioskop 2, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) equipped with a Zeiss CCD camera and analysed using Axiovision software (Zeiss) [46].

2.8. Quantitative One-Step Real Time

RT-PCR (qPCR) Analysis was performed as previously described. Briefly, one-step real-time qPCR was carried out with the LightCycler System (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) using the QuantiTect SYBR Green RT-PCR kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Relative transcript expression was expressed as the ratio of target gene concentration to the housekeeping gene hydroxymethylbilane synthase (HMBS) [47, 48].

2.9. FACS Analysis

For flow cytometry cells were harvested with TrypLE (Invitrogen) for 7 min at 37°C to obtain single-cells suspension. Next, cells were washed twice with PBS, blocked with 5% HSA-solution (in PBS) to avoid unspecific binding of the antibodies to the Fc-receptor. Cells were washed again with PBS and incubated for 40 min at 4°C with CXCR4-PE (Invitrogen), subsequently c-Kit-APC (Invitrogen) was added for additional 10 min at 4°C in FACS buffer (2% FCS in PBS), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were washed with FACS buffer, 50 ng/mL DAPI was added, to exclude dead cells from analysis, and the samples were directly analysed on a LSRII flow cytometer (BD).

For intracellular SOX17 staining cells were washed twice with PBS, blocked with 5% HSA-solution (in PBS) to avoid unspecific binding of the antibodies to the Fc-receptor. Cells were washed again with PBS and the pellet was resuspended in 4% PFA and incubated for 15 min at 37°C for fixation. Subsequently the cell pellet was resuspended in 0.5% Saponin in FACS buffer (saponin buffer) and incubated for 30 min on ice. Cells were pelleted and stained with SOX17 (1 : 100, R&D systems) at 4°C for one hour. Cells were washed with saponin buffer and afterwards incubated for 30 min at 4°C with anti-goat Alexa Fluor 647. Finally cells were washed with FACS buffer and directly analysed on an LSRII flow cytometer (BD).

2.10. Statistical Analysis

If not stated otherwise, error bars indicate standard deviations. Calculations were done with GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego,

3. Results

3.1. Reprogramming Human Hair-Derived Keratinocytes to hiPSCs

For the depicted studies we utilized keratinocyte cultures from plucked human hair of healthy individuals (Figure 1(a)). With the use of a lentiviral, multicistronic four-factor reprogramming system, keratinocytes were successfully reprogrammed to human induced pluripotent stem cells displaying embryonic stem cell like morphology (Figure 1(a)) as well as hallmarks of pluripotency tested via immunohistochemistry and qRT-PCR for the expression of embryonic stem cell markers. Several lines of more than 5 individuals (data not shown or reported in [3, 25, 38]) were tested for their proliferation and differentiation capacity and subsequently two lines were selected, named “hiPSC_1 and hiPSC_2.” Both lines were additionally tested for the protein expression of OCT4, SOX2, NANOG, SSEA4, TRA1-60, and TRA1-81 (Figure 1(b)) and mRNA levels of three pluripotency markers (OCT4, SOX2, NANOG). At the pluripotent stage definitive endoderm makers (FOXA2, SOX17) and markers for pancreatic progenitors (PTFA1, PDX1) were negative (Figure 1(d)). Additionally, all lines were capable of differentiating into cells of all 3 germ-layers, as shown by -3-tubulin (neurons—ectoderm), -actinin (muscle cells—mesoderm), and -fetoprotein (liver cells—endoderm) (Figure 1(c)). One line was further treated with recombinant Cre protein to excise the reprogramming STEMCCA cassette being flanked with loxp sites. To test for successful excision, PCR amplification of the STEMCCA cassette was performed in cre- and nontreated iPS cell clones from this respective line showing the band only in controls (Figure 1(e)). Taken together, our established hiPSC lines display an embryonic stem cell like phenotype, proven by morphology and expression of pluripotency markers as well as absent mRNA for endodermal markers.

3.2. Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Can Be Differentiated to Cells Representing the Definitive Endoderm

To test the differentiation potential of our established hiPSC lines into definitive endoderm (DE), previously published protocols were combined in terms of a small molecule-driven approach [4345]. Small molecule-based assays are less biased by batch-to-batch variations and are usually more cost effective. Upon extensive testing of different combinations, our protocol led to the following replacements of established growth factors being known to drive definitive endoderm differentiation: CHIR90021 replaced Wnt3a [40], IDE1 replaced Activin A [41], and LY294002 inhibited the AKT signalling pathway to abolish pluripotency [42]. Figure 2(a) represents a detailed scheme of the differentiation conditions used for the formation of DE from day 0 (undifferentiated pluripotent hiPSCs) to day 6 (definitive endodermal cells). In vitro differentiated hiPSCs became positive for endodermal markers, confirmed by positive immunostaining of cells on day 5 for FOXA2 and SOX17 (Figure 2(b)). To analyse and characterize the SOX17 expression more objectively, we quantified SOX17 expression via intracellular FACS analysis in a time course from day 3 to day 6 of the applied protocol. Figure 2(c) shows representative FACS plots from both lines, representing SOX17 positive cells on day 3 and day 5. We did not observe differences in the differentiation capacity of virus-free hiPSCs after excision of the reprogramming cassette in comparison to virus-containing cells, making further analyses of silencing of exogenous factors unnecessary (Figure 2(d)). In summary, SOX17 expression is increasing from approximately 45% at day 3 to nearly 80% of SOX17 positive cells on day 6. Recent publications depict CXCR4 and c-KIT positive cells as definitive endoderm progenitors, that give rise to self-renewing endodermal progenitor cells (EPCs) [49]. To confirm our protocol, we did time course analysis by flow cytometry for CXCR4 and c-KIT positive cells during differentiation. Figure 2(e) shows representative FACS plots of CXCR4 and c-KIT positive cells of the two hiPSC lines on day 3 and 5. Two independent experiments for each line were summarized and shown from day 2 to 7 of endodermal differentiation. From day 2 on, the double positive population (CXCR4 and c-KIT) is steadily increasing in both lines. The maximum is reached with almost 90% double positive cells for hiPSC_1 and almost 80% for hiPSC_2 (Figure 2(d)). Again there was no relevant difference upon excision of the reprogramming cassette (Figure 2(f)).

To further confirm the definitive endodermal identity of the differentiated lines, we measured mRNA levels using qRT-PCR analysis for OCT4, SOX17, and FOXA2. From day 1 to day 5 mRNA levels for the pluripotency marker OCT4 decrease continuously (Figure 2(g), summarized for hiPSC 1 and hiPSC 2). SOX17 and FOXA2 levels were tested in the two established hiPSC lines during differentiation and displayed increasing mRNA levels from day 1 to day 5 (Figure 2(g)). This data clearly indicates that the investigated hiPSC lines can be differentiated into DE, loosing markers of pluripotency and up regulating the expression of endodermal markers during endoderm formation.

3.3. Expression of Calcium-Activated Potassium Channels (SKCas) during DE Differentiation

Next, we had a closer look on the expression of the different SKCas subtypes during DE differentiation. hiPSCs were differentiated into DE cells and expression of SKCa was investigated after 5 days of differentiation. On day 5 SOX17 is strongly expressed indicating the differentiation into DE cells (Figure 3(a)). To analyse the expression of the SKCas, DE cells were stained for the different SKCa subtypes. Immunofluorescence analyses show a quite strong and stable expression of SK1, SK2, and SK3 whereas SK4 seems to be expressed at a lower level (Figure 3(b)). SK1, 2, and 4 are localized in the cytoplasm and the cell membrane. However, SK3 is not only localized at the cell membrane but also as PUNCTUA in the nuclei (Figure 3(c)). This is a finding that needs to be analysed in further studies. Double immunofluorescence staining for SOX17 and respective channel proteins are shown in Supplementary Figure 1 available online at

mRNA expression analysis via quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) shows a relative constant expression of SK1 and SK2 during DE differentiation (Figure 3(d)). In contrast, transcript levels of SK3 obviously increased after 4 days of differentiation (Figure 3(d)). SK4 mRNAs levels marginally increased during the first days of differentiation and peaked on day 3, followed by a sharp decline up to day 5 (Figure 3(d)). To note, all four SKCa subtypes are expressed during DE differentiation. SK1 and SK2 are constantly expressed whereas SK3 seems to be up regulated during ongoing DE differentiation. The transcript levels of the different SKCa subtypes on day 5 reflect our observations of the immunofluorescence analysis. In sum, all 4 SK subtypes are differentially expressed during DE differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells with a yet undescribed localization of SK3 in the nucleus.

4. Discussion

In the current study, we provide proof of the concept that plucked human hair-derived iPSCs are highly potent in their capacity to commit not only towards mesoderm [3] and neuroectoderm [25] but also towards the endodermal germ layer, particularly definitive endoderm. To this end, a newly adopted protocol based on previously published studies was applied and resulting cells were extensively characterized by gene expression analysis, immunofluorescence microscopy, and FACS-staining for intracellular and surface markers defining the definitive endoderm signature.

As induced pluripotent cells are currently considered to resemble human embryonic stem cells, a state-of-the-art assay for hiPSC generation is required. Such an assay requires the following prerequisites: (i) noninvasive harvest of the cell type of origin, (ii) broad applicability in terms of guided differentiation to all three germ layers, (iii) useful for large-scale hiPSC biobanking, (iv) highly efficient, and (v) fast reprogramming to the hiPSC stage. Keratinocytes from the outer root sheath of plucked human hair represent such a cell source and thus points towards the generation of patient-specific human induced pluripotent stem cells as a new paradigm for modelling human disease and for individualizing drug testing. Previously, we have further optimized this method in terms of efficiency and speed by using rat embryonic fibroblasts as a feeder layer for keratinocyte reprogramming [38]. The arising hiPSCs fulfilled all the prerequisites of pluripotency including teratoma formation and spontaneous three-germ layer differentiation.

In further studies, we have applied plucked hair-derived hiPSCs to guide differentiation towards motoneurons [25] and cardiac pacemaker cells [3], both representing highly specified cell types from either ectodermal or mesodermal origin. However, their differentiation capacity to give rise to definitive and primitive gut tube endoderm remained elusive. While forming, definitive endoderm is incorporated by morphogenetic movements into a primitive gut tube stage. This in turn is patterned into foregut, midgut, and hindgut to form the functional epithelial compartment of multiple internal organs: liver, intestines, lungs, and the pancreas [50]. Nowadays, virtually every cell population arising from the primitive gut tube has been generated using guided differentiation of pluripotent cells towards liver, intestines, lungs, and the pancreas [5153]. Thus, the induction of DE cells marks a prerequisite for the entire process of pluripotent stem cell differentiation into, for example, pancreatic or hepatic progenitor cells [54, 55]. Several protocols have been developed and modified to increase the efficiency of DE commitment. All these protocols are strongly dependent on high doses of TGF signalling mediated by Activin A as the major driving force of the process. However, large-scale differentiation experiments should be cost effective, thus, making a small molecule-based assay more desirable. To this end, we combined several previously described strategies. First, we replaced Activin A by IDE1, a compound having shown to display similar but also superior characteristics compared to Nodal or Activin A [41]. Similarly, we substituted Wnt3a by the small molecule CHIR90021 that inhibits GSK 3 kinase to mimic Wnt signalling [40]. The third small molecule LY294002 inhibited the AKT signalling pathway, by repressing PI3K, to promote the exit from pluripotency [42]. In consequence, a robust and reproducible assay was developed which shows to be effective in several human plucked hair-derived iPSCs. As the formation of definitive endoderm is a prerequisite to obtain, for example, relevant numbers of pancreatic -cells, our data in combination with the presented reprogramming strategy are highly relevant for human disease modelling approaches.

However, several studies have suggested that -cells generated from human pluripotent stem cells lack adult, and at the most reach, fetal maturity as particularly expressed by their polyhormonality. This observation reinforces the notion that establishing culture conditions that promote appropriate maturation represents a significant obstacle for the generation of functional -cells in vitro [56]. A recent landmark paper identified self-renewing definitive endodermal progenitor cells as a potential cell source to bypass this limitation. -cells generated from these cells showed features of adult maturity as even shown by functional assays [57]. Given the fact that all published protocols so far lack this feature, the quality of the definitive endodermal intermediate seems to have an impact on the final maturity. The generation of definitive endodermal progenitor cells was characterized by high positivity for c-KIT and CXCR4 [57]. Thus, we included in our current DE analysis an FACS-based tool and indeed succeeded in obtaining a pattern likely to allow the isolation of this distinct cell type. The similar differentiation capacity of all our analysed plucked human hair-derived iPSCs is relevant to the field of disease modelling, using patient-specific material. Plucked hair keratinocytes are more or less the only cell type, which matches the above criteria. Nevertheless, a potential ectodermally biased epigenetic memory could limit their utility [58]. Our finding abolishes such a bias at least based on the number of different cell lines and the reproducible endodermal commitment pattern.

The development of in vitro models underlying embryonic development is a prerequisite to build new knowledge and to develop new strategies targeting various genetic diseases. The development and investigation of endoderm-derived cells are such as pancreatic cells, are of high importance for the field of developmental biology and clinical implications. Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) with their unique features of unlimited self-renewal and nonrestricted differentiation capacity are a highly promising tool for regenerative medicine as well as for studies on developmental biology. iPSCs have been generated from a variety of different cells types originating from all three-germ layers [38, 58, 59]. Finally, this setup has been used to determine the expression pattern of a certain ion channel family which has been previously shown to be differentially regulated in embryonic stem cells and involved in differentiation processes, namely, small and intermediate conductance calcium-activated potassium channels [2, 3, 5, 60]. Thus, our study gives novel insights into guided pluripotent stem cell differentiation towards definitive endoderm and a potentially involved protein family.

SKCas either exhibit small (SK1, KCa2.1, Kcnn1; SK2, KCa2.2, Kcnn2; and SK3, KCa2.3, Kcnn3) or intermediate (SK4, IK, KCa3.1, and Kcnn4) unitary conductance for K+ ions. Important roles in multiple cellular functions, for example, cell cycle regulation in cancer cells [20, 61], smooth muscle relaxation [23, 62], mesenchymal stem cell proliferation [22], and cytoskeleton reorganization in neural progenitors [21] have been reported. SKCas are widely expressed throughout all different tissues. While SK1 is exclusively expressed in the central nervous system, SK2 is more widely expressed in different organs arising from different germ layers such as brain, liver, or heart. SK3 is the most widespread expressed isoform with a predominant expression pattern in the central nervous system but also in smooth muscle rich tissue. SK4 can be detected in inflammatory cell-rich, surface-rich, and secretory tissues such as the pancreas [63]. In the pancreas, for example, SK4 regulates glucose homeostasis and enzyme secretion of acinar cells [64, 65]. Moreover, SKCas are overexpressed in a variety of cancers, including pancreatic cancer [20] and, for example, SK3 was shown to be involved in cancer cell migration [66]. Nevertheless, the role of SKCas in developmental processes remains enigmatic though it is well accepted that cell differentiation and maturation affect the expression patterns of ion channels. Our group has shed for the first time light on their role in differentiating pluripotent stem cells derived from mouse and men [2, 3, 5, 25]. A potential role of SKCas was already suggested by their differentially regulated expression pattern. In fact, it temporally coincides with the commitment of the cardiovascular progenitor showing an expression peak of the respective isoform around day 5 [5]. In consequence, we aimed to address the expression pattern of SKCas in the developing endoderm using plucked human hair-derived iPSCs as a bona fide modelling system. Interestingly, the differential regulation of most SKCa isoforms was relatively modest. Albeit SK2 and SK4 show a slight expression peak around day 2/3, the only regulated isoform seems to be SK3 showing a continuously increasing expression with ongoing DE formation. Interestingly, reports showing SK3 expression in DE-derived organs are restricted to a handful of studies showing SK3 expression in epithelial cancer cells and a liver-specific splice variant [67, 68]. Further studies including gain and loss of function approaches within the same assay have to clarify the respective functions of SKCa isoforms with DE formation and later maturation processes towards liver and pancreas.

To summarize, we present an efficient, novel, and robust DE formation assay being suitable for ectoderm-derived plucked human hair iPSCs. Given the prerequisites for reprogramming fulfilled by plucked human hair, a robust DE assay for this particular iPSCs type is highly relevant for disease modelling approaches. Subsequently, we have identified dynamic expression of the SKCa family of proteins during DE formation.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Authors’ Contribution

Anett Illing and Marianne Stockmann contributed equally.


The authors thank Stefanie Fischer, Ralf Köhntop, and Sabine Seltenheim for the excellent technical assistance enabling research to be conducted in our laboratories. The authors thank all members of the Kleger and Liebau lab for discussing and critically reading the paper. The research that enabled this paper was funded by a Fellowship by the Medical Faculty of Ulm University (Bausteinprogramm, L. SBR.0011) and by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (KL 2544/1-1, SL BO1718/4-1), the German Foundation for Heart Research (F/34/11; to AK and SL), Boehringer-Ingelheim BIU (N5 to SL; C1 to AK), the virtual Helmholtz-Institute (VH-VI-510 to SL), and the Else-Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung (2011_ A200; to AK and SL). AK is indebted to the Baden-Württemberg Stiftung for the financial support of this research project by the Eliteprogramme for Postdocs. The authors apologize to authors whose work has not been covered or directly cited due to space limitations.

Supplementary Materials

Immunofluorescence analysis of Calcium-activated Potassium Channels during definitive endoderm differentiation

  1. Supplementary Material


  1. A. M. Zorn and J. M. Wells, “Vertebrate endoderm development and organ formation,” Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 25, pp. 221–251, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. A. Kleger and S. Liebau, “Calcium-activated potassium channels, cardiogenesis of pluripotent stem cells, and enrichment of pacemaker-like cells,” Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 74–83, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. M. Muller, M. Stockmann, D. Malan et al., “Ca2+ activated K channels-new tools to induce cardiac commitment from pluripotent stem cells in mice and men,” Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 720–740, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. A. Kleger, C. Loebnitz, G. V. Pusapati et al., “Protein kinase D2 is an essential regulator of murine myoblast differentiation,” PLoS One, vol. 6, no. 1, Article ID e14599, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. A. Kleger, T. Seufferlein, D. Malan et al., “Modulation of calcium-activated potassium channels induces cardiogenesis of pluripotent stem cells and enrichment of pacemaker-like cells,” Circulation, vol. 122, no. 18, pp. 1823–1836, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. Liebau, P. U. Mahaddalkar, H. A. Kestler, A. Illing, T. Seufferlein, and A. Kleger, “A hierarchy in reprogramming capacity in different tissue microenvironments: what we know and what we need to know,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 695–706, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. L. Linta, M. Stockmann, T. M. Boeckers, A. Kleger, and S. Liebau, “The potential of iPS cells in synucleinopathy research,” Stem Cells International, vol. 2012, Article ID 629230, 6 pages, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. A. Kleger, P. U. Mahaddalkar, S. F. Katz et al., “Increased reprogramming capacity of mouse liver progenitor cells, compared with differentiated liver cells, requires the BAF complex,” Gastroenterology, vol. 142, no. 4, pp. 907–917, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. S. Chen, M. Borowiak, J. L. Fox et al., “A small molecule that directs differentiation of human ESCs into the pancreatic lineage,” Nature Chemical Biology, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 258–265, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. K. A. D'Amour, A. G. Bang, S. Eliazer et al., “Production of pancreatic hormone-expressing endocrine cells from human embryonic stem cells,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 1392–1401, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. N. Shiraki, T. Yoshida, K. Araki et al., “Guided differentiation of embryonic stem cells into Pdx1-expressing regional-specific definitive endoderm,” Stem Cells, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 874–885, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. Q. Zhou, A. C. Law, J. Rajagopal, W. J. Anderson, P. A. Gray, and D. A. Melton, “A multipotent progenitor domain guides pancreatic organogenesis,” Developmental Cell, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 103–114, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. T. Touboul, N. R. Hannan, S. Corbineau et al., “Generation of functional hepatocytes from human embryonic stem cells under chemically defined conditions that recapitulate liver development,” Hepatology, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 1754–1765, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. S. J. Arnold and E. J. Robertson, “Making a commitment: cell lineage allocation and axis patterning in the early mouse embryo,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 91–103, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. K. A. Lawson, J. J. Meneses, and R. A. Pedersen, “Clonal analysis of epiblast fate during germ layer formation in the mouse embryo,” Development, vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 891–911, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  16. A. Rodaway and R. Patient, “Mesendoderm: an ancient germ layer?” Cell, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 169–172, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. Y. Kadokawa, Y. Kato, and G. Eguchi, “Cell lineage analysis of the primitive and visceral endoderm of mouse embryos cultured in vitro,” Cell Differentiation, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 69–76, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. Kanai-Azuma, Y. Kanai, J. M. Gad et al., “Depletion of definitive gut endoderm in Sox17-null mutant mice,” Development, vol. 129, no. 10, pp. 2367–2379, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  19. A. H. Hart, L. Hartley, K. Sourris et al., “Mixl1 is required for axial mesendoderm morphogenesis and patterning in the murine embryo,” Development, vol. 129, no. 15, pp. 3597–3608, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  20. H. Jäger, T. Dreker, A. Buck, K. Giehl, T. Gress, and S. Grissmer, “Blockage of intermediate-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels inhibit human pancreatic cancer cell growth in vitro,” Molecular Pharmacology, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 630–638, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. S. Liebau, B. Vaida, C. Proepper et al., “Formation of cellular projections in neural progenitor cells depends on SK3 channel activity,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 101, no. 5, pp. 1338–1350, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. S. P. Wang, J. A. Wang, R. H. Luo, W. Y. Cui, and H. Wang, “Potassium channel currents in rat mesenchymal stem cells and their possible roles in cell proliferation,” Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 1077–1084, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. D. L. Tharp, B. R. Wamhoff, J. R. Turk, and D. K. Bowles, “Upregulation of intermediate-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channel (IKCa1) mediates phenotypic modulation of coronary smooth muscle,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 291, no. 5, pp. H2493–H2503, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. A. P. Wong, C. E. Bear, S. Chin et al., “Directed differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells into mature airway epithelia expressing functional CFTR protein,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 876–882, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  25. M. Stockmann, L. Linta, K. J. Fohr et al., “Developmental and functional nature of human iPSC derived motoneurons,” Stem Cell Reviews, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. B. E. Shmukler, C. T. Bond, S. Wilhelm et al., “Structure and complex transcription pattern of the mouse SK1 KCa channel gene, KCNN1,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1518, no. 1-2, pp. 36–46, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. T. Strassmaier, C. T. Bond, C. A. Sailer, H. G. Knaus, J. Maylie, and J. P. Adelman, “A novel isoform of SK2 assembles with other SK subunits in mouse brain,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 22, pp. 21231–21236, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. H. Tomita, V. G. Shakkottai, G. A. Gutman et al., “Novel truncated isoform of SK3 potassium channel is a potent dominant-negative regulator of SK currents: implications in schizophrenia,” Molecular Psychiatry, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 524–535, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. D. Tuteja, S. Rafizadeh, V. Timofeyev et al., “Cardiac small conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channel subunits form heteromultimers via the coiled-coil domains in the C termini of the channels,” Circulation Research, vol. 107, no. 7, pp. 851–859, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. M. A. Schumacher, A. F. Rivard, H. P. Bächinger, and J. P. Adelman, “Structure of the gating domain of a Ca2+-activated K+ channel complexed with Ca2+/calmodulin,” Nature, vol. 410, no. 6832, pp. 1120–1124, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. X. M. Xia, B. Fakler, A. Rivard et al., “Mechanism of calcium gating in small-conductance calcium-activated potassium channels,” Nature, vol. 395, no. 6701, pp. 503–507, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. P. Sah and E. M. McLachlan, “Potassium currents contributing to action potential repolarization and the afterhyperpolarization in rat vagal motoneurons,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 1834–1841, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  33. M. Stocker, “Ca2+-activated K+ channels: molecular determinants and function of the SK family,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 758–770, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. N. Rouchet, O. Waroux, C. Lamy et al., “SK channel blockade promotes burst firing in dorsal raphe serotonergic neurons,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1108–1115, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. O. Waroux, L. Massotte, L. Alleva et al., “SK channels control the firing pattern of midbrain dopaminergic neurons in vivo,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 3111–3121, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. M. P. Davies, R. H. An, P. Doevendans, S. Kubalak, K. R. Chien, and R. S. Kass, “Developmental changes in ionic channel activity in the embryonic murine heart,” Circulation Research, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 15–25, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  37. L. Lu, Q. Zhang, V. Timofeyev et al., “Molecular coupling of a Ca2+-activated K+ channel to L-type Ca2+ channels via α-actinin2,” Circulation Research, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 112–120, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. L. Linta, M. Stockmann, K. N. Kleinhans et al., “Rat embryonic fibroblasts improve reprogramming of human keratinocytes into induced pluripotent stem cells,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 965–976, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  39. S. Frank, M. Zhang, H. R. Scholer, and B. Greber, “Small molecule-assisted, line-independent maintenance of human pluripotent stem cells in defined conditions,” PLoS One, vol. 7, Article ID e41958, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  40. Y. Kunisada, N. Tsubooka-Yamazoe, M. Shoji, and M. Hosoya, “Small molecules induce efficient differentiation into insulin-producing cells from human induced pluripotent stem cells,” Stem Cell Research, vol. 8, pp. 274–284, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  41. M. Borowiak, R. Maehr, S. Chen et al., “Small molecules efficiently direct endodermal differentiation of mouse and human embryonic stem cells,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 348–358, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. C. H. Cho, N. R. Hannan, F. M. Docherty et al., “Inhibition of activin/nodal signalling is necessary for pancreatic differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells,” Diabetologia, vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 3284–3295, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. M. Hosoya, Y. Kunisada, A. Kurisaki, and M. Asashima, “Induction of differentiation of undifferentiated cells into pancreatic beta cells in vertebrates,” The International Journal of Developmental Biology, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 313–323, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. Y. Kunisada, N. Tsubooka-Yamazoe, M. Shoji, and M. Hosoya, “Small molecules induce efficient differentiation into insulin-producing cells from human induced pluripotent stem cells,” Stem Cell Research, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 274–284, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. Y. Kunisada, M. Shoji, and M. Hosoya, “A gene expression-based screening system for compounds influencing differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells,” Journal of Biomolecular Screening, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 140–151, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. N. Azoitei, G. V. Pusapati, A. Kleger et al., “Protein kinase D2 is a crucial regulator of tumour cell—endothelial cell communication in gastrointestinal tumours,” Gut, vol. 59, no. 10, pp. 1316–1330, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. A. Kleger, T. Busch, S. Liebau et al., “The bioactive lipid sphingosylphosphorylcholine induces differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells and human promyelocytic leukaemia cells,” Cellular Signalling, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 367–377, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. A. Kleger, S. Liebau, Q. Lin, G. von Wichert, and T. Seufferlein, “The impact of bioactive lipids on cardiovascular development,” Stem Cells International, vol. 2011, Article ID 916180, 13 pages, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. X. Cheng, L. Ying, L. Lu et al., “Self-renewing endodermal progenitor lines generated from human pluripotent stem cells,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 371–384, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. A. E. Chen, M. Borowiak, R. I. Sherwood, A. Kweudjeu, and D. A. Melton, “Functional evaluation of ES cell-derived endodermal populations reveals differences between Nodal and Activin A-guided differentiation,” Development, vol. 140, no. 3, pp. 675–686, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. M. D. Green, A. Chen, M. C. Nostro et al., “Generation of anterior foregut endoderm from human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 267–273, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. M. C. Nostro, F. Sarangi, S. Ogawa et al., “Stage-specific signaling through TGFβ family members and WNT regulates patterning and pancreatic specification of human pluripotent stem cells,” Development, vol. 138, no. 5, pp. 861–871, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. J. R. Spence, C. N. Mayhew, S. A. Rankin et al., “Directed differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells into intestinal tissue in vitro,” Nature, vol. 470, no. 7332, pp. 105–109, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. F. Li, Z. He, Y. Li et al., “Combined activin A/LiCl/Noggin treatment improves production of mouse embryonic stem cell-derived definitive endoderm cells,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 1022–1034, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. P. Wang, R. T. Rodriguez, J. Wang, A. Ghodasara, and S. K. Kim, “Targeting SOX17 in human embryonic stem cells creates unique strategies for isolating and analyzing developing endoderm,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 335–346, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. S. J. Micallef, X. Li, J. V. Schiesser et al., “INS(GFP/w) human embryonic stem cells facilitate isolation of in vitro derived insulin-producing cells,” Diabetologia, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 694–706, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. X. Cheng, L. Ying, L. Lu et al., “Self-renewing endodermal progenitor lines generated from human pluripotent stem cells,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 371–384, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  58. O. Bar-Nur, H. A. Russ, S. Efrat, and N. Benvenisty, “Epigenetic memory and preferential lineage-specific differentiation in induced pluripotent stem cells derived from human pancreatic islet beta cells,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 17–23, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. M. Kajiwara, T. Aoi, K. Okita et al., “Donor-dependent variations in hepatic differentiation from human-induced pluripotent stem cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 31, pp. 12538–12543, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. S. Liebau, M. Tischendorf, D. Ansorge et al., “An inducible expression system of the calcium-activated potassium channel 4 to study the differential impact on embryonic stem cells,” Stem Cells International, vol. 2011, Article ID 456815, 12 pages, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. O. Gavrilova-Ruch, K. Schönherr, G. Gessner et al., “Effects of imipramine on ion channels and proliferation of IGR1 melanoma cells,” Journal of Membrane Biology, vol. 188, no. 2, pp. 137–149, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. S. Ro, W. J. Hatton, S. D. Koh, and B. Horowitz, “Molecular properties of small-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels expressed in murine colonic smooth muscle,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 281, no. 4, pp. G964–G973, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  63. M. X. Chen, S. A. Gorman, B. Benson et al., “Small and intermediate conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels confer distinctive patterns of distribution in human tissues and differential cellular localisation in the colon and corpus cavernosum,” Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology, vol. 369, no. 6, pp. 602–615, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. S. Ohya, T. Fujimori, T. Kimura, H. Yamamura, and Y. Imaizumi, “Novel spliced variants of large-conductance Ca2+-activated K+-channel β2-subunit in human and rodent pancreas,” Journal of Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 198–205, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. G. Drews, “Physiological significance of SK4 channels in pancreatic β-cell oscillations,” Islets, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 148–150, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  66. M. Potier, V. Joulin, S. Roger et al., “Identification of SK3 channel as a new mediator of breast cancer cell migration,” Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 2946–2953, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. M. L. Palmer, K. R. Schiller, and S. M. O'Grady, “Apical SK potassium channels and Ca2+-dependent anion secretion in endometrial epithelial cells,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 586, no. 3, pp. 717–726, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. E. T. Barfod, A. L. Moore, and S. D. Lidofsky, “Cloning and functional expression of a liver isoform of the small conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channel SK3,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 280, no. 4, pp. C836–C842, 2001. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Anett Illing et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.