Review Article

Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate-Enhanced Marrow Stimulation of Chondral Defects

Table 2

Clinical studies of BMAC-enhanced marrow stimulation for articular cartilage repair.

Patient numberDefect
location(s)
Defect typeDefect
size
Additional treatmentNature of biomaterialsSource of bone marrowConcentration performed?Method of concentrationAspirate amount/defectStudy group(s)Follow-upEvaluation
methods
Major findingsRef.

11Femoral condyle, patella1 or 2 chondral defects, Outerbridge types III or IV2–8 cm2MicrofractureType I/III porcine
collagen matrix
(1) Iliac crestYesBMA (24 ml) centrifuged (15 min) to obtain a concentrated phase containing mononuclear cells.n.a.(1) Microfracture
+ collagen
membrane
+ BMAC
6
months
(1) FACS
analysis
(1) More cells with
MSC phenotype
obtained from
iliac crest than
microfracture
site.
[71]
(2) Microfracture
site
(2) Culture of
bone marrow
samples from
iliac crest and
microfracture
site
(2) Only MSCs
from bone
marrow could
be long-term
propagated
and efficiently
differentiated
in vitro.
(3) Clinical
evaluations:
pain, adverse
events
(3) No pain. No
adverse events.

50Patella, medial femoral condyleChondral defects, ICRS grade IVMedian lesion sizes of 4.5 or 6.5 cm2MicrofractureHyaluronic acid-based scaffoldIliac crestYesBMA (60 ml) centrifuged. Yield: cellular concentration ~6× baseline value.n.a.(1) Hyaluronic
acid-based
scaffold + BMAC
(HA-BMAC)
2 and 5
years
(1) MRI(1) 100% normal or
nearly normal
IKDC objective
score at 2 years
in HA-BMAC
(microfracture
64%).
[72]
Batroxobin enzyme used to activate the BMAC.(2) Microfracture(2) IKDC
objective and
subjective
score
(2) HA-BMAC
group maintained improved
knee function
at 5 years
according to
Lysholm, Tegner, IKDC
objective and
subjective scores.
(4) KOOS(3) Higher score
for HA-BMAC
group according
to Tegner, IKDC
objective, and
KOOS scores.
(5) Lysholm
(6) Tegner
34TalusOsteochondral defects0.5–2.2 cm2Microfracturen.a.Iliac crestYesn.a.3 ml(1) Microfracture2.8–8.3 years(1) FAOS pain subscale(1) FAOS and SF-12
PCS score
significantly
improved in
microfracture
group after a
mean of 6.4
years and in the
microfracture
+ BMAC group
after a mean of
4 years.
[73]
(2) Microfracture
+ BMAC
(2) SF-12 PCS(2) MOCART score
in microfracture
+ BMAC group
significantly
higher than in
microfracture
group after 2
years.
(3) MRI(3) Per MRI less fissuring and fibrillation in the microfracture + BMAC group after 2 years.

12TalusFull-thickness chondral1.0–3.9 cm2Particulated juvenile articular cartilage (PJAC); subchondral drillingBovine type I collagen and glycos-amino-glycanIliac crestYesBMA (60 ml) centrifuged. Yield: 6 ml of BMAC6 ml(1) Subchondral
drilling + BMAC +
collagen
scaffold
2.1 years (range: 1.0–3.5 years)(1) AOFAS
score
Better clinical
outcome for the
subchondral
drilling + PJAC
group according
to higher AOFAS
and FAAM scores
after 2 years.
[74]
(2) Subchondral
drilling +
PJAC
(2) FAAM
score
(3) SF-12
score

AOFAS: American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Surgeons; BMA: bone marrow aspirate; BMAC: bone marrow aspirate concentrate; FAAM: Foot and Ankle Ability Measure; FACS: fluorescence-activated cell sorting; HA: hyaluronic acid; ICRS: International Cartilage Repair Society; IKDC: International Knee Documentation Committee; KOOS: Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome score; Lysholm: Lysholm Knee Questionnaire; MOCART: Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; MSC: mesenchymal stem cell; n.a.: not available; PJAC: particulated juvenile articular cartilage; Ref.: reference; SF-12: short form 12 general health questionnaire; SF-12 PCS: SF-12 physical component summary score; Tegner: Tegner activity scale.