Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Stem Cells International
Volume 2016, Article ID 7419389, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7419389
Research Article

N-Stearoyl-L-Tyrosine Inhibits the Senescence of Neural Stem/Progenitor Cells Induced by Aβ1–42 via the CB2 Receptor

1School of Pharmacy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
2Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China

Received 25 August 2015; Revised 16 November 2015; Accepted 1 December 2015

Academic Editor: Gary E. Lyons

Copyright © 2016 Wen-Qing Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease, one of the neurodegenerative diseases, shows the progressive senescence of neural progenitor/stem cells. N-Stearoyl-L-tyrosine (NsTyr) showed neuroprotective effect against chronic brain ischemia in previous reports. In the present study, we find the antisenescent effects of NsTyr-2K in NSPCs induced by A in vitro. Cell viability of NSPCs was evaluated by CCK8 assay; SA-β-gal staining was used to evaluate senescence of NSPCs. CB receptors were detected by immunohistochemistry in NSPCs. AM251 or AM630 was used to offset the anti-senescence effects afforded by NsTyr-2K. The positive rate of SA-β-gal staining was significantly increased in NSPCs after incubation with A for 9 days. CB receptors were found on the surface of NSPCs. The expression level of CB1 receptors was significantly decreased in NSPCs after incubation with A. This phenomenon was reversed dose-dependently by NsTyr-2K. NsTyr-2K attenuated A induced NSPCs senescence dose-dependently, and its antisenescence effect was completely abolished by AM630. A dose-dependently increased the prosenescence molecules p16 and Rb. Their expression was inhibited by NsTyr-2K dose-dependently and blocked by AM630 in NSPCs. These results suggest that NsTyr-2K can alleviate the senescence of NSPCs induced by A via CB2 receptor.

1. Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD), a neurodegenerative disease, is characterized with neurofibrillary tangles, the progressive loss of neuron, and insoluble inclusion of amyloid plaques [1]. Accumulation of the amyloid β-peptide is believed to be the initial trigger for neurogeneration. A peptide is more prone to assemble to oligomer and fibril structure than A. Small soluble amyloid oligomers deriving from a variety of proteins in very different tissues have recently been suspected to lead to pathologies in many amyloid diseases, such as AD (Aβ), Parkinson’s (α-synuclein), Huntington’s (huntingtin), type-2 diabetes (islet amyloid polypeptide, IAPP), and prion diseases [2]. Although considerable energy and money have been spent trying to find new targets or medicines for the treatment of AD, there are still no drug treatments available that can provide a cure for Alzheimer’s disease [3]. Theoretically, damaged or dead neural cells could be replaced by transplanted cells. Therefore, stem cell research will be a major driver in the search for an AD cellular therapy. Endogenous neural stem/progenitor cells (NSPCs) within adult subventricular zone (SVZ) or subgranular zone (SGZ) remain the ability to self-renew and have multilineage potential, differentiating into new neurons or glia. The process of neurogenesis is robust in young and decreases exponentially in aged rodents or primates [4]. Neural stem/precursor cells can be intravenously administered and then migrate into brain damaged areas and induce functional recovery [5].

Neurogenesis, highly sensitive to a hostile microenvironment as the result of stress and aging, is critical for the maintenance of normal learning and memory [6]. It has been reported that there existed increasing number of immature neuronal cells in the brains of patients with AD, compared with the brains of age-matched control subjects [7]. Our previous reports suggested that A oligomer accelerates the senescence of NPSCs via formylpeptide receptor 2 after long-term incubation [8].

Senescent cells, no longer response to external stimuli, remain viable and metabolically active for a long period of time despite their inability to multiply [8]. Therefore, to avoid the senescence of NSPCs in neurodegenerative patients may help the maintenance of neurogeneration in their brain. Endocannabinoid system (ECS) has been shown to be implicated in different pathophysiological functions including cognition and neurodegeneration [9]. Cannabinoid receptors (CB) are widely distributed in the central nerve system. The agonists of CB1 receptor and (or) CB2 receptors both have potential neuroprotective effects on neurodegenerative diseases and brain stroke [10].

The endogenous arachidonate-based lipids, anandamide (N-arachidonoylethanolamide, AEA) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG), are known as “endocannabinoids.” Endocannabinoids are taken up by a transporter on the glial cell and primary degraded by fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) or monoacylglycerol lipase (MAGL) [11]. N-Fatty-acyl amino acids exist as endogenous substances and may have a role in regulating tissue functions as endocannabinoid. Among the AEA analogues, N-fatty-acyl amino acids with a long-chain fatty acyl structure have emerged as the most attractive candidates. It has been reported that N-stearoyltyrosine (NsTyr, one of synthesized analogues of AEA) protected primary cortical neurons against A induced injury through inhibiting endocannabinoid degradation via FAAH [12].

Accumulation of misfolded protein aggregates may lead to the brain organ failure during the process of neurodegeneration. In this study, we showed that A oligomer promoted the senescence of cultured NSPCs at 1 μM after long-term incubation. We also provided evidence suggesting that NsTyr-2K inhibits NSPCs senescence via CB2 receptor. This finding may provide us new insights into the potential therapy of stem cell for neurodegeneration including AD.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Experimental Animals

Pregnant Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats ( g, grade II, certification number SCXK 2007-0005) were purchased from the Shanghai SLAC Laboratory Co. Ltd. The experimental protocol used in this study was approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Experimentation and was conducted in strict accordance with the Guidelines for Animal Experimentation of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Shanghai, China).

2.2. Reagents and Drugs

Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM)/F12, B27 Supplement, basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), and epidermal growth factor (EGF) were purchased from Invitrogen Corporation (Carlsbad, CA, USA). Cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assay was purchased from Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology (China). A peptide was purchased from AnaSpec incorporated company. NsTyr-2K was kindly provided by Professor Lu Yang (Shanghai JiaoTong University, Shanghai, China). The polyclonal antibodies against Rb, p-16, and GAPDH were purchased from Proteintech (Campbell Park, Chicago, USA). The antibodies against CB1 and CB2 receptor were purchased from Abcam Inc. (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA), respectively. Senescence β-Galactosidase Staining Kit was purchased from Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology (Shanghai, China). All other reagents used were of analytical grade. NsTyr-2K was diluted in cell culture medium before use.

2.3. Cell Culture

Neural stem/progenitor cells (NSPCs) were grown from dissociated hippocampal tissue of 14 d Sprague-Dawley rat embryos in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM)/F12 containing B27 Supplement with 20 ng/mL bFGF, 20 ng/mL EGF. The NSPCs were kept in an incubator at 37°C in a 5% CO2 fully humidified atmosphere and were fed every 3-4 days with half-fresh medium. The NSPCs grew into floating neurospheres after 7 days in vitro. The neurospheres were dissociated into single cell and passaged every 5 days. For adherent monolayer cultures, methods have been previously described in detail [13]. Cells were plated on dishes percolated with poly-D-lysine hydrobromide (PDL) and laminin containing above-mentioned medium.

2.4. Immunohistochemistry

Cells grown on PDL/laminin-coated coverslips were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min at room temperature (RT) and rinsed with PBS three times before being permeabilized in 1% Triton X-100 for 10 min. Nonspecific antibody binding sites were blocked by incubating with normal goat serum for 2 h at RT before labeling with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. Primary antibodies included the rabbit anti-CB1 antibody (AbCam Limited, Cambridge, UK, 1 : 200) or rabbit anti-CB2 antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, 1 : 200). After washing three times in PBS for 5 min, sections were reacted for 1 h at 37°C in the dark with second antibodies. The second antibodies included AlexaFluor 488 goat anti-rabbit IgG and DyLight 694 goat anti-rabbit IgG (1 : 500). Nuclei were stained with 40, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). After final washing, the stained slides were mounted with Olympus DP control and DP software.

2.5. Oligomeric Aβ1–42 Preparation and Neurosphere Proliferation Assay

Oligomeric A peptide is prepared as described previously. A peptide was first dissolved to 1 mM in 100% hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP), HFIP was removed under vacuum, and the peptide was resuspended in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) to 5 mM. Dulbecco’s modified media (DMEM) were added to bring the peptide to a final concentration of 100 μM and incubated at 4°C for 24 h. The solution was centrifuged at 12,000 g for 20 min, and the supernatant was stored at −20°C before use. After trypsinizing neurospheres, NSCs were resuspended in proliferation medium. The cells were seeded into 96-well plates at a density of 104 cells per well. The drugs were added when the plates were seeded. After incubation for 6 or 9 days, cell proliferation in 96-well plates was measured by a commercially Cell Counting Kit (CCK-8, Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, China). 10 μL CCK-8 reagent was added to each well and incubated at 37°C for 4 h. Absorbance was measured at 450 nm by using a spectrophotometer. Each experiment was performed in triplicate and repeated at least three times.

2.6. SA-β-Gal Assay

Senescence was determined by the detection of senescence-associated β-galactosidase (SA-β-gal) activity using a β-Galactosidase Staining Kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, China). Briefly, cells were plated on PDL-coated coverslips. After treatment with 1 μM A for 9 days, NSPCs were washed three times with PBS and fixed for 30 min at room temperature with fixative solution. After incubation with the staining solution overnight at 37°C, the absolute numbers of SA-β-gal+ cells were quantified by counting six random fields per slides. AM251 or AM630 was incubated, respectively, with NSPCs 1 h prior to and during A oligomers insult. NSPCs were treated with different inhibitors in the presence or absence of NsTyr-2K to determine which CB receptor antagonists could block the antisenescence provided by 1 μM NsTyr-2K.

2.7. Western Blot

After incubation with NsTyr-2K for 24 h, NSPCs were lysed with RIPA lysis buffer. Total proteins from cell lysates were denatured at 100°C for 5 min and 20 μg of protein was electrophoresed on a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and transferred to a Polyvinylidene Fluoride (PVDF) membrane. The membranes were blocked at room temperature for 1 h in PBS containing 0.5% Tween 20 and 5% BSA and then incubated for 2 h at 37°C with antibody diluted in PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20. After washing, the membranes were incubated for 1 h at 37°C with the appropriate horseradish peroxidase-labeled secondary antibody (Proteintech, Chicago IL) diluted in PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 and the proteins visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence detection (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA). GAPDH was used as the internal control.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Data collected from 3~6 independent experiments were used to calculate means, which are expressed as mean ± SD. SPSS statistical software 16.0 for Windows was used and statistical significance was evaluated by using one-way ANOVA and the SNK test. Statistical significance was assumed if .

3. Results

3.1. Oligomeric Aβ1–42 Detected by SDS-PAGE

Assembled oligomeric A peptide was detected by SDS-PAGE. As shown in Figure 1, the first lane is marker, and the second lane is oligomeric A. We can find that the most of oligomer was found at 16–25 kD (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Assembled A oligomer detected by SDS-PAGE. (1) Marker, (2) oligomeric A. Analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by silver staining.
3.2. CB Receptor Detected on the Surface of NSPCs

CB1 and CB2 receptors were detected in human brain, spinal cord. In the present study, we demonstrated that both CB1 and CB2 receptors are expressed in neurosphere consisting of NSPCs. CB1 receptors were stained with AlexaFluor 488 (green) and CB2 receptors were stained with DyLight 694, respectively. Their nuclei were both counterstained with DAPI (blue) (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Detection of CB1 and CB2 receptor immunoreactivity in neurosphere. (A) Neurosphere was counterstained with DAPI (blue). (B) Neurosphere was immunolabeled with anti-CB1 antibodies and AlexaFluor 488 goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulins (green). (C) Neurosphere was immunolabeled with anti-CB2 antibodies and DyLight 694 goat anti-rabbit IgG (red) original magnification, 100x.
3.3. Effects of Aβ1–42 on the Viability of NSPCs after Long-Term Incubation

To analyze the effect of A on proliferation, NSPCs were treated with A (0.1, 0.3, or 1 μM) for different time. The viability of cells was measured at 6, 9, and 12 days using the CCK-8 assay. A dose-dependently promoted the proliferation of NSPCs after 6 days of incubation. A did not significantly change cell viability of NSPCs after 9 days of incubation. Treatment of NSPCs with A for 12 days significantly inhibited viability of NSPCs in a concentration-dependent manner. Based on our screening results, we chose 1 μM of A to incubate NSPCs for 9 days for the following experiments (Figure 3).

Figure 3: The time course of NSPCs viability after coincubation with different concentrations of A. Cell viability was measured by the CCK-8 assay. The concentration of A was 0.1, 0.3, and 1 μM, respectively. The error bars represent the standard error of the mean (S.E.M.) of at least three experiments (). , versus control group. , versus 0.1 μM A group. (A) Six days, (B) 9 days, and (C) 12 days.
3.4. Effect of NsTyr-2K on the Expression Level of CB Receptors during Aβ1–42 Insult

To analyze the effect of NsTyr-2K on the expression level of CB1 and CB2 receptors in NSPCs during Aβ insult, we evaluated their expression by using Western blot. A significantly inhibited the expression of CB1 receptors in NSPCs, and NsTyr-2K dose-dependently reversed the decreasing expression of CB1 receptors induced by A. However, A did not have significant effect on the expression levels of CB2 receptors after coincubation. The expression of CB2 receptors did not have been changed by NsTyr-2K in NSPCs during A insult (Figure 4).

Figure 4: The expression of CB1 and CB2 receptors in NSPCs. The NSPCs were treated with (1) none, (2) 1 μM A, (3) 1 μM A + 0.1 μM NsTyr-2K, (4) 1 μM A + 0.3 μM NsTyr-2K, (5) 1 μM A + 1 μM NsTyr-2K, and (6) 1 μM A + 3 μM NsTyr-2K. The expression of CB1 and CB2 was detected by WB. control group, versus A group.

Immunofluorescence assays confirmed the same results. CB1 receptors were stained with AlexaFluor 488 (green) and CB2 receptors were stained with DyLight 694, respectively. Their nuclei were both counterstained with DAPI (blue). The expression level of CB1 receptors had a significant decrease after A insult, and CB2 receptors did not have been obviously changed (Figure 5).

Figure 5: Detection of CB1 and CB2 receptor immunoreactivity in NSPCs. (A) NSPCs were counterstained with DAPI (blue). (B) NSPCs were immunolabeled with anti-CB1 antibodies and AlexaFluor 488 goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulins (green). (C) NSPCs were immunolabeled with anti-CB2 antibodies and DyLight 694 goat anti-rabbit IgG (red) original magnification. (1) None, (2) 1 μM A, and (3) 1 μM A + 1 μM NsTyr-2K, 100x.
3.5. Effects of NsTyr-2K on the Viability of NSPCs after Long-Term Incubation

NsTyr-2K dose-dependently improved NSPCs viability after incubation for 6 days. The maximum proliferative capacity was observed in NSPCs after incubation with 3~10 μM NsTyr-2K for 9 days (Figure 6).

Figure 6: The time course of NSPCs viability after coincubation with different concentrations of NsTyr-2K. Cell viability was measured by the CCK-8 assay. The concentration of NsTyr-2K was 0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, 10, 30, and 100 μM, respectively. The error bars represent the standard error of the mean (S.E.M.) of at least three experiments (). , versus control group. (A) Six days, (B) 9 days.

After NSPCs were subjected to 1 μM A for 9 days, the number of positive SA-β-gal stainings in NSPCs was increased approximately 4.2-fold. The cells of control group were transparent and plump, but the cells of A group showed the flattened and enlarged morphology. The 0.3–3 μM NsTyr-2K significantly protected NSPCs against cellular senescence induced by A (Figure 7).

Figure 7: The effects of NsTyr-2K on the numbers of SA-β-gal positive cells of NSPCs after A insult for 9 days: (A) control, (B) Aβ group, and (C) A insult + NsTyr-2K. Quantification by densitometric scanning was presented below. The error bars represent the standard error of the mean (S.E.M.) of at least three experiments (). , versus control group. , versus A group.
3.6. Influence of Selective Receptor Antagonist on the Antisenescence Effects of NsTyr-2K

Since activation of CB1 receptor or CB2 receptor contributes to the neuroprotective effect against focal cerebral ischemia in rats, we tested whether CB1 or CB2 receptor antagonist worsens the antisenescence of Nstry-2K in NSPCs during A insult. 1 μM AM630 or AM251 produced no significant effect during A insult (). Those results suggest that cannabinoid receptor antagonists did not directly exacerbate NSPCs senescence during A insult. There was not statistically significant difference between the NsTyr-2K group and the coincubation of NsTyr-2K and AM251 during A exposure (). 1 μM AM630 (a potent and specific inhibitor of CB2 receptor) did not protect NSPCs against A insult (). However, AM630 statistically ablated the antisenescent effect offered by NsTyr-2K during A insult (Figure 8).

Figure 8: The effects of selective receptor antagonist on the number of senescence cells. The NSPCs were treated with (1) none, (2) A, (3) AM251, (4) AM630, (5) A + AM251, (6) A + AM630, (7) A + NsTyr-2K, (8) A + AM251 + NsTyr-2K, and (9) A + AM630 + NsTyr-2K. , versus control group. , versus A group.
3.7. Effect of NsTyr-2K on the Expressions of Prosenescence Molecules

To further confirm the effect of NsTyr-2K, we also monitored the expressions of prosenescence molecules p16 and Rb. Rb and p16 can indicate the senescence of cells. A induced the expression of Rb and p16 dose-dependently after 9 days of incubation in NSPCs; these results further confirmed that A induced the senescence of NSPCs after long-term incubation (Figure 9).

Figure 9: The influence of A on the expression of Rb1 and p16 in NSPCs. The NSPCs were treated with (1) none, (2) 0.1 μM A, (3) 0.3 μM A, (4) 1 μM A, and (5) 3 μM A. The expression of Rb1 and p16 was detected by WB. versus control group.

NsTyr-2K dose-dependently inhibited the expression of Rb and p16 induced by A which suggested that NsTyr-2K effectively alleviated the cellular senescence of NSPCs (Figure 10). Additionally, AM630 significantly ablated the antisenescent effect in NSPCs offered by NsTyr-2K during A insult (Figure 11). Therefore, these results further indicated that NsTyr-2K inhibits the senescence of NsTyr-2K by CB2 receptor.

Figure 10: The influence of NsTyr-2K on the expression of Rb1 and p16 in NSPCs which coincubated with A. The NSPCs were treated with (1) none, (2) 1 μM A, (3) 1 μM A + 0.1 μM NsTyr-2K, (4) 1 μM A + 0.3 AM251, (5) 1 μM A + 1 μM NsTyr-2K, and (6) 1 μM A + 3 μM NsTyr-2K. The expression of Rb1 and p16 was detected by WB. versus control group, versus A group.
Figure 11: The influence of selective receptor antagonist on the expression of Rb1 and p16 in NSPCs. The NSPCs were treated with (1) none, (2) 0.3 μM A, (3) 1 μM A, (4) A + NsTyr-2K, (5) A + AM251, (6) A + NsTyr-2K + AM251, and (7) A + NsTyr-2K + AM630. The expression of Rb1 and p16 was detected by WB.

4. Discussion

AD is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by progressive loss of neuron, neurofibrillary tangles, and insoluble inclusion of amyloid plaques [1]. Stimulation of endogenous neurogenesis or transplantation of NSPCs has been considered in the therapy of cognitive impairments [14]. Since disturbed brain microenvironment hampers the neurogenesis of AD patients, exogenesis NSPCs transplantation has limited therapeutic benefits [15].

To explore the effect of Aβ on the cell viability of NSPCs, we incubated NSPCs with A and measured the cell viability at 6, 9, and 12 days. We chose 1 μM of A as the highest concentration to evaluate the cell viability in this experiment which was much lower compared with other researches. A dose-dependently improved the viability of NSPCs dose-dependently after incubation for 6 days. After 9 days of incubation, A did not significantly inhibit viability in a concentration-dependent manner. However, A inhibited the proliferation of NSPCs in a dose-dependent manner after 12 days of incubation. These results suggest that A promotes the proliferation of NSPCs at the early stage and inhibits cell viability after long-term incubation. Additionally, A inhibited the expression of CB1 receptors but had no effect on the expression of CB2 receptor significantly. CB2 receptor seems to be a more suitable target for the treatment of neural damage induced by Aβ. A selective agonist of receptor usually downregulates the corresponding receptor to avoid overstimulation via receptor internalization. Our results suggest that A does not directly bind with CB2 receptor in NSPCs. Whether A binds with CB1 receptor directly or indirectly is still under our exploration.

CB1 is one of the most abundant G-protein-coupled receptors in the central nervous system. It has been reported that endocannabinoids act as neurogenic niche cues during cortical development via CB1 receptor. In addition, CB1 receptor is involved in the control of neural cell proliferation/survival decision. CB2 receptor was found in the undifferentiated NPSCs in the brain, which has been proved that CB2 receptor promotes neural progenitor cell proliferation via the activation of the PI3K/Akt/mTORC1 axis. Therefore, cannabinoid receptors play important roles in progenitor/stem cell proliferation and differentiation.

NsTyr-2K, an anandamide (AEA) analogue, is similar to not only AEA structurally but also biological activity. AEA has been demonstrated to have direct neuroprotective effects on neurons against Aβ toxicity [16]. Therefore, we hypothesized that NsTyr-2K might exert antisenescent effect against NSPCs senescence induced by amyloid. Oligomeric A significantly promoted the number of positive numbers of SA-β-gal stainings in NSPCs after 9 days of incubation. After they were subjected to NsTyr-2K, the senescent numbers of NSPCs were significantly reduced. Taken together, these results suggest that NsTyr-2K can inhibit the senescent effect induced by A in NSPCs.

Activation of CB1 receptor plays an important role in rapid ischemic tolerance, and activation of CB2 receptor contributes to the delayed neuroprotective effect against focal cerebral ischemia in rats. We tested that the antisenescent effect of NsTyr-2K against A whether via CB1 or CB2 receptor. We found that 1 μM AM630 significantly inhibited the antisenescent effect of NsTyr-2K, but 1 μM AM251 had no significant effect. These results suggest that CB2 receptor may play the key role in the antisenescent effects of NsTry-2K in NSPCs.

Retinoblastoma protein (Rb) and protein 16 (p16) are important signaling proteins of replicative senescence. p16 is a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor that acts upstream of Rb to arrest cell cycle. The amount of their expression indicates the serious degree of senescence cells. Rb and p16 both were significantly increased after incubation with 1 μM of A after 9 days of incubation. These results further confirmed that A can induce cellular senescence of NSPCs after long-term incubation. NsTyr-2K significantly inhibited the expression of Rb and p16 induced by A. These results further suggest that NsTyr-2K has protective effect against the senescence induced by A in NSPCs. In addition, AM630 offset the antisenescent effect of NsTyr-2K by improving the expression of Rb and p16 in NSPCs. AM251 failed to reverse the antisenescent effect of NsTyr-2K.

In summary, present study demonstrates that NsTyr-2K can effectively protect NSPCs against senescence induced by A within a given range of concentrations. Its antisenescence effect is possibly mainly mediated by the activation of CB2 receptor in NSPCs.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by the Shanghai Jiao Tong University Fund (Grants nos. 14X130040002, AE1700019), National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 81270432).

References

  1. T. Gómez-Isla, R. Hollister, H. West et al., “Neuronal loss correlates with but exceeds neurofibrillary tangles in Alzheimer's disease,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 17–24, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. Bucciantini, E. Giannoni, F. Chiti et al., “Inherent toxicity of aggregates implies a common mechanism for protein misfolding diseases,” Nature, vol. 416, no. 6880, pp. 507–511, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. F. Mangialasche, A. Solomon, B. Winblad, P. Mecocci, and M. Kivipelto, “Alzheimer's disease: clinical trials and drug development,” The Lancet Neurology, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 702–716, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. I. Amrein, K. Isler, and H.-P. Lipp, “Comparing adult hippocampal neurogenesis in mammalian species and orders: influence of chronological age and life history stage,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 978–987, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. Pluchino, L. Zanotti, M. Deleidi, and G. Martino, “Neural stem cells and their use as therapeutic tool in neurological disorders,” Brain Research Reviews, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 211–219, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. R. Yirmiya and I. Goshen, “Immune modulation of learning, memory, neural plasticity and neurogenesis,” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 181–213, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. Z. Nagy, M. M. Esiri, and A. D. Smith, “Expression of cell division markers in the hippocampus in Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative conditions,” Acta Neuropathologica, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 294–300, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. W. Shay, O. M. Pereira-Smith, and W. E. Wright, “A role for both RB and p53 in the regulation of human cellular senescence,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 196, no. 1, pp. 33–39, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. V. Micale, C. Mazzola, and F. Drago, “Endocannabinoids and neurodegenerative diseases,” Pharmacological Research, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 382–392, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D. Piomelli, A. Giuffrida, A. Calignano, and F. R. de Fonseca, “The endocannabinoid system as a target for therapeutic drugs,” Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 218–224, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. Petrosino and V. Di Marzo, “FAAH and MAGL inhibitors: therapeutic opportunities from regulating endocannabinoid levels,” Current Opinion in Investigational Drugs, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 51–62, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Y. G. Cao, X. Y. Mao, C. Y. Sun et al., “Baicalin attenuates global cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury in gerbils via anti-oxidative and anti-apoptotic pathways,” Brain Research Bulletin, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 396–402, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. H. Babu, J.-H. Claasen, S. Kannan, A. E. Rünker, T. Palmer, and G. Kempermann, “A protocol for isolation and enriched monolayer cultivation of neural precursor cells from mouse dentate gyrus,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 5, article 89, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. O. M. E. Abdel-Salam, “Stem cell therapy for Alzheimer's disease,” CNS & Neurological Disorders—Drug Targets, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 459–485, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. X. Qian, A. A. Davis, S. K. Goderie, and S. Temple, “FGF2 concentration regulates the generation of neurons and glia from multipotent cortical stem cells,” Neuron, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 81–93, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. N. G. N. Milton, “Anandamide and noladin ether prevent neurotoxicity of the human amyloid-β peptide,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 332, no. 2, pp. 127–130, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus