Review Article

The Application of Stem Cells from Different Tissues to Cartilage Repair

Table 1

Summary of recent results in the application of stem and progenitor cells to cartilage repair and regeneration.
(a)

AuthorYearCell sourceModelExperimental studyAdverse effectsKey findings

Shafiee et al.2011CartilageMiceProliferation, tumourigenesis, and multipotency of nasal septum-derived adult cellsNoneNCs retained chondrogenic potential until passage 35. Markers suggest chondrogenic ability equal to that of BMSCs
do Amaral et al.2012CartilageIn vitroProliferation and multipotency of nasal septal cartilage surface zone cells within the context of cartilage repairNACells in pellet culture resulted in chondrogenesis without TGF-β or BMPs. NCs were CD105+, CD73+, CD44+, and CD146
Pelttari et al.2014CartilageHumans (10), mice, goatsSuitability of adult human neuroectoderm-derived nasal chondrocytes for articular cartilage repairNoneNCs proliferated faster and were more chondrogenic than Acs in vitro. In vivo, defect filling was observed after 4 months
Jiang et al.2016CartilageHumans (15), miceCartilage repair potential of resident cartilage stem/progenitor cellsNoneACs became CD146+ in high-density 2D culture, and their chondrogenic potential is similar to that of BMSCs. In vivo results were promising
Embree et al.2016CartilageRats, rabbitsPotential of single resident fibrocartilage stem cells (FCSC) to regenerate cartilage, bone, and haematopoietic compartmentNoneFCSCs spontaneously produced cartilage anlage in vivo which was then remodeled into trabecular bone. Addition of sclerostin maintained the FCSC pool and led to chondrocyte differentiation and cartilage repair in vivo
Fellows et al.2017CartilageIn vitroSenescence of healthy versus diseased human knee articular cartilage rather than regenerative potential per seNAThe number of progenitor cells was greater (2x, ) in OA tissue than in healthy cartilage. Subpopulation of OA-derived cells had reduced proliferative potential and underwent early senescence in vitro. An increase in senescent cells may contribute to the disease phenotype
Pittenger et al.1999BMIn vitroMaintenance of multipotency in individual adult BMSCsNAAdult stem cells can be induced to differentiate exclusively into adipocytic, chondrocytic, and osteogenic lineages
Wakitani et al.2004BMHumans (2)Effectiveness of autologous BMSC transplantation for the repair of full-thickness articular cartilage defects in the patellae of 2 individualsNoneClinical symptoms (pain & walking impediment) were significantly reduced 6 months postop. Benefits remained for 4-5 years. Arthroscopy revealed defects filled with fibrocartilage
Wakitani et al.2011BMHumans (41)Safety of autologous BMSC implantation for cartilage defectsNoneNo tumour or infections reported in any patient. Five had total knee replacement due to progression to OA
Wong et al.2013BMHumans (56)Autologous BMSC i.a. injections with microfracture and tibial osteotomyNoneThe experimental group showed significantly better IKDC (), Tegner (), MOCART (), and Lysholm () scores

(b)

AuthorYearCell sourceModelWhat was examinedAdverse effectsKey findings

Vangsness et al.2014BMHumans (55)Safety and effects on OA changes in the knee following intra-articular injection of allogeneic human BMSCsNoneEvidence of meniscus regeneration and improvement in knee pain following treatment with allogeneic human mesenchymal stem cells
Gobbi et al.2014BMHumans (25)BMAC (BM aspirate concentrate) for the repair of large full-thickness knee cartilage defectsNoneSignificant improvement in Tegner, Marx, Lysholm, VAS, IKDC subjective, and KOOS scores at the final follow-up compared with their respective preoperative scores (); MRI analysis at the final follow-up showed stable implantation and complete filling of the defect in 20 of 25 patients
Vega et al.2015BMHumans (30)Effects of i.a. injection of allogeneic BMSC versus hyaluronic acid for the treatment of knee OANoneAt 1-year follow-up, cartilage formation in cell-treated defects was significantly improved over control (HA)-treated defects
Nakagawa et al.2016BMRatsLubricin expression and chondrogenesis in BMSCs using pellets & hanging-drop cultures in vitro and in vivoNSThe treatment group scored significantly higher than the control group when assessed histologically at 8 and 12 weeks
Chen et al.2016BMRabbitsPTH-treated versus untreated BMSCs embedded in fibrin glue for the repair of induced articular cartilage injury in rabbitsNoneThe ICRS score significantly increased () in PTH-treated versus non-PTH and untreated groups. Significantly increased levels of type II collagen and aggrecan mRNA and protein in PTH versus non-PTH groups ()
Shapiro et al.2017BMHumans (25)BMAC for the treatment of knee pain from bilateral osteoarthritisNoneKnee pain decreased in all groups, although no significant difference between BMAC and saline groups ()
Koga et al.2008SynoviumRabbits“Local adherent technique” whereby an i.a. injection of synovium stem/progenitor cells adheres to the defect site within 10 minutesNAIncreased cell attachment correlated with improved cartilage repair at 24 weeks. It was reported that 60% of injected cells adhered at the site
Nakamura et al.2012SynoviumPigsAdherence of synovium-derived cells to cartilage defects and effects on cartilageNoneThe cartilage matrix detected in all treated defects versus none in the control group. Wakitani and ICRS scores were significantly higher in treatment groups (). Higher chondrogenic potential in synovial cells versus BM, adipose, muscle, or periosteum-derived cells
Sekiya et al.2015SynoviumHumans (10)“Local adherent technique” using autologous synovium-derived stem/progenitor cells1 patient had fibrillation of repaired cartilageTransplantation of synovial cells was deemed effective: Lysholm and MRI-based scores increased over 3 years + follow-up period (both )
Mak et al.2016SynoviumMiceChondrogenic potential of synovium-derived sca-1-positive stem/progenitor cells injected into injured jointNSIntra-articular injection of Sca-1+ GFP+ synovial cells from C57BL6 or MRL/MpJ “super-healer” mice to C57BL6 mice following cartilage injury led to similar levels of cartilage repair. Treatment with cells resulted in cartilage repair that was significantly greater than that of untreated defects
Baboolal et al.2016SynoviumDogsRole of HA on MSC attachment to cartilageNSIt was confirmed that HA inhibits MSC-cartilage attachment
Diekman et al.2010AdiposeIn vitroDifferences in chondrogenic potential of ADSC and BMSC in different culture conditionsNAADSCs and BMSCs require different in vitro culture conditions to achieve optimal chondrogenic outcomes. While both ADSC and BMSC underwent chondrogenic differentiation in all conditions tested, BMSCs produced a more matrix over a wider range of conditions
Koh et al.2013AdiposeHumans (18)Outcome of i.a. injections of autologous ADSCs for the treatment of knee OAOne case of pain and swellingSignificant reduction in WOMAC scores () relative to preop levels. The Lysholm score increased from 40.1 points to 73.4 points (), and the mean VAS score decreased over the period of the study from 4.8 to 2.0 ()
Jo et al.2014AdiposeHumans (18)Safety and efficacy of i.a. injections of autologous ADSC for knee OANoneImprovements were seen in the high-dose group (improvement in WOMAC & VAS at 6 months). Significant decreases in cartilage defect size paralleled by an increase in cartilage volume at some defect sites at 6 months
Koh et al.2015AdiposeHumans (30)Injection of ADSCs and arthroscopic lavage for knee OASlight knee pain, resolved with medicationThe technique appears to be effective in cartilage healing, reducing pain, and improving function
Koh et al.2016AdiposeHumans (80)ADSCs with fibrin glue and microfracture (MFX) versus MFX alone in patients with symptomatic knee cartilage defectsNSBoth treatment groups saw improvement in multiple clinical outcomes; however, the degree of improvement was greater in patients who received ADSC in addition to MFX
Pers et al.2017AdiposeHumans (18)Intra-articular injections of different doses of ADSCsUnstable angina pectoris reported in 1 patient, 5 minor AEs reported by four patients potentially related to the procedureAll dose groups saw an overall negative trend in WOMAC (pain, stiffness, and function), VAS, and SAS, although these data were significant only in the low-dose group
Saw et al.2013Peripheral bloodHumans (50)Postoperative i.a. injections of hyaluronic acid with and without PBSCNoneA nonsignificant () increase in the IKDC score for the PBSC group at 24 months. A significant () increase in the MRI score in the PBSC group at 18 months
Fu et al.2014Peripheral bloodRabbitsMobilised rabbit PBSCs versus rabbit BMSCs for in vivo chondrogenesisNonePBSCs showed greater chondrogenic potential than BMSCs in vitro, although both cell types performed equally well in in vivo assays for cartilage repair
Fu et al.2014Peripheral bloodHumans (1)Injection of autologous activated PBSCs + autologous periosteum flap in a chondral lesionNoneSecond-look arthroscopy showed a smooth surface at 8 months postoperation. CT and MRI evaluations showed a significant improvement compared to preoperation
Saw et al.2015Peripheral bloodHumans (8)Autologous PBSCs and HA with concomitant medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomyNoneAt 25-month follow-up, arthroscopy and biopsy revealed smooth, well-integrated regenerated tissue rich in type II collagen and proteoglycan, with some type I collagen present
Ha et al.2015Umbilical cordMinipigsAbility of human UBSC cell lines in HA hydrogel (versus empty defects) to repair osteochondral defectsNoneDefects which received cells + HA had more safranin-O-positive staining, more regenerated cartilage, and better integration with the surrounding tissue. The IRCS score was better in cell transplant defects than in empty defects
Li et al.2016Umbilical cordIn vitroIt was determined whether coculture of human ACs could increase chondrogenic potential of human UBSCsNAIndirect coculture increased expression of chondrogenic markers. However, qPCR, WB, and some 2D IHC data contain inconsistencies
Gomez-Leduc et al.2016Umbilical cordMiceChondrogenic potential of human UCBSCs seeded on type I/III collagen sponges ± chondrogenic factorsNSUBSCs cultured in vitro with TGF-β1 and BMP-2 were implanted in nude mice. Cells exposed to growth factors in an in vitro phase produced a cartilaginous matrix rich in type II collagen. No scaffolds progressed to calcification but instead deposited type II collagen-rich ECM
Park et al.2017Umbilical cordHumans (1)Transplanted human UCBSCs in a 4% HA hydrogel into a rabbit trochlea defectNoneVAS, IKDC, & WOMAC improved. At 1-year follow-up, second-look arthroscopy and biopsy showed smooth safranin-O-positive hyaline-cartilage with excellent peripheral integration. MRI showed defect filling, abundant repair tissue, and good integration with the surrounding tissue
Park et al.2017Umbilical cordHumans (7)Treatment of a large osteochondral defect by autologous UCBSCs in a HA hydrogelNoneRegenerated tissue was thick, smooth, and glossy white with good integration with the surrounding tissue and resembled hyaline-like cartilage with abundant GAG content. No bone formation or overgrowth was observed
Park et al.2017Umbilical cordRabbitsEfficacy of human autologous UCBSCs and HA hydrogels for cartilage regenerationNoneMacroscopically, cells + hydrogel produced better cartilage formation than hydrogel only or untreated controls. Regenerated tissue was smooth and type II collagen rich

NA: not applicable; NS: not stated.