Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Stem Cells International
Volume 2016, Article ID 4069543, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4069543
Research Article

Identification of CHD1L as an Important Regulator for Spermatogonial Stem Cell Survival and Self-Renewal

Department of Histology and Embryology, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China

Received 28 September 2016; Accepted 27 October 2016

Academic Editor: Qingzhong Xiao

Copyright © 2016 Shan-Shan Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. N.-F. Ma, L. H. Hu, J. M. Fung et al., “Isolation and characterization of a novel oncogene, amplified in liver cancer 1, within a commonly amplified region at 1q21 in hepatocellular carcinoma,” Hepatology, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 503–510, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. N. Hirschhorn, S. A. Brown, C. D. Clark, and F. Winston, “Evidence that SNF2/SWI2 and SNF5 activate transcription in yeast by altering chromatin structure,” Genes & Development, vol. 6, no. 12 A, pp. 2288–2298, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. Flaus, D. M. A. Martin, G. J. Barton, and T. Owen-Hughes, “Identification of multiple distinct Snf2 subfamilies with conserved structural motifs,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 2887–2905, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. D. Ahel, Z. Hořejší, N. Wiechens et al., “Poly(ADP-ribose)-dependent regulation of DNA repair by the chromatin remodeling enzyme ALC1,” Science, vol. 325, no. 5945, pp. 1240–1243, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. J. Gottschalk, G. Timinszky, S. E. Kong et al., “Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation directs recruitment and activation of an ATP-dependent chromatin remodeler,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 33, pp. 13770–13774, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. B. R. Cairns, “Chromatin remodeling complexes: strength in diversity, precision through specialization,” Current Opinion in Genetics and Development, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 185–190, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. J. Morrison, J. Highland, N. J. Krogan et al., “INO80 and γ-H2AX interaction links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling to DNA damage repair,” Cell, vol. 119, no. 6, pp. 767–775, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. V. Saladi and I. L. de la Serna, “ATP dependent chromatin remodeling enzymes in embryonic stem cells,” Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 62–73, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. Q. T. Wang, K. Piotrowska, M. A. Ciemerych et al., “A genome-wide study of gene activity reveals developmental signaling pathways in the preimplantation mouse embryo,” Developmental Cell, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 133–144, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. C. Snider, D. Leong, Q. T. Wang, J. Wysocka, M. W. M. Yao, and M. P. Scott, “The chromatin remodeling factor Chd1l is required in the preimplantation embryo,” Biology Open, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 121–131, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. B.-H. Jiang, W.-Y. Chen, H.-Y. Li et al., “CHD1L regulated PARP1-driven pluripotency and chromatin remodeling during the early-stage cell reprogramming,” Stem Cells, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 2961–2972, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. X. Meng, M. Lindahl, M. E. Hyvönen et al., “Regulation of cell fate decision of undifferentiated spermatogonia by GDNF,” Science, vol. 287, no. 5457, pp. 1489–1493, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. C. K. Naughton, S. Jain, A. M. Strickland, A. Gupta, and J. Milbrandt, “Glial cell-line derived neurotrophic factor-mediated RET signaling regulates spermatogonial stem cell fate,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 314–321, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. K. Ishii, M. Kanatsu-Shinohara, S. Toyokuni, and T. Shinohara, “FGF2 mediates mouse spermatogonial stem cell self-renewal via upregulation of Etv5 and Bcl6b through MAP2K1 activation,” Development, vol. 139, no. 10, pp. 1734–1743, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. M. Oatley, M. R. Avarbock, A. I. Telaranta, D. T. Fearon, and R. L. Brinster, “Identifying genes important for spermatogonial stem cell self-renewal and survival,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 25, pp. 9524–9529, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. X. Wu, J. M. Oatley, M. J. Oatley, A. V. Kaucher, M. R. Avarbock, and R. L. Brinster, “The POU domain transcription factor POU3F1 is an important intrinsic regulator of GDNF-induced survival and self-renewal of mouse spermatogonial stem cells,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 82, no. 6, pp. 1103–1111, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. X. Wu, S. M. Goodyear, J. W. Tobias, M. R. Avarbock, and R. L. Brinster, “Spermatogonial stem cell self-renewal requires ETV5-mediated downstream activation of brachyury in mice,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 1114–1123, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. X.-X. Mei, J. Wang, and J. Wu, “Extrinsic and intrinsic factors controlling spermatogonial stem cell self-renewal and differentiation,” Asian Journal of Andrology, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 347–354, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. E. Falender, R. N. Freiman, K. G. Geles et al., “Maintenance of spermatogenesis requires TAF4b, a gonad-specific subunit of TFIID,” Genes and Development, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 794–803, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. Z. Sahin, A. Szczepny, E. A. Mclaughlin et al., “Dynamic Hedgehog signalling pathway activity in germline stem cells,” Andrology, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 267–274, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. P. E. Szabó, K. Hübner, H. Schöler, and J. R. Mann, “Allele-specific expression of imprinted genes in mouse migratory primordial germ cells,” Mechanisms of Development, vol. 115, no. 1-2, pp. 157–160, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. Y. Sun, K. Tao, J.-J. Tu, W.-B. Zhu, and L.-Q. Fan, “Establishment of a long-term culture system for mouse spermatogonial stem cells in vitro,” National Journal of Andrology, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 695–700, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. Kanatsu-Shinohara, N. Ogonuki, K. Inoue et al., “Long-term proliferation in culture and germline transmission of mouse male germline stem cells,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 612–616, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. D. G. de Rooij and J. A. Grootegoed, “Spermatogonial stem cells,” Current Opinion in Cell Biology, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 694–701, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. H. Kubota, M. R. Avarbock, and R. L. Brinster, “Spermatogonial stem cells share some, but not all, phenotypic and functional characteristics with other stem cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 11, pp. 6487–6492, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. R. I. McLachlan, N. G. Wreford, D. M. de Kretser, and D. M. Robertson, “The effects of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone on the restoration of spermatogenesis in the gonadotropin-releasing hormone-immunized adult rat,” Endocrinology, vol. 136, no. 9, pp. 4035–4043, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. R. A. J. Tagelenbosch and D. G. de Rooij, “A quantitative study of spermatogonial multiplication and stem cell renewal in the C3H/101 F1 hybrid mouse,” Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, vol. 290, no. 2, pp. 193–200, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. J. A. Costoya, R. M. Hobbs, M. Barna et al., “Essential role of Plzf in maintenance of spermatogonial stem cells,” Nature Genetics, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 653–659, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. H. Kubota, M. R. Avarbock, and R. L. Brinster, “Growth factors essential for self-renewal and expansion of mouse spermatogonial stem cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 47, pp. 16489–16494, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. J. Nichols, B. Zevnik, K. Anastassiadis et al., “Formation of pluripotent stem cells in the mammalian embryo depends on the POU transcription factor Oct4,” Cell, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 379–391, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. A. A. Avilion, S. K. Nicolis, L. H. Pevny, L. Perez, N. Vivian, and R. Lovell-Badge, “Multipotent cell lineages in early mouse development depend on SOX2 function,” Genes and Development, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 126–140, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. I. Chambers, D. Colby, M. Robertson et al., “Functional expression cloning of Nanog, a pluripotency sustaining factor in embryonic stem cells,” Cell, vol. 113, no. 5, pp. 643–655, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. Y.-H. Loh, Q. Wu, J.-L. Chew et al., “The Oct4 and Nanog transcription network regulates pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells,” Nature Genetics, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 431–440, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. G. Fuhrmann, A. C.-K. Chung, K. J. Jackson et al., “Mouse germline restriction of Oct4 Expression by germ cell nuclear factor,” Developmental Cell, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 377–387, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. D. J. Mangelsdorf and R. M. Evans, “The RXR heterodimers and orphan receptors,” Cell, vol. 83, no. 6, pp. 841–850, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. J. M. Orth, G. L. Gunsalus, and A. A. Lamperti, “Evidence from Sertoli cell-depleted rats indicates that spermatid number in adults depends on numbers of Sertoli cells produced during perinatal development,” Endocrinology, vol. 122, no. 3, pp. 787–794, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. D. Cortes, J. Müller, and N. E. Skakkebaek, “Proliferation of Sertoli cells during development of the human testis assessed by stereological methods,” International Journal of Andrology, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 589–596, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. L. D. Russell and Y. Clermont, “Degeneration of germ cells in normal, hypophysectomized and hormone treated hypophysectomized rats,” Anatomical Record, vol. 187, no. 3, pp. 347–365, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. S. Takashima, M. Kanatsu-Shinohara, T. Tanaka et al., “Functional differences between GDNF-dependent and FGF2-dependent mouse spermatogonial stem cell self-renewal,” Stem Cell Reports, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 489–502, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus